‘ ‘ " 1 ‘ I‘ ;“ \:’1 , , s. -I: /\ I V 8/! .,.'I.. K I ‘-1 /1’ 1"‘ In ‘I 2'"/I", i i‘ _ ’/‘i J" €Q/ I(’,"IL I, Ch} 9 £7‘\‘t«-../L WT ’ . v »-‘(.1 J ( C I I I X ) J -I / ~ '- A ‘I ~ “-‘“~—7-‘V ’~ I 7 nr " .»f c--_.: '.»._, . 1: DRAFT “:9 9 In I*““ W7“ W I““""’ I‘0‘°I“* ‘W I ' r~ 2» n ~ . «I J *7 »Z,_,c.:q’\ I" 1' A\I/Ix*i,\£/ ~‘——j\/I1M.a._.._ Mk FWV1 ‘W “I49 I7 “I If IM"’""°J ‘Q;/“"\‘~— /U Liv/(“JV *~— MC». MVK BARGRAVE GENEALOGY 5”“? ‘3"'*”’”“”“* s W, JM wk ‘>~»,,L.r .» ~‘»w’L i"L-Ia;-Jk\_~‘ I,W('‘ —' I'll“ /"‘:/ —J0hn BARGRAVE (I‘12.l643 Sir Henry PALMER Edward (Iyoung) Thomas (*~l620;I‘l2.l642 Honora ES'I‘C0'I"I‘ ('I’|682) who remarried afier l.l660 Joseph ROBI-1R'I‘S ofCanterbury ii ‘I.:|i""""'”' V " ' '“""‘ , _ M \ "V. |—Thomas (%|653) I~~°~«-m u""‘7 «x v‘ 7; ‘ t‘ |-—Charles (%l65 l ;'I‘ I 7l3) of Eastry Court | =Elizabeth WITHWICK (H732) |—lsaac (* l680;I' I727); ofEastry Court =Christian LEIGH (*l698;'I‘l772); daughter of Sir Francis Ll-:l(iIl of Hawley |—lsaac (* I721 ;'I‘24.5. I800); of Eastry Court; eminent solicitor in London | =l751 Sarah LYNCH (T1780); daughter ofGeorge LYNCH, M.l). (H787) I—Christian (*~l734;I‘~l 774) | =Rev. Claudius CLARI3 of Hythe | —Christian (*l75 l; ’I'26.9.l806) | =at Hythe, Robert TOURNAY (I‘l9.5.l825) of Brockhull, Saltwood and afterwards Eastry Court7 | =Robert KIRK; Captain in the Royal Navy I—Frances =John BRO/\Dl.l-ZY (“r l 784)__ T I I Charles \ x"\ ‘S I, =Sarah AUS'I‘l~:N; of the Isle ofS /ti"/‘ 3" I —Robert (‘I‘l7.l2.l779,aged 84;IEast church) =5.l733 Elizabeth LEIGH (I 737); daughter of Sir Francis LEIGH of Hawley —Robert (’rl4.2. I 774;aged 39); a Procter in Doctors’ Commons =Rebecca RUDD ('I‘2.l l.l795,Deal); daughter of Dr.RUDl), Vicar of Westwell —Rebecca —.lohn WYBORN of Hule, near Sholden = I 753 Elizabeth B/\ss1:'r'r —Elizabeth (* l678,Eastry) =l702 Edward S'I‘. LIJGIER (*l665,Maidstone;I' l729,Great Mongeham);8 surgeon, of Deal —Honora I I I I I I I I~ I I— I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I /3/1/er;/e.4 1'15 (}1jNl:‘/ll,()(} Y —— Sheet 2 L. L. Boyle () 7/()7/()0 DRAFT =l660 Charles KNOWl.l5R =Joseph R()I3I:IR'I‘S I I I I I I—Martha I | =I7I4 Zouch PILCHI-:R I I—Hester I I =William BRIDGl:‘S; ofSandwich I |—Mary_ I :David DIENNE Robert (* I 628;I‘ I 66 I ,lzmir;ISt.Veneranda Cemetery, Izmir) =l653 Elizabeth TURNER (* I 632;'l‘ I 703;I/Kensington); only daughter of Robert TURNER of Canterbury I~Robert (*25.8. I654;~I28.8. I 659,Canterbury Cathedral) I~Hester (* I .l657;I«East Malling) I =5.2. 1680, in Canterbury Cathedral, Francis TURNI-IR of London I—E|izabeth (*~l659) | =Mr. TUCKWIELL of London |—Isaac (%I4.8. l660,Canterbury Cathedral;I' I0.7. l663;Canterbury Cathedral) Mary (* I629) =John SMl'I‘H _ |~Jane (I‘l630;~I«Canterbury Cathedral) l~L$’l’I''‘ : ‘ ' |—Hester (* I 632) I =Francis NOWERS |—Elizabeth (* I635) I =Edward WILSI-‘ORD |—Henry (* l636;I‘ I 637) I; 8 . I ' x ‘I 7 =Robert NAYI.()R ' I I I I I I I I I |—Isaac (T1626, young;»I«Canterbury Cathedral) 1);‘ I_ ~_,/.1» I I I I I I I |_ I ‘Anne ~Alice =Robert T()URNAY of Sturry —Angela (I I 3.1 I.l645,Canterbury Cathedral) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I =4. I0. I 604 John BOYS (*I57 I ,Eythorne;I‘30.9. 1625)‘); Dean of Canterbury Cathedral 3.5. I6I9;'° Fellow ofC|are College, Cambridge I592 ' Admitted to the Bar at LincoIn’s Inn 7.I 1.1590; Q1/IVJIL 0”") "(”"t?1> 2 This ship was recorded on 4.5.l6l8 as being involved in the trade with Virginia. James Brett of London was the master. . . .62/‘’*‘ ‘'’.”‘‘-~’-’'‘* 3 Sister of Sir Thomas PF1Y’l‘()N (I‘l684;IWestminster Abbey) of Knowlton Court v z , 4 Doctor of divinity; Canon in the 5th prebend ofCanterbury 26.9.1662; matriculated Peterhouse; Vicar of Smarden and rector of HarbIedown.' I(”._ ‘I, L’ ‘ 5 The sale to Sir Arthur Slingsby was arranged by Sir Samuel Ph‘Y’I‘()N; however, Bifrons was already the family home of Sir Guilford Slingsby so thes -details nee confirmation. I’ Seized by Parliamentary forces at Gravesend 8. I642 and imprisoned for 3 weeks in the Fleet without trial or being charged. gw Mk V2,,” ILA 3,, . r 71 ) Ii‘/IRGR/I V1; (]l:'NI:'/II.()(} Y —— Sheet 3 L. L. Boyle 07/0 7/()0 DRAFT 7 Took the surname and arms of BARGRAVE in addition to those of TOURNAY by Royal Sign Manual dated 23.8. I 800 8 Son of Dudley ST. LEGER (*l639;1'1700) and Winnifred HORNE‘0f Deal. 9 Son of Thomas BOYS of Eythorne and his wife Christian SEARLES, daughter and co-heir of John SEARLES of Wye. ‘O Rector of Betteshanger. BARGRA VE GENEALOGY —— Sheet 4 L.L.B0yle 07/07/00 —John BARGRAVII of Bridge =AIice KENNARD; she remarried John LUKYN of Fordwich in I584 I—Robert I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I BARGRAVE FAMILY GENEALOGY = I 568 Joannah GILBI-IRT ('I’ I2. I 598); daughter ofjohn GIl.Bl5R'I‘ of Sandwich |—Richard I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I :9 |—‘/\Iice (*l6|5) |—Jane (*I6 I 9) —John; builder of Bifrons : Jane CROUCI 1, daughter and co-heir ofGiIes CROUCH of London |-—R0bert (* I605) ——.I oan I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I = 1635 Elizabeth Pl'~IY'|'()N; daughter of Sir Samuel PI£Y'l‘()N n‘ ‘.v-’ " |~J0hn; sold Bifrons I = Francis T URNISR of London |—Thomas |—lsaac |—EIizabeth | =l684 John I7Ul,I./\GliR of Langley, Kent |—Jane |—R0bert of Doctors’ Commons = Sarah eElizabeth =17 I 5 Benjamin COADI-I of London :Mr. RAYM()Nl); doctor of divinity =Mr. HUSSHY; doctor of divinity —Jane (* I608) =Lodowick Wl~Il€MYS; doctor ofdivinity; Prebend of Westminster I—Anne (Tin infancy) |wSarah (* I613) |—John ('I‘l680); doctor of divinity; Prebend ofCanterbury; Vicar of Smarden and Harbledown =Partridge LINCOLN of Lincolnshire =Frances WILD; daughter of Sir John WILD John (I I625) =Mrs. WOOD; widow I to 1- ‘I r« « II’: .. ,. 1, l_,_,«;. CD1 1032:.‘ Sakai: Searcéw "'ohn bargrave" Search BOOKS Si n in ,3 J Calendar of Transcripts: Including the Annual Report of the Department of Archives and HiSt0|'y By John Pendleton Kennedy, Edward Steptoe Evans, Virginia State Library Archives Division, Archives Division, Virginia State Library Summary By John Pendleton Kennedy, Edward Steptoe Evans, Virginia State Library Archives Division, Archives Division, Virginia State Library Published 1905 Davis Bottom, superintendent public pflnfing 658 pages Original from the University of Michigan Digitized 13 Nov 2006 Edward Steptoe Evans, acting chief of the Division of archives and history. Buy this book Abebooks.co.uk Google Product 5 Borrow this book Find this book in Other editions Ke Calendar of Transcripts: Including the Annual J9” Report of the Department of Archives and History tr: by John Pendleton Kennedy, Edward Steptoe Evans, go, Virginia State Library Archives Division, Archives Division, re,‘ Virginia State Library - 1905 - 658 pages luc- Edward Steptoe Evans, acting chief of the Division of Vin archives and history. co} No preview available bla Cmlzglc Seam‘: "john bargrave" ] Search Books Sign in The Virginia Magazine of History and Biography By Virginia Historical Society Summary V I 3%G§.‘\'5.\ ~\L'\(2,fi.1/.II‘~‘i‘I By Virginia Historical Society Contributor Philip Alexander Bruce, William Glover Stanard Published 2000 Virginia Historical Society Original from Stanford University Digitized 31 Aug 2006 Related books am.-.-a. .___ . The William and Mary Quarterly by institute of Early American History and Culture (Williamsburg, Va.), College of William and Mary - 1964 Editors: 1892-1919, L. G. Tyler-- 1921-43, E. G. Swem with others.—-1944-46 R. L. Morton and others. Snippet view - About this book A Blessed Company: parishes, parsons, and parishioners in Anqlican Virginia, 1690-1776 by John Kendall Nelson - 2002 — 477 pages In this book, John Nelson reconstructs everyday Anglican religious practice and experience in Virginia from the end of the seventeenth century to the start of the American... Editors: 1893-98, P.A. Bruce 1928, W.G. Stanard. Other editions The Virginia Made by Virginia Historical Editors: 1893-98, P.. Snippet view - Abo_uf The Virginia Maqa by Virginia Historical Title from ProQuest on December 10, 20 Snippet view - Abou’ The Virginia Made by Virginia Historical Editors: 1893-98, P.. Snippet view - Abou’ show more » Search in this book "john barggrave" 7 pages matching "john ba Ctwglc Soot: Searciw "john bargrave“‘ 0kSi Sign in The Virginia Magazine of History and Biography By Virginia Historical Society Summary By Virginia Historical ECiltOl'SI 1893-98, P. A. Bruc __ Society W. G. Stanard Contributor Philip Alexander Bruce, . William Glover Stanard Published 1893 Virginia Historical Society I Original from Stanford University Digitized 22 Feb 2006 Contents Assembly of Virginia 1919 Tercentenary of 203 caperton, lewter, marcuson Byrd William First Letters of 260 sayeth, shoare, epes Notes and Queries 309 skillen, handly, skillern 9 other sections not shown Other editions The Virginia Magazine of History and Bioqraphy L. by Virginia Historical Society — 1961 Editors: 1893-98, P.A. Bruce; 1899-1928, W.G. Stanard. Snippet view - About this book The Virqinia Magazine of History and Bioqraphy by Virginia Historical Society - 1893 Title from ProQuest 5000 International journal list (viewed on December 10, 2002) Snippet View - A.bg__ut.t.tbi_§..b9,9K The Virqinia Magazine of History and Bioqraphy by Virginia Historical Society - 2000 Editors: 1893-98, P.A. Bruce; 1899-1928, W.G. Stanard. »«<~¢:~«~eaa9~.«9M-*1.*a«v.v~v»w ii \"2)1é,:'xu& @ 31357:}: in’ Snippet view — A.b_2y::c_i3i.s %%%% show more » Search in this book "john bargrave" T 1 page matching "john bargrave" in this book Page 143 tiiéfizzito” "*i:*:2::-rtzrmr’ (J Hath’ hémnzo ”c:c':':‘isii’饧ri§“E:§§f§'i:A::‘%:'3"" {S3 A ;:.1*‘?~<':r pubiiséae-:1 in this Kfzgazine Vif. 1-1:3, shows iizisa 22*: have ’:>e::::-2 £1:-mi, s";-hr; Ba:-grave, of Pa:1_'%>ckst:csu:n, Krsmt. Robert Bargmve. of flrézfge, karat. ha: 3. auzzv -er of r:*%n§&.rsm. One of 331:: éwghtens Iraqis: or Anggi. ma.rrac*::i Rev. 3am: Bcevée, afmnvarais 3122.122 0! C:~.:'tm'bx2'ry. '§"t;at ., at , ~ .. . ‘M H‘ Where's the rest of this book? Ke auu ne; pre exi ish res Pla I9! Y 91: Y '|::‘ O F 2: About Google Book Search - Book Search Bloq - Information for Publishers - Provide Feedback - Google Home ©2007 Google %;“;*::2iP;:V;:;i-S- mm. . dose Maw partacrslcnp wz ‘ in Kent tiger hrfigazm. cg C35 Colonial Churches: A Series _ - ‘ " * Of Sketches Of Churches In The Oriqinal Colony Of W, V“, mia '2}: the face of much discouragem b Anon mous — 2004 - 388 “W” ‘“‘h“‘‘‘‘‘”‘ f°’ ‘he ‘“‘‘‘’’l’1 y y abscrihers wcrx: frankly disillus pages - . . .. ., With Pictures Of Each Church. Each Sketch By An Especially Qualified Writer. " 1m'rgrave:”an’u"z:‘*u express purpose of mrry Limited preview — _k » dam), 333,, ti, bfing W show more » 1: for Martitfs Branden. T} Key terms jenings, virginia historical, caruthers, virginia gazette, calwell, colonial churches, miskell, Virginia magazine, skyring, swift creek, henrico, captain martin, argall, benjamin harrison, nelms, lindsay opie, nova scotia, temperance flowerdew, patrick henry, staunton spectator Places mentioned in this book 3. Canada ‘"4 \"‘¢ P§9jé;~7T Use ? 707 E. Franklin Street, Richmond, Virqinia - Page 77 ? 581 E. Street, Chula Vista, California - Page 179 ? 20 Adams Place, Delmar, New York - Ana....,A»3.-.. C'a....h’a-.1 I_o_.’/ 270 (M10) RESEARCHES AND DISCOVERIES IN KENT THE BUILDER OF BIFRONS In their interesting note on the excavations at the site of Bifrons in Patrixbourne, R. Cross and T. Allen say that the original house ‘was erected either by Sir Robert Bargrave (d. 1600) or by his son, Sir John Bargrave’ (Arch. Camfi, cvii [I989], 328), but neither Robert nor John, nor any other member of the family, was ever knighted. In his will Robert Bargrave describes himself as Robert Bargar, of Bridge, yeoman, but he was also a tanner there and was buried in the chancel of Bridge church on 4th January, 1600/01, as was his wife Jane, daughter of John Gilbert, of St. Peter’s, Sandwich, late in 1603. He had directed in his will, which was dated in 1598, that he was to be buried with his father at Patrixbourne, but he apparently changed his mind. He was identified with Bridge, where he had his tanhouse, rather than with Patrixbourne, and of his eleven children all were baptized at Bridge, except the last three, who were baptized at Patrixbourne, beginning with his son, George, on 2nd April, 1586. John, the eldest son of Robert, was certainly of Patrixbourne and, moreover, he did not inherit his father’s tanhouse at Bridge, although his eldest son was baptized there in 1598. Of his seven remaining children, five were baptized at Patrixbourne, but Sarah, the fifth, was baptized at Tilmanstone, on 8th November, 1607, and John, the sixth, at Nonington, on 18th November, 1610, suggesting the family’s absence from Patrixbourne during that time. Their father is reputed to have been the builder of Bifrons, and it would appear from these details that he was, and that the construction was carried out in the period 1607 to 1611. It was in September 1611, too, that John Bargrave, alias Bargar, of Patrixbourne, had a grant of arms from Camden, Garter. The possibility that John’s father, Robert, built Bifrons cannot as yet be ruled out, but is contrary to tradition and not really supported by the existing evidence. One interesting aspect of the matter is the sudden rise to riches of the Bargars, or Bargraves, of Bridge, because before John, certainly, and Robert, possibly, the family were of somewhat humdrum station in Willesborough. Wealth may have come through John’s marriage to Jane, the daughter and co-heir of Giles Crouche, of London, about 1597. PHILIP H. BLAKE King im- jzuzlmrtxt to aux-ndu}. Haunt ax- lenxis like King. i~’tuh':biiian: Adjourn- uncut. Sunday. Liembers ta xtcrivv: rim ‘Cannnimniutz. 'C£M‘fai Fast. Pr-¢:_clm' sp;w1n1.td. 21 Lac. I. them, for the Honour of the House, and Advanccnic-4:1 oi‘ the ismicc, to make Choice of some fitter; whereof mm are mung. M2‘. Trcasarcr and Mr. Cmnptrollcrfetcliazul lead him to the Chair; where being set, 11-: stem} up, and told the Ilomv, (hut, sithnncc he fauncl this dam: by God's De- sigmneut and l’rm-iclencc, his Lies: E!}{i,(c‘i]\-'0LlI"$ should nut be winning: Wauitf carry an even ileurt imtween llcad and Bciily, and clean lhmds, in Bills ‘bctvsmen l’arLv and Part’: Yet ctcsirr:-ti: Liberty, with their Fa- vour: to nppea to his ilfajcstg, to spare him, and to direct Ilse Clzoice ufnfittazr.--'1l1at his ;'lInj:::Lvlin1h nia- oinled the House, upon .S'atz:1'dqy, at Twu ofthe Clock 3*“ I!) the :\:'rm1o(:n, to present their Speaker to him. (icxxcrally agreed to meet here, and tn be ready at One; and an the House dqrartccl. Sulzbaii, E21‘ "cI2ruczri1', 21' Jricobi. T 1% E Speaker cicct coming into the House presently i aflcr One of the (Rock this Afuzrmaon, and sitting in his Chair Iii! a1:uu:Threc_, at last a Mesa-nm:-r came down from the Upper House, declaxring, his Mapstylxad sent ti): this House, to come up. anti present their $p'.‘;ike1* unto him. Wimretipuii Mr. Speaker elect want u p, uccampanied with about 20:) of the Ilouse. The Speaker returning about an Hour after, with the Seijcunl carrying the Mace hclim: him; and being set in his Chair. and the {louse settled ; uccarding to the usuui Custoni, mm: was l‘€5u|, ‘ L. 14. An Act coucrtrniug Prabatc of Sugestiozzs, in Cases of Prolaibitiun. This wasn Bil}, which ind been read, committed, and ing\rqsscd, the lust Convention in Parliament. 'r"laich Bill ixting rend; \Yili'L€)u1 any other Tiiing done (as the usuai Manner been) 2\z'r.Spealwr, and the Motion made, or on that Day truth House, arose and dc-partcd. Linus, 23° .:’."t:b:11ari:', 1593. I1. .S'::cfi:'ng dciivcrcuz in the Bili tn" the Subaoth; which passed both Houses lnstComrention in Yar- liament, amxl lmth cversithence 2-'Ei’i:. passed this House. I. 1*. An Act for punislaznem of divers Abuses on the Lord's Day, nailed Szmday. Sir Jams Pcrmrt ‘.--—-A .Ié27x ;2ri'm:r}m'rm:,-—TI:nt, as in the Two last Parliaments the Communion’ mIminis- trod, sanow; as 2 Sign of Unity in Hind and Religion, and of our Cimrity:—:tnd a 'I'hm:ksgEving, for our Bleeding, and for Kim l’rii1cc~his snfe Ri::um.-—Aiim1'cd a f.'_()(1(i Motion. The old (Jrdcr, being to be now al;nsc1‘x'c:I. Sir£:.'d:r. Cm‘&'.:—Gla:I thatwc in this Course.-Jlovctlz (us in the 1.0.1! Ca::1z:r£csuseil)n crgmeml Fastfcrthis House. -m-'l'izis to be general llmwgiz iii! the Iiiugdom, at a'Dn_y to in: preEiw£l.~—:\ Bidd-(Izzy called there.-—-Very boun- tifui to the Paar tl1m‘t:.——'I'Isi5 £l»SlliJGid)' 0fTl1anks to the Kiug.—'l'u pelifiml his Majesty for his Consent to this. Sir Il"'m. -S'£:'a:c¢Ie:—-To il1l\’l: this nmvczl to the King by some honourable Person abaut the (Jlmir.--llopeth, now no Man of this . . . ill uffcclmi of Ila.-Ii-7ion.——'l'iie Knights of the Shires to take Notice of :11! ’cr$ons re. turned. and to give Infonnation of any mtumcd, sus- pcctcd in Religion; whereof knowczh none. Six‘ d'Vm. Bouisirodc propoumietli, for the Preacher, 1):. Ilargrmsc :\Iiuish<«.r of St. xlfargrtrews, the l’l::-cc ngrpeui upon.-—Tl:e Time, Sumlzm next. read, was allowed; and liielikc I 9° 2 1'°——-2 3'° Felvramvii. 6.- 1 Sir Frwwis Barzinglarr, Sir Eriw. {}'3u'c.v, Sir Mai. 25*» .vlrw.’c, .‘iir.Io:aw.s Pcrmtf, Sirff’17:.l’i£!s, and the CI: to take Care of chase which receive: the Communion. Sir Gm:-. .hFooi-c .-——:'L goat! lie vimaing fl gout! Ste!‘ the End. Tin: b£LSt.l3I!gil’1t1i11g. In ask to ll1cEu_4;l._ . Molicns pasucnd all to thefllosy tn (lad. ‘fins an 3"r_n'c~1i‘ot1t at’ all Stulut6~lmoi:s ])l‘il1lt:(i. The iike ll 1i0n:2‘,‘° 1:{i:. and mi 0rder,1'o:-One uftho Privg Can: to auovc the Queeu.——-332:: taut fit; for this Marian be general, and um. only for 0l.ll‘E~L‘iS'lZ‘S. Mr. Spenke1‘:—Wc Power mrcr ourselves only. 'J gcucral, over the Kingd-mn, not in our1’.y!/, SirJa:i2w Permit, $ir(}':: Fame, Sir 1}. SI. Jalm, Mr. Recorder, Sir Jam: Jag;/as Mr. Solicitor, Sir Tim. Hawaii, Mr. J}r_d».l*c, Sir 1!. Pa: Sir Ra. Pfcilfi par, Sir Nark. 1?ici:..Sir Gan‘. Gariizg, . P. Hrr_ymaI.r. .. fr. Pymmc, Sir Ja. Sazyfc. Sir Die. Crier Sir Ofiwcr Luke, Sir ,7‘/ta. J'i*‘c°z:'or, Mr. Ezmriznzzr, Sir}? .P¢74’cr , Sir h"m. F('c'I¢".L\o0!i, Sir 1"7':::zc.-‘:1-Irtmz, Mr. 11%). Sir ‘rauczlc I3rrrrin=rIa2:, Sir Gear. zifczrzizcrs, Mr. Gin agile, Sir Wm. 11.~.—Z:m, Mr. pm. I}rur_y, 81: Im Bmvzam, Sir 7'/:0. Apriac, Sir Nieiz. Ttgflazi, Sir H. -551 In-r, Sir H. Fmzr, Sir Ecfizv. Pnylozi, Sir .3)’. FA~x*tm’xx.l‘, : Jlici.-. Yrmg, Sir Ho. Jiiamrsrff, Sir Ban. Ifrzdyrzr, Sir ff Dczzlou, Si r Rager .:Vm't!:, Mr. Carirqgmn, Clumce.-E Duchy, Sir CW3:-{es zilariszm, Mr. Fc1£:cr:ta::, Sir Ea Ccciil, Mr. flfoore, Sir I]. ifibllop , Mr. Bmoka. Mr. .Ma!{w3,r. and Sir Tito. I19 !r_y :——Ta:x have all, II: will came, to have Voice. Mr. Spcakcr guttzlh them in mind «if the Orders the House, wizic never so in this. Sir I"m::c:'.c .S'q;z2:or:~—’l‘o hm-e the Question, Wilclil ever?’ Mat: shall have Voice. 3» r. Aifbrd, ca1:!:’a:——-lhzcause against ail Preccden‘ Questicm, Whcthcr all that will come, to have Voi at this Co1nmilzee:——-Resairezl, No. (Question, Wlwtlacr the Persons nominated ouky 12¢ :—Re.>=a1'z:cc?, Yea. Mr. P_:;mmc:-—Cuunse1 to 1:: admitted :1: the Cu: mittce.-«Agreed; mty? bcgiii on Tkicrafizzy in’ the :l.l‘icrnoon,_ at ’I:wo of L . FR: ....-.... Mr rm Cmnjls mi’ Jnsutu. Smmriug. Ctmcanlo menu. Ham»: to sit. Prohibitions Canfmace. 6'72 House.-Frida_§( hex}. to be the first Day; at TV’? °f ‘lie Cluck; aml so ex-cry FrE¢!a_y and xlfmzelagy, during tint? Stzssiun. Si rIf’:1:.I1‘aL’.v!raa’c.—-fora Sub-‘committee FDFG *3 L“r‘l1iW=5- Sir Ra. Pflilfipjxca .~—No such Cmnmitme Inst (£en}~en_- tinn; but Petitions prcsenuxl to him, that had ll1r:(.l:nu* for Grievmmcs. Sir Ra. Pbiliippes movctir, u Conmziuee ‘of the whale House for Courts of Justice, in the House. tlpqn -’-l"¢'r?f- nc.vdr:_y next; mad. aft¢1', every IV::zi.=:c.sa"rI_y, durtng U115 Sessioai.-wihimlrcz/. IL. 1*. Actagninst profane Swearing and Cursing. L. 1*. An Act for the general Quiet of the Subjects against. nil I’:-<:Lem.‘cs sf Coucczxlmeuts whszlsoevcr. Notice, of :1 Message from the Lords, that shall be prr-,~sentiy sent; and therefore desire we will sit till it come; srhich is intended not to be long. Answer sent by the Scnjeum. to the Messenger witizout, that brought it, that the House will sit. L. 2‘. .-‘kn Act concerning Prahate of Suggestions of Cases uf Pr(2l1ibi:iun.- Mr. (3!(uz:3,u’c:—-'1'o lnm: this Bill commiued:——— For sufcsut fur the Passage at‘ the l3ill.——But‘prcscz1I13*1o do it, and bring it back again. Sir Gcor. .#{9are:——No committing, without some ‘Exceplloxi mkeix against it. M r. Br2z:I.w:~——In the Four Counties; of .NortIeg:mafi»e:*- fazzd, I3"l'sl:zz0;'Ir::z£1, Czm:i.~crIm:d, and Bishopricl: of DW- Iwm, have A.-ssizes but once :4. Ymr.--'1' 0 have 1’rovision here for them. 1):. (r‘aad::--Protsilaitimxs oft mischievous, Suits thrice afiimmd ; in Cmmlry, Arches, Dclcgale3.——’l‘o have Pro- hibitions reslmincd to some Timc.—Cost.s to be taxed.-— Cumrniucd to Sir Ecfw. Colic, Mr. Gfmmwe, Mr. 39. licitar, Sir Ra. Ifitciaarii, Mr; Recorder, llrlr. Brca»l'e, Mr. Bamls, Dr. Good: :—Pm-scmly, in the Committee Chamber. » A Message {mm the Lords by the Two Chief Justices, Sc ‘emit Darys, Sexjeaiut Crew.- .urd Chief Justice:--'.l‘11c Lords have sent mi with 111'»; Iilcsss re to this honcfumble liousc: That, whcrms the Klug's£.l\Iuj(:5lyinl1i3 Speech declared, he would give Dircclicu to his Admiral, and Two Secretaries, to deliver cermin Particulars, of t Consequence, the principal Cause of calling this Parliament; the Lords, for the bet- ter Correspondence of both Houses, which they uuncstiy desire, desire a Conference between both Houses, Ta- murrow, in the Painted Chamber, if this House think fit: The Reason, because the Secretaries being to attend, and make Relnlitm, with their Pu lrs,nn mu ask any Que;-tion ; wherein the Atlnaimi willgive. batislaction. Mr. Speaker 1-clnlcth the Message to the House. Mr. A‘_1for:z‘:——Nu man here, as he supposelh, pre- pared to make Demands, but to hear them; and than lawful for any Member of it to ask any Question, to re- ccive Satisfaction; but 110 further. - Sir Gem‘. M"oorc:—Wbcn 3. Conference aboutfitxppiy to the King. we refused to confer, othenfise than to hear, upon gcncmis, without making any particular Axiswer. Mr. TIea5urer:—-The Intent of this Conference, to inzform us of the Particulars of the Heads (l€ll$‘(fI'{:(l by the Kiuw; and then, if any doubtful, to propouml, and require sxliafactlolzl. Sir Edw. C’aEe:—No Man to speak there, without Warrant from the IIOu5c.—Now only to hear, and to speak nothing. 23°--24° Febmarif. J. I Chancellor of tin: Exchcqnxer, and Sir }’-‘a'rr::ti.s- (on, to be added to 11mm; and they Four to I: Report back to this liaxzsc. The Comnrittce braught hack the iiili for San; in Prohibitions; with Oaimia &w«:.——Upr:u t\ Ingrassctur. Sir H. lime elczcztcth to serve fur (.'rzr{:,u'::. .?iIm'1:'.:9, ‘£4’ F¢'!1:‘mr:'i5, 1523". 1.. 1’. N :\cz!1:-rtiae Natu1'ali;:i:1;._; of 1w./1; fimrrc/ti. L. 1?. An Act for Ike Mxturaiizing uf Gglus I’? Sir Ethan liars:-m'rI clccteth to sc_rw:: For Cmmc :.’t_I;n;', and relinquisimtll Iffiliiiigfard in Bc:‘!:m . , .. Sir Edrp. cm mm.-as :a'1:ds’beu.a Time.- Wnm, in the Realm, of that, which is the Li: Kingdom; Trzxde, and . . . .-—~'I'im Want of ‘it: live Ccmnmditics, which bring: I: grant. Want of and thin: begctwth n Dismluation ofszli our aim moditics.——As in the nnluru! flatly, so in the 13 When that inclines In a Cunsumpticm, Two M atgfmvixs, and r‘c17m:'c'n.i*.——~:’ln excellent Pnrlium now, to remove Impcditncnts. The 1;‘.x'pe:'m Ed. III. thrice us much as the Iinpnmlliuii: : Importation far exceeds the Expurbalion.--T: select Committee for this Busimrss. Mr. Neale:-—At our last Meeting here, mi: forTradc much debated. The Patents of Mom of Trade the principal Means of Decay of ‘I'm The Law Co:m!rie5 a good Pre-4:ed::nI: ; who as Trade and Slzipping.-—'1.’lu:Merclmm. Aclvemura and the East-!a:rdCamp1myuffwzarlwr. -—'l'l:e=‘il=’: ti}? Men ubmxncling in5l1ippin=I, yet lmve M11 650. but I'rmu I.zm:lm:.——-'l‘o haw-2 these Patents in to the Cummiltee, la in: appointed for 'I‘:-mic‘ Sir .W:::. Capt:-—'l'hntt!1is Cxzmmaitlee may :4 sidemlion of the Necessities of poor '1'm:1essm cinll ‘ belongin to (liolhing. 3 r. .5'lm':z':'l :--'.'l’l'm£ llat-'3'1'ade overchargetlt lmrthened with some Tlriugs f.'1‘0lI§lJll¢ Home I Search A2A I About A2A I New AZA Users I Farnily History I Research Interests I Useful Links I Contact Us Exit Session I Search Results I Back I Catalogue Table of Contents I Catalogue in Full I Troubleshootinq I Site Map Centre for Kentish Studies: Kent Quarter Sessions [QM/SR0/1606 - QM/SRC/1618] The contents of this catalogue are the copyright of Centre for Kentish Studies. Rights in the Access to Archives database are the property of the Crown, © 2001-2004. To find out more about the archives described below, Contact Centre for Kentish Studies Kent Quarter Sessions Catalogue Ref. Q Creator(s): Canterbury Quarter Sessional Division, c 1350-1797 Maidstone Quarter Sessional Division, c 1350-1797 Kent Court of Quarter Sessions, 1797-1814 Kent Court of Annual General Session, 1814-1971 West Kent Quarter Sessions Records RECOGNIZANCES - ref. QM/SRC FILE - Edward Wilsford of Tilmanstone, yeoman, in £10, to cease victualling "unless he shall hereafter procure lycence from the Bench for that purpose"; sureties, John Bargrave of the same, esquire, William Gibbens of Betshanger, yeoman, Thomas Wilsford of Sandwich, surgeon and Vincent Wilsford of Tilmanstone, yeoman. — ref. QM/SRc/1607/35 — date: 25 April 1607 Page 1 of 1 Search Resufls You ran a basic search on "bargrave". There were 7 hits within catalogue entry details. Hits 1 to 7 are shown below sorted by covering dates. PRO Reference Title/Scope and Content Covering Dates E 328/156/ii Commission to R(obert), Archbishop of York, William Babthorpe kt., Robert 26 March Chalenor esd.. and Thomas Barqrave esci.. to take the above acknowledqment. 1548. Endorsement that ececution appears on indenture annexed. C 3/22/30 Boys v.Bar9rave; Kent. A-D- 1558‘ 1579 STAC 5/B60/37 Barqrave v. Dickenson & Alqer 33 EH2- STAC 5/B69/28 Barcirave v. Alqar and others 35 EH2 STAC 8/235/19 Payton v. Boys, Pownall, Austen and Barqrave (Barqar): Kent. 04/03/1603- 27/03/1625 STAC 8/235/18 Payton v. Boys, Hamond, Barqrave (Burc1_rave), Pownall, Austen, Dison, Oldfielde O4/03/1603- (Ovi||) and others: Kent 27/03/1625 E 134/1Jas1/Michll Christopher Phillips v. Edwd. Pavne, John Fletcher.: Land in the manor of St. 1 Jas 1 1603 Neots, called "Balves Hedcie" otherwise "Colfields, in Barcirave": whether formerly held by John Phillips (Grandfather to plaintiff) as of the manor of St. Neots, and how; and whether plaintiff is riqht heir thereto? whether the lands were qranted to Robert Pavne (father to defendant) by the late Queen Elizabeth, bv lease under Great Seal, in consideration of a vearlv pension of 8|. :4 wow») '-a.mb»nwovvz*:-rxyn Sort results by former reference. Sort results by cataloque reference. Sort results usinq relevance rankina. http ://catalogue.pro.gov.uk/BasicsearchResults.asp?txtSearchTerm=bargrave&'. .. 17/O3/03 Show Batch of Index Matches Page 1 of 1 MSS Home : MSS Index : MSS Descriptions Manuscripts: Index Entries Search for: Bargrave Bargrave . Family of Pedigree 19th cent. §A_dd.___3_39j__9___f. 294 Bargrave (-) Capt.. His project touching Virginia 1623. A_ddA_._1_2_4_9)67 Bargrave (Isaac) . Letter to J. Evelyn 1775. _Adc_1_.___3A8_4_8__(_)_"f. 344 Bargrave (Robert) . Letter to W. Longueville 1680. _A__ci_;,l,._V_V_2_)A9“§§7._1°. 441 Bargrave (Robert) . Letters to R. Oxenden and others 1637-1648. 265, 266, 290 Add. 28002 ff. 87, 89 - 6. Bargrave (Robert) . of Canterbury Biographical notes on him and his wife 1628-1661. §lgan§.___LZQ8_f. 107 7. Deane (Henry Bargrave) Sir. judge Letter to Lady Gilbert 1911 AWg1_d;49_341_f. 166 .U‘.4*‘P°."’.*“ Number of hits: 7. __ Mssaome ;Mss1ndex.Mss Descriptions‘ http://molcat.b1.uk/msscat/INDX0010.ASP 6/26/00 Page 1 of 1 Centre for Kentish Studies: Dering Manuscripts Part 2 J The contents of this catalogue are the copyright of Centre for Kentish Studies. Rights in the Access to Archives database are the property of the Crown, © 2001-2003. To find out more about the archives described below, contact Centre,_for.Kenz:ish___$tgdies Dering Manuscripts Part 2 Catalogue Ref. U1107 CORRESPONDENCE FILE - Robert Bargrave - ref. U1107/C29 - date: [1660] FILE - Robert Bargrave - ref. U1107/C31 - date: 1660 FILE - Joseph Roberts — ref. U1107/C33 - date: 1661 \_ [from Scope and Content] to Sir Edward Dering seeking a settlement of the estate of Robert Bargrave deed. for which Dering acts ESTATE PAPERS Testamentary matters FILE - Draft of letter from Sir Edward Dering - ref. U1107/E6 - date: 1661 \_ [from Scope and Content] Relating to the estate of his 'cousin' Bargrave Individual Record Page 1 of 1 FamilySearch® International Genealogical lndexT'V' v4.01 IGI Record Select record to download - (50 maximum) I’ Isaac BARGRAUE Sex: M British Isles Event(s): Christening: 14 Aug 1660 Cathedral, Canterbury, Kent, England Parents: Father: Robert BARG RAUE Mother: Source Information: Batch number: Dates Source Call No. Type Printout Call No. T P020651 1564- 942 B4HA V.2 Book 6906421 F 1861 Sheet Ifiepare selected records forgdownloacl Gender: :‘\./'1 Christening: 14 Aug I660 (f;1thed1"al, C;1m‘erbu3‘y, Kem. Englzmd © 1999 by Intellectual Reserve, Inc. All rights reserved. English approval: 3/1999 Use of this site constitutes your acceptance of these QQn_ditig:g§:::gf___LJ___s_e_. Last updated: 3/22/1999 I_?_rgi,yfiy_I_~f’gligy. Last updated: 3/22/1999 http://www.fami1ysearch.o. . ./indiVidua1_record.asp?recid=48051 19&1dsnn= 5/12/00 Family: Marriage: ,,,USA Spouse: _ , é 9/ , {ifi' .t ,. gt 0 Witten, Sarah Jane Wye ‘x. . Birth : 12 JUL 1838 ,Tazewell Co.,Virginia,USA ‘U; Ca/Hr: _ L~~:\‘:» ._j_____f_____.; . ,_._._ . ’ [V D/5‘/"’ Back to Main Page it-,7,“'\ ‘~ ’ w 9“ 1 my W Bargrave, Anne Parents: Father: Bargrave. Isaac Dean-Canterbury (ll ~03) _ Gewi- ‘zrtiav Ci-:l:’”5"Q#L "Q _ '_ 1:. ‘ Vw HZ! \‘-,2 L“! Family: 3"“ W‘ - rum» - I “A /Th I» Spouse: F _’__,...¢..—~4- --—~~— ~---———~———~-- /“W F V (),,|,M Nu. .l,l€3o ,_ I Coppin, Thomas Reverend Q _ _/agu: M, (.(‘~v"~»“:M‘)_-’ ‘£3/0’ Parents: 3 \ ‘H . *=',I2S Father: Cogpin, John Esg. Mother: . Susan Family: 3 of 14 2/8/00 12:40 AM Genealogy Data http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Pointe/2058/dat1.ht' Marriage: ,,Kent,Eng1and Spouse: Palmer, Henry Sir Birth : Of Howlets,,Kent,England Death : 1659 ,,Kent,England Children: Palmer, Isaac Palmer, Robert Palmer, John Public Record Office I Catalogue Page 1 of 1 3.-'|.l'§4li..lI2..' __ [(1-.C,"UR§1 -’ I K New Document Details for STAC 8/235/18 flew rooster Lettercode Title Records of the Court of Star Chamber and of other courts Ciass Title Court of Star Chamber: Proceedings, James I Piece Title Payton v. Boys, Hamond, Bargrave (Burgrave), Pownall, Austen, Dison, Oldfielde (Ox others: Kent Text Date O4/O3/1603-27/O3/1625 Closure Status Open Place of Public Record Office, Kew Deposit Goto Document Details for STAC 8/235/18 to store a favorite/bookmark to these details ,:_F;;sg§;ogg_n1ent V j Document V flocument Catalogue Release 1.4 http://cata1ogue.pro. gov.uk/ListInt/browse_documents_se1ected.asp ?iMode=2&ind=741 1... 14/04/01 Public Record Office I Catalogue Page 1 of 1 ea Mats Screen flew mrttercasgii: t’-iew {Itasca Document Details for STAC 8/235/19 Lettercode Tiiie Records of the Court of Star Chamber and of other courts Ciass Titie Court of Star Chamber: Proceedings, James I Piece Titie Payton v. Boys, Pownall, Austen and Bargrave (Bargar): Kent. Text Date O4/O3/1603-27/O3/1625 Ciosure Status Open Place of Deposit Public Record Office, Kew Goto ____DAo__c_Wu_r_r1eAntpetaii§jo_r_§§T[AVQ flE_3,_[2§_:3"[_1_§_3__ to store a favorite/bookmark to these details tmsszumezat flex: Docnmzztat ’._Vf~‘Er:a—i 5-ecumertt _ Catalogue Release 1.4 Bargrave, John (bap. 1610, d. 1680), Church of England clergyman and collector of curiosities, was baptized at Nonington, Kent, on 18 November 1610. His father, also named John, was the elder brother of Isaac Bargrave and had increased the family fortune derived from tanneries in east Kent by his marriage to Jane Crouch, the daughter of a prosperous London haberdasher. A year after the birth of John, his second son, he received a grant of arms and soon afterwards retired from his profession as a mercenary soldier to build the country house of Bifrons, at Patrixbourne, near Canterbury. As a younger son, Bargrave was destined to follow his uncle into the church. He attended the King's School, Canterbury, between 1623 and 1626, and proceeded in 1629 to Peterhouse at Cambridge where Isaac's close friend Matthew Wren was master. He served as college librarian between 1634 and 1636 and was admitted as a fellow in 1637. By this stage Wren had been succeeded by John Cosin, at Archbishop Laud's special behest. In the polarization of political and religious views that preceded the outbreak of the civil war, Bargrave held to the churchmanship and royalist loyalties of his Kentish connections. His uncle, as dean of Canterbury, took a lead in defending universities and cathedral chapters against the Long Parliament in 1641, and helped to rally the Kentish gentry to the king's support in 1642. Bargrave himself was caught up in the reprisals, being ejected from his fellowship in 1644. From 1645 until the Restoration, Bargrave chose to spend most of his time travelling on the continent. From time to time he had charge of young fellow travellers from among his Kentish and Cambridge connections. The first of these journeys, which took place in 1646-7, resulted in the first Italian guidebook published in the English language; it appeared under the name of his nephew John Raymond. The likelihood that Bargrave had a major part in this work is strengthened by the recent discovery of a manuscript journal of Bargrave's earlier French tour of 1645. Bargrave's periods of foreign residence, and particularly the four journeys to Rome that he undertook in 1647, 1650, 1655, and 1660, enabled him to collect numerous coins, curiosities, and small-scale antiquities. His subsequent comments in cataloguing them, together with his acute observations penned in the margins of a set of mounted prints of the College of Cardinals, provide innumerable piquant details about his life as a royalist exile. With the Restoration Bargrave resumed his ecclesiastical career, though his longest foreign journey was still to come. In September 1662, simultaneously with his appointment as a canon of Canterbury, he took charge of a royal mission to ransom Christian slaves from the dey of Algiers; the mission, successfully concluded, allowed him to add a portrait of the dey and a mummified chameleon to his collection. Bargrave's marriage in 1665 to Frances Osborne, née Wilde, a well—connected Kentish widow, was childless. Up to his death in Canterbury on 11 May 1680 he remained an active member of the cathedral chapter, compiling a survey of its revenues as receiver-general in 1675, and later serving as vice-dean. He was survived by his wife. Buried in Canterbury Cathedral, he had requested that the chains of one of the slaves whom he had redeemed be hung over his grave. His meticulously documented collection, housed originally in two cabinets and left to the dean and chapter in his will, has achieved a widespread reputation as the best preserved example of its kind in Britain. Stephen Bann Sources Pope Alexander the Seventh and the College of Cardinals, by John Bargrave ...; with a catalogue of Dr Bargrave's Museum, ed. J. C. Robertson, CS, 92 (1867) - S. Bann, Under the sign: John Bargrave as collector, traveler and witness (1994) - D. Sturdy and M. Henig, The gentle traveller: John Bargrave, canon of Canterbury and his collection (1985) - J. Raymond, An itinerary contayning a voyage made through Italy in the yeare 1646, and 1647 (1648) - J. Bargrave, ‘A part of my journal of France 1645’, Canterbury Cathedral Library, IRBY deposit, U11/ 8 - J. Harris, ‘To oblivion and back: Dr Bargrave's Museum of Rarities’, Country Life, 179 (1986), 278-80 - C. E. Woodruff, ‘A seVenteenth—century survey of the estates of the dean and chapter of Canterbury in east Kent’, Archaeologia Cantiana, 38 (1926), 29-44 - Venn, Alum. Cant., 1/ 1.84 - J. Philipott, ‘The visitation of the county of Kent taken in the year 1619 [pt 1]’, Archaeologia Cantiana, 4 (1861), 241-72, esp. 252 - A. Bernau, Sixteenth-century marriages, 1538-1600 (1911) - P. H. Blake, ‘The builder of Bifrons’, Archaeologia Cantiana, 108 (1990), 270 Archives Canterbury Cathedral, IRBY deposit, U11 / 8 - Canterbury Cathedral, literary MSS, E 39 Likenesses M. Bolognini, oils, 1647, Canterbury Cathedral Library - assistant of G. B. Canini, oils, 1650, Canterbury Cathedral Library © Oxford University Press 2004 All rights reserved: see legal notice UWKVKI/SIT? F8555 Stephen Bann, ‘Bargrave, John (bap. 1610, d. 1680)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004 [accessed 18 Nov 2004: http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/1371] Back to top of biography Site Credits 716 RENAISSANCE QUARTERLY iconography. Protestants, especially Puritans, were naturally less attached to the Gothic in religious architecture; and Protestant fears of paganism and idolatry restricted use of mythological and overly self-aggrandizing refer- ences in portraits, except in court circles. Variety of response matched richness of source material in the British Renaissance; and the authors of Albion’5 Classicism have performed an im- portant service in rescuing the complexity of that period and that place. JUDITH M. AKEHURST Minneapolis, Minnesota Stephen Bann. Under the Sign: john Bargrave as Collector, Traveler, and Wit- ness. (The Body, In Theory: Histories of Cultural Materialism.) Ann Ar- bor: University of Michigan Press, 1994. 30 pls. + X + 152 pp. $34.50. ISBN: n.a. Although ]ohn Bargrave’s name may not be recognized by most readers, this somewhat obscure mid-seventeenth-century Kentish gentleman, travel- er, and vice-Dean of Canterbury Cathedral has warranted a book-length study of his life almost by historical accident: Bargrave’s Cabinet of Curios- ities, assembled during his Cromwellian-era travels on the continent, re- mains one of the few such collections to have survived largely intact. Yet despite its unique status, still preserved and catalogued in Canterbury Ca- thedral, Bargrave’s holdings have earned little critical notice. As Bann points out, Bargrave’s life and works are significant because they traverse both the history of collecting, with its link to the origins of Western Euro- pean museums, and the practice of early modern travel, particularly the relation of travel to exile during the Civil War period. Heavily influenced by the theoretical work of Krzysztof Pomian and ‘Stephen Greenblatt, Bann’s study examines the ways that Bargrave offers an example of “the special phenomenon of ‘living symbolically’” (viii). The consummate “semiophore-man,” in Pomian’s terms, Bargrave uses travel and collecting as often-compensatory strategies of self-representation. Bann’s first chapter, “Rise and Fall of the House of Bargrave,” examines Bargrave’s family background and early life. The most historically-orien- tated section of Bann’s argument, this chapter contains some of the most interesting details of the book; ironically, Bann’s discussion is at its liveliest when directed at figures other than Bargrave himself, like Bargrave’s father john, who campaigned for a “patriarchal” management of the Virginia Col- ony, or his uncle Isaac, Dean of Canterbury Cathedral during the Laudian era. Also, Bann’s heavily-theoretical attention to minutiae often detracts from these intriguing details, as when he discusses the ideological import of orthographical changes to the Bargrave name, and the etymology of the family’s country home (“Bifrons”), or his labored reading of the inscription on a family monument that the younger Bargrave placed in the parish REVIEWS 717 church of Patrixbourne. This section is more successful when it examines the significance of family links to key sites of power and patronage, like university, church, and local politics — a fascinating look at the background of two generations of an extended Kentish Royalist family on the eve of the Civil War. Bann’s argument gains strength in its final two chapters, particularly in its association of Bargrave’s practice of collecting to relevant theoretical models, like Foucault’s concept of the “author-function,” Freud’s theory of mourning, or Adorno’s comments on Benjarnin’s own similar “lack of system.” Bann is less successful in providing evidence for the symbolic im- port of Bargrave’s collection as a whole; the fact that Bargrave received many of these items as gifts, and that his efforts at collecting were hampered by his inability to afford or transport many desired objects, does little to support Bann’s contention that Bargrave’s collection represents a concerted effort and coherent pattern of self-representation. Bann’s final chapter, “The Witness of History,” provides a fascinating examination of Bargrave’s College of Cardinals, an annotated manuscript collection of portraits of Catholic leaders. One wishes that Bann had further explored these issues of religious politics and controversy. Although Bann’s book often frustrates its reader with its concern for minutiae over comprehensiveness, this study will serve a valuable purpose if it directs further critical attention to the early modern cultural practices of travel and collecting. MARK NETZLOFF University of Delaware Graham Parry. The Trophies of Time: English Antiquczrians of the Seventeenth Century. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1995. 16 b/w ‘illus. + Xi + 382 pp. $85. ISBN: O-19-812962-9. The seventeenth century witnessed growing interest in Britain’s antiq- uity. While this interest was often motivated by intellectual curiosity, scholars also looked to the records and remains of early Britain to cham- pion legal, political, and religious causes. The Renaissance appreciation of the classical world fostered examination of Britain’s Roman history, ruins, and artifacts. This interest in the Roman occupation was balanced by a strong sense of national destiny that encouraged investigation of the Saxon and prehistoric roots of British civilization. Antiquaries examined Stonehenge, monastic ruins, Roman coins, funerary urns, early texts, and other remnants of the past. Antiquarian discoveries shaped nearly every facet of seventeenth-century British culture. Church historians aimed to chronicle the arrival and spread of Christianity in Britain, while linguists recognized the Anglo-Saxon roots of English and realized that knowledge of the Anglo-Saxon language was fundamental to a proper understanding of Folger Institute ¢%lger Institute Q Habits of Reading ® Folger Library @ Home http://www.folger.edu/institute/nproject8.html Page 1 of 2 Raymond, John. An Itinerary Contayning (2 Voyage. London: Printed for Humphrey Moseley, 1648. John Raymond undertook what has become known as the Grand Tour in the company of his uncle, John Bargrave, and another young man. There is some dispute about the authorship of the resulting book. But according to Edward Chaney, Raymond’sItinerary is "what we must now recognize as the first comprehensive English guidebook to Italy" (49). It is also important for its Royalist prefatory epistle from Sir John Berkenhead, which links the origins of the formal Grand Tour with the events of the mid-seventeenth century. By presenting Rome as the ultimate destination for the young traveler (indicated by the phrase ne plus ultra, the "highest attainable point," or more ominously, "go no further"), the engraving signals the politics of the book to follow, a gesture particularly crucial in the year of Charles I’s capture and execution. The bookseller, Humphrey Moseley, was the most important source for "high-end" Royalist books during the period. Moreover, the book’s running title, Il Mercurio Italico, demonstrates its role in the "pamphlet wars" of the period, "Mercury" being the common name for newsbooks on both sides of the civil wars. For further information, see Edward Chaney, The Grand Tour and the Great Rebellion: Richard Lassels and "The Voyage to Italy” in the Seventeenth Century (Genaeve: Slatkine, 1985) and Stephen Bann, Under the Sign: John Bargrove as Collector, Traveler, and Witness (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994). 6/ 12/00 Folger Institute Page 2 of 2 ' u—p—r y»,a2::‘:’gg£;j,§:s AN X-5:s’::*; «I I1?*1NERARY; Contayrfmg Made zhrtaugh ‘ ITALYW In the yarn 1646, and I ?-I ' Illufhaxed with divers figures of Anfiquities . Nwar befare Pttfilijbsd. 33- jg. : KAY Mona, Gmf. L ON D 0 N: Frimcd For flaaafbuy Mafia}, afl311‘¢!°‘» be {old at his Shop at the Prime: ,,-rm;-3 in 3‘. Pay}: C-bllflha ylld. I 5 4 B; 19 , Folgef Engtétvéci title page: and fdcing typographical title page. http ://www .fo1ger.edu/institute/nproj ect8 .html 6/ 1 2/00 Site map New §§§|‘Cb 333* The Travel Diary of Robert Bargrave, (1647-1656), Levant Merchant Michael Brennan Series: Hakluv.t.So;iety. Third Series. $89.95/£45.00 Add to ,8as,k_et This is the first fully annotated o|d—spe|ling edition of the entire text of the autograph English journal of Robert Bargrave (1628-61), recording his extensive travels as a merchant. This manuscript (now Bodleian Library MS Rawlinson C 799), describes four separate journeys made by Bargrave: his sea voyage from England to Constantinople; an arduous return journey overland from Constantinople to England, via Bulgaria, Romania, Poland, Germany, and the Low Countries; extensive travels, for both commercial and cultural purposes, in Spain, Sicily, Italy and the Morea; and a return journey from Venice to Margate, via Trento, Innsbruck, and Augsburg, including his visit to Heidelberg where he met the exiled English royalist community at the court of Elizabeth, Queen of Bohemia. The introduction to the edition gives detailed consideration to the political, religious, and personal affiliations of the Bargraves, a prominent Kentish family, with special reference to their experiences of overseas travel. While abroad, Robert also twice met up with his cousin, John Bargrave (c. 1610-80), the noted traveller and antiquarian. The introduction also provides an assessment of the historical, literary, and geographical importance of Robert Bargrave’s journey; a survey of his extensive musical and dramatic interests; and the first detailed account of the provenances of both MS Rawlinson C 799 and now a lost earlier draft of this journal, identified here as the Eastry Court Manuscript. The edition includes seventeen illustrations, Bargrave family trees, and a selective bibliography of primary and secondary sources consulted. Contents Introduction; The Bargrave family: the life of Robert Bargrave; Isaac Bargrave and Sir Henry Wotton; The Bargraves and the Civil War; Robert Bargrave’s travels: The first journey: April 1647—September 1652; The second journey: September 1652—March 1653; The third journey: November 1654—February 1656; The fourth journey: February 16S4—March 1656; Robert Bargrave’s dramatic and musical interests; Robert Bargrave’s diary: Bodleian Library Oxford, MS Rawlinson C 799: Composition; Posthumous provenance of MS Rawlinson C 799; The Eastry Court manuscript of Robert Bargrave’s travels; The travel diaries of Robert Bargrave; Robert Bargrave’s sea voyage from England to Constantinople and his residence there (1647-52); Robert Bargrave’s overland journey from Constantinople to England (1652- 3); Robert Bargrave’s travels in Spain and Italy (1654—6); Robert Bargrave’s journey from Venice to Margate (1656); Bibliography; Index. Further Information Affiliat.-ion: Michael Brennan Illustrations: Includes 17 b&w illustrations ISBN: 0 904180 63 8 Publication Date: 09/1999 Number of Pages: 308 pages Binding: Hardback Binding Options: Available in Hardback only Book Size: 247 x 174 mm fisSi+§Gflfi'E THE EXILE OF TWO KENTISH ROYALISTS DURING THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR MICIIAEL (I. BRENNAN In the early—summer of 1647 two members of the Bargrave family of Kent broke off their separate travels abroad to enjoy a two—weel< rendezvous at Siena, a city then especially favoured by English visitors for its architecture, wines, and horseriding, as well as for the clarity of its spoken Italian. .Iohn Bargrave (c. 1610-80), having been ejected in I643 from his fellowship at Petcrhouse, Cambridge, had been travelling through Fiance and Italy since May I645.‘ The younger man, Robert Bargrave (1628-61), was just beginning an ad- venturous Iife of international commerce a11d travel. The two men were first cousins and already knew each other well. Robert was the son of Dean Isaac Bargrave (l586~l643) of l?a.vtry Court and Canter- bury Cathedral while John was the son of Isaac's elder brother, John Bargrave of Bi_/“runs and Patrixbourne (d. (5. I625)? In April 1647 Robert had left England on board the merchant ship London with his employer, James Modyford, an experienced Levant trader, and was bound for Turkey with the party of Sir Thomas Bendish, the new ambassador to Constantinople (Istanbul). After sailing from the Downs, the London arrived at Leghorn (Livorno). The young Robert was determined to cross from there to Siena in order to meet up with his cousin John. They were able to spend some two weeks exploring Siena before moving on to Florence where John devoted five days to guiding his cousin around the major tourist landmarks. Robert then travelled on alone for a further three weeks, rapidly acquiring a basic proficiency in the Italian language, before meeting up again with his party at Leghorn, from where they sailed on to Smyrna (Izmir) in Turkey.‘ The travels abroad of John and Robert Bargrave are of interest to historians of the Civil War in Kent for several reasons. Firstly, unlike most other members of the Kentish gentry who withdrew — either discreetly or in more perilous flight‘ — from England to the Continent during the l64()s and 16503, these two have left unusually extensive 77 .p‘~((/ll,\3Q;3/Li.’¥\7\ Cawtwa (La; 77 , tos’ (zone) MICHAEL G. BRENNAN written records of both their experiences abroad and their condenm- atory views of the political developments in their home county. In addition to his travels in France (and later in the Low Countries, Poland, and Germany_). John Bargrave also made at least four separ- ate perambulations through Italy: in 1646-47 as tutor to two young Kentish men, Alexander Chapman and John Richards (or Rycaut),4 who were also accompanied by Rargrave’s nephew, .lohn Raymond; in l65() as tutor to Philip Stanhope (later second Earl of Chester- field)‘ and William Swan;" in 1655 with William Juxon, the nephew of William Juxon, then Bishop of London and (from 1660) Arch- bishop of Canterbury; and again in 1659-1660 with unknown com- panions fora final visit to Rome.7 During this entire period, John Bargrave was an avid collector of small antiquities and other travel mementoes, which still fortunately survive along with his manuscripts as an integral collection at Canterbury Cathedral Archives.“ Ile compiled an extensive catalogue of this cabinet of curiosities (Lit MS E 16). laced through with various anecdotes of his travels both in Italy and in other locations such as Leyden, Utrecht, Paris. Nuremberg, Augsburg, Vienna. Prague, and Innsbruck. On his last visit to Italy, John also purchased at Rome ‘The Pope, and Colledge, or Conclave ofCardinalls’ (Lit MS E 39a-c), an extensive set of prints of Pope Alexander VII and his cardinals (edited by James Craigie Robertson as The College of Cardinals in 1867, see note 5). He then heavily annotated these portraits with his own comments on both the individuals represented an(l papal history, as well as numerous incidental and fragmentary memoirs of his own travels abroad — thus rendering them. in this respect, as another kind of sporadic and disordered travel diary. In addition to these surviving manuscript collections, Anthony it Wood first suggested (and recent scholarship has tended to agree) that John Bargrave also played a major (and perhaps predominant) role in the compilation of the most famous English guidebook to Italy of the Civil War period. /in Iti11emr_v (kmtaytzitzg (1 Voyage Made Tlimuglt. Italy, in the Yeare I646, amt’ I647 (1648)." Although this slim volume bore on its titlc—page the initials of John Raymond (who was, as already noted, Bargrave’s nephew and one of his young charges during his 1646-47 residence in Italy), it seems likely that Raymond’s manuscript was compiled with full access to John Bargrave”s own notes.‘” Furthermore, John Bargrave’s own manuscript diary of his travels through France from May 1645 until February 1646 with John Raymond and Alexander Chapman, crammed with his incidental observations, jottings. sketches, and reminiscences, has also recently surfaced in Canterbury Cathedral Archives (U1 1/8). 78 THE EXILE ()F TWO KF.N'I'ISII ROYALISTS l)UR.IN(,l 'l'IIIZ ENGLISII CIVIL WAR Robert Bargrave‘s travels abroad between April 1647 and March 1656 are no less well documented since be compiled a lengthy autograph diary (now in the Bodleian Library, Oxford) of four separate voyages undertaken at this period as a merchant trading in the Levant and other Mediterranean countries. The first account (April I647—September 1652) describes hisjourney by sea from Eng- land to Constantinople and his often perilous experiences as a n1er— chant in Turkey. The second account (September l652~March 1653) records his arduous travels home overland from Turkey to England. Robert’s third voyage (November 1654—February 1656) took him to Spain and then on to Venice; and his rapid progress home overland from Venice to England (February—March 1656) is described in the fourth account. lntcrspersed with Rohert’s accounts of various commercial and diplomatic incidents, are also examples of his own poetry, including a masque with musical settings. and his general observations as a tourist and exile from his own country." When drawn together, the various manuscript remains of John and Robert Bargrave offer an informative insight into the personal circumstances and political views of two Kentish men, who, like many others of their generation. were displaced abroad in the mid—164()s by the developing civil dissent in their home county. Although neither John or Robert Bargrave was an especially remarkable man in any way, each was clearly preoccupied with analysing and recording for posterity the significance of their own experiences as travellers; as well as asserting — for whatever readership was ultimately envisaged for their manuscripts — their own unwavering position in the ongoing struggle between Parliament and the English monarchy. As will be outlined below, the Bargravcs could claim various personal royal connections, most notably through Robert’s father, Dean Isaac Bar- grave, who had served at Westminster from 1622 until 1625 as a per— sonal chaplain to Prince (‘.h211‘les.”ls2121c Bargrave was also on intimate terms with the prinee‘s elder sister, Queen Eli7.abeth of Bohemia. whom he had visited at Ileidelberg in .1616." Hence, as travellers abroad on the same continent as the temporarily (at least to their eyes) displaced royal family and their various entourages, John and Robert Bargrave found in the concept of the exiled royalist Englishman a powerful and poignant expression of their nation’s constitutional dilemma during the l64()s and 1650s. J0/in. and Robert Bargrave as l\’oya/ist En1igr(5.v The way in which both John and Robert Bargrave sought to utilize the various written memorials of their travels between 1645 and 1660 as 79 MlCllAl<‘.l. G. BRENNAN implicit statements of their personal loyalty to the English monarchy is well illustrated by an example from John Bargrave’s scholarly annotations in his College of Cardinals to the portrait of Cardinal John Charles de’ Medici, whom, by his own account he had often seen in the flesh at Rome and Florence. In a note jotted down in 1679 onto the portrait, John recalled: I remember that one of the times that l was at Florence, in the Great Duke’_s most famous gallery, 1 found Cromwell‘s picture hanged up amongst the heroes (which vexed me); and I, after a day or two, having audience of the Great Duke (father to the present), he asked me how long it was since 1 was there last. I told him about 5 years. ‘Then,’ said he, ‘I have added much to my gallery since you saw it last.’ To which I answered, that there was one picture added, which was Cromwell’s, that spoyled all the rest. At which he stopped, and did not know well how to take it; but, at length, said he, ‘On occasion it is as easily taken down as it was hanged up’. Stephen Bann has provided an interesting reading of the techniques ofliterary selllpresentation inherent in this apparently minor scrap of marginalia added by a then old Canterbury cleric to an ephemeral collection of ecclesiastical prints, designed over two decades earlier for the tourist market at Rome: Several things emerge, and are intended to emerge, from this fragment of Bargrave’s biography, penned in 1679, the year before his death. First, there is the concern to present himself as a seasoned traveller, familiar with the sights of Italy, on speaking terms with the great men, and notable collectors, of his time. But then there is the wish to demonstrate, in his exchange with the ‘Great Duke’, that he is willing to ovcrstep the boundaries ofconventional politeness in order to defend the political cause that he holds dear, which indeed is inseparable front his identity as an English (and Kentish) gentleman,"' When viewed in this light, John Bargrave’s biographical jotting is transformed from being a merely incidental travel memoir into a politicized interpolation on the role and duty of the royalist English traveller abroad, who, if necessary, should be willing even to correct ltalian princes if the cause of his displaced king so requires. This anecdote was added to John Bargrave’s College a_/'Cardinuls almost two decades after the restoration of King Charles ll; and the truth of his apparently bold encounter with the Duke of Florence sometime in the 1650s is now impossible to decipher. But John Bargrave’s diary of his experiences in France in 1645 and 1646 (Can- terbury Cathedral Archives, Ull/8), is undoubtedly contemporan- eous with these travels and bears testament to his awareness that fellow~travellers from other countries would often seek to define an 80 THE EXILE OF TWO KF,N'flSll ROYAl...lS'l‘S DURING THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR Englishman abroad during the mid—l640s in relation to his adherence to either king or parliament. Having crossed from Dover to Calais on 23 May 1645 (or, as John Bargrave himself notes, 2 June I646 New Style), with three young companions, John Raymond, Alexander Chapman, and John Richards (or Rycaut), his party began to make its way towards Paris. At. Beauvais a serious altercation broke out between John Bargrave and a group of eight Germans with whom he was travelling, four of whom had crossed the Channel with him on the same packet boat from Dover. Speaking in Latin (their one common language), one of the Germans explained that he was a ‘noble mans sonn’ who had innocently visited England ‘only as a traveler to see it’. But, as Bargrave learned, officials at London had roughly confiscated from him various ‘bookes, beads, crosses, and the like’, fanning his hostility towards the English, of whom John Bargrave appears to have been little more than a conveniently vulnerable representative. Seeking retribution, the belligerent German persist- ently threatened Bargrave, ominously warning him that he was now ‘not in England’. The situation suddenly became much more dangerous when Bargrave’s own patience finally snapped: upon which 1 told them that they shold know thay were not in Germany, and that I had hands and a weapon as well as he which was violent; and because he had thretned to be my death on the way to Paris, I desird him to goe single with inee and end the quarrell there, which his ‘companions per- ceiving, thay tookc him from his violence, and desiring to know my af- fections iu the difference that was betweene the King and his subiects: l told them l was of no party, but by my Oathes l was bound to be obedient to my Sovereign and all the iourny after thay were my very good freinds, an(l Tres humbles Servitures but I had an cy to the shavers pistolles. (fols. Sv_6t‘) As with the account of his conversation with the Duke of Florence, John Bargrave is also clearly concerned in this passage with his own self—iinage as a bold and resolute traveller abroad. But, here, the defining moment in the heated interchange is seen to be Bargrave’s plainly expressed allegiance to his sovereign, a simple gesture of such apparent potency that the aggression of the Germans immed- iately melts away (even though the ever-cautious Bargrave still keeps a wary eye on their pistols). As it stands, the passage reads as a striking, if slightly stage-managed, assertion of an essential aspect of Bargrave’s sense of himself abroad, not only as an Englishman but also as an exiled royalist. Such a seltlimage was firmly founded in reality since from the second decade of King James I’s reign the fortunes of the Bargrave family had in no small measure been determined by their personal 81 MICH/\I3l. G. BRENNAN involvements with the monarchy and the established Church of England. In 1663 .lohn Bargrave placed in Patrixbourne Church a large black marble memorial stone to the memory of the Bargrave family which eloquently records (in Latin): ‘In the Civil War on the King’s side / The FAMILY stood and fell’ and mournfully concludes: ‘John the Heir from ruins / to ruins placed this stone / Year of our Lord l663’.'5 The cause of this post—Restoration elegiac lament was, of course, the impact of the Civil War in Kent, the execution of the king in I649, the loss of the Bargrave family fortunes, and the resulting dispersal of several members of the family abroad. Three decades earlier, the Bargrave family had been very much in the aseendant in their home county. .lohn Bargrave’s father. John ((1, c.1625) was the eldest son of Robert Bargrave (d. I600), who had owned a tannery at Bridge in Kent. The financial means for rising above this respectable but unremarkable trade seems to have come from John’s fortunate marriage in about I597 to Jane, the daughter and co—heir of Giles Crouche, a wealthy London haberdasher. John’s imposing family seat, B1:/'r0n.s' (‘two—faeed‘), where our John Bargrave would have spent much of his childhood, gave monumental expression to the fami|y’s new—|’ound status in county society.“ In I611 .lohn Bargrave (d. (r. 1625) received his grant of arms from William Camden (‘()r. on a pale gules a sword erect argent, hilted and pomelled gold, on a chief a7.ure three bezants. Crest: on a mount vert a pheon gules between two laurel branches proper’), marking, as Stephen Bann has noted, the famiIy’s smooth ‘passage from yeoman to gentle status'.‘7 While travelling abroad John Bargrave was particularly aware of the public potency of his status as an English gentleman, ensuring that the family crest was prominently incorporated into two portraits of him painted at Rome and Siena. In his lirench travel diary (Canterbury Cathedral Archives, U1 U8) John Bargrave also recorded how in Oet— obcr 1645 at Bourges he and his charges, were then studying under the language master, Monsieur Mondon: It is the Coustome in France for gentlemen to give either theire armcs or name, or both, to the severall Masters of excersice. Which Monsciur Mondon my Master of the language desiring of mee, hee left a handsome booke with mee wherein were diverse coates and names, in which I writt as followes. (fol. 44*‘) The resulting coat of arms, which Bargrave proudly sketched into Monsieur Mondon’s album - and then took the trouble to copy into his own diary - powerfully states the dual commitments of an exiled member of the Bargrave family during the mid—l(>4(')s: ‘Fear God. Honour y" King’ (Fig. I). 82 TIIIZ EXILE OF TWO KENTISII ROYALISTS DURING THE ENGLISII CIVII. WAR I gt“ #1§${li’zvu;¢ ' 3 u‘ . = -:5‘ }zh‘:‘.‘éZ~‘&Ii«. fa‘; ~;. la, in *.:(;fiat_r,'rzz-W‘\ ig” llllolii-"X - » ‘.1 7~ ", , A V , .-«'71:/f‘4st /fzinfz. ilflgiegrum, c5}xn'(~ztlsm /1441177! mm ,»2'a.,5<§g.n'»,’l,/‘,1.-’}a; AU‘ " ‘ 1- . :I;( _ /t-I-M &§ ‘YT;/¢”7‘l‘l7n,(l.7?1/Ltd I411’ .4}1q,/‘xi/J. lfc./_(4,»_’-'_7z»; "4/4./((1/e‘ fofigti fir‘! r /_,/T .. _ ‘ 4. / J? ., x 7 .- 1 \ , " v «/}/‘':{.“z .' ‘t g 57 r2z.m_ Fig. I: John Bargrave’s family coat of arms. Canterbury Cathedral Archives. Ul I/8, fol. 44". Reproduced by permission of Canterbury Dean and (‘haptetx 83 MICIIAEI . (Ll. BRENNAN While the family of John Bargrave of Bi/'ron.i' was steadily ascend- ing into the levels of the wealthiest Kentish gentry during the reign of King James I, his younger brother, Isaac (the father of our other traveller, Robert), was enjoying comparable success in securing both court and church preferment. After studies at Pembroke College and Clare Hall, Cambridge, Isaac Bargrave was ordained at Peterborough on l() May 1612.” From April 1616 until July 1618 he served as chaplain to the English ambassador at Venice, Sir Henry Wotton; and on 1 October 1618 he married Elizabeth Dering, a daughter of Wotton’s sister, Elizabeth. Wotton’s influence assisted Isaac in 1622 to a prebend’s position at Canterbury and further honours came his way when he was appointed to the living of St Margaret’s, West.- minster, which involved serving as one of Prince Charles’s personal chaplains. When his brother—in—law, Dean John Boys, died in September 1625, Isaac Bargrave succeeded to his position as Dean of Canterbury Cathedral on 16 October 1625. Soon after his marriage in 1618 Isaac Bargrave had probably taken up residence at Easlry Court in the village of Eastry, where his fourth son Robert (b. 1628) would have spent tnuch of his childhood. With a growing young family to support during the 1620s and 1630s (Isaac and Eli’/.abeth Bargrave had ten children, with four dying in infancy), Isaac proved an active, and sometimes interventionist, Dean of Canterbury but one who usually sought an essentially pragmatic line in matters of church and court politics. Above all, he maintained an unwavering public loyalty to his former royal charge; for example, preaching a sermon from 1 Samuel 15:23 before the king on 27 March 1627 which offered a resolute confirmation of the divine right of kings and (more implic— itly) seemed also to lend its support to the collection of that year’s arbitrary loan.” However, following the opening of the Long Parliament on 30 November 1640, Isaac Bargrave experienced a series of rapid and ultimately fatal shifts in his personal fortune. In I641 the Dean and Chapter of the Cathedral had agreed to the sale of some church plate and embroidery ‘for the relief of the poor Irish protestants’. The phrasing of the order was probably drafted by Isaac Bargrave himself and its opening statement left no doubt over his own loyalties: Whereas the bleeding estate of the Kingdom of Ireland together with the lamentable condicon of this Kingdome of England do call for the help and assistance of all his Maiesty's loyall and obedient subjects, We the Dean and Chapter being willing to expresse ourselves therein according to the utmost of our power ".2" Soon afterwards a bill for the abolition of the deans and chapters was 84 'I'HIL EXILE 01’ TWO KENTISH ROYAI.IS'l'S DURING 'l‘l-IE I-ENGLISH CIVIL WAR introduced to the Long Parliament by Sir Edward Dering, Elizabeth Bargrave’s first cousin (once removed), and Isaac was eventually fined £l,()()() as a prominent member of convocation. Following the failure of the Battle of Petitions it seemed probable that Kent would staunchly support the position of the king. The Commission of Array was set up in the county before the parliamentarian Militia Ordinance and on 16 July 1642 a ‘great meeting’ of several ofthe Kentish gentry families was held at the Deanery at Chartham, one of Dean Bargrave’s houses.'“ The consequences of this meeting for Isaac Bar— grave were catastrophic: in the following month, during the Dean’s absence, Colonel Edwyn Sandys visited Canterbury and in retribution attacked the Deanery, grossly threatening Elizabeth Bargrave and other members of her family. Frustrated at not finding the I)ean himself, Sandys hastened to Gravesend where he caught up with Bargrave, instigating his confinement in the Fleet Prison for three weeks without trial before being released without charge.” Seriously weakened by these experiences, Isaac Bargrave died in January 1643 and was buried in the Lady Chapel at Canterbury. Predictably, the Kentish Rebellion of 1643, following the parlia- mentarian attempt to administer the Covenant in the county, attracted the support of several members of Isaac Bargrave’s own immediate circle. Most notably, his nephew, William Jarvis of Sturry, and Sir Thomas Peyton, whose sister had married in 1635 Robert Bargrave, the son of Isaac’s eldest brother, John (and brother of our traveller, John Bargrave). As the situation steadily worsened in August 1643 Sir Thomas Peyton’s three small children were sent to the relative safety of B/jfrmzs, where Sir Thomas himself joined them in May 1644.“ In the previous year, as already noted, Isaac’s nephew, John Bargrave, had been ejected from his fellowship at Peterhouse, Cain- bridge, on account of his high—church beliefs and, very possibly, simply on account of his kinship with Dean Bargrave. Now bereft of both his Cambridge fellowship and a secure family home in Kent, John Bargrave’s decision to absent himself from England in May 1645 was very probably the result of having no other viable options. It also seems certain that his cousin Robert Bargrave’s own discreet departure abroad in April 1647 with the embassy of Sir Thomas Bendish was primarily motivated by a similar necessity. The King ’.s' Loyal Subjects Although when he left England in May 1645 John Bargrave knew no French, the international language of Latin proved an effective means of communication, especially when inspecting churches and other 85 MICHAEL G. BRENNAN notable civic monuments.“ By the mid—l64()s there was also the expectation that an Englishman arriving at the French capital would be able to make reasonably easy contact with the growing community of English emigrés and fellow travellers who either already resided there or were in transit to other destinations.’--‘ John Bargrave’s account of his first few weeks at Paris confirms just how readily such advice could be found by someone newly arrived in France: lfol. 6"] About 5 at night wee came to Paris. alighted Au Croix de Ferr Rue Saint Martin (the Iron Cross in S‘ Martins streete) but (being directed by young M" Skinner)?“ went to the signe Au Ville Du Venice” in the Foburg ofS' Germins, where the first man I met with was M" James Newinan./l“ who saluted mee by my name: he was then lately come from Rome and the other parts of ltalie. On Saturday t.he last of May l had an opportunity to talke above an howre with the Marquess of Newcastle,” and after that with the Earle of [sparre leftfm‘ rmnml and the Lord German"’ whoe for the memorie of my uncle the Deane of Canterburie used me excee(ling courtcously_ M" Cooly of Trin Coll Camb." was the secretarie to the Lord lfol. 7"] On Sunday I went to S" Richard Browns” lodgings whoe was Agent for his Maiesty of England, where wee had read the English liturgie, and an Eng- lish sermon by M‘ Crowder, chaplaine to the Lord Germie Earle of Yar» mouth:33‘ which being ended, wee received the sacrament in the forme ap- pointed by the Church of England. On this day I melt with Dr Cosins” att the Loover (or Court) whoe is Master of the same Coll: whereof I am a Il116)lll)Cl'tf(<'l(.’le(fl fellow. vi7.. S‘ Pet Coll Cantabrig. On munday the I2 of June I went to visit S" Tliomas Stanly and his l.ady35 [fol. 7"] In the afternoone S" Thomas Stanley and his sonn caryed us to see the Pallace Roy|all'?], the Arsenall (or towre) the Magazine |Alol. 8"] The rest of the weeke was spent in seing the English Nnnnerie, (whctherl ledd the Lady Stanley to Church and there left her and her (laughter) and other places of the City, as the Loouer, the sevcrall bridges, the Twileries, some Colleges &e. The Sorbon, Jesuits &e. On Sunday we had an English sermon at S" R: 'Brownes lp7gings, preached by l)r [s'/mrre I({fI_f'rn‘ nanm] Bishop of l)erry3" In Ireland.’ Apart from providing newly arrived English travellers with help_in finding accommodation and local contacts, the emigre community also circulated among themselves news from back home in England. By September 1645 John Bargrave had travelled from Paris through Epernon, Etampes, Artenay, and Picrrefitte, before arriving at Bourges. There he met: an English gentleman that attended on the Prince of Condie, whoe came to Bourges that day: he said his name was M" Lambrone a Westmorland man, whoe told mee how his Lord the Prince of Condie had heard the state of 86 THE EXlLE OF TWO l(EN'l‘lSH ROYAl,.lS'l‘S l)l..lRlNG THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR England stoode at that time, of which I had not heard a word I0 weeks before. (fol. 35"”) The last events recorded in John Bargrave’s French travel diary are dated February 1646 when he was resident at Orléans, having left Bourges on 31 January after a residence there of some eight months (fol. 64"). Although no written account" of his experiences during the next year is known, it is known from John Raymond”s Itin(.'rur_v that their party continued their perambulation southwards through France before crossing by sea from Antibes to Genoa.3"“ They must have been resident at Siena some time before Robert Bargrave met up with them in the early—summer of 1647 since Robert was certainly aware oftheir presence there (although he does not specify how) as soon as he himself had landed at Leghorn: Being arrivtl, & having a nett Porrcnt from England touching our health. we soon had prattick & went to Shoare; but having no acquaintance there of mine own, his Lordship very kindly ordred me handsom accomodation, as for one of his own retinue: Yet out of my Ambition for the Language, as to see my Cousins mr John Bargrave. & mr John Raymond then at Sienna, l put my Viaticum in my purse; & all alone adventurd thither, which is about 80: miles within the land. (fol. 6")” While Robert Bargrave was undoubtedly a much less experienced man than his older cousin John, both self—consciously presented themselves abroad as members of the dispossessed royalist gentry forced to earn a living overseas. While John had lost his Cambridge fellowship, Robert had lost his father and. with him. a previously secure and prominent position in Kent society. As he sailed out to the Levant aboard the London, he considered it important. enough to note in the very first sentence of his travel diary that he had joined the party of ‘Sir Thomas Bendyshe, with a double Commission as well from K. Charles then reigning as the Parliament then sitting, t.o suc- ceed Sir Sackvile Crow in the Embassy at Constantinople”.’"’ Robert‘s pointed reference to Bendish’s ‘double Commission’ implies a clear awareness of the complexity of an English ambassador’s position in I647. Bendish himself had already suffered greatly for the royalist cause through his close association with the Kentish Petition of 26 July I642 that sought to establish a peaceful solution to the disputes between the Crown and Parliament. Instead, Bendish found himself serving two years in the Tower and had his estates in Essex sequestrated.“ When he was released in 1644 he was fined £800 and banished from his home county, although these restraints were lifted in 1646 and soon followed by his appointment as English Ambassador to the Porte. While retaining his credibility with King 87 M l("liAl£I. (I. BRENNAN 88 Fig. 2: Mattio Bologninfs portrait of John Bargrave (centre). Alexander Chapman. and John Raymond. Canterbury Cathedral Archives. MS Lit E16. fol. 77’. Reproduced b y permission of Canterbury Dean and Chapter. 'I‘IIE EXILE OF TWO KI:'N'I‘ISll R(,)YAI,IS'I'S DURING THE ENGLISH CIVII. WAR Charles I, and ultimately returning to England in honour after the Restoration of King Charles II, Bendish’s experiences between I642 and 1646 taught him a harsh lesson about the power of Parliament and the need to be circumspect in how he presented his support for the rnonarehy."’- As Robert Bargrave records in his diary, Sir Thomas Bendish, who travelled out to Turkey with his wife, eldest son, and five daughters, was Itimsell, in accepting the embassy to Constan- tinople, also undertaking - like John and Robert Bargrave — a form ot‘ political and personal exile from England. While at Siena with John Raymond and Alexander Chapman, John Bargrave commissioned a painting in oils on copper of the three of them together by a (presumably) local artist, I\/Iattio Bolognini (Fig. 2).“ John Bargrave stands at the centre 01’ the picture with his family arms clearly hung from a wall behind them and his two young charges on either side of him. They each hold with one hand a large map of Italy while John Bargrave, cast in the role of instructor, points to Siena as the centre of their intellectual and cultural pursuits. On an obvious level relating to their travels, the portrait endows itself with a provenance by literally indicating a particular point of geographical progress. But also, more implicitly, it may be read as a representation ofthree displaced Kentish exiles coming to terms with their asylum in a foreign country. In this sense, Bargrave’s linger points not just to a trave|Ier’s chosen destination but also to an especially peaceful and provincial Italian location where an English stranger fleeing civil dissent at home could happily dwell in exile. As John Raymond him- sell‘ notes in his Itinerary, Siena was then renowned for its hospitality to strangers and its natives were: very curteous, a great deale suiting to the humours oi" foreigners, and be- sides the purity of the Italian language, is here protest, and spoken, these and the like conveniences make it much frequented by Travellers, and indeed mov’d us to settle our selves there, for some Moneths In a word, I found Siemzu the most eommodious place a stranger could pick out to live retiredly, and make his time beneliciall.“ Although Robert Bargrave was only in the company ot‘John Bargrave and John Raymond for some three weeks, it is clear from his own travel diary, which describes several of the sights and buildings as detailed by Raymond in his Itinerary, that both the memory of their meeting and Raymond’s volume were very much in his mind as his compiled his own accounts of Siena and Florence in Bodleian Library MS Rawlinson C 79‘). It is even possible that Robert’s need as a tourist in 1647 for basic information about such locations as Siena and Florence first prompted John Bargrave and John Raymond to pen 8‘) MICHAEL G. BRENNAN their invaluable guide for inexperienced English travellers in Italy.“ However, when it reached print in I648 Raymond’s volume no longer merely presented itself as an innocent handbook for those interested in Italian geography and culture. It opened with a fulsome dedication to ‘the Most Illustrious Prince Charles, Prince of Great Britaine’: It is humbly conceiv’d the duty of all the youth of F.NGl,.AN[) to dedicate themselves and their endeavours to your HIGI-INESSE: not only in regard of your Native but Acquired Greatnesse. which drawes the eyes of all Good Men upon Your I-IIGHNESSE Person and Actions. This Sir Makes me humbly beg leave to lay my first fruits at Your HIGIINESSE feet, which (without farther Presumption) is the utmost Ambition of Your Highnesse most humble and most faithfully devoted John Raymond (sigs. A3”—A4')“‘ In his preface immediately following this dedication, Raymond claimed: ‘My intention was to confine this wanderer to my Closet and no farther, till the advice of some familiar, and command of Superior Friends prest mee to exchange a single Manuscript for more Numer- ous Prints’ (sigs. A4" "). It seems particularly strange, then, that the name of his relative, tutor. and friend, John Bargrave, was not given at least some gracious mention in the preliminaries. Unless, of course. it was John Bargrave himself who explicitly desired that any references to the Bargrave family should be suppressed in the printed version. It seems feasible that Bargrave might have wished to protect his young charge from any public association with either himself, effectively a figure banished from Cambridge in disgrace, or his uncle, Dean Isaac Bargrave, driven from a position of prestige at Canterbury to tin early death on account of his loyalty to the king. Furthermore, as Stephen Bann has explained, the fact that the Iliiwrnry was ‘prefaced by a highly inflammatory pro—Royalist statement, by the Cavalier propa- gandist. and exile John Berkenhead, is sufficient proof that it was not simply being published as an innocent travelogue’. Berkenhead, writing of Arniens, addressed the reader of Raymond’s Itinerary with an unequivocal gesture of loyalty to the beleaguered monarchy. He began his comments with the quip that such a guidebook was ‘use- fully done, since now so many of us are doom’d to wander, not like Cain for drawing blood, but for asking Peace’. He then offered both actual travellers and the armchair reader of Raymond‘s volume a memorable dissection of the dislocated state of England in I648: Now you are come home, you’l have stranger sights then any abroad; you‘l see Grml BriImim> a Floating l.v/and, and the most vcrtuous M()l1(ll‘('/I 90 TIIE EXILE OF TWO KF.N'l‘lSl’l R(f)YALlS'I‘S DURING THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR under lleaven cast into a small Isle as on some plank in a great Ship—wrack Sir, when you behold a Kingdome without a King, a Church without Clergy, a University without Scholars, you'l grant wee have a r/wrong/1 It’r'_/bnriatimr. But two houres since I saw a better sight then Italy affords; ‘tis His Highnesse the Prince of Wales, who for Soule and Body is sure the most hopefull Prince in the Christian World; whose comming hether this afternoone brings a flood ofbusinesse (as well as joy) on all the English in this Towne. lpp. I l~l2] Through its printed preliminaries John Raymond’s Itinerary was. in effect, translated from a mere travelogue to a l’ulI—bIown statement of pro—royalist propaganda of especial appeal to those Englishmen driven abroad by their loyalty to the king.“ Furthermore. with l1ind— sight there is something disturbingly sombre about the coupling in the opening pages of the Itinerary of the young Raymond’s hopeful dedication and the older Birkenhead’s satiric prefatory address, both of which insistently depict Prince Charles as the real hope for the future, a tacit (and perhaps not even entirely conscious) admission of the impotence of the king’s own position in early I648 (following the vote of ‘No Addresses’ by Parliament in January and the outbreak of the Second Civil War in April). The Kentish Rebellion of 1648 was a far more extensive affair than that of I643 and is generally regar(led as the last great local insur~ rection in English history. Sir Thomas Peyton, along with the Bargraves of Brjfrmm, Sir Ilenry Palmer (who had married Isaac Bar— grave’s widowed daughter, Anne), and several other influential local families, led support for the petition in their neighbourhood. As negotiations proceeded at Dover. the fleet then anchored in the Downs suddenly declared their allegiance to Kent and the king. Their mutiny had been encouraged by Sir Ilenry Palmer. a former naval officer, and by his close associates, Robert and Richard Bargrave, the elder brothers of Isaac. ’almer and Robert Bargrave. were among those who flatly turned down Parliament’s attempts to resolve the situation peaceably and in the second week oflune they crossed over to Holland to secure Dutch support. They returned in July I648, according to one report with L500 Dutchmen, just as the revolt in Sussex finally erupted/"‘ By December, however, the tide had turned against them and on It December I648 Robert Bargrave and Sir Henry Palmer, having fled abroad, were obliged to confess their involvement ‘in the late commotion in Kent’ and sought permission from the Committee for Compounding to return to England.” Six weeks later. however, on 30 January I649 ParIiament‘s monu- mentally dramatic gesture at Whitehall of the execution of King Charles Iconfirmed the irrevocable dislocation ofthe Bargraves from 9] lV1lCHAl£l. G. BRENNAN tlteir former world of family prosperity and public patronage. Robert Bargrave ol’ Bzfrmzs (the elder brother of our John Bargrave the traveller) also died in l649 and Sir Thomas Palmer’s estates were sequested in l65l.5° One Tltomas Bargrave of Eastry, almost cert- ainly the elder brother of the diarist Robert, had also been involved in the rebellion of the fleet, as the entry in the Calendar ofthe Commit- lecfm‘ (fmiipoiuzdi/zg makes clear: ‘|Thomas l3argrave:] Compounds for delinquency. Was captain of a frigate in the Prince’s fleet, in the last summer’s engagement at sea against Parliament. 9 August 164‘). Fine £5935‘ ‘(he deplm‘z,zble Tragedie 0f0m' King in England’ When news of the execution of the king finally reached Const- antiitople, Robert Bargrave had been itt exceptionally good spirits, 3 Thane! Harbledown o .(:antel-bury , Sandwich Chamham ' ‘ ' Patrixboume - Eastry Bridge T h e Bifrons , D 0 w n s Eythorne ‘ Pluckley Map. l. liast Kent locations mentioned in the text 92 THE liXll.l7. 01"‘ TWO KENTJSJI ROYAl,lS'l‘S DURING Tllli ENGLISH CIVIL WAR having just been involved, as a break frotn cotntnercial concerns, in the staging of ‘two or three Comedies, with the reward of great Applause: Nor was our whole Conversation other then a various Scene of Mirth’ (fol. 13“). Suddenly, ‘the Tide of our Joy, turnd into a Streame of Grief first by the deplorable Tragedie of our King in England’ (fol. I4‘), compounded by the death by drowning of Sir Thomas Bendish’s eldest son, Thomas, when his ship, the Talent, on its way to Jerusalem was attacked by a French boat.” ()tt his third voyage, Robert Bargrave’s ship picked up at the Morea another member of the Raymond family, Thomas ((7. l6l0-c. 1681), an almost exact contemporary of John Bargrave, who was either a brother or cousin of John Raymond. This Thomas Raymond’s autobiography has fortunately survived (Bodleian Library MS Rawlinson D l 150), and it indicates that he knew well the family of Dean Isaac Bargrave and had been accustomed during the 1630s to visiting them at C2ll1lCl'blll'y.53 Thomas Raymond’s response to the royal execution was as ltorrified as Robert Bargrave’s. In his autobiography, most (if not all) of which was probably penned after the Restoration, Thotnas Raymond recalled, with undisguised delight, one telling incident: Soone after ottr tttost gratious King Charles the First was by hellish mis- creants sonnes of Belial put to death, it was my chance to be in London at sermon in St. Mary Alder—Maryes Church, it being death then for any man and especially mittisters to speake in vindication of that good King. The preacher fell to aggravate the great synnes whereof we were guilty and ltaveing instanced itt severall greate and crying ones, ‘Nay,’ said he, ‘wee have put to death ottr King, our most gracious and good King’ — at which he made a little pause (the people amazed and gazing aboute expecting the preacher should be pulled ottt of the pulpitt) but he added — ‘the Lord Jesus Christ by our sinncs and transgression’.5“ Similarly, in his notes to the portrait of Cardinal Bernardino Spada, John Bargrave recorded how Dr Gibbs, an English physician at Rome in the retinue of this cardinal, had given him a Latin hexastichon, which Bargrave pointedly translated attd added sometime after 1662 to his College of (frmlina/s — as one of the very few items of verse included in this collection: Of the King of l£ngland’s Death, and the Kingdom Turned into a Republic. An Epigram of Cardinal Spada’s. The axe is for the private subjects’ necks, And not for kings. O horrid monstrous sects! The kingdom with the king in sunder’s cut, As front the other world the island’s shut. That Commonwealth with ill birds doth begin, Where th’axe is made by them a common things” 93 MICHAEL G. BRENNAN Such resolutely condemrratory (but, of course, post—Restoratiorr) com- ments by the Bargraves and Raymonds also raise the issue of exactly when Robert Bargrave compiled the Bodleiarr Library Rawlirrson C 799 manuscript of his travels between 1647 and 1656. The metic- ulously written manuscript was clearly intended as a ‘fair copy’, presumably drawn together from either an earlier draft or compiled from various notes and diary records jotted down during his four voyages. If the Bodleian Library polished draft of these memoirs were written up as a purely private document soon after his return home to England in March 1656, then Robert’s frequent gestures of royalist devotion may simply be regarded as an honest — but also potentially risky ~ committing to paper of his personal adherences in the period either immediately before or during the second Protect- orate Parliament (September l656—June 1657). Brit if, as is entirely possible and perhaps more likely, he compiled the manuscript in the months immediately after the Restoration of King Charles II, then his account of his travels may also be regarded as an implicit attempt to document early in the new reign his own personal credentials as a loyal royalist and man of international affairs. Whatever the case, one of the most. noticeable aspects of Robert Bargrave’s diary is its insistent commemoration of its author’s personal contacts with emigre royalists during his travels. Through- out his European travels. he enjoyed a privileged access to exiled members of Charles ll’s entourage and to former supporters of King Charles I. At Danzig, for example, he was lrospitably entertained by George Cock. formerly treasurer to William Cavendish, later Duke of Newcastle (fol. 79"). While at Ilarnburg he met up with his cousin, Charles Dering, a member of another staunchly royalist Kentish family (fol. 86"); and at Madrid he struck up a friendship with ‘Col- orrell Waters’ (fol. 147") who, from his title and presence in Spain, was almost certainly another royalist exile. But the first of what were Robert. Bargrave’s two most important meetings with royal emigrés took place at The Hague in February I653 where he met Elizabeth, Queen of Bohemia (the daughter of King James I); the renowned Lady Jane Lane, who had assisted Charles II in his escape from England, disguised as her manservarrt, after the Battle of Worcester in I65]; and Lady Stanhope, Catherine Kirkhoven (d. 1667), formerly the governess ofCharles I’s eldest daughter, Mary, the Princess Royal. In l64l Princess Mary had married William. son of Frederick Henry, Prince of Orange, and her court had become an important focus of support for Charles II and his brother, James, until contact was forbidden by the Dutch States on the outbreak of the war between England and Holland in 1652. Lady Stanlrope, ‘the greatest Beauty 94 THE EXILIE OF TWO KENTISH R()YAl.lS'l‘S DURING 'l‘l~lli ENGI.lSl'l CIVIL WAR there”, as Robert Bargrave admiringly calls her, had only recently returned to The Hague, after being arrested and tried in England on account of her royalist connections (fols. 94""). On his fourth and last journey in March I656 Bargrave arrived at Heidelberg, where he was warmly welcomed at the court of Elizabeth of I3ohernia"s son. the Palsgrave Charles Louis, who introduced Bargrave to various members of his own family, including his re- nowned brother, Prince Rupert and his sisters, Elizabeth and Sophia (fols. 185"—l86"). Ileidelberg was the capital of the Rhine Palatinate and, as Bargrave records in his diary, the contact enjoyed by his father, Isaac, with the court of Frederick and Elizabeth at Heidelberg in 1616 was fondly recalled by the Palsgrave himself: /\l’ler church, the (lay following our arrivall, I was sent for to the Palsgrave, when having all of us kissed his hands, he honourd me with about an howres discourse after which the Palsgrave, with Prince Rupert, and the Palsgraves Sonn, his Princess (daughter to the Landtgrave van Iless) to- gether with Princess Eli‘/.abeth and Pr'irreess Sophia (his Sisters) sate doune to Dinner: Being sett, by the Palsgraves order I was rrrade sitt at the table with them; when the Palsgrave soon ask’d rrre if I were related to Doctor Bargrave dean of Canterbury; which having heard from me, he straight after drank to me. and discoursed with me much of dinner time. (f. 185") This conversation, which continued after dinner, provided one of the highlights of Robert Bargrave’s journey home from Venice to Eng- land. The Palsgrave Charles Louis freely expressed his affection for the Bargrave family, and after hearing about Robert‘s earlier exper- iences in Turkey. requested (perhaps somewhat disappointingly for Robert Bargrave who may have been hoping for a more politically relevant commission from the Palsgrave) ‘a description of the great Turkes Seraglio’ (f. I86’). Robert was clearly deeply moved by the hospitality shown to him at Heidelberg and by how the memory of his father. Dean Isaac Bargrave, was still honoured within this /\nglo— (lerman royal family. On departing Heidelberg, he neatly expressed his sentirrrerrts in the Latin epithet: ‘Qzmm I’azelix es], virtuoso Patri Filius, case’ (‘How happy it is to be the son t.o [i.e. of] a virtuous father’). It was especially poignant that such a patriarchal benefit could, of course, now only be enjoyed by Robert Bargrave abroad. The rest of the party’s journey home was largely uneventful. Leaving Heidelberg on I() March, they arrived at Frankfurt on the following day, passed through Mainz on the l2 March, and hoped to reach Cologne by the next evening. But bad weather restricted movement on the Rhine and they were forced to put up overnight in a small unnamed village: ‘where the only enjoyment we had, was to lodge in the house where the King ofEngland, the Duke of Yorke and 95 MICHAEL G. BRENNAN Prince Rupert had all lodged but newly before us’ (fol. 188‘). Robert Bargrave’s pointed emphasis here on naming Charles as ‘the King of England’, whether written in I656 or 1660, is entirely unequivocal. Four days later, he visited Henry Stewart, Duke of Gloucester and Earl of Cambridge (the third surviving son of King Charles I), who was then resident at Cologne with Sir Gilbert Talbot and Admiral Sir John Mennes, the commander of Charles l’s navy in 1645 (fols. I89”). Still hampered by bouts of bad weather, they headed on through Dtisseldorf, Wesel, Rheinbcrg, Rees, Emmerich and Nijmegen, reaching Dordrecht on 24 March. From there they made rapid prog- ress to Flushing, where Bargrave agreed terms with a Captain Bun- ker, the commander of a convoy ship, for his party’s passage to Eng- land. They reached Thanet on 29 March 1656 and braved inountain— ous seas in a small landing craft so as to hasten their family reunions. The l§argmve.\' am! the Restorati()n On this final journey home, prior to his visit to the court of the Palsgrave Charles Louis at Heidelberg, Robert Bargrave had visited Augsburg. He was both surprised and delighted to meet up with his cousin, John Bargrave, and his young charge, William Juxon, who were then resident there. Once again acting as Robert’s travel guide, John Bargrave filled the next three days by taking him to see the great Fuggerhaus at Augsburg, the city’s watermills and fountains, and various displays of fine local metalwork. In particular both men were fascinated by intricate examples of the ‘incomparable watchwork’ produced by the skilled craftsmen of the city. Together they pored over various mechanical musical boxes, miniature orchestras, and, most remarkable of all, a mechanical coach ‘which by Engines with- inside, (governed by those who sitt in it) has been driven round the Streets of Agosta, so that it seemd to the Spectators to goe of its own accord’ (fol. 182""). Regretfully leaving ‘the enjoyment of m" Juxon & my Cousin mr Bargmvex Company’, Robert Bargrave and his party pressed on to Ulm, which they reached on 5 March. Sadly, this may have been the last time that the two men were able to meet. Between his return to England in March 1656 and the accession of King Charles II on 29 May 1660, Robert probably spent some time either at Canterbury or at one of the Bargraves’ Kentish residences, such as Eastry Court or Btf'rort.s'.5“ His career prospects were signific- antly enhanced by his appointment at some point before the Restor- ation as personal sccretary to Heneage Finch, second Earl of Winchil- sea ( I 628-89). For several years, Winchilsea had been a powerful force among Kentish royalists and his loyalty was rapidly rewarded by King 96 THE EXILE OF TWO KENTISII ROYALISTS DURING TIIE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR Charles II with the Lord—Lieutenancy of the county, the Wardenship of the Cinque Ports, and finally the embassy to Constantinople. On 20 October 1660 Winchilsea sailed from the Downs on the Plymouth, along with two Levant Company ships, the Prosperous and the Smyrna Factor. Also on board the Plymouth was Winchilsea’s new private secretary, Paul Ryeaut, and Robert Bargrave himself, who at the age of thirty—two had recently been appointed (probably through Winchil- sea’s influence) as the new secretary in Constantinople. The holder of this post, a position of considerable prominence and responsibility in Turkey, was elected by the general court of the company in London and received the then considerable salary £l5() a year. Bargrave’s major duty would have been to serve as chancellor of the company’s factory at Constantinople but his new role was also of no small diplomatic im- portance since he would have been expected to deputi'/.e for Winchil- sea, in the case of the ambassador’s absence, illness, or death. Robert Bargrave, as he embarked from the Downs with his wife Elizabeth, must have held high hopes for a long and distinguished career in commercial and public service. Through his appointment as Secretary at the Porte, his branch of the family seemed well on their way back to a restitution of their former fortunes and privileged royal connections during the reign of King Charles I. But as the Plymouth finally arrived at Smyrna for the Christmas and New Year season of l660—l, Robert Bargrave was laid low by a severe fever and was too ill to travel on to Constantinople. He was left behind in the care of his wife but his subsequent death was reported on 9 February l66l to Winchilsea, then safely arrived at Constantinople, in a brief note jotted down among other business and political memoranda from the English Consul at Smyrna, Richard Baker: Your servant in" Bargravc is dead & buryed at Santa Venaranda whither wee all accompanied him; his wife most disconsolate & to be admired for her love & care of him.57 Paul Ryeaut was appointed in June 1661 to Bargrave’s Seeretaryship and for the next six years held this post in tandem with his own as private secretary to the ambassador. The Earl of Winchilsea had come to Constantinople to take over the embassy from the retiring ambassador, Sir Thomas Bendish, who boarded the Plymouth on 7 March for his return journey to England. Accompanying him was Robert Bargrave’s widow, Elizabeth, beginning her sad journey back home to Kent. If she had with her a copy of her late husband’s travel diary and perhaps sometimes browsed through it as a means of occupy- ing the hours during the long sea voyage home, she would have been touched by the sad contrast in their respective seajourneys across the 97 MICHAEL G. BRENNAN Mediterranean in the company of Sir Thomas Benclish. Just as Robert in l647 had first sailed out to Turkey on board the Londorz, accompanied by the entourage of ambassador Bendish. who was then on his way out to take up his new embassy at Constantinople, so in 1661 Robert’s widow, returning in mourning, found herself travel- ling home with Sir Thomas at the end of his long service in 'l‘u1‘key.5“ John Bargrave was more fortunate than his cousin. Robert. in having some two decades after the Restoration during which to enjoy some of the fruits of the Bargrave family’s unwavering loyalty to the monarchy. In his Col/(%gt* of C'ardinnls at the bottom of the publisher’s Latin dedication to Pope Alexander Vll, Bargrave wrote in 1662: The College of Cardinalls when l was my fourth and laste tyme at Rome, l being then there when King Charles the Second was restored to his three crownes, and to my knowledge to the great greife of that triple crowne and that college. whoe thought to have binn masters of England, I660.” Following this joyful news, he seems to have made his way rapidly back to England, determined to secure some of the rewards which, with ample reason, he felt were due to himself and his family name. By 2 August 1660 his fellowship at Peterhouse had been recovered and in the following November he was recommended, by royal mandate, for the degree of l)octor of Divinity. On 23 December he was ordained to the priesthood by Bishop Sanderson of Lincoln at the Barbican Chapel, London. Now qualified for prcferment in the Church, and doubtless through Archbishop Juxon’s personal patron- age, John Bargrave was appointed as a preacher at Canterbury Cathedral. He was also presented to the rectory of llarbledown in September 1661 and to Pluckley in .luly 1662. But one more prefer- ment still remained in the restoration of the Bargraves to their former position of pre—eminence at Canterbury Cathedral.“" In May 1662 John Bargrave personally petitioned King Charles II for the position of a prebend at Canterbury. The exact phrasing of this document, recalling Bargrave’s personal loyalty to the king and sufferings for his allegiance to the established church, is particularly evocative of his history as an exiled royalist: To the Kings Most Excellent Majestie. The humble petition of John Bargrave, D.D.. llumbly sheweth, That there being a Prebcndaries Place in y“ Cathedrall Church of Can- terbury now voyd by y" death of Doctor Paske. and your petitioner being of knowne loyalty to your Majestic and a true sone of y“ Church of England, for which he hath beene a great sufferer, Most humbly prayes that your Majestic wilbc gratiously pleased to conferr the said Prebendarics place upon him.“ 98 THF. EXILE OF TWO KENTISH R()YAl.lS'l'S DURING Till‘: lSNGLlSll ClVll. WAR This application, supported by Gilbert Sheldon, Bishop of London. was successful and on 26 September l662, in what must have been an especially poignant moment, John Bargrave was indttcted into the fifth stall which had previously been occupied by his uncle, Isaac Bargrave, before his elevation to the Deanery. The Bargrave family"s wealth. however, could not be regained by a mere prebend of Canterbury and John Bargrave’s family home, Bifrons, was sold to Sir Arthur Slingsby towards the end of I661. as recorded by Henry Oxinden, a long—time neighbour and friend of the family: ‘Bifrons, a house that was my brother Bargrave’s. beside Bridge hill, was lately sold".“3 From i662 John Bargrave’s home, which he held for life, was his prebendal lodgings at the Cathedral. Before settling into his new duties he undertook one more major trip abroad — but this time at the personal request of his king. A petition had been presented to King Charles II on behalf of some three hun- dred British subjects held in captivity at Algiers and, following a widespread appeal, some ;l;' l 0,()()() had been raised to pay their ransom from captivity. John Bargrave and John Selleck, Archdeacon of Bath, were instructed in a licence dated l6 September I662, to go to Algiers and to negotiate the release of as many captives as their gold could buy. With this mission completed by January I663, John Bargrave made his way back to Canterbury. ll appears that a significant number of slaves were released and Bargrave made a gift of a picture. drawn by an Italian slave, to ‘his Ma"“ Charles the Second. who hanged it in his private cl.oset’.“-‘ Two years later on 26 March 1665, John Bar— grave, then aged about 55 years, married a financially well—endowed Canterbury widow, Frances Osborne. With his personal and eccles- iastical life now secure, one of John Bargrave‘s final acts as the guardian of the Bargraves’ family history was to set up in I679 an imposing memorial to Dean Isaac Bargrave in the Lady Chapel. with a painted portrait, probably taken during his lifetime, set into the cartouche. attributed to Cornelius Janssen (Johnson). This memorial, along with the 1663 memorial slab in Patrixbournc Church, reiterates John Bargrave’s interpretation of the family’s dual identity as mar— tyrs through their loyalty to their monarch and the true church.“" Less than a year later, on 1 I May 1680, John Bargrave died and was buried in the northwest transept of the Cathedral. Through their various writings, John and Robert Bargrave both found a means of recording their pre—oceupations with royalist history and the fate of their own family, along with preserving their personal reputations as well—travelled men of the world. lt is important to reiterate here that their various written records of travels and royal service span the period both before and after the Restor- 99 l\/IICIIAEI. G. BRENNAN ation. Jolm Bargrave’s French travel diary was clearly compiled on a day-to-day basis during his actual travels in 1645 and 1646. Jolm Raymond’s Itinerary was also written and published, almost cert- ainly using .IoIm Bargrave’s own notes, in late-I647 and I648. In con- trast, John Bargrave’s College of(,‘arditzal.i' and the catalogue to his collections were steadily augmented from the Restoration until 1679, the year before John Bargrave’s death. Robert Bargrave’s travel diary was probably written up from contemporaneous notes JUSI alter the Restoration, perhaps to mark his appointment as Secretary in Con- stantinople. This was a position ofenough seniority, certainly to Rob- ert Bargrave’s own eyes at least, to merit the compilation of a bio- graphical history of the youthful experiences abroad of its holder. At the same time, Robert was also able to confirm through these inem— oirs his pedigree as an ultra-loyal royalist and as member of proud Kentish family who had suffered greatly for their king during the English Civil War. If he had not suddenly died at Smyrna in.I66l,_1t seems very likely that Robert would have intended to continue his activities as a writer and historian. In fact, this role seems to have been appropriated by the individual who (innocently) gained most from Robert Bargrave’s death - Paul Ryeaut - who was rapidly appointed to Bargrave’s company secretaryship and for the next six years held this post in tandem with his own as private secretary.to the ambassador. During the next four decades Rycaut established himself as one of EngIand’s most important and prolific historians.“° Although neither John nor Robert Bargrave deserved to be ranked alongside Paul Ryeaut in terms of the academic importance of their historical writings, their written records remain a full and often moving testa- ment to the sufI‘erings of the Bargrave family of Kent. during the English Civil War. ACKN()Wl,EDGI:'MEN'I'S The author is very grateful to Dr M. M. N. Stansfield, former Archivist Canterbury Cathedral Archives, and to Sonia Anderson, Assistant Keeper, Historical Manuscripts Commission, for their advice and assistance during his work on the Bargrave family. N(‘)’l‘ES I John Bargrave had matriculated from St l’eter‘s C<>llUls"3 lP¢l°"l‘“u5Cl 0” 3 Jul)’ I629 and was awarded BA (I633) and MA (I636) before being elected a fellow (1637). I 00 THE EXILE OF TWO KENTISII ROYALISTS DURING Tllli ENGLISII CIVIL WAR 2 See Stephen Bann, Um/er the Sign. John Bttrgruve as (7nlletrtar, Traveler, am! Wit- ne.r.s' (Ann Arbor, I994), 46, for John Bargrave’s statement that as a pupil at the King's School, Canterbury, he used to spend weekends at the (‘harthznn deanery, one of Dean Isaac l3argrave’s residences. * Robert. I3argrave’s account of his meeting with John Bargrave in Italy is recorded in ‘[711; Travel 1)i'ury of Robert ltvtrgruve, Levant Mercltant I647-1656, ed. Michael G. Brennan, The Ilakluyt Society, 3rd series, no. 3 (London, I999), 15-18, 60-5. 4 Cliapman may have beeneitherthc son or nephew ofAIexanderChapman(d. I629), formerly a prebendary of (Tanterbury. In his French travel diary (Canterbury (.‘athedraI Archive, Ill I/8), John Bargrave describes John Richards as ‘Young Mr Riekad St‘ Peter Rickads sonii ()f Kent in England’ (fol. 26V). This individual was probably, John, the third surviving son of Sir Peter Ryeaut, who was knighted by Charles I in I64l and held extensive estates in Kent. Another of his sons, Paul (I629-I700), travelled with Robert Ilargrave to the Levant in I661. Sec Sonia I’. Anderson, /In Euglls/1 (.‘mi.rul in ’['1u‘/li.rtm'y ns 25 (I940-I), 14-24; and Anderson, An Etiglish Comrul, 21-4, 248-9. 5 Philip Stanhope (l633—l7l3) succeeded his giandfather, Philip (I584-I656) as Earl of (‘.hestcrfieId. In his Pope Alexa/tdet‘ the Seventh and the College 0./'CurtIitial.r, ed. by James Craigie Robertson, Camden Society 92 (I867), I I, I6, Bargrave records how Queen Henrietta Maria, then in exile at Paris, wrote a letter of recorninendation for him to Cardinal Capponi at Rome and another to her sister, the Duchess of Savoy, at 'I‘ut‘in, who wrote on Bai'grave’s behalf to Cardinal I’an'/.irola. ‘’ In his Pope Alexa/itler, ed. Robertson, II—I2, John Bargrave describes this indi- vidual as ‘now Sir William Swan, baronct’ and the son—in-law of Sir Thomas Peyton, Another of I’eyton’s daughters, Elizabeth, married Robert Bargrave, the eldest brother of our traveller, John Bargrave. 7 For further details ofJohn Bargrave’s travels, see Pope /I/exu/zder, ed. Robertson, x-xi, xx-xxii; John Sloye, lftiglixlt 'I'rctve[ler.\' /lbmud I605-I667. 'l'lieir Itifluemrc in Euglilrh Smziety m1t[I’olitlr.‘.i‘ (Revised Edition, New Haven and London, 1989), 135-6, 15 I, I61-3', Bann, Umlcrt/te Sign, 63-98; and Tire 'I'mvel Diary of Robert lirirgmve, ed. I3J‘ennan, I5-I7, 3|, 36, 50-I, 60-5. 8 See Bann, Undert/1eSigtz, 3-7, 74-6, 82-3, and David Sturdy and Martin Ilenig, 'l'Ite Getttle 'I'ruvel/rrr. .Ir)lI/I Burgmve, (‘ntwu o,/'Catilerbiiry aria’ }it'.s' (.'0lle<,'tt'tm (Canterbury, I985). 9 Anthonya Woocl,/ltlteitae ()xotziett.res '1'!) IVh1u/zAt'eAa'zled, The /"a.s‘ti0rAit/tul.s', oft/re Salt! I/niverslty to the Year 1690, 2 vols (London, I691-2), II, col. 828. Ray- niond’s Ititiemly is also commonly known as ll Mercurin Itallcu from the phrase used on its illustrated frontispieee. After the Restoration its popularity among English travellers to Italy was superseded by Edmund Wareup’s, Italy, in iI.\' ()riginal Glory, Rititie and Revival (I660). I“ For Jolui Ilargrave’s possible role in compiling the Itt'rterury, see Pope Alexander, ed. Robertson, xxi; Sturdy and Henig, The Gentle Traveller, item (b); and Bann, Under the Sigtt, I()7—II3, 132. H The autograph manuscript ofRobei't Bargrave’s travels (MS Rawlinson C 799) was deposited in the Ilodleiau Library, Oxford, as part ofthe bequest of Richard Rawlinson in I756. Another, now lost manuscript of these travels was at l;'a.i'try Court near Sandwich, Robert Bargrave’s childhood home, until at least the mid-1830s. See The 'l'rui.'el Diary uflfnherl Bargruve, ed. Brennan, 43-5 I. IOI MICHAEL G. BRENNAN 1")‘ Isaac Bargrave was presumably in attendance on I4 .lune I625 when his brother-in-law, John Boys, as Dean of Canterbury preached in the cathedral before Charles I and I-Ienrictta Maria. who had landed only two (lays previously at Dover, Bann. Unn’er_1l1e Sign, 30-], examines the links between the the Boys and I-Iargrave families. 13 The Travel !)inry 0_/‘lt’nb('rt Bargmve. ed. Brennan, I, 7-I0. M Pope /\f(’,\T(ltI(1(’t', ed. Robertson. 89. Bann. Under the Sign, I2. '5 ‘Stetit ct cecidit FAMILIA Iohan Haercs a ruinis in Ruinas lapide posuit An: D'“ M DC LXIII’. The memorial is translated and reproduced in Bann, I/mim'tlz(»Sigt1, 25, and figure 7. l(’ The early history ofthe Bargrave family is examined in more detail in Bann. Under the Sign, 28-45 and The ’I‘rm/el Dirtry o_/'RoI7ert I3urgmvz*, cd. Brennan, 6-7. See also Philip II. Blake, ‘The Builder of Bifrons'. /lrtrlmeolngirt (fmttiumt, cviii (I990), 270, '7 Bann, l/na'ertlie Sign, 34--5. '3 In I6|4 Isaac Bargrave was appointed as rector of Eythorne, a position which he held until his death in I643. '9 This sermon was printed as /I Serntott I’I'£’(l(.‘/I(’.li Before King (.'Itm‘Ie.s' ( I 627). Isaac Bargrave‘s dealings with Archbishop Laud and other aspects of his church career are examined in The 'I'ruvel Diary r)_/'It’ahert lIm'grav(a, ed. Brennan, 7-I I. See also Stephen Bann’s entry on Isaac Bargrave for the New Dictiotmry of Natimml Biography (forthcoming). The author is grateful to Professor Bann for allowing him to see the typescript of this article. 2" See C. Eveleigh Wootlruff, ‘Church Plate in Kent. Canterbury Cathedral‘, /lt‘CiIll(’- nlogia C(IltIf(llI(I, xxviii (I909), I45--55; and idem ‘Some Seventeenth Century Letters and Petitions from the Munimcnts of the l)can and Chapter of Canterbury’, /\r(:Ima- ologia (fantiumt, xlii (1930), I17. 2' Alan Evcritt, The C()I7lIlItlIliIy of K('tlI and the Great Rr'I)€lIirm, 1640- I660 (Leicester, 1966), I09, citing BL Additional MS 28,000, fol. 213; and M. J. Sparks and E. W. Parkin, ‘The Deanery, Chartliatn‘, An‘/tttmlogirl Cmttimia, lxxxix (I974), I69-82. 37‘ Bann, I/nzier the Sign, 60, recounts how Thomas Bargrave, the l)ean’s son. had his sword broken by Colonel Sandys ‘before his face’ and was placed in confinement at Dover Castle. Angela (Bargrave) Boys, the Dcan’s sister and the widow of Dean Boys, had some gold coins confiscated, although they were later returned. See also Edward lrlastcd, The History and 'l'0pographi(,'ul SIH‘l’(’)7 of the Cotmty of Kent, 4 vols (Can- terbury, l778—99), IV, 593-4; and /I Ilistory of C(II1[Pt‘f)llt'y (‘atlwrlrn/, eds. Patrick Collinson, Nigel Ramsay, and Margaret Sparks (Oxford. I995). I95-6. In August 1642 Colonel Sandys had also arrested Sir Peter Rycaut who ended up in the Tower of London. See Anderson. /tn. Ifnglislt (,‘rm.mI, 2t. 23 Evlzritt, T/W Commmtity of Kent, 190- I. The 0.t'itI(l(’tt and l’eytan I,etter.r 1642-I670. Being the (‘DI'I'(’.\'[1()ll(/(’)I(‘(' of Hmtry (),rim1’cn of Bar/mitt, Sir Thomas Peyton o_/’Ktzr)wltzm rmri their r'irr'l(', ed. Dorothy Gardiner (London, I937). 23-4, 30, 46-9. 24 John Bargrave records, for example, that at Calais he visited the convent of the Minims: ‘Wee being in the Chappcll One of the order (an ancient man) being sweeping of it, came to mee and spake french, but I answered him in Latinc (having not as yet the french Language) he replycd in Latine that I was welcome‘ (fol. 3"). Bargrave‘s ac- rimonious dispute with the Gcrmans, discussed earlier, was also conducted entirely in Latin. As his proficiency in the French language increased, so Bargrave often ‘mingled latin and french together’ (fol. 53") as did many of the Jesuits whom he met on his travels. l()2 I I I I THE EXILE OF TWO KENTISII ROYALISTS DURING TI-IF ENGLISH CIVIL WAR 75 Initial contact with other English visitors was often made with the help of the landlord of the inn at which the visitors were staying. Such a service was generally expected and, on one of the rare occasions \vhcn it was not forthcoming, at the ‘limv W101‘ at Orleans. Bargravc commented: ‘the Host of the howsc saidc the English men we,-c good for nothing but to take Tobacco, and was very surly to us, so that wee cold not gett him to send a messenger for to speake with any English gentlemen to come unto us or shew us to them‘ (fol. XV). 25 This ‘young M’. Skinner’ was perhaps a son or relative of Robert Skinner (|5()[—l667), Bishop of Bristol (l636—4l) and Oxfor(I (I64 I-63), who had been com- mitted to the Tower of London in l64I. Alternatively, it may have been the physician, Stephen Skinner (I623-67). who took the degree of MI) at Ileidclberg in I654 and spent much of his youth on the continent; or one of the Skinners. such as Edward (Jesus. matriculated I641) or .loscph (Jesus, I644). who were at Cambridge at about the same time as John Hargrave. See /I/tmmi (‘mttultrigim1.re.r from NH‘ l§m'lic.s't Timex In /900. Part I. Frmn the Ertrlt'(e.vt 'l'itnes to /75]. compiled by John Venn and J. A. Venn, 4 vols (Cambridge, I922-7). 27 The Hotel (or Ville) de Venise. near the Pont Neuf in the rue dc Bussy (Buci), was often rec(nnmended to English visitors between 1590 and I650. See The I)im'y (2,/"John E,i(;[_ytt., ed. S. de Beer, 6 vols. (Oxford, 1955). II. 90; and Th!’ TI'(Il‘(’f l)iat‘\' (16/1- ]6]2) ofrm l?n;,rIi.rh Ccttlmlic Sir (flmrles Smnerset. ed. Michael G. Brennan (Leeds. 1993), 70. 2” Bargrave does not supply enough detail to identify positively this ‘Ml James New- man’. However, he may have been one of his contemporaries front Cambridge and/or Canterbury, perhaps the James Newman of Canterbury who matriculated at St Ca- tharine's (I634), took an Ll,.B from Trinity Hall (1639), and entered I.incoln‘s Inn (I6/-ll). See Alumni C(tItt(1I)t'igiett.wr.r (note 26). 2" William Cavendish rt.-. 1593—1(»7m. Earl (I628), Marquis ( I 643), and l)uke ( I 665) of Newcastle, was one of King Charles l's most capable military leaders. After the Battle of Marston Moor ( I644), he fled abroad to Hamburg (July I644-February I645), and then on to Paris (16458) and Antwerp (I648-60). He had acted as governor to Prince Charles from 1638 until I64] and accompanied him back in triumph to London in I660. See The 7'r(ti/cl l)iur_\> 0fR()/7(’I‘f Bargmve, ed. Brennan, I3, 27, I53 n. 9. 3" Bargrave is referring here to Henry Jcrmyn (d. I684). who was created Baron Jermyn of St Edmundsbury in I643 and Earl of St Albans in I660. He was appointed as vice-cliambcrlain to the queen in I628 and escaped to France in l64| after the ‘First Army Plot‘. Ile returned to England in I643 but crossed back to France with the queen in the following year. His coded letters written on Iicr behalfto Lord l)igby, the king’s private secretary. were intercepted and published by l"arliament. See The Lord (ieorge l)ighy'.v (‘ahinet (I646). Henry Jermyn was also informally known as the Earl of Yar mouth during the 1640s. See The Crllettrirtr oft/11' (..'omn1ittr'(’for the /Idwttwc nfMnt1('_)', l)mnr'.\'ti(:, /642-I656, Part I], 640, 17 November I645, recording an assessment of: ‘Hen. Jermyn, now Earl of Yarmouth (sic). £4,000’. In official terms, Sir Robert Paston (1631-83) was created first Earl of Yarmouth in I679. ‘H No suitable. individual named ‘CooIy‘ (or Colley, Cooley, Coolie, Cooly) is re- corded in /tlumhi (fantuhrigir'tm's as a member of Trinity College, Cambridge. How- ever. a Mr ‘Pooly‘ does appear in Henry Jermyn’s correspondence in I645. See (‘ul- amlar ufStute Pu]wr.r, Dmm=.s‘ti(', 1645-7, 3 I -2 (although no such individual is listed as a member of Trinity College). I7 Sir Richard Browne (I()t)5—83), was resident at the French court as the representa- tivc of King Charles I and Cliarles ll, l64I—60. At Paris he provided a clmpel for Anglican services, a refuge for displaced Anglican clergymen, and a cemetery for Protestants. John Evelyn married his daughter, Mary. See Evelyn, l)iary, ll.9l). I 03 MICI IAI-El , G. BRHN NAN '” Probably Joseph (‘rowther, who was a fellow of St John’s College, ()xfo1'd, from 1628 ttntil I648. He had been ejected as a prebend ofSt Paul's in I642. He later became Regitts Professor of Greek at Oxford. See Evelyn, l)t'ury, II. 564, III. I‘), 37-8. ‘I4 Jolttt (‘osin (I59-”l—l672), a friend of Archbishop_ Laud, was the Master of Peter- house, Cambridge. He became Vice-chancellor of Cambridge in I63‘) and Dean of Pelerborough in I640. lie was deprived of his bencfices by tlte Long Parliament in the same year. After sending l’eterhouse plate to Charles I in I642 he was ejected from his Mastership. He served as chaplain to the Anglican royalists at Paris front 1642 until the Restoration. 3’ This was possibly Sir 'I'|tomas Stanley of Cumberlow, Ilcrlfordshire, and Leyton. stone, Essex, an ardent royalist, whose son, Thomas Stanley ( 1625-78) was certainly in France at tltis period and later gained some renown for his l’acm.s' (I647). In the Cat. temlar ofthe (.‘ottttttittc(»_/m‘ the Azlvu/tn’ aflvlmtey, I)oItte.s'tit‘, I(>42-l()5(), Part 1, 389, 15 May I644, this Sir Thomas Stanley is described as wishing to ‘stir abroad’. See also Part III, 143‘). 3“ Dr John Bramhall (I594-I()63) was consecrated as Bishop of Derry on 20 May 1634, later transferring to become Archbishop of Armagh on I8 January l()6|. Ile was intpeacltcd by the Irish Commons for his opposition to the (Iovenattters and imprisoned but liberated through the influence of Archbishop James Ussher in 1641. Ile crossed to England Ill I644 and lent his support to the royalists bttt later in the same year was forced to retire to the Continent. 37 Iilsewhere in his French travel diary, John Bargrave also records meeting ‘Mr Ja: Brockman of Kent in Iinglattd and IVI" Wll. Johnson of Midlesex or Suffolkc, my very wortlty friends’ (fols. 31V, 40", 66V); and ‘Mr Ricltot li.e. Rycautl art Ettglislt gen- tleman’ (fob 31V). 3“ Raymond’s IIt'ttw‘ttr_y notes: ‘There are but two ordinary passages out of I’rattr*e into Italy, the one over the Alpes, the other by the Mediterranean Sea, those commonly which goc by the first, returne by the second, and so contrary. We (Novetnber being quite expired ere we left France) for our owne convenience preferred a boate‘. 39 The Travel l)i1tr_v nfI\’ol)crt U(lI'gI'lI|’L’, ed. Brennan, ()0. “'1/»ztt., 53. ‘ll Peter Ryeaul the younger was also imprisoned for his part in drawing tip this peti- tion. Sec Anderson, /in Englts/t Cottxttl, 21. ‘I2 Cale/tzlat‘ of /he I’mt:eetIiug.s' of the (lbztttttitlce for Catt:/)t)tttttl1'It,L;, 1643-]66() /I645-O/, 2547. Bendish’s diplomatic position is discttssed itt tuore detail in Mark ('.‘harles Fissel and Daniel Goffman, ‘Viewing the Scaffold frotn Istanbul: The Ben- dysl1— Hyde Affair, l647—l65 I ’, Albion, 22 (I990), 421-48. See also The 'I'rttvu[ l)iru'y o_/‘Robert Burgravc, ed. Brennan, 14-15, 18-22, I04. *3 Canterbury (7athedral Archives, MS I.it 1510, I". 77", described in John Bargrave’s own catalogue: ‘67. To Itang upon my Cabanet. my/Owne picture upon Copper, in little/and in Scculo, between my Nephe/and my neighebor, dt‘aw'c at Siena, I647. by the hand of Sig’r Mattio/Bolognini as written on the/baek—side’. Bargrave commis- sioned another portrait of himself at Rome in I650, again giving prominence to his family arms. See Bann, Urtt1erI}ue.S't'gn, 65-9, I 13-15. ‘ll Raymond, Itinerary, 50, 56-7. Raymond may have had Robert Bargrave in mind when he wrote (sigs. B4r"V): ‘One of my Cotiteitiporaries lat Florence] discoursing with a Fryar, in a Contplemettt protested he did reverence Clergy men for that he was the smttte ufu Priest in Ettgltt/ttl: which the Monke could not constcr but either an Irony to his order, or Infamous to the Gentlemans owne descent’. 4’ The Travel l)t'ur_v of Robert B(tI'gI'(H’€, ed. Brennan, I7. "I" The following leaf is also signed as ‘A4’, perhaps indicating that the preliminaries I04 THE EXILE OI‘ 'I'W() KENTISII ROYALISTS DURING 'I'I‘lli ENGLISH CIVIL WAR to the ltimrrury, which were clearly intended to be controversial, had been censored in some way before publication. The volume was published by lltnnpltrey Moseley (who had published the 1645 edition of MiIton’s Poems); and its licence had been granted by Nathaniel Brent, the Warden of Mcrtott College, who in I647 had presided over the notorious parliamentary visitation of Oxford University. 47 Bann, t/mm the mu, 107-1 I I. ‘X livcritt, Ctmtnzttttity U‘/'KL’ItI, 240-44, 249-50, 268-‘). Burnt, Under the Sign, 134, note I8. ‘I0 (7ttletular of the C()I)ZIIIfIIL’l! _/or (fmttpotttttli/ig, I)mne.s'lit', I643-l66(), Part III, 1878. ll December I648. 5” '1"/it: Tmvcl l)t'ttry of Robert Burgrave, ed. Brennan, I3, note 3. 5‘ (.‘alemlar of the (fottztttittee for (fotztpottrtzlittg, [)ome.i'tic, I()43—l()()(), Part III, 2109, I8 July I649. 53 The Travel [Mary of Robert Iittrgrctve, ed. Brennan, 78. 53 Ibid., 232, 235. /ltttnliiography 0,/"l'/to/rtax Ruyl)l()It(1aH(1M(!III()fI‘.\'Qfl/IE Family of (}ui.s‘e o_/"l:'lntore, (Ilttttc't».rtw'.rhiI‘t', ed. G. Davies, (‘,amden Society, 3rd series, vol. 28 (I917), 30, 46. 5" ll>it1., 59-60. 55 Pope /\[é’.t‘(lIl([l.’I‘, ed. Robertson, 23-4. 5" John Bargrave was back in England in the spring of 1658 when he left London for the Continent in April, but it is not known if he was able to meet up with Robert before his departure. Pope Alextutder, ed. Robci'tson, xii. 5711/mt I"im,'/t M.s's, I. 93; now -.1: Leicestersltire Record Office no.7 (Box 4982). Robert Bargrave’s eldest son, Robert, had died in August 1659, before his appointment as Secretary in Constantinople; and his only other son, Isaac, died in July 1663. See The Tram’! Diary of Robert [3m'gruve, ed. Brennan, 5-6. 58 The 'I'/‘ttwrl Dittry of Robert Burgruvc, ed. Brennan, 2-5. 59 Pope /tlexumler, ed. Robertson, 6. 6“ Ibt‘d., xii-xiii. “I 'l‘his petition is printed in Pope /U(5.XtlIl(/III‘, ed. Robertson, xiii, from (L'(tlen(t'ttr of State Pttpem, [)()lIl(f.S‘lf(,‘, 1661-2, 394. 0‘) The ().tintleu uml Peyton Lettetzv, ed. Gardiner, 258, 9 December 1661. See The Tl'(lV(?/ Diary of Robert Bargrave, ed. Brennan, 12, for the later history of Bi/tutti‘. “J Pr)/)eAltexumler, ed. Robertson, xiv—xvii, I38. Culetttlaro/'Slttte [’upers, l)umesIit:, 160/-2, 488-90. (“I See A Ht'.rIm‘y of Ctutterbttry Cat/tedral, ed. Colliuson, et ul., 524, for this inter- pretation of Isaac Bargravc’s memorial. “5 A preliminary bibliography of Ryeaut’s published works is given in Anderson, Art l:'ttglt'.\'h Cmtsul, 294-6. C0 '33:‘: E3-ctc:l<; i?e3.;‘~:l*: jbyfrons Search Books ] Sigflin Essex Review: An Illustrated Quarterly Record of Everything of Permanent Interest in the County summary : Published 1957 Key words and phrases li~.~‘.l;.‘2 E. Durant a”d C0-i [etc-1 widford lord abbot gepp saffron walden hallingbury Buy this b°°k V -5 ’ broad oak, felsted, dialect dictionary, finchingfield, Abeb0OkS harold smith, pleshey, lands called, dunmow, fully Anbl-is appears, stansted, theydon garnon, orrin smith, chipping ongar, bridget hussey, earls colne Amaazgan Barnes&Nobl .E.[Q.Q9l.e.. Abebooks.co. E.fQQ9.l§...UK ”—“""—“'“““ Borrow this bc Find libraries Contents 1 R 1 1 ” Otherueditions SeC’fi0n 1 255 ill 5 Essex 3eCtl0“ 2 255 1” ‘ M Review: 1 Section 3 257 Illustrate: cellarer, hoggets, lambing Qgartgflrly 28 other sections not shown Search in this book ILLUSTRA libyfrons Search I l The Harv Horn in 1 page matching byfrons in this book Page 171 Fighting in W a . .. . Epping F :: | South .-¢. . . u.-mu,-~... .- ;:r<:ar:rz=r: it and the ‘Zmmd. :3. t’.r;zs;é:1 ?*Is:z1“.2’t }§~.argrax«*¢ died at his house Yiyfr-rzrzs‘ mm: {ant»zrbur:.* Ockendon in Ifiezat. 40-1660 1 ( M’, Barman in \\'arwi::1:sItz£re, MP, Barker in Ftnti.am:1, I-‘I shirifis, died L the Evoluti thfiz; ‘£'§m§lb;0fL ‘ _ f the . - 7 Grandfathe Where s the rest of this book. CW JOHB FRENCH| Epping Fai Markets,.. Snippet vie About i Essex 1‘ Review: , lJ.l.u§:rat_e5 Quarterly Record... 5037 emu! Snippet vie About ‘i”ii'J§iE§{é'I Quarterly Re99_r Wills 5 documents found search tips AdVanCed Seam“ Displaying documents: 1 to 5 - 7 Browse Categories: To see more documents try running a fuzzy search. Family History If you have too many results, try refining your search using Other Records the advanced search What’s new? 1 FAQ Description Date Catalogue Details Contact us ref‘ About Documentsonline Will of James Bargrave 06 August PROB View Terms of use 1662 11/308 Details PRO Catalogue Will of Robert Bargrave of 19 PROB View scanning on demand Patrixbourne, Kent November 11/283 Details Pl’-20 home page 1658 Will of Margarett or Margarete 02 May PROB View Bargrave, Widow of Saint 1655 11/249 Details Mildred in Canterbury, Kent Will of Thomas Bargrave of O4 PROB View Eastry, Kent September 11/234 Details 1654 Will of Robert Bargrave, 11 PROB View Gentleman of Doctors February 11/443 Details Commons, Middlesex 1698 DocumentsOnline [Jew iaaij _;rm:r" l"¥l'.’3i'23§'y . . . . . . . . . Quick Search ‘type here search tips Advanced Search Whats new? FAQ Contact us About DocumentsOnline Terms of use PRO Catalogue Scanning on demand PRO home page Restrict by date. search tips Advanced Search Browse Categories: Family History Other Records What’s new? FAQ Contact us About Documentsonline Terms of use PRO Catalogue Scanning on demand PRO home page 2 Shopping basket Image details Cata'°9."e PROB 11/96 Reference: Dept: Records of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury series_ Prerogative Court of Canterbury and related ' Probate Jurisdictions: Will Registers Piece: game of Register: Wallop Quire Numbers: 39 - Date: 07 June 1600 Description:Wi|| of Robert Bargar, Yeoman of Bridge, Kent Image . contains: 1 will of many for the catalogue reference Number of image files: 2 Image Sfigmat Part Size Sfumber Price "i‘*““”°“°‘*version ”“““""” ‘*3’: passes ‘P l_2/38:2 i PPF 1-2 ,1 t "lO4..3.’6.... I 3-00 12/ 383 PDF 1.2 407 2 0.00 Total Price (£) 3'00 cata'°9"° PROB 11/283 Reference: Dept: Records of the Prerogative Court of Canterbury SerieS_ Prerogative Court of Canterbury and related ' Probate Jurisdictions: Will Registers . Name of Register: Wootton Quire Numbers: 575 Piece: - 626 Date: 19 November 1658 Description:Wil| of Robert Bargrave of Patrixbourne, Kent Imag? 1 will of many for the catalogue reference contains: Number of image files: 1 Image Eggmat Part Size gfumber Price Reference Version Number (t(B) Pages (£) 438/ 1012 PDF 1.2 1 373» 12» ____ 3.00 3.00 BRITISH HISTORY ONLINE placcfi I subjects | sources | maps | full text search First time visitors: Reg_lst_er for free (uses cookies). | Login | Text: smafl, ligg LONDON RECORD SOCIETY 1582 London Subsidy Roll Cornhill Ward Sponsor: London Record Society Publication: Two Tudor subsidy rolls for the city of London Year published: 1993 Supporting documents: Al2:b_re\_/Lagtjogs Pages: 203-06 Citation: ‘1582 London Subsidy'Roll: Cornhill Ward’, Two Tudor subsidy ro//s for the city of London: 1541 and 1582 (1993), pp. 203-06. URL: http://www.british- history.ac.uk/report.asp?compid=36134. Date accessed: 07 April 2006. Bookshelf: Add this text t_oWvour bookshelf Contents CORNEHILL WARDE Footnotes CORNEHILL WARDE 273. [r.15] CORNEHILL WARDE [Petty collectors: Morgan Rychardes, skinner, and Wyllyam Ryder, haberdasher.] ST MYCHELLS ST CHRISTOFERS & ST MARYE WOLCHURCHE PAROCHES [Enghsh] £ s. Thomas Tyrryll (£70) 3 10 Wyddowe Wayght in landes (£15) 20 Edmond Pygott (£60) 3 Thomas Allyn skynner (£80) [x - Kent £1] 4 Bryan Caverley (£50) 50 John Harbye (£50) 50 Phyllypp Gunter (£300) 15 John Lute (£50) 50 Morgan Rychardes (£50) 50 II II ll II II II II II ||“| 96. A marginal mark (+) indicates that Levans was exonerated of payment in Cornhill ward, but I did not find a corresponding entry for this exoneration in the enrolled accounts, E.359/52. <-- Previous: Next:--> 1582 London Subsidv Roll: 1582 London Subsidv Roll; C@a_i__rJ_.ce_rflaor.d Qi.l3J1€,uQa\t§u uljl/,ar_d opyright 2003-2006 University of London & History of Parliament Trust Terms of use | Erivacy policy | About us | Journal I Site map | Advertise with us Roger Rygbye (£15) 15 _ Thomas Paradyne & John Paradyne (£40) 40 : Edward Ryder (£5) 5 : Humfrey Streete (£12) 12 : Henry Ayleward (£12) 12 : Davye Wythers (£3) 3 : Wyddowe Boweyer (£10) 10 : Luke Bedford (£3) 3 : Thomas Smythe (£5) 5 : Arnold Rychardson (£5) 5 : John Jaques (£20) 20 : John Thompson (£8) 8 : Rychard Gylmore (£5) 5 : Danyell Androwes (£10) 10 : John Maskall (£5) 5 : Thomas Lyllye (£5) 5 : 276. ST PETERS PAROCHE IN CORNEHILL [Enghsh] Thomas Pygott (£40) 40 : Phillipp Jones (£50) 50 : Thomas Gardyner (£60) [ass. £3 in Mddx.] 3 : Gamalyell Woodford (£50) 50 : Wyddowe Hylles in landes (£15) 20 : Straunger Waldron Pope (£10) 20 : ST PETERS PAROCHE Frauncys Lambert (£5) 5 : Doctor Preyst (£10) 10 : Theophylye Adams (£30) 30 : George Gunbye (£3) 3 : Rychard Hodge (£8) 8 : Rychard Carlehill (£3) 3 : Davyd Evans (£10) 10 : Roberte Gunston (£6) 6 : Rowland Rayleton (£15) 15 : John Malyn (£3) 3 : 115 7 E 115 8 E [Endorsed] Summa ootnotes ist of abbreviations Thomas Palmer (£5) 5 _ John Brokebanke (£12) 12 : John Warner (£3) 3 : Rychard Levans (£5) (fD.\9/5) 5 : Robert Wyllcoxe (£3) 3 : Wyllyam Shambrooke (£5) 5 : Wydowe Bales (£6) 6 : Nycholas Nenton grocer (£5) 5 : John Shambrooke (£3) 3 : Rychard Marcam (£8) 8 : Thomas Wythers (£3) 3 : Gabryell Curtys (£3) 3 : Hugh Sponer (£3) 3 : Alexander Sharpe (£3) 3 : Henrye Rychardson (£3) 3 : Raphe Bynckes (£6) 6 : Samuell Monger (£5) 5 : [r.16] Lawrence Caldwall (£10) 10 : Thomas Holmes (£6) 6 : Thomas Thornehill (£5) 5 : Meredyth Hughes & John Cooper (£5) 5 : 275. Rychard Dodd (£10) 10 : Wyllyam Browne (£40) 40 : Edmond Jarvys (£3) 3 : Ellys some (£20) 20 : John Nokes (£15) 15 : Wyddowe Yomans (£3) 3 : Robert Stephens (£10) 10 : James Crucheley (£5) 5 : Peter Hardlowe (£20) 20 : Wyddowe Merrycke (£6) 6 : John Marshall (£10) 10 : George Dale (£12) 12 : Anthonye Sodye (£5) 5 : John Eldrydge (£5) 5 : Thomas Foxe and Thomas Bruce (£6) 6 : Edward Phlllyppes (£3) 3 : Robert Sallysburye (£3) 3 : George Smythe (£6) 6 : John Stephens (£3) 3 : Israeli Owen (£6) 6 -2: Edmond Aunsell (£80) John Wheeler (£60) Nycholas Fuller (£50) [ass. 20s. in Essex] 50 Edward Thorne in landes (£20) 26 Thomas Forman (£100) Wyllyam Ryder (£70) 10 Rychard Milles (£50) 50 Gyles Crowche (£50) 50 George Kevall (£50) 50 Cornellys Corne estraunger (£10) 20 John Bull (£5) 5 Thomas Burdett (£20) 20 Wyllyam Chappman (£5) 5 Wyllyam Hamond (£6) 6 Rychard Maye (£3) 3 John Bowltinge (£8) 8 Thomas Porche (£5) 5 Thomas Evans (£5) 5 Edward Barbor (£25) 25 John Wythers (£15) 15 Nycholas Abraham (£3) 3 Wyllyam Flewett (£6) 6 Wyllyam Lanam (£10) 10 Wyddowe Luter (£3) 3 Rychard Saunderson (£3) 3 Thomas Fygge (£3) 3 274. Robert Westley (£8) 8 Thomas Stowe (£10) 10 James Cannon (£5) 5 Thomas Colfe (£6) 6 Nycholas Pudsey & John Ryddlesdon (£5) 5 Percyvall Burton (£3) 3 John Ryckeford (£3) 3 Thomas Doncaster (£6) 6 John Jones (£5) 5 John Gryffyn (£3) 3 Mychell Crowche (£5) 5 Wyllyam Keltrydge (£30) 30 George Hall (£3) 3 George Walker (£5) 5 Gylberte Godfrey (£3) 3 Cutbeart Creeckeplace (£3) 3 II II ll II II II II II ll ll ll ll ll ll II II II II ll ll II II ll ll ll II II II II ll ll ll ll ll ll ll II II |l°°ll II II §t...~V€«m 44AP\I‘¢$:. Tkusar-'4 “"“‘*‘"’Z “A ’ W ‘ Us s‘ \ gm: r>1>%.s~v!=»I> Pa9*!5" 'M1"'?A\J WM I5-uuv é"' J‘) E‘ {f1A’,\i\.o )b® IL ‘ ‘in. $w'a9.r A¢C\:;1:~\u::<:~‘f;::-Pa‘:|m"m;nA,w, [‘,;‘,,.;.),-g;l:)>‘£‘o 2..., g,,‘,3,,_,,,,2' 8-.+<..u<,r‘? .“ 'w;m’ $_.M.“,,(. Sim... .. Mug MT-1/La»-.«.; $.32 '-9-’ "‘/wk gm (.9 [l..’k/kg»). =~ - Q : pol 1-—: "’ "' N1“? ” . C, [(.\{}_/,5.) 7*-Nu Pun/1...» gnaw-'r ‘5'*“/ ||b@ukc-ac-uk I [\flY_AQ9QL!U,t l Si9.n...o_ut Wrens kent Search Books Stick Searath V; « Back to Search results 1 reference to bifrons kent in this book Page 207 ; 5 e. ; v ‘ },.mf_3L, ‘N 3 .. 1 . F §£::i=*. xsr-1', Ii1;1zig>,,-rfe;:vrv..i " ‘—‘ V‘ I “I. f‘ V .w E Whe.re’s the rest of this book? Synopsis Vol. 2 edited by Joseph Jackson Howard, 1883. Related information Web search for reviewsyof The Visitation oflLondon Other web paqes related to The Visitation of London Bibliographic information Title: The Visitation of London Publisher: Henry St. George, Richard Saint-George, Joseph Jackson Howard, Authods): Joseph Lemuel Chester Publication Date: 1880 Advanced Book Search Gooole Book Sea_r__V_____ rieip The Visitatiu ofLondon: Anno Domi 1633, 1634, and 1635. Made by Sr Henry St. George, Kt. 83/ Henry SE2. Geozg Richard Saint—Geo: Joseph Jackson §-toward: Joseph Le Chester .32.: 'Iw<~av CWT” ; Buy this book Abebooks Alibris Amazon Froogle Abebooks.co.uk F£99g|e_oU_t€ Find this book in a Search in this book {bifrons kent . About Gooqle Book Search — information for Publishers - Provide Feedback - Gooqle Home ©2006 Google