,\ CBNYNGFAM SETTLED FSTATES to Uessrs. Allen & Overy on the Schedule of deeds and docurnents handed Way 1950.- day of Bundle No. l.’l876. Aug. 25th POBATE of the Will of The Most Honourable Francis Nathaniel Tarquess Conyngham. V1880. Oct. 4th. APPOINTMENT of New Trustees Baron Colville (1) Sir Theodore Henry Brinckman and William Henry Satlwell (2) V1904. Mar. 15th DISEVTAILING ASSWRANCE Victor George Henry ‘Francis Marquis Conyngham (1) William Henry i Saltwell (2) . —-_-_--__---___--—-—_-__—-_ Bundle No. 2. 1879. Jan.1st. Settlement George Henry Marquess Conyngham v/” 1) Henry Francis Conyngham (2) Wi.liam Henry Dominick Fitzgerald and Gustavus William Francis Lambert (5) William Arthur Baron Wrottesley and Theodore Henry Brinckman (4 ,/$882. Mar.l8th. settlement Henry Francis Earl of fiount Charles (1) Miss De Moleyns (2) sd Gustavus Francis Willie, Lambert and Rev.Henry Joy Tombe (5) The Hon Lincoln Edwin stanhope and Capt.Andrew Gilbert wauchope C.M.G.(4) 1899. June 5rd. APPOINTMENT sd Sir T.F.Btinckman (1) sd. \/ A.:}.'.".Tottesley (2) The Hon.Arthur William ~ de Molevns (5) and sci. Sir T.H7;‘Br1nckman and Arthur William De Moleyns (4) V//1904. Mar.l5th DISENTAILING ASSURANCE The Host Eon Victor G,H.F. marquees Conyngham (l) and W.H.Saltwel1 (2) V’1929. July lst.VESTING DEED Rt.Hon.Arthur William Baron Ventry (1) The Most Hon.Frances Elizabeth Sarah Dowager Varchioness Conyngham and the Rt.Hon. John Gretton (2) V/nl929.July lst APPOINTMENT sd.Barén Ventry (1) sd.Dowager Marchioness and Rt.Hon.John Gretton §2) "5 ___-__-—--—___-—____—___-—-—_- Bundle Ho. 5.y&919. May.27th PROBATE of the Will and Codicil of the Most Hon.Victor George Henry Francis Harquis Conyngham. V/1926. Dec.5lst VESTING DEED The Most Hon.Frances Elizaheth Sarah Dowager warchioness Conyngham and Herbert Arthur scawen Blunt “/1929. July lst.DECLARATION sd.Dowager karchioness (1) and sd.John Gretton (2) V/I951. July 10th CONVEYANC3 AND VESTIHG DEED sd.Dowager Vaschioness Gonynfham (1) and as John Gretton (2) V/1957. Sept.6th CCPTEVENCW AVE VESTINC DEED sd.Dowager “erchioness Conyngham (l) sg Rt.Hon John Gretton (2) The Hon.George Evan Vichael Baillie and Sir Francis Hugh Brooke (5) u_w—~a to Messrs. Align ---_----..-....-.'... CONYNG§EA;SE'l’TLED ESTATES Schedule of dids and documents handed éc Overy on the day of May 150, .——_——-.¢-——--—.———-- 3 1. 1876. Aug. 25t1PHOBATE of the will of The Most Honourable Francis Nathaniel Marquess Conyngham. 1880. Oct. 4th) PPOIWTMENT of New Trustees Bar-on Oolville 1904. Mar. 15th Bundle No. 2. 1379. Jan.lst. 1882 . Bar .18th 1899. June 3rd 1904 . Mar .l5th 1929 . July 1st 1929 ..ru1y lat BuDd19 HO. 3. 1926. Dec .5131: 1) Sir lheodore Henry Brinckman and William Henry Satlwell (2) 7IS‘.=.N'?AILING ASSURANCE Victor George Henry -"rancia Marquis conyngham (1) William Henry ialtuell (2) bttlement George Henry Marquess Conyngham 1.) Henry Francis Conyngham (2) William Enry Dominick Fitzgerald and Gustavus Vllllam Francis Lambert (3) William Arthur Ba-on wrottesley and Theodore Henry Brinckman ( . Swttlement Henry Francis Earl of Mount Ghcrles (1) Miss De Moleyns (2) ed Gustavus Frncis Willie, Lambert and Rev.Henry Joy Tome (:5) ‘me Hon Lincoln Edwin Stanhope and Capt .A.ndrew Gilbert Wauchope G.M.G.(4) . AF,’0INT‘s!EN‘I' ad Si!‘ '1'.H.Btinckman (1) ad. Afiiwrottesley (2) The Hon.Arthur William do W-‘oleyns (5) and ed. Sir '1‘_.H%Brinckman and Arthur William De Moleyns (4) DISE\_¥TAILII\C° ASSURANCE The Most Hon Victor C-.H.'§‘. Marquess Conynghem (1) and W.H.Sa1tw611 (2) NESTING DEED Rt.Hon.Arthur William Baron Vsntry (1) The Most Hon.FI‘ances Elizabeth Sarah Dowager Marohioness Conmham and the Rt.Hon. John Gretton (2) APPOINNENT ad .Baron ventry (1) sd.Dowager Hsrchioness and Rt .Hon.John Gretton I2) PROBATE of the Will and Ccdicil of the Most Hon.Victor George Henry Francis Marquis Conymham. VESTING DEED The Host Hon.Frances Elizabeth Sarah Dowager Narchioness Conyngham and Herbert Arthur scawen Blunt 1929. July lst.DECLARATION sd .Do1va.ger Y-archioness (1) and ed John Grett-on (2) -/1951. July 10th CONVEYANCE AND VESTING DEED sd.Dowager Ezienchioness Conyngham (1) and as John Gretton (2) ‘.957. Sept .6th CDNVEYANCE AND VESTING DEED sd.Dowager ffiarchioness Conyngham (1) 33 Rt.Hon John Gretton (2) The Hon.George Evan Michael Baillie and Sir Francis Hugh Brooke (5) Bundle No. 3. oontd. Bundle No . 4 . 1943. May Slat. VESTING DEED ad.Rt.Hon.John Gretton and sir Francin Hugh Brooke Bt. (L) and The Former Owners and John Frederick Gretton and George Grenville Forteeoue (2) 1945. May Slat. DECLARATION ed. Rt.Hon John Gretton and sir F.H.Brooke Bt. (1) and ad.John Frederick Gretton and George Grenville Forteeoue (2). 1945. May 7th VESTING DEED Rt.Hon.John Baron Gretton sir F.H.Brooke The Hon.John Frederick Gretton and George Grenville Forteeeue (1) The Hon.Fredorick William Henry Franoie Earl of Mount Charles (2). -...--—.--...——.....—_.. .-.._- _-—.-.—-_..- —... _- —_——..-a 1901. Oct.25rd. MOTGAGE ed.S1r T.H.Brinokman and ad. William Henry Seltwell (1) the Venry Rev. The Hon.Wil1iem Henry Freemantle Dean of Ripon and the Rt.I-Ion.Robeu-t Thernhagh Baron cranworth (2) 1902. Feb. 5th. DECLARATION by Herbert Blunt. 1902. Fbb.10th. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT For production of Deeds. 1905. Dec. let. MORTGAGE ed.Dean of Hipon (1) ed.Dean of Ripon and John wentworth Gurneye Bond and Arthur Eldon Bnnkee (2) . 1912. Oct. 5rd. TRANSFER OF MORTGAGE ed.Deen of Ripon J.W G Bond and A.E.Benkee (1) William Henry Saltwell (2) ed.Viotor G.H.F. 5th Marquem conynghem (3) and Henry Augustus Johnston and Arthur Burr (4) 1912. Oct. 4th. TRANSFER OF MORTGAGE ed.H.A.Johneton and A.Burr (1) The Capital and Gountiee Bank Limited (2) ‘ 1915. J’an.18th. TRANSFER OF‘ MORTGAGE ed.capital and Counties Bank (1) ed. Marqueee Oonyngham (2) ed,W.H.Sn1twe11 (3) Gerard Van Heythmpaon and Arthur Harry Seltwell (4) with covenant by ed Marquees conyngham dated 14th June 1915 and Transfer of Mortgage dated 11th Maroh1920 endorsed. 1927. Jan. 24th. TRANSFER OF MORTGAGE ad.A.H.SIIltwe11 and Archibald Buchanan Dunlap (1) Edward Francis Farrell William 0'Rei1ly John ?arnerd Goodrich Dick and A.H.Sa1twe1l 2 ASSIGNMENT & TRANSFER to E.F.FARRELL and others. 1952 . Nov .l25h 1934. Dec.31st. TRANSFER OF MORTGAGE (endoreed on Trenef of 24th Jan.1927) sd.E.F.Fnrrel1 W. Bunéle No. 3. 1945. Pay Slst. contd. V/ ‘/1945. May 51st. V/1945. Hay 7th Bundle No. . V1901. ~’)ct.23rd.. V1902. Feb. 5th. V}9O2. Feb.lOth. VESTINF DEED sd.Rt.Hon.John Gretton and Sir Francis Hugh Qrooke St. (L) and The Former Owners and John Frederick Gretton and Ueorge Grenville Fortescue (2) DECLARATIOE sd. Rt.Hon John Gretton and Sir F.H.Brooke 3t. (1) and sd.John Frederick Gretton and George Grenville Fortescue (2). VRSTIN“ DEED Rt.Hon.John Baron Gretton Sir F.H.3rooke The Hon.John Frederick Gretton and George Grenville Fortescue (1) The Hon.Freéerick William Henry Francis Earl of Mount Charles (2). HOFTGAGE sd.Sir T.H.Brincknan and sd. William Henry Saltwell (1) the Venry Rev. The Hon.William Henry Freemantle Dean of Ripon and the Rt.Eon.Eobert Thornhagh Baron Granworth (2) DECLAPATION by Herbert Blunt. ACKNOWLEDGENENT For production of Deeds. )< 7 _;§C3 fin 1¢+/,MnhnfliaE nEvDnnnIfip pip E €J\M5A:WAnn of £9: ' ’ 3%., PT. A LLl1?‘.‘I(1lI\-IVIKIZ‘-‘I-l:.l \;b|&l’.l:T .7,” :14 and / I\‘ni“1"\1'In4E"IR/\vu on ‘I «-4 lO\ .. L . - ,n vs? \.—.., (/1912. Oct. 5rd. L/~l9l2. Oct. 4th. vp1915. Jan.l8th. ,,/T927. Jan. 24th. ./r952. Nov.12¢sh ,¢19 . . t. V, 54 Dec 515 V/I944. “fiy 12th T?ANSFER OF WORTGAGE sd.Dean of Ripon J G Bond and A.E.3&nkes (1) William Henry Saltwell (2) sd.Victor G.¥.V 5th Harques ‘H - .~» Conrngham (5) and Henry Augnstus Johnston mfi mtmm &mr(4) TRANSFER OF MORTGAGE sd.H.A.Johnston and A.Burr (1) The Capital and Counties Bank Limited (2) TRANSFER O? H3ETGA~E sd.Capital and Counties Bank (1) sd. Varquess Conyngham (2) sd.W.E.Saltwel1 (5) Gerard Van Heythmpson and Arthur Harry Saltwell (4) with Covenant by sd Warquess Conyngham dated 14th June 1915 and Transfer of Mortgage dated 11th Varchl92O endersefi-_ TRANSFER OF FOFTGAGE sd.A.F.Saltwel1 and Archibald Buchanan Dunlop (1) Edward Francis Farrell William O'Reilly John Barnard Goodrich Dick and A.H.saltwell (2) ASSICFVENT ? TRANSFER to E.?.FA?TELL and others. TRAESFER OF WOETGAGE (endorsed on Trensf q£_2&Lh_lan.l922) sd.E.F.FarPell W. O'Reilly J.3.C.D1ck and A.H.Sa1tweb1 (1) Basil Francis Giles (2) STATUTO?Y ?:CfI?T annexed to Deed of 24th January 1927. Bundle No. ‘4. ' 1902. Feb.10th. RORTGAGE Sd Sir T.E£.Brinckman and 71.13.. contd. Saltwell (1) Thomas Edward Jennings ' George Hutchinson Shepherd and Percy Jennings (2) 1902. F‘eb.26th.AGY€32E?fE:£i'I‘ as to custody of Title. 1907. July 1'Ith.'rEANsFEB or mortgage ad.T.E..Tenn1nga G.!=!.Shepherd ant“: P.J’anning.e (1) ad.W.£-I. Saltwell (2) The achvictor G.¥v¥.F. Marquess conyngham (3) and Frederick William Fane and James Fitzpan Hope (4) 191-1.Feb .20th. TRAIISF'£;"-I of ?J.ort:ga.ge sd.?.W.P&ne and LP‘. Hope (1) sd.W.H.8a1twe11 (2) 66-\'.G.H.B. 5th marquees Conyngham (3) and sir Robert Rodney Wilmot and Henry Vivian Gibson C()I'e)11g and Charles Herbert Caley Saltwel-1 4 1932. Oct.10th. TRAIISFEF. and LEGAL (EEAFGE ad.C.H.G. Ssltwell (1) ad.F.E’.-.S.Dowagex- Earohionesa Gonzmgham (2) Dame Harriet cooper Henry William Holland Henry Sydney John Street- fiald and Bassett Fitzgerald Wilson (3) 1956. Apr1.29tn.'AcxnowLEDoumnr to Dame Cooper a Owe. 1944. Apr1.10th STAEETTDEY F!?‘:.'Z§‘.IP'£‘ (endorsed on Dead of xotn Ozt.1932) 1948. Feb. 11th. CANCELLATION of Charge under Land X 9., Charges Act. A W‘ 3 «Q Bundle No. 5. 1867. Mar. 22nd. 3{OF?.TGAGE sd.Francis Nathaniel Marques; Oonynghsm (1) Marquess Anglesay the Hon. George Henry conyngham and John Henry Benbow (2) 1872. Dec. 6th. F"LF.'1‘EI'2? CHARGE sd.F.T-I.hia.!'quesa Conyrgham (1) ed.G.H.C'oxryngham and J'.E.Benbow (2) 1877. Feb.1'7th. i?.ANSFER ad.G.R.conyng-ham and J.E.Benbow (1) Charles John Baron célville of Gulross and J.E.Benbow (2) 1880. Oct. 4th. TFANSFE 'ad.Be.ron Golville of Gulz-oea (1) Sir Theodore Henry Brinekman and William Eenry Saltwell (2) 19-32. Feb. 7t}; RELEASE 8: 82300311-':~3YANCE Qin duplicate) ‘ ‘ Bd.SiI‘ 'I‘..‘.I.B!'5.nc:kman and 1¥.H.3a1twe11 (1) John ‘Bryon (2) 1902. Feb. 24th. DECLARATION by E!.B1unt 84 FI.E1..8e.1tIe11. 1902. Feb. 26th. TEANSFH? or mortgage ad.T.E.Br1nckman an W.B.salt\rell (1) Montague John Guest Edvard Gould »S: Digby Collins (2) 1902. Feb. 26th. MORTGAGE same parties (1) and (2) Thomas iéerthry Guest (5) 1907. J'u1y.10th. IRANSPE? of Mortgage ad.M.J.Guest. E.Gou.1d and D.Go111ns (1) Rmfion. Theodora Guest (2) ad. E.Gou1d and D. Collins (3). Bundle No. 4. “£902. Feh.lOth. MORTGAGE Sd-Sir T.H.Brinckman and W.H. contd. Saltwell (1) Thomas Edward Jennings " George Hutchinson Shepherd and Percy Jennings (2) P/1902. Feb.26th.AGHWEWENT as to custody of Title. 1907. July l7th.TRANSFEP of Mortgage sd.T.E.Jennings G.H.Shepherd and P.Jenninps (l) sd.W.H. Saltwell (2) The sd.V1ctor G.U.F. Marquess Conyngham (3) and Frederick William Fame and James Fitzpan Hope (4) J‘ u,» l914.Feb.20th. TRANSFER of Wortgage sd.W.W.Fane and J.F. Hope (1) sd.W.H.Sa1twell (2) sd.V.“.F.H. 5th Marquess Conyngham (5) and Sir Robert Rodney Wilmot and Henry Vivian Gibson Craig and Charles Herbert Caley Saltwell (4) b/_l932. 0ct.10th. TRANSFER and LEGAL CWAFGE sd.C.W.C. seltwell (1) sd.F.E.S.Dowager Marchioness Conyngham (2) Dame Harriet Cooper Henry * William Holland Henry Sydney-John Street- field and Eassett Fitzgerald Wilson (5) VJ“ 1936. Aprl.29th. ACKNOMLEDGNWNT to Dame Cooper & Ore. L——«l944. Aprl.lOth STATVTOPV P’¢,IPT (endorsed on Deed of 10th Oxt.lO52) ",L248. Feb. llth. CANCWLLATTON of Charge under Land Charges Act. Bundle E3. 5. n/1867. Mar. 22nd. MCFTCACW sd.Franc1s Nathaniel Marquess Conyngham (1) Marquess Anglesey the Hon. George Henry Conyngham and John Henry Tmmmw(m V/1872. Dec. 6th. FURTHER CHAFGE sd.F.N.Marquess Conyngham . (1) sd.G.H.Conyngham and J.H.Benhow (2) V4l88O. Oct. 4th. TRANSFER sd.Baron Colville of Culross (1) Sir Theodore Henry Brinckman and William Henry Saltwell (2) ¢;» 1902. Feb. 7th RELEASE & RECONVHVANCE Qin duplicate) Sd.SiP T.H.3rinckman and W.H.Snltwell (1) John Tryon (2) ~"l902. Feb. 24th. DECLAP.TTON by N.Blunt & W.U.Saltwe11. M/~l9O2. Feb. 26th. TPANSFER of Mortgage sd.T.F.Brinckman & 'r..I..... Anna‘- Bundle No. 5. contd. Bundle No. 5. ‘,1/922. Bundle No. 7. L/I846. Bundle No. 8. V/1914. 20th May. V2914. _/1-914. 5rd 5rd June 5rd June. DECLARATION by Herbert Blunt. TRANSFER of HOFTCAGE sd.Edward Gould and Digby Collins (1) sd.Rt.Hon Theodora Guest (2) Host Hon.V.G.H.F Varquess Conyngham (5) Phoenix Assurance Company Limited (4) and James Robert Hart (5) June. FURTHER ASSURANCE sd. V.G.F.F. Marquess Conyngham (1) ad. Phoenix Assurance 'Company Limited (2) with STATVTORY PVCHIPT dated 15th September 1942 endorsed. Acknowledgment for production of deeds tjggle. 1919. 11th Nov. DEED varying terms of Mortgage. 9th Feb. MORTGAGE ad. Vost. Hon Frances Elizabeth Sarah Warchioness Conyngham and H.A.S. Blunt (1) Atherton Henry Hayhurst Hayhurst France (2) d/1924. 17th Jan. TRANSFER sd. A.F.H. HAYHU?ST France (1) ad.Marchioness Conyngham and E.A.S. Blunt (2) and John Edmund Philip Spicer and Sir William Henry Feilden (5) /1928. 51st Oct. TRANSFER sd. Sir W.H.Feilden (1) ed. V Sir fi.E.Fei1den and Patrick Eadow (2) V/1944. 12th Nay. TECEIPT sd. Sir W.F.Feilden Rt. and Alastair Patrick fIadow.t0 be annexed to above. 20th Jan. ) ,/1847. 25rd Jan. 7 V/E857. 27th Aug. )Various Conveyances of property y/1858. 7th May. ) in Kent. c/’1859. 4th April.) ,/’l864. 18th Jan. } »/"1869. llth Jan. ) ~/'1e71. 6th June ) u//1875. 11th Oct. ) V1945. 15th March. Distentailing Deed of English _/ Estate. 1945. 13th fiarch. Disentailing Deed of Irish Estate y’l927.25rd Narch Death Certificate of F.A.S.Blunt. .9/’194l.26th April Death Certificate of Dame Harriet Cooper. V” 1941. 6th June. ditto James Evan Bruce Qaillie. Bundle N0. 9. V}9l5. K}:'925. 1940. V //2940. /(1944. \/(946. \/“£947 . \/1949. 12th Blst 22nd 30th 9th lst 21st 6th 2nd 10th 1: may. Dec. Aug. Sept. June. Juneo Novr. Feb. June. Oct. . June. April. Oct. V/“Kent. Counterpart Lease to Frank Penn. Lease to Pearson and Long Limited. ditto Mining Dorman Agreement for hire of cottage,shopt etc. L.V.Turner. Agreement as to water supply to Middle Pett Farm Corporation of Hargate to Trustees of Conyngham Estates. Agreement as to {rant of right to connect Water supply pipe at Duskins Farm. Patrixbourne Advowson. counterpart Lease of land at Patrixbourne to Mr. and mrs. Chapman. Counterpart Lease of land and buildings at Bifrons to fiajor C.L.W.K9ye. Counterpart Deed of Grant to Kent County Council Fields at Council. counterpart Lease of Playing Patrixbourne to Kent County order of Exchange Dean & Chapter of Canterbury. ' ditto The Rev. J.E.HEllett. Report and Valuation of Daniel Smith & Co. as to property in Kent. Uemorandum of deposit of deeds. Report andlvaluation Daniel Smith & Co. Authority to inspect deeds at Barc1ay's Bank Four Searches of property in County of fl Envelope containing sifirth Certificates of the Annuitants under will or Victor Marquess Conyngham, RECEIVED of Gustavus Thompson 5 ama Sons of Devereux Chambers Temple. W.C.2. the above named deeds ané documents. fin+nA 1950. 19~6'3 Com ABSTRACT ofthe TITLE .. of - FREDERICK T.'fILLIA1‘~’I HENRY FRANCIS EARL OF MOUNT CHAREES to lands in the County of Kent including ALIEN 3: ovmur, ’ 9-12 Cheapside, London, E.C.2. 19:5 196.3 ABSTRACT of_the TITLE .. of .. FREDERICK WILLIAM HENRY FRANCIS EARL OF MOUNT CHARLES to lands in the County of Kent, including ~—‘——w—¢—¢ BY HIS WILL THE MOST HONOURABIE VICTOR GEORGE HENRY FRANCIS MARQUIS CONYNGHAM after revokzing former Wills and appointing his Mother The Most Hon. Frances Elizabeth Sarah Marchioness Conyngham and Herbert Arthur Scawen Blunt Executcrs and Trustees Testator devised devised ALL his manors etc. messuages farmlands tithe rents advowsons tenements and hereditaments in England or Ireland (except those in the County of Kent) of which he might be seised or over which he might have any absolute power of appointment exercisable by Will UNTO his sa.id Mother and__said H. A. S. Blunt UPON TRUST to permit his Mother to use and occupy Slane Castle County Meath for life and to receive not exceeding £3,500 p.a. for maintenance thereof and subject to certain armuities TO the use of his brother Lord Frederick William Burton Conyngham for life Remainder to use of first and every other son of said brother successively in tail male Remainder over Proviso that if any person to whom an estate in tail male by purchase thereinbefore limited was born in his life time such estate in tail should not take effect and in lieu thereof Testator devised said premises to the use of such person and his assigns during his life without impeachment for waste with remainder to the use of the first and every other son of such person successively according to seniorities in tail male and declared that every person under said limitations entitled as tenant for life or tenant in tail male by purchase to the possession or receipt of the rents and profits of the said premises thereinbefore devised Proviso that if any person who would but for that provision be beneficially I entitled to possession as tenant for life or in tail male by purchase should be under 21 years the Trustees might enter into possession and manage the said premises and additional powers not material to this Abstract were given to said Trustees and including powers of absolute owners And subject as aforesaid Testator directed his Trustees should stand possessed of his real estate in County of Kent Upon trust to pay out of rents and income to each of his sisters 1. Lady Blanche Frances wife of Capt. Edward Seymour '2. Lady Hersey Constance Evelyn wife of Arthur Baird 3. Lady Edina Dorothy Hope then vdfe of Thomas Ainsworth 4. Lady Mildred Martha Conyngham 5. Lady Barbara Helen Conyngham during spinsterhoold an annuity of £500 per annum and not during spinsterhood £100 during her life and subject as aforesaid 1916 1918 1919 1926 His real estate in the County of Kent to such and the same uses as thereinbefore declared concerning the hereditaments in England and Ireland thereinbefore devised in Strict Settlement but not so as to w multiply charges AND appointed the Trustees to be Trustees for purposes of the Conveyancing and Law of Property Act 1881 and of the Settled Land Acts l882 to l89O EXECUTED and attested. BY CODICIL the said Testator revoked devise and all other benefits (if any) given to his said brother by said Will and in lieu thereof devised _ said hereditaments and premises To the use of Trustees for the time being of said Will during lifetime of said brother but subject and charged as aforesaid upon trust to pay out of the rents and profits to said brother during his life such a sum as together with annual income to which he might be entitled under the Conyngham Heirlooms Act would make up an aggregate sum of £2,000 p.a. by quarterly payments EXECUTED and attested. DEATH of said Testator at Dringthorpe Middlethorpe York PROBATE of said Will and Codicil granted to said Dowager Marchioness Conyntham and H. A. S. Blunt out of Principal Probate Registry. BY VESTING ASSENT so dated made between said DOWAGER MARCHIONESS CONYNGHAM and H; A. S. BLUNT of the one part and said DQWAGER MARCHIONESS CONYNGHAM and said H. A. S. BLUNT of the other part RECITING by his said Will and Codicil the freehold property described in lst Schedule to abstracting presents (subject nevertheless as to such part or parts of the freehold property described in said lst Schedule as were affected thereby to the Mortgages specified in 2nd Schedule thereto) were settled upon trusts under which Frederick William Henry Francis comonly called the Earl of Mount Charles an infant under the age of 21 years (who was the eldest son of the Most Hon. Frederick William Burton Marquis Conyngham and was born on the 13th March 1924) was tenant in tail male in possession or would be if he were a person of full age AND RECITING said Dowager Marchioness Conyngham and said H.A.S.Blunt were the Trustees for the purpose of the Settled Land Act l925 of the Settlement created by said Will and Codicil and were during the infancy of the Tenant in tail male statutory owners of the said property within the meaning of the said Act AND RECITING“ there was no person named in said Will and Codicil as being entitled to appoint New Trustees or a New Trustee of said Settlement 2. THE Dowager Marchioness Conyngham and said H.A.S.Blunt should stand possessed of said premises upon such trusts as might be requisite for giving effect to the rights of the said infant and other persons interested under the said Will and Codicil and subject to powers and provisions upon and subject to which under the said Will and Codicil or otherwise the same ought to be held from time to time 3. THE said Dowager Marchioness Conyngham and said H.A.S.Blunt were the Trustees of said Settlement for the purposes of Settled Land Act 1925 4. THIS Clause contained additional or larger powers conferred by said will and Codicil not material to this Abstract — THE FIRST SCHEDUDB above referred to — PART I fimwahw EXECUTED by both parties and attested. MMORANDA: TAKE NOTICE that the Most Hon. Frances Elizabeth Sarah Dowager Marchioness Conyngham and the Right Hon. John Gretton of 35 Belgrave Square in the City of Westminster M.P. a Colonel in H.M.Army Were the Present Trustees of the Settlement created by the will and Codicil referred to in before abstracted Vesting Deed dated 31st December l926 for the purposes of the Settled Land Act 1925 3. 1927 L929 (continued) MMORANDA:- 10th July 1951 CONVEYANCE and VESTING DEED of this date by the said Dowager Marchioness Conyngham and John Gretton made supplemental to the abstracted Vesting Deed dated 31st December l925 6th September 1937 CONVEYANCE and VESTING DEED of this date whereby (inter alia) it was declared that the said John Gretton and the Hon. George Evan Michael Baillie and Sir Francis Hugh Brooke were the Trustees of the Settlement arising under the Will and of the compound Settlement therein referred to for the purposes of the Settled Land Act l925 31st May 1943 VESTING DEED of this date whereby (inter alia) it was declared that the Rt. Hon. John Gretton Sir Francis Hugh Brooke Bart. John Frederic Gretton and George Grenville Fortescue were the Trustees of the Settlement arising under the will or any Compound Settlement constituted by such W111 and for the purposes of the Settled Land Act 1925 VARIOUS OTHER MEMORANDA not affecting the property the subject of this Abstract. THE said H. A. S. BLUNT died at Old Parsonage Ospringe R.D. BY VESTING DEED so dated THE RIGHT HON. ARTHUR WILLIAM BARON VENTRY (thereinafter Called "Lord Ventry") of the one part and the said DOWAGER MARCHIONESS CONYNGHAM (thereinafter called "the Dowager Marchioness") and THE RIGHT HON. JOHN GRETTON of 35 Belgrave Square in the City of Westminster a Colonel in H.M.Army of the other part RECITING the hereditaments thereinafter described were on lst January 1926 limited and settled by a compound settlement constituted by the following documents:— (1) An Indenture dated the let January l87O and made between George Henry Marquis Conyngham of the first part Henry Francis Conyngham (comonly called Henry Francis Earl of Mount- Charles) of the second part William Henry Dominick Fitzgerald and Gustavus William Francis Lambert of the third part and Arthur Baron Wrottesley and Theodore Henry Brinokman of the fourth part (2) An Indenture dated the 18th March l882 and made between the said Henry Francis Earl of Mountoharles of the first part The Dowager Marchioness (then the Hon. Frances Elizabeth Sarah de Moleyns) of the second part and the said Gustavus William Francis Lambert and Henry Joy Tombe of the third part and The Hon. Lincoln Edwin Stanhope and Andrew Gilbert Wanchope of the fourth part (5) An Indenture dated the 15th March 1904 and made between Victor George Henry Francis Marquis Conyngham of the one part and William Henry Saltwell of the other part and (4) The before abstracted Will and Codicil of the said Victor George Henry Francis Marquis Conyngham AND RECITING Frederick William Henry Francis Conyngham Earl of Mount Charles was born on 13th March l924 was on the lst January 1926 Tenant in tail male of the said hereditaments which were subject to a jointure rent charge of £2,000 per annum in favour of the Dowager Marchioness during her life created by the said Indenture of the 18th March 1882 and charged upon so much of the said hereditaments as were situate in the Parishes of Minster Patrixbourne Bridge and Chislet in the County of Kent in exercise of a power in that behalf contained in the said Indenture of the lst January 1879 4. L929 IT (a) (b) (1) (2) (3) BY DEED OF DECLARATION MARCHIONESS CONYNGHAM IT AND RECITING Lord Ventry was on 1st January 1926 the sole Trustee of said Compound Settlement for the purposes of the Settled Land Act 1925 and it was apprehended that upon the said date the hereditaments vested in him as Statutory Owner thereof AND RECITING the Dowager Harchioness and said J. Gretton were the then Trustees for the purposes of the Settled Land Act 1925 of the said Compound Settlement AND RECITING the Dowager Marchioness and said J. Gretton were desirous of executing abstracting Deed pursuant to the provisions of said Act and had requested Lord Ventry to concur therein in manner thereinafter appearing in case his concurrence might be necessary WAS WITNESSED:— LORD VENTRY as Trustee thereby granted and conveyed unto the Dowager Marchioness and J. Gretton ALL AND SINGUIAR the freehold hereditaments and property described in the 1st Schedule to before abstracted Vesting Deed dated 31st December 1926 and all other the freehold hereditaments and poperty then by any means subject to the trusts of the said Compound Settlement TO HOLD unto the Dowager Marchioness and said J. Gretton in fee simple subject as to parts thereof affected thereby to the Mortgages specified in the 2nd Schedule to before abstracted Vesting Deed dated 51st December 1926 LORD VENTRY Dowager Marchioness and said J. Gretton declared :- The said Dowager Marchioness and said J. Gretton should and would stand possessed of said premises upon such trusts as might be requisite for giving effect to the rights of the said infant Earl of Mount Charles and other persons interested under the said Compound Settlement and subject to trusts powers and provisions upon and subject to which under said Compound Settlement or otherwise the same ought to be held from time to time The Dowager Marchioness and said J.Gretton were the Trustees of the said Compound Settlement for the purposes of the said Settled Land Act 1925 and that they had the larger powers conferred by the said Will and Codicil and set forth in the before abstracted Vesting Deed dated the 31st December 1926 _ The Statutory Powers of appointing New Trustees were applicable EXECUTED by all parties and duly attested. so dated made between the said THE MOST HON. FRANCES ELIZABETH SARAH DOWAGER of the one part and TEE RIGHT HON. JOHN GRETTON of the other part RECITING abstracting presents were Supplemental to abstracted Vesting Deed of 31st December 1926 AND RECITING death of said H.A.S. Blunt on 25rd March 1927 WITNESSED WAS that pursuant to Section 55 of the Settled Land Act 1925 it was thereby declared that the said Dowager Marchioness Conyngham and J. Gretton were the Trustees of the Settlement created by the said Will and Codicil for the purposes of the Settled Land Act 1925 EXECUTED by both parties and attested. L932 AND ALSO (by way of conveyance and not of exception) ALL OTHER (if any) the freehold property vested in Dowager Marchioness Conyngham upon trusts of said Will and Codicil TO HOLD unto the Dowager Marchioness Conyngham and said J.Gretton in fee simple subject as to parts thereof respectively affected thereby to Mortgages specified in Second Schedule to the First Vesting Deed or such of the same Mortgages as were still subsisting DECLARATION that said Dowager Marchioness Conyngham and John Gretton should stand possessed of said property upon the trusts and subject to the powers and provisions upon and subject to which for the purpose of giving effect to the rights of the infant tenant in tail male referred to in the First Vesting Deed and other the persons interested under the said Settlement created by the said Will and Codicil or otherwise the same ought to be held AND that the Dowager Marchioness Conyngham and said J. Gretton were Trustees of said Settlement for the purposes of the Settled Land Act 1925 and that Statutory power to appoint new Trustees was applicable EXECUTED by both parties and attested. 1-BY TRANSFER and LEGAL CHARGE between CHARLES HERBERT CALEY SALTWELL of "Lyndhurst" Upper Avenue Eastbourne in the County of Sussex Esquire (thereinafter called "the Transferor") of the first part FRANCES ELIZABETH SARAH DOWAGER MARCHIONESS CONYNGHAM of T5 Belgrave Square Westminster a Colonel in H.M.Army (thereinafter called "the Trustees") of the second part and DAME HARRIET COOPER HENRY WILLIAM HOLLAND and THE RIGHT HON. JOHN GRETTON of 24 Gilbert Street Grosvenor Square Westminster Widow of 27 Cannon Street London Chartered Accountant HENRY SIDNEY JOHN STREATFIELD of l9a Charles Street Berkeley Square Westminster a Lieut. Col. BASSETT FITZGERALD WILSON of the third part (retired) in H.M.Army, D.S.O., and of 21 Cannon Street aforesaid Solicitor (thereinafter called "the Lenders") RECITING2‘ (1) Testator") by his The Most Hon. Francis Nathanial Second Marquis Conyngham (thereinafter called "the Will dated the 18th October 1874 after appointing Charles Jbhn Baron Colville of Culross and John Henry Benbow the Executors and Trustees devised all the freehold land in England or Wales to which he should at his death be entitled or over which he had a power of disposition by Will unto said Trustees for 1000 years from his death without impeachment of waste Upon trust by mortgage sale or otherwise to raise (in the events which happened) £100,000 to be held upon the trusts therein mentioned (2) Testator died on 17th July 1876 without having revoked or altered his said will save by a Codicil not material to these presents and said Will and Codicil were duly proved by said Executors on 25th August 1876 in the Principal Probate Registry (5) Said J.H.Benbow died on 5rd May 1880 (4) By a Deed dated 4th October 1880 between said Baron Colville of Culross of the one part and Sir Theodore Henry Brinckman Bart and William Henry Saltwell of the other part the said Sir T.H.Brinckman and W.H. Saltwell were appointed Trustees of the said Will and Codicil in place of said Baron Colville of Culross (who retired from the trusts) and said J.H.Benbow and said Baron Colville of Culross thereby assigned unto said Sir T.H.Brinckman and W.H.Saltwell all and singular the lands and hereditaments by said Will limited to the use of said Baron Colville of Culross and J.H.Benbow for the term of 1000 years (other than such parts thereof as had been sold or exchanged) and also all other the hereditaments which were then comprised in the said term or subject thereto to hold unto the said Sir T.H.Brinckman and W.H.Sa1twe11 for residue of said term upon trusts aforesaid (5) By a Deed (thereinafter called "the Principal Deed") dated 10th February 1902 between said Sir T.H.Brinckman and W.H.Sa1twe1l (in that recital called "the Mortgagors") of the one part and Thomas Edward Jennings George Hutchinson Shepherd and Percy Jennings) (in that recital called "the Mortgagees") of the other part in consideration of £21,000 paid by Mortgagees to the Mortgagors (as such Trustees as aforesaid) the Mortgagors assigned unto the Mortgagees the hereditaments mentioned in Schedule thereto and delineated on the plan annexed thereto (being part of the hereditaments subject to the trusts of the said term) for the residue of the said term of 1000 years by way of Mortgage for securing payment to the Mortgagees of £21,000 and interest (6) The said Sir T.H.Brinckman died on the 7th May 1905 (7) By a Transfer dated 17th July 1907 between said T.E.Jennings G.H. Shepherd and P-Jennings (in that recital called "the Transferors") of first part said W.H.Saltwel1 of second part and The Host Hon. Victor George Henry Francis Marquis Conyngham (thereinafter called "the 5th Marquis Conyngham”) of third part and Frederick William Fans and James Fitzalan Hope (in that recital called "the Transferees”) of fourth part in consideration Of £19,000 (being the principal sum then owing upon the security of the Principal Deedd) paid by Transferees to Transferors the said prfirdpal sum then owing on the Principal Deed was assigned to Transferees absolutely and the messuages and hereditaments then subject to the Principal Deed were assigned to Transferees for residue of said term of 1000 years subject to redemption and the 5th Marquis Conyngham (who was then entitled in fee simple in possession to the hereditaments devised by the will of the Testator including the hereditaments then comprised in said term of 1000 years) thereby covenanted with the Transferees to pay £19,000 and interest and entered into sundry covenants with the Transferees as to the repair and insurance of the said premises (8) By Transfer dated 20th February 1914 made bettmen the said F.W.Pane and J.F.Hope (in that recital called "the Transferors“) of first part said W.H.Saltwell of second part and 5th Marquis Conyngham of third part and Sir Robert Rodney Wilmot Henry Vivian Gibson Craig and said C.H.C.Sa1twell (in that recital and in recital No. 10 called "the Transferees") of fourth part in consideration of £19,000 paid by Transferees to Transferors the principal sum of £19,000 then owing upon security of the Principal Mortgage and all interest were assigned unto the Transferees absolutely and the messuages and hereditaments then subject to the Principal Deed were assigned to Transferees for residue of said term of 1000 years subject to redemption (9) That the residue of the money raiseable under trusts of said term had been raised and no other money (either for costs duties or otherwise) remained to be raised under trusts of said term _ (10) That by virtue of the Law of Property Act 1925 the property became vested in the Transferees for a term less 10 days than the term assigned by Principal Deed subject to cesser on redemption under the Principal Deed and the head term of 1000 years created by Will of Testator had merged in the fee simple of the said messuages and hereditaments but without prejudice to the derivative term above referred to (11) The said Henry Vivian Gibson Craig died on 16th May 1926 and said Sir R.H.Wilmot died on 16th August 1951 (12) That particulars of the property then subject to the Principal Deed was contained in 1st Schedule thereto (13) The principal sum of £17,680 and no more was then owing upon security of Principal Deed but all interest thereon paid (14) The 5th Marquis Conyngham by Will dated 11th April 1915 appointed the said Dowager Marchioness Conyngham (thereinafter called "the Dowager Marchioness Conyngham") and Herbert Arthur Scawen Blunt Executors and Trustees thereof and also Trustees for the ‘purposes of the Settled Land Acts and devised (inter alia) all his real estate in the County of Kent (which included the properties mentioned in the 1st and 2nd Schedules thereto) unto said Trustees upon the trusts therein mentioned (15) The 5th Marquis Conyngham died on 9th November 1918 without having revoked or altered said Will save by a Codicil dated 19th November 1916 and said Will and Codicil were duly proved by the Dowager Marchioness Conyngham and said H.A.S.Blunt on the 27th May 1919 in the Principal Probate Registry (16) Under the trusts of the said will as varied by the said Codicil Frederick William Henry Francis Conyngham (commonly and thereinafter called "the Earl of Mount Charles") was at the date of the Vesting Deed thereinafter recited and still then was tenant in tail in possession of the hereditaments devised by will of 5th Marquis Conyngham including the properties mentioned in the 1st and 2nd Schedules thereto (17) The Earl of Mount Charles (who was an Infant) was the eldest son of The Most Hon. Frederick William Burton 6th Marquis Conyngham (18) Abstracted vesting Deed dated 51st December 1926 (19) The said H.A.S.B1unt died on 23rd1"iarch 1927 (20) By a Deed (supplemental to said Vesting Deed) dated lst July l929 made between the Dowager Marohioness Conyngham of the one pert and said Rt. Hon. John Greton of the other part it was declared that the Trustees were the Trustees for the purposes of the Settled Land Act l925 of the Settlement created by the said Will and Codicil of 5th Marquis Conyngham (21) A Memorandum was duly endorsed on the said Vesting Deed in accordance with the provisions of Section 35(2) of the Trustee Act 1925 (22) The Transferor had required payment of said £17,680 (23) The Trustees required to raise £17,680 for the purpose of paying Transferor said principal sum so owing upon security of Erincipal Deed (24) The Trustees required to raise £2,320 for purposes mentioned in Section 71 of Settled Land Act 1925 (25) Agreement for loan etc. of £20,000 IT was in pursuance of the said agreement and in consideration of £20,000 paid by Lenders out of moneys belonging to them on a joint account that was to say 517,680 (part thereof) at request of the Trustees to the Transferor (the receipt etc.) and £2,320. (the balance thereof) to the Trustees as such Trustees as aforesaid (the payment of £17,680 etc. and the receipt of said sum of £2,520 etc.) WAS WITNESSED as follows:— 1. THE Transferor as mortgagee by the direction of the Trustees conveyed and transferred to the Lenders THE benefit of the Principal Deed and of the benefit of the covenants H “ by the 5th Marquis Conynghan etc. 2- (a) THE Trustees as Trustees and in exercise of the power in that behalf conferred on them by the Settled Land Act 1925 and of any and every other power in that behalf charged TEE freehold properties described or referred to in 1st Schedule and 2nd Schedule thereto WITH payment to the Lenders on the 10th April 1995 of £20,000 with interest as therein provided 3. VARIOUS provisions for protection of Lenders not material to this Abstract The like for protection of Trustees 4. STATUTORY acknowledgment by Trustees for production of documents mentioned in 3rd Schedule thereto (the possession of which was retained by the Trustees) and to delivery of copies — TEE FIRST SCHEDULE above referred to - V Her I ALL THOSE pieces or parcels of land situate in the Parishes of Bridge Bakesbourne Patrixbourne Bishopsbourne Upper and Lower Hardres Nackington and Canterbury in the County of Kent (part of Bifrons Estate) comprising 1607 acres 1 rood and 16 perches or thereabouts and delineated on Plan No. l annexed thereto and thereon coloured pink TOGETHER with the messuages and buildings erected thereon which said premises were more particularly described in the 2nd Part of that Schedule TOGETHER also with all other the properties (if any) then subject to the Principal Deed 1944 4th Oct. 1880 1st Nov. l899 15th Mar. 1904 27th May 1919 30th June 1921 31st Dec. 1926 1st July l929 1st July 1929 BY STATUTORY RECEIET gm: 2 (inter alia) — THE SECOND SCHEDULE above referred to — f(Not the subject of this Abstract) ] — THE THIRD SCHEDULE above referred to — THE thereinbefore recited Appointment of Trustees. MORTGAGE between Sir T.H.Brinckman Bart., and W.H.Saltwell of the one part and the Yorkshire Penny Bank of the other part. A DISENTAILING ASSURANCE of this date made between the 5th Marquis Conyngham of the one part and W.H.Saltwell of the other part. THE EROBATE of said will and Codicil of 5th Marquis Conyngham. RECONVEYANCE made between The Yorkshire Penny Bank (in voluntary liquidation) of the first part John Carnes and George Edwin Thackeray of the second part said W.H.Saltwell of third part and The Most Hon. Frances Elizabeth Sarah Dowager Marchioness Conyngham and H.A.S. Blunt of the fourth part. THE thereinbefore recited Vesting Deed. APPOINTMENT between the Dowager Harchioness Ccnyngham of the one part and the said Right Hon. John Gretton of the other part THE thereinbefore recited Deed. EXECUTED by C.H.C.Saltwell, John Gretton and Dowager Marchioness Conyngham and attested. annexed to abstracted Legal Charge the said H.S.J.STREATFIELD and BASSETT FITZGERALD WILSON then of 85 Whitelands House Chelsea London the survivors of the therein within named Lenders acknowledged to have on lOth April 1944 received £18,420 representing the balance remaining owing in respect of the Mortgage money secued by the therein within written Legal Charge of the lOth October l932 together with all interest and costs the payment having been made by the said RIGHT HON. described as The Right Hon. John Gretton) County Celbridge Eire JOHN then BARON GRETTOE (in the within written Legal Charge SIR FRANCIS HUGH BROOKS BART. of Pickering Forest JOHN FREDERIC GRETTON of Needwood Burton—on-Trent Stafford Esquire and GEORGE GRENVILLE FORTESCUE of Boconnoc Lostwithiel Cornwall Esquire (the then owners of the mortgaged premises) SIGNED by H.S.J.Streatfield and B.F.Wilson and attested.47 10. 6th Sept. 1937 BY CONVEYANCE AND VESTING DEED between the said CAMERON THE MOST HOHOURABLE FRANCES ELIZABETH SARAH commonly known as The Dowager Harchioness Conyngham the wife of John Russell Bedford Cameron of Slane Castle in the County of Heath Irish Free State (thereinafter called “the Retiring Trustee") of the first part the said THE RIGHT HON. JOHN GRETTON (thereinafter called "the Continuing Trustee") of the second part and THE HON. GEORGE EVAN MICHAEL BAILLIE M.C. of Ashford Hall Bakewell in the SIR FRANCIS HUGH BROOKE BART. County of Derby and of Ballyfad Coolgreany in the County of Wexford Irish Free State (thereinafter called "the New Trustees”) of the third part RECITING abstracting deed was supplemental to (1) Abstracted Vesting Deed dated 51st December 1926 (thereinafter called "the First Vesting Deed") (2) Abstracted Conveyance and Vesting Deed dated 10th July 1951 (3) Abstracted Vesting Deed dated lst July 1929 WITNESSED IT WAS as follows :- THE Retiring Trustee and Continuing Trustee as Trustees thereby conveyed to the Continuing Trustee and the New Trustees ALL THOSE freehold properties described in 1st Schedule to First Vesting Deed (except such parts thereof as had been sold or exchanged) TOGETHER with all other (if any) the freehold property vested in the Retiring Trustee and New Trustees on trusts of the will or Compound Settlement TO HOLD unto the Continuing Trustee and the New Trustees in fee simple subject nevertheless to the Mortgages then affecting the same or some parts thereof particulars of which Mortgages were contained in Schedule thereto IT WAS DECLARED as follows:— V (1) That the Continuing Trustee and the New Trustees should stand possessed of the said properties or so much thereof as were subject to trusts of Compound Settlement upon trusts and subject to powers and provisions upon and subject to which under Compound Settlement or otherwise the same ought to be held for purposes of giving effect to rights of Lord Mount Charles and other persons entitled under Compound Settlement and as to remainder of said properties or (insofar as Compound Settlement did not affect same) as to all said properties upon the Trusts and subject to the powers and provisions upon and subject to which under Will or otherwise same ought to be held for purpose of giving effect to rights of Lord Mount Charles and other the persons entitled under the Will (2) The Continuing Trustee and New Trustees were Trustees of Settlement and of Compouni Settlement for purposes of Settled Land Act 1925 (3) The following additional or larger powers were conferred by Will in respect of Settled Land (that was to say) the additional or larger powers set forth in First Vesting Deed as affecting the Settled Land .12! q -1" s. .E S C H E D J L E - re... Particulars of Mortgages to which the Settled Land was subject — inter alia — ll. Date and by whom created Persons in whom Mortgage Amount then secured then vested and interest MORTGAGE dated the 10th Sir R. R. Wilmot Bart., and £17,800. February 1902 by the Charles Herbert Caley Saltwell Trustees of the Will of Francis Nathaniel Marquis Conyngham MORTGAGE dated the 10th Dame Harriet Cooper £19,050 @ 4%% October 1932 by the Henry William Holland Trustees of the Will of Henry Sidney John Streatfield Victor George Henry Francis and Marquis Conyngham Bassett Fitzgerald Wilson EXECUTED by all parties and attested. -959 THE said DOWAGER MARCHIONESS CONYNGHAM died on this date. L941 THE said GEORGE EVAN MICHAEL BAILLIE died at Edinburgh. L943 BY VESTING DEED so dated made between the said RIGHT H.H. JOHN GRETTON and SIR FRANCIS HUGH BROOKE Bart. of Pickering Forest Celbridge County Kildare Ireland (thereinafter called "the Former Owners") . of the one part and THE FORMER OWNERS and JOHN FREDERIC GRETTON of Needwood Burton on Trent in the County of Stafford Esquire and GEORGE GRENVILIE FORTESCUE of Boconnoc Lothwithiel in the County of Cornwall Esquire (thereinafter together referred to as "the Present Owners") of the other part IT WAS WITNESSED AND THEREBY AGREED AND DECLARED as follows :- 1. IN abstracting Deed the following expressions should have the following meanings that was to say:- (a) "the said Act" should mean the Settled Land Act 1925 (b) "the Testator" should mean the Most Hon. Victor George Henry Francis 5th Marquis Conyngham whose death Will and Probate have been abstracted (c) "the Last Vesting Deed" should mean the hereinbefore abstracted Conveyance and Vesting Deed dated the 6th September lCb7 (d) "the Settled Lands" should mean all such of the lands and hereditaments conveyed by last Vesting Deed as had not since the date of last Vesting Deed been conveyed away by way of sale or exchange and had not been extinguished under Tithe Act lOh6 or acquired by Coal Commission under Coal Act 1938 2. (a) Death of G. E. M. Baillie on 6th June 1941 at Edinburgh (b) The Former Owners had ceased to have the statutory powers of a tenant for life over or in respect of Settled Lands and the settled lands remained settled lands and Present Owners had become and were then the only persons who by virtue of the said Act or otherwise had statutory powers of tenant for life over or in respect of the settled lands (0) That abstracting Deed was executed in order to comply with the provisions of said Act 12. 943 the Present Owners ALL the Settled Lands TO HOLD the same unto the Present Owners in fee simple (subject as far as still thereby respectively affected to Mortgages referred to in last Vesting Deed) Upon the Trusts and with and subject to powers and provisions upon with and subject to which under the said will and Codicil of Testator or any Compound Settlement constituted by such Will and Codicil and any other document _or documents or otherwise the same ought to be held from time to time 4. THE Present Owners were Trustees for purposes of said Act of each and every Settlement affecting said lands or any part thereof 5. THE following additional or larger powers were conferred by said Will and Codicil in relation to such of settled lands as were comprised in Settlement thereof created and by virtue of said Act operate and were exercisable as if conferred by said Act on a tenant for life namely the additional or larger powers set forth in Clause 4 of said abstracted Vesting Deed dated Blst December 1926 6. THE power to appoint a New Trustee or New Trustees of each and every settlement affecting all Present Owners EXECUTED by all parties and attested. BY DEED OF DECLARATION so dated made between the said RIGHT HON. JOHN GRETTON and SIR FRANCIS HUGH BROOKE Bart (thereinafter called "the Continuing Trustees") of the one part and JOHN FREDERICK GRETTON of Needwood Burton on Trent in the County of Stafford Esquire and GEORGE GRENVILLE FORTESCUE of Boconnoc Lothwithiel in the County of Cornwall Esquire (thereinafter called "the New Trustees") of the other part IT WAS WITNESSED AND THEREBY DECLARED as follows :- l. (a) That abstracting Deed was executed pursuant to sub-section 95 of Settled Land Act 1925 (D) That Deed was supplemental to hereinbefore abstracted Vesting Deed dated 6th September 1957 (0) Death of C.E.M.Baillie on 6th June l94l at Edinburgh 2- THAT Continuing Trustees and New Trustees were present Trustees for purposes of Settled Land Act 1925 of Settlement and of each and every Settlement affecting any lands conveyed by said Vesting Deed or subject to all or any of the trusts upon which lands were conveyed by said Vesting Deed EXECUTED by all parties and attested. BY VESTING DEED made between the said THE RIGHT HON. JOHN GRETTON SIR FRANCIS HU}H BROOKE Bart. and THE HON. JOHN FREDERIC GRETTON and GEORGE GREHVILEE FORTESCUE (thereinafter called "the Trustees") Of the one part and THE HON. FREDERICK WILLIAM HENRY FRANCIS EARL OF MOUNT CHARIES called "the Estate Owner") of the other part RECITING:- (thereinafter 13. 1947 1255 Deed (thereinafter called (a) Abstracting Deed was supplemental to abstracted Vesting "the Principal Deed") dated 51st May 1943 (b) for the purposes of the Settled Land Act 1925 (thereinafter called That the Estate Owner by reason of attaining full age had become a tenant for life "the said Act”) of property assured by Principal Deed (except as thereinafter mentioned) had requested the Trustees to make such conveyance to him of said property IT WAS WITNESSED that abstracting deed made in pursuance of the provisions of the said Act as follows:- ‘ 1. THE Trustees as Trustees thereby conveyed unto the Estate Owner ALL the property assured by the Principal Deed (except such of the same as had since the date of the Principal Deed been disposed of or parted with) TO HOLD unto the Estate Owner in fee simple subject as to such of the premises as were affected thereby to the Mortgages referred to in the Principal Deed 2. THE Estate Owner should stand possessed of the said property upon the trusts and with and subject to powers and provisions upon with and subject to which under Will and Codicil of Testatcr mentioned in Principal Deed or any Compound Settlement constituted by such will and Codicil and any other document or documents or otherwise the same ought to be held from time to time 3. THAT the Trustees were Trustees fo purposes of said Act of each and every settlement affecting said property or any part thereof 4. THAT additional or larger powers referred to in Clause 5 of the Principal Deed operated and were exercisable as if conferred by said Act on a tenant for life 5- THAT POWGT to appoint a New Trustee or New Trustees of each and every settlement affecting all or any part or parts of said property was the power conferred by statute EXECUTED by all parties and attested. CERTAIN MMORANDA not affecting the subject of this Abstract. u THE said JOHN GRETTON died this day at Starleford Park Freeby Road BY STATUTORY DECLARATION of this date made by CHARLES EDWARD APPS of Tudor Cottage Bekesbourne Kent who did solemnly and sincerely declare as follows 1. He was 54 years of age and was born in Patrixbourne Village. From the year 1920 to the year 1921 he was in the employ of Conyngham Settled Estates as Assistant woodman. From the year 1928 to the year 1934 he was employed by the said Conyngham Settled Estates as Estate Tractor Driver. From the Year 1945 to the year until the date thereof he had been employed by the said Conyngham Settled Estates as local Estate Bailiff. 2. He was well acquainted with the whole of the property belonging to the Estate situate in the Parishes of Ash Bekesbourne Bridge Lower Hardres Minster Nackington Patrixbourne Upper Hardres and Woodnesborough in the County of Kent and shown on twelve plans annexed thereto and marked ‘A’ and numbered 1 to 12 and thereon coloured pink which said property was at that time in the ownership of 14. L954 1959 the Earl of Mount Charles the present Tenant for Life of the Conyngham Settled Estates 3. During the whole of the time he had resided at Patrixbourne Village aforesaid Conyngham Settled Estates had been in possession or in receipt of the rents and profits thereof of the property coloured pink on the said plans without to his knowledge any adverse claim whatsoever 4. He deposed as above from his knowledge of the Estate and his employment with the Conyngham Settled Estates as aforesaid AND he made that solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same to be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835 H DECLARDD at Tudor Cottage Bekesbourne on 29th June 1953 before W.E.Low a Commissioner for Oaths, and signed Charles Edward Apps. THE said SIR FRANCIS HUGH BROOKE died this day at Pickering Forest Celbridge Co. Kildare Eire. BY DEED OF DECLARATION so dated made between THE RIGHT HON. JOHN FREDERIC BARON GRETTON and GEORGE GRENVILLE FORTESCUE (thereinafter referred to as "the Present Trustees") of the one part and THE HONOURABLE FREDERICK WILLIAM HFRY FRANCIS EARL OF MOUNT CHARLES (thereinafter referred to as "the Estate Owner”) of the other part RECITING abstracting Deed was supplemental to abstracted Vesting Deed of 7th May 1945 AND RECITING that by the said Vesting Deed it was declared that the said the Right Hon. John Baron Gretton Sir Francis Hugh Brooke and the Present Trustees were the Trustees for the purposes of the Settled Land Act l925 of each and every Settlement affecting the said property or any part thereof AND RECITING the deaths respectively of the Right Hon. John Baron Gretton and Sir Francis Hugh Brooke ‘AND RECITING all equitable interests and powers under the said Will dated 11th April l9l5 or under any Compound Settlement constituted as aforesaid had ceased or determined or had been fully and properly secured as regarded the said property formerly subject to the trusts of the said Will and Codicil or any Compound Settlement constituted thereby but nevertheless then subject as otherwise mentioned or referred to in the Principal Deed IT WAS WITNESSED and the Present Trustees THEREBY DECLARED that they the Present Trustees were discharged from the trusts of the said Will and Codicil so far as regarded the real property assured by the Principal Deed (except such of the same as had since the date of the Principal Deed been disposed of or parted with) EXECUTED by all parties and attested. ....'~.. ___.._. -._ . ;.£a:s-. .. . ,. ...:.. ‘P44! .....,_.L.t..u ,1. . x 1.8 I it x.. l x s . ,5 E... .A.x£lu 1 .‘.|. élldr ......y . 3“. .i.. ..\.l,|,....u.r.n.r|.-n..PItl|A;.|» . . . . w E THE RIGHTh;O1'0'» ; . --5-“c ;AgO3‘§ r3;5'?I"-an o.-3.3., and GEORGE GRENVILLE EDHTESCUE of Boconnoc, Lostwithiel, in the County of Cornwall Esquire, the Trustees of the will of the Fifth Marquess Conyngham deceased HEREBY ACKHOWLEDGE the right of The Honourable Frederick William Henry Francis Earl of Mount Charles to the production and delivery of copies of the deeds and documents mentioned in the Schedule hereto DATED this %£'-l—-—2lee...L- day of L ¢—1.a¢(. One thousand nine hundred and sixty one. THE SCHEDULE above referred,to 31st December 1926 PRINCIPAL VESTING DEED The Most Hon. Frances Elizabeth Sarah Dowager Marchioness Conyngham and Herbert Arthur Scawen Blunt (1) The Most Hon. Frances Elizabeth Sarah Dowager Harchioness Conyngham and Herbert Arthur Scawen Blunt (2) 1st July 1929 VESTING DEED The Rt. hon. Arthur William Baron Ventry (1) The Most Hon. Frances Elizabeth Sarah Dowager Marchioness Conyngham and The Rt. Hon. John Gretton (2) lst July 1929 DEED OF DECLARATION The Most Hon. Frances Elizabeth Sarah Dowa er Harchioness Conyngham 1) The Rt. Hon. John Gretton (2) 10th July 1931 CONVEYANCE AND VESTING DEED The Most non. Frances Elizabeth Sarah Dowacer Harchioness Conyngham (1) The Rt. don. John Gretton (2) 6th September 1957 COEVEZANCE AND VESTING DEED The Most hon. Frances Elizabeth Sarah Dowaver Marchioness Conyngham (1) The Rt. non. John Gretton (2) The Hon. George Evan Michael Baillie and Sir Francis _Hugh Brooke, Bart. (5) 51st May 1943 CONVEYANCE AND VESTING DEED The Rt. Hon. John Gretton and Sir Francis Hugh Brooke, Bart.,(l) The Rt. Hon. John Gretton, Sir Francis Hugn Brooke, Bart., John Frederic Gretton and George Grenville Fortescue (2) 31st May 1943 DEED OF DECLARATION The Rt. Hon. John Gretton and Sir_Francis Hugh Brooke, Bart. (1) John Frederic Gretton and George Grenville Fortescue (2) .e°§?a~gqi/mx,4—:on. who has moved to Tlplrernry und rented \\’l.-tkcticld {mm the 0‘lli-ions. where he not only hunts three day; 3 week. lint new two with the Limerick as well. The \Vartl.~s. too. go on gayly. though with two days ins-it-ind oi‘ llll‘i‘(‘. for they not the lhihlin men. 11..-.. P:-rlzelly Scha-In-d ma. H... ... :l'rl‘f‘1IIlHl or his interest. His world is not llnlllfll (sis has -0 iiflnn been the urine nitli the l‘utht~r:< or fax- hunting) in tho hound ~_i l hoist- that have to him. an to \\'hytt-.Mt-l- ville. the Iiest n! his tun. Hr liu.~' a keen eye also for all the best of that splendid form of liten-tture and '_art which t‘cntt‘o:< around the horse- .man. Thiv \\'0l|ltl have been clear. ,it he had written nnthlm: eLs.~. from ihls extrnztivc knuwlevllte or ‘h‘oyc. into.» great l“rt-rich urtixt who spent jhls lile in the iinlleil States and ’imlnor‘t.nll;-.exl tilt: best at the old ’hlocd~s:uuk that was to .':iv¢ you. later on. siich hunter? are Mr. Smith i-lure-4 lilinxelt. And in the book be- ltoro me he is run at allusions to matters that are nt liiterrxl to art lover.-< all nvcr the world. .\‘ln\-lni:_ \-:i'.h the late Major Fl-ank wise. for’ Instance. t-x-.\In.stei- or the Limerick’ at Rut-hewtuwn in Tliini:rar)'. he mw lhree paintings by the Famous T-‘cr-‘ nt-ley. one of L.nd \\'ater-ford on‘ ttlirlker, the next ol Squire l)sllctlde- ‘ n on Rover. and ti lnirtl entitled ‘Captains: Hounds on to the l..ine."! Now it is a curious taut that Fer-i nele_\'«——lo my mind the fint-in .~liinrt- Jug crust utter Hen .\ior:‘hall—vn-as] very l-art-ly engraved. His it-orkf was done {or his clientu, hung uni their walls and ntwer mmrtld. As a. matter oi (art. i had been iuokingf ,rrir one nr thi-so iiirltirox for :i lonlt - ers had arranged to warm the alt (liy way ur contrast): Loni imcn-[ icn-er; Lindmy Fitzpatrick: lard ; i\lierdi;t~il. the Viuero.\'. and many ' ltncirr-. Then ruck again to th(' coun- ; Elry for t:uli.hunl.lns:. and his tlrst, lnm-.t with the marines oi’ Ruckbnr-| ton. one of whom had translated‘ l-lat-.u.-c. quite in the best. uld ll'n ‘ idllian. then to MD). Villlnrzi-Jtutksun-I int Clonmcli_ where the notorious; ;Lady Bllbkdnzton had lived: to out 'l'amnu.~< hlccalmnntnz .to Lord Water- |{urd'.-- lit:n'lllf\2' emnlc: and to Mid- dleton Park for the pheasant shoot-) log. one thing seems to have Si‘!-I I . l vcfnlly delighted him, and that is the ‘ Irish Lmnienax .' .\t lsel-.'rtict-c. three miles (roni ' Mulllngiir. for instance. seven men - are kept b|J.~_V throughout the year ' in the wnlled rdrden. and evrry mriety vi‘ flower and shrub is grown. Along the wall: vmr and apple trees sun their (run to per. . teetlon. Every walk is kept tree (mm weeds and the rows of box are a treat to look at: the latter , crown in ximfusian. as there is lint little trust. ‘ ' ' In the Harden won at Newpurk. Mr. Bloomfield .-ihoworl in: where .1 century oi,-o the own- thomutzhly around the entire un- closure of two acres iiy a system at nine: so that no sudden cold spell vrith snow or .-ileet could harm the fruit. ' It wus with Slicer:-oz. hi’ Ralnliawu Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. winner or the (lent.-see Vnll-.-y Point to Point, on-ner up. that lllr. Smltli hail what must have been nearly hlga licnl day's hunting. with the single exception. perhaps. at’ his nan with ‘the Black und ‘runs on Scribhler ~ from Ballyhnlnhnn. Suct.-es had to ; {ace the "l{ill'ing Kildnrea" when the '-\'c:itmc.itli pack met at _l-iorselean gun Feb. :1. 1913, mid both Hunt: urcrc out to try their mettle. The iliildzxre.-4 churlzed every fence. every‘ in-all untl even‘ hunk without a. look itor a leurl. and when .1 istlxl-necked :l'0X was found in Moorland Bag and :ntztdc for I-‘ay's Scruh. the crack men lwere racing over Fay‘: Ridge. \\'lt.i'v ickiptoln Hlgglnson ahei-ltl._Thcy were all galloping hell for leather over 'sm.-,s ticlds thnt looked as .-rate as could lie when. tit rull.puct-. Sure-ash: front tcet went thrmii.-h the turf. ‘Phe home turned in complete som- :m-lult mid lilr. Smith took his thirty-seventh full (in lrelnnd). He ‘.Vns up in a moment. Success lay still. At last the brave beast. elas- gcrcd to his feet. shook his head vio- lently and they went on. He was worse hurt than: he was able to tell his muster. But there was no giving in. for only two others or the “fest- meoth (l-‘ether liiagee and lilajor Bayley) were up with those Killing Klldnrcs. They were just leaving Crlevc alter a shiirt ch_eck when they tame to a big stone wall. five fool eight inches high and two feet: brand or the top. with an overhanging stone coping. There was no time to he lost. Peeling sure ct Success, I let him stnde at it. and without vnrylnt! his stroke an inch he sailed over the tap and landed in the wake of the pack while the others crowded through the gnte. How proud 1 was or him and how thankful that, neuritis l°|'lY~£lElIl. ! could have hnd those alxty minutes. every .580- ond or which was golden. and what . an additional pleasure to mm youiselt lonn, keen and as hungry for the bit: ones as o boy. There Is ‘much more I could say About one of the checriturt books of lax-hunting I have ever read; but. like good old Success. l‘m reaching my limit. and stables are not tnr oil’. in concluxion. th€—"i¢ words ol the author: To nir lhc-re never has been such a cornlilriution or linpplness and exallatlon tI.~q when I hm‘:- hec-ii un the back or a blood horse unu he is lioldiriie his own with the lll‘.\iL There is that tense feeling which comes over you as you mount at the meet; there is that kcert desire to be zuvay at the tlrst whirnpcr: Um ,':r¢'.IIt reefing of measure that creeps river the u- nerlerlced horse and hunting man when they set in hehlnd the pack on it good acentlng day: and above all that enlzer thrill which throne from head to heel when the jumns follow each other in rupld succ» a. slim. ‘ ' ' The older we grow. the more we drop out of all com-_ M-tition save those of the brain. Many can look back and think is: the pleasure they had when they knocked out a home run. carried the ball between the posts for n touchdown. or pulled off the \-ad. rage set or i: tennis match: but hunting alone gives the older man the opportunity of still indulging in that splendid competition oi’ mind and body which makes him young agnlrt with l[D|Ind.‘s' ucnztrnlniz in from and :1 gallant home under you. no Jump seem: too big. and holding your hunter firmly tazethcr you start the (lighters with as keen an eye 2.. you scanned the starters in any stceplechasc years tielorc, Anrl so sly Ml or us! 25 of 33 DOCUMENTS Copyright 1996 Newspaper Publishing PLC The Independent (London) April 27, 1996, Saturday SECTION: WEEKEND; Page 20 LENGTH: 133 words HEADLINE: Property: Househunter Patrixbourne, Kent BODY: This Jacobean house might look authentic, but it was actually rebuilt 20 years ago after a major disaster. The previous owner had almost finished restoring the 16th-century, five-bedroom house when it caught fire and was almost totally gutted. He lost heart and couldn't face starting all over again, so sold what was left to the current owner, who was experienced in-house restoration. Mostly old materials were used, and the original features have been replaced inside so that the house now has the character of an old one, but with the benefit of modern construction - in other words no creaks. Patrixbourne House is in the centre of Patrixbourne village, near Canterbury, Kent with around half an acre of garden. It is for sale for pounds 450,000 from Calcutt Maclean (01233 812060). LOAD-DATE: April 29, 1996 Deaths Sep 1883 BLUNT Charlotte 24 ,l§r1awgfiY_. 9b 1 5 3%“ Deaths Dec 1884 Blunt Cha1:lo\tte Alice 22 LBromwic._h 613 £|§4 ‘ 1 Deaths Jun 1886 BLUNT Charlotte Mary 68 LJ1_C!Q,|1._._£_..-. 1c 22 $1193 '5 at *”f~“_f‘l»l'V"~«-'<% .. , .. L{d;“f;J_;,>/‘ltjjl, "I, ll“/v~"b<_')‘L£ Deaths Sep 1888 '1 :,».WU,§ BLU NT Charlotte 2-, CD§§§§.Efl..§Ld 7b ___3_4§. «tr 1 \‘D”e‘aths Dec 1904 BLUNT Charlotte Fletcher 88 Q1§£t_S_€Y. 2a 4_3__ Deaths Dec,L9Q] g_ BLUNT charlo/tte“A7ma/'0 _lll/..:lam_ 4a 8;. S h Type: Deaths Surname: blunt First name(s): charlotte ffrarc Start date: Mar End date: Dec County: all 1870 1910 Whilst FreeBMD makes every effort to ensure accurate transcription, errors exist in both the original index and the transcription. You are advised to verify the reference given from a copy of the index before ordering a certificate. If you are SURE that our transcription(s) below differs from the GRO index, you can submit a correction request by clicking on the Info button to the right of the entry in question. Surname First name(s) Age District‘ Vol Page Deaths Sep 1871 Blunt Charlotte *83 Towcester 3b _8_ Deaths Sep 1873 Blunt Charlotte 34 Derby 7b 2 o Deaths Jun 1875 BLUNT Charlotte 63 Camberwell 1d 446 IL1£é3 Deaths Sep 1879 Blunt Charlotte: 78 Amgthill 3b 09 4212:: 5.-4 L.‘Lfi:. fiefirtz.-t.,.,.o«“~.-«l it la 'Wi|braham2' Lead / Letter Index links to: Families covered: Wilbraham of Delamere, Wilbraham of Nantwich, Wilbraham of Rode Hall, Wilbraham of Skelmersdale Richard Wilbraham of Nantwich (b 1528, d 1612) m1. Eliza Maisterson (dau of Thomas Maisterson of Nantwich) m2. Margaret (widow of Alexander Elerch) Unsure which wife was the mother of 1. Richard V\filbraham in London (dvp 13.09.1601) m. (1584) Elizabeth Puleston (dau of Sir Thomas Puleston, Lord Mayor of London) Thomas V\filbraham of Nantwich m. (1619) Rachael Clive (dau of Joshua Clive of Huxley) Roger Wilbraham of Nantwich (b 1623) m. Alice Wilbraham (dau of Roger Wilbraham of Dorfold) Randle V\filbraham of Nantwich, Sheriff of Cheshire (d 1732) m. Mary Brooke (dau of Sir Richard Brooke. 2n__d_,Bart of Norton) A. 3. (1) Roger Vwlbraham of Nantwich (d 1745) m1. (1731) Elizabeth Brooke (dsps, dau of Sir Thomas Brooke, 3rd Bart of Norton Pr m2. (1740) Mary Hunt (dau of Thomas Hunt of Mollington) (A) George Vwlbraham of Nantwich and Delamere Lodge, Sheriff of Cheshire (d m. (13.10.1774) Maria Harvey (dau of William Harvey of Chigwell) (i) George V\filbraham of Delamere House (b 08.03.1779, d 24.01.1852 m. (03.09.1814) Anne Fortescue (d 28.02.1864, dau of Hugh Fortes (B)+ 2 sons Randle V\fi|braham of Rode Hall (d 1770) m. (24.08.1722) Dorothy Kenrick (dau of Andrew Kenrick of Chester) (A) Richard Wilbraham, later V\filbraham-Bootle of Rode Hall (d 1796) m. Mary Bootle (dau of Robert Bootle of Lathom House) (i) Edward Bootle-Vwlbraham, 1st Lord Skelmersdale (b 07.03.1771, d m. (19.04.1796) Mary Elizabeth Taylor (d 02.06.1840, dau of Rev. E (a) Richard Bootle-V\filbraham (b 27.10.1801, dvp 1844) had is m. (22.05.1832) Jessy Brooke (d 18.07.1892, dau of Sir Ric (b) Mary Charlotte Bootle-Vwbraham (cl 03.06.1868) (c) Emma Caroline Bootle-V\fi|braham (cl 26.04.1876) m. (21.05.1825) Edward Geoffrey Stanley. 14th Earl of Derl Prime”Minister) (ii) Randle Vwbraham of Rode Hall (b 10.01.1773, cl 12.01.1861) had is m1. (05.12.1798) Letitia Rudd (d 30.03.1805, dau of Rev. Edward R m2. (09.02.1808) Svbilla Eqerton (d 30.05.1868 dau of Philip Eqert (iii) Anne Dorothea Wilbraham (d 17.01.1825) m. (09.09.1734) Richard PepperArden, 1st Lord Alvanley (b 20.05.‘ (iv) Mary Vwlbraham (b c1760, d 13/23.11.1784) m. (26.10.1780)William Egerton of Tatton Park (v) Francisca Alicia V\filbraham (d 03.09.1810) m. (20.12.1783) Anthony Hardolph Eyre of Grove (b 08.03.1757. d ' (vi) Sibylla Georgiana Wilbraham (d 22.11.1799) m. V\fllliam Ffarington of Worden (vii) Emma Wilbraham-Bootle (d 30.11.1797) m. (01.06.1794) Sir Charles Edmonstqne. 2nd Bart of Duntreath (b_j (viii) Elizabeth V\nlbraham-Bootle (d 17.12.1841) m. (1821) W. Barnes (rector of Brixton Doverill) Frances Vwlbraham m. William Wright Elizabeth Wilbraham m. (07.01.1736) Vifilliam Falconer Mary Wilbraham m. Thomas Chetham murray.htm Page 1 of 5 PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE of NORTHERN IRELAND The Murray of Broughton Papers (D/2860) Summary PAGE MENU The Murray of Broughton Papers comprise c.1,000 Summang documents (correspondence, legal papers, rentals, Backgrglirfi surveys, etc), c.1625-1918 (but mainly 1664-1802), The papers relating principally to the Co. Donegal estate of the Murray family of Broughton, Wigtownshire, and Cally, Gatehouse-of-Fleet, Kircudbright. I Background The Murray family obtained a Plantation grant of lands in south-west Donegal in 1610, and by 1620 had engrossed most of the baronies of Boylagh and Banagh (minus churchlands) and secured their erection into the two manors of Castlemurray and Ballyweel by royal patent, of which there is an early 17th century transcript among the papers. As Dr Graeme Kirkham remarks, in an article cited at the end of this description of the archive, the estate was situated '... in parcels around Donegal town, Ardara and Killybegs, including large parts of the parishes of Killaghtee, Killymard, Killybegs, Killcar and lnishkeel. ...' Even in the late 18th century, it contained over 40,000 statute acres, with a further 25,000 let to Lord Conyngham — the Conynghams claimed in perpetuity and the Murrays claimed by determinable leases. Part of the archive is taken up with documentation of this http ://proni.nics. gov.uk/records/private/murray.htm 8/25/00 murray.htm Page 2 of 5 and other major lawsuits over title. The outcome of the Conyngham lawsuit is not recorded, but the Conynghams appear to have retained possession of the disputed lands. The principal places of note on the estate were the town and parliamentary borough of Killybegs, and the village of Mount Charles, where the Conynghams had a seat and from which they took one of their titles. I The papers The papers’ principal significance lies in the light they throw on economic conditions in a remote area of Ulster, particularly in the late 17th and early 18th centuries. The survey material is especially noteworthy. Of the correspondents, those who are of interest in their own right include William (Speaker) Conolly of Castletown, Co. Kildare, General Henry Conyngham of Slane, Co. Meath (d. 1706), Conyngham’s widow, Lady Shelburne, and Conyngham’s descendant, William Burton Conyngham (d. 1796), a founder of the Royal Irish Academy and of the Kildare Street Club, Dublin, and the developer of Burton Port at The Rosses, Co. Donegal. The letters, which run from the late 17th century to the late 18th century are mostly from Robert Spence of Donegal town, Capt., Thomas Knox, James Hamilton of Mount Charles, Co. Donegal, Andrew Patton and Henry McDowell, successive estate agents, and contain many shrewd comments on the development of the estate. The shortage of money in 1704 provokes this comment to Alexander Murray from Lady Shelburne, wife of General Henry Conyngham, Murray’s largest single Irish tenant and head agent for the Irish property, who was then serving in Spain: ’... Mr Conyngham told you there was so great an arrear upon your estate and that he could not get http://proni.nics. gov.uk/records/private/murray .htm 8/25/00 murray.htm Page 3 of 5 ready money enough out of both his and yours to pay the crown rent. This I can aver, that out of a year and a half’s rent ( 1,500) due in that country I cannot at this time command 50 in money but am forced to take cattle, butter, etc, at such rates as the tenants will please to give them and after being at the expense to bring them to Dublin, sell them at five or six shillings in the pound less, and even this way have no hopes of getting in the arrear ...' . The famine of 1728-1729 caused the devastation of estates in this region because, as James Hamilton reported: ‘Capt. Henry Conyngham's tenants, though bound in firm leases for four years ending next May, are throwing them up daily. I have written pressingly to him to Brussels, where he now is, to come over this spring and give his tenants abatement - otherwise he will have a waste estate. Col Montgomery's tenants have many of them run away — it was so high set that I could not get the rents collected so I quit it at last All Saints. There's a ship lying now at Killybegs belonging to New England that has indented with as many passengers as she can carry The agent complained about the inactivity of the Murrays during the crisis. But immediately thereafter the disappearance of many tenants compelled them to a re-assessment of estate policy based on a detailed survey of the estate (transcribed in full in PRONI's list) by Thomas Addi of Donaghadee, Co. Down. This was conducted in 1731, and alongside it are the comments made on it by Alexander Murray to James Hamilton. To procure tenants for the estate Addi advertised in Armagh, Antrim, Lurgan, Lisbum, Belfast, Randalstown, Newtownards, Ballywalter, Greyabbey, Bangor and Comber as well as in every town within a forty-mile radius of the estate, the advertisements being ‘as cautiously and well worded as possible‘. The late 18th century correspondence is concerned inter alia with the renewal of the Conynghams' huge leasehold interests under the Murrays, the http ://proni.nics. gov.uk/records/private/murray.htm 8/25/00 murray.htm Page 4 of 5 unprofitability of James Murray’s Donegal estate and the desirability of selling it. Some of the papers of the period c. 1625-1699 relate in whole or in part to the Murrays’ Scottish estates. From an early date the link between the Killybegs estate and the Murray seats in southern Scotland (Broughton and Cally) was provided by several merchants from Donaghadee, notably Sam Smith, William Pinkstan and Francis McMinn, as will as Isaac and George Macartney of Belfast during the early 18th century. They also looked after the material comforts of the family, which were supplied from Dublin. This archive complements the Broughton and Cally archives in the Scottish Record Office, Edinburgh, whose range and quality is indicated in an article by D.A. Verschoyle entitled ’The Background to a Hidden Age’, in The Donegal Annual, Vol. vi, No. 2, 1965. There has been a recent and important study of the Murray of Broughton estate in Co. Donegal by Dr Graeme Kirkham, entitled "'No more to be got off the Cat but the Skin": Management, Landholding and Economic Change on the Murray of Broughton Estate, 1670-1755 ', published in Donegal History and Society: Interdisciplinary Essays on the History of an Irish County, edited by William Nolan, Liam Ronayne and Mairead Dunlevy (Geography Publications, Dublin, 1995). A.P.W. Malcomson I Page created 1 1 July 97; updated 22 Sep 1997 This material is subject to Crown copyright and, except for personal study, any unauthorised use, copying or mirroring, is prohibited. Permission to publish may be http://proni.nics. gov.uk/records/private/murray.htm 8/25/00 Ce1bridge.Net - A History of Ce1bridge/ The Conollys of Castletown Page 1 of 4 v Celbridge News Free Email @ Celbridge.Net Get A Site on Ce|bridge.Net Local Business Celbridge.Net E-Zine Celbrid e ChatRoom & Club Newsletter A Histo Of Celbrid e Search The Website Useful Information About This Website Celbrid e E-Sho What to see in Celbrid e Train & Bus Timetables Contact Us A History of Cetbriclge by Tony Doohan Exclusively Online with Cefbridge.Net The Conollys of Castletown William Conolly William Conolly, later known as "Speaker Conolly", was born in 1662 in Ballyshannon, Co. Donegal, the son of a publican. He was of humble origins but succeeded in becoming the richest man in Ireland. He had a yearly income of 525,000 and in his Drapiers Letters, Swift wrote that if Wood's halfpence became current, Mr. Conolly would have required 240 horses to bring his half-year's rent from Dublin to Castletown -- and two or three great cellars in his house for storage. He became a legend in his own lifetime and one petitioner wrote "whatsoever you undertake God prospers". He became so popular and famous that many parents named their children after him and so there was William Conolly Conyngham, William Conolly Coan and William Conolly McCaus|and. Making sure of the two fold patronage of Mr. & Mrs. Conolly, George Finey of Celbridge, agent to William Conolly, called his daughter Williamina Katherina. Speaker Conolly's Wealth: William studied law in Dublin, qualified as a solicitor in 1685 and later as a barrister. He was an agent for Captain James Hamilton, for the Duke of Ormonde and for two elderly maiden ladies who left him a fortune. He accumulated further wealth on forfeited estates after the Williamite wars. As he was an Irishman and a Protestant, many families chose to sell to him in preference to English landlords. In 1703 he purchased approximately 10,000 acres of forfeited lands in Meath, Westmeath, Roscommon and Wexf'ord. He later acquired lands in Waterford, Donegal, Fermanagh, Dublin, Kildare and in Wales. In 1709 Thomas Dongan was obliged to sell him his estates in Kildrought, Castletown, Moortown and Collinstown which amounted to 1,730 acres. His marriage to an heiress, Katherine, daughter of Sir Albert Conyngham, allied him to many of the most powerful Protestant families in Northern Ireland. They had no children. Public Life & Landlord: Conolly was amongst a circle of landlords who were interested in showing Ireland's prosperity, expertise and craftmanship by making the country houses more beautiful and by encouraging a higher standard of art and craft. When he arrived in Celbridge in 1709 his tenants lived in thatched cabins and he complained that they were all beggars. He insisted that in future they would build houses of stone with chimneys and windows. Following his election as a Member of Parliament for Donegal in 1715 he was appointed Speaker of the Irish House of Commons. In 1717 he-was chosen as one of the three Lord Justices to administerthe government of the country in the absence of the Lord Lieutenant but his nomination was resented by many of the new settlers. The first home of William Conolly was at Rodanstown, Kilcock, and it continued to be his country residence until he came to live at Castletown. Capel Street was the centre of his political activities where he lived in commanding elegance for fourteen years. His brilliant vermillion and gold state coach added distinction to the neighbourhood. William died of a heart attack in 1729 and on his last journey from Dublin to Celbridge he was accompanied by a huge number of mourners, wearing linen scarves of Irish manufacture. He was buried in the vault in The Death House at St. Mochua's Church. Katherine Conolly Katherine Conolly was 67 years of age when her husband died. She was to survive him by 23 years, living at Castletown or in the great house in Capel Street. Mrs. Conolly had always shared her husband's political interests and after his death people continued to flock to the Capel Street house to enlist her support. She continued to perpetuate his memory by building the Death House, the Collegiate College, the Obelisk and the Wonderful Barn. She was renowned for her generosity _ to her friends and to the poor. All her letters were handwritten and at the '’ age of ninety she could read a newspaper by candlelight without glasses. Katherine was succeeded in Castletown by her nephew William Conolly who was married to Lady Anne Wentworth, daughter of Thomas Wentworth, Earl of Stafford. However, William died two years later in http://www.countyki1dare.net/History/page8.htm 29/03/01 Ce1bridge.Net — A History of Celbridge / The Conollys of Castletown Page 2 of 4 1754 and was succeeded by his son Thomas. Thomas and Lady Louisa Conolly Lady Louisa: Thomas Conolly married Lady Louisa Lennox, daughter of the Duke of Richmond, in 1758 when he was 24 years of age and she was 15. Lady Louisa loved Castletown and under her direction for 63 years the great house came to represent all that was comfortable and pleasant in Irish country life. Cottages, lodges, bathing houses and temples sprang up ' about the estate. It was generally agreed that she was the kindest, wisest and most generous of‘ all creatures, having by comparison with her husband a goodly share of many virtues. Lady Louisa was a "most accurate calculator" and used money and . materials with the greatest economy. Stone for building was quarried on the estate and timber supplied from her own saw pit. She was also her own architect and relied on good tradesmen to advise and carry out her plans. The pleasure of giving filled her whole life. She was kind and generous to the poor and provided them with free education and an industrial school for employment. Lady Louisa died in 1821 in a tent on the Castletown lawn where she could see and admire the beautiful house which she loved so much. Thomas Conolly: By the unanimous opinion of Lady Louisa's sisters, Thomas Conolly was a silly tiresome boy. They agreed that his only redeeming qualities were his love for Louisa and his unquestioned generosity. He had a great appetite for Irish politics but his ideas and opinions were limited and confused. e pursued a will-of-the-wisp policy which at times aggravated his friends. He as a poor statesman and a worse orator. Rising of 1798 Thomas Conolly succeeded in averting rebellion in Celbridge in 1798. He pleaded with his tenants not to get involved in the rising but despite all his efforts he could not prevent many of the enraged people from joining the ranks of the United lrishmen which he strongly opposed. He and other prominent landlords formed Yeomanry Corps to act as a volunteer home guard to help to maintain law and order. The regular troops were posted along the coast to prevent any attempt at invasion by the French. The rebellion cast a gloom over Castletown as the Conollys had relatives on both sides. Tom Conolly opposed rebellion while Lady Sarah Napier of Oakley Park, sister of Lady Louisa, was a committed rebel. Lord Edward Fitzgerald, nephew of Lady Louisa, was leader of the United lrishmen in Leinster. Celbridge was always in danger of being attacked by rebels coming from their camps at Timahoe and Donadea. This resulted in Colonel Napier of Oakley Park fortifying his house and when a company of Derry Militia arrived to protect Castletown House, he and his family moved in with the Conollys. They secured themselves in the house and were protected by eighteen soldiers who slept on the floor of the Long Gallery. On May 21 st, 1798 Lady Louisa wrote: "This last week has been a most painful one to us. Maynooth, Ki/cock, Leix/ip and Celbridge have had part of a Scotch Regiment quartered at each place and every day threatening to burn the towns. I have spent days in en1rea1ies and threats, to give up the horrid pikes. Some houses burnt at Al/cock yesterday produced the effect. Ma ynooth held out yesterday though some houses were burnt and some people punished. This morning the town of Leix/ip are bringing in their arms. Celbridge as yet holds out though five houses are now burning." One June 1st she writes again: "There have been skirmishes in this neighbourhood; 200 of them forced through our gates and passed across our front lawn at three o'clock on Saturday morning last, but they went through quietly. We are happy in having been able to preserve Celbridge and the poor people will find that we are their best friends at last." St. Mochua's Church is reputed to have been burned during the rebellion but there is no evidence of this. Lord Edward Fitzgerald - Lord Edward Fitzgerald was born at Carton House, Maynooth, in 1764. He , ; fie» http://www.countykildare.net/History/page8 .htm 29/O3/01 Ce1bridge.Net - A History of Celbridge / The Conollys of Castletown Page 3 of 4 was the son of James Fitzgerald, Earl of Kildare. His mother Emily was sister of Lady Louisa Conolly of Castletown and of Lady Sarah Napier of Oakley Park. Lord Edward was greatly influenced by the American and French Revolutions. He welcomed Wolfe Tone's ideal of a republic and wished to unite lrishmen of different religious belief. At one time he had supported the cause of Catholics seeking to abolish the Penal Laws. Later he joined the United lrishmen and was appointed their leader in Leinster. On the 2nd of March, 1798 he and other members of the United lrishmen were meeting in Dublin to plan the rising. Informed by spies the government forces closed in on the meeting and arrested most of the leaders. Lord Edward escaped capture and went on the run. The government offered 1,000 reward for his apprehension. As military commander he planned the rising for 23rd May, 1798. However, on 19th May he was betrayed, wounded while resisting arrest and captured in Thomas St., Dublin. He died later in prison from the pistol shot wounds received in the struggle. A Day in the Life of Lady Louisa - click here for more Thomas Conol|y's Kennels: Thomas Conolly brought a pack of‘ hounds from England to Castletown in 1764 and was among the first of the Irish gentry to maintain hounds for hunting on his estate. The hounds were kept in kennels behind the farm buildings at Castletown House and later moved to where the Church of Ireland School is presently located at Castletown Gates. He must also have indulged in the sport of bear baiting as the accounts show that a bear was kept in 1762 and John Fenaughty was paid E 6.9.10 for feeding him. Edward Packenham Thomas Conolly was the third and last of his name to live at Castletown. He had no children and after Louisa's death the house was given to Edward Packenham, son of his niece, who lived at Donaghcomper. In accordance with the terms of Thomas Conol|y's will Packenham assumed the name and arms of Conolly. "Tom" Conolly Edward Packenham Conolly died in 1848 and he was succeeded at Castletown by his eldest son Thomas. Tom Conolly, as he was affectionately known, was born in 1823 and succeeded his father as Member of Parliament for Co. Donegal. He lived recklessly as a young man, spending much time on the Continent where he became an intimate friend of Napoleon III. A Sea Adventure: Tom Conolly was in America during the great American Civil War (1861-1865). Pressed for money, he bought a large vessel and having filled her with an expensive cargo, he attempted to run the blockade into the southern part of Charleston. intercepted by cruisers of the Northern States, and his ship sunk, he found himself cast adrift on an unknown coast. He hailed a passing sailing vessel and served his passage home as an ordinary sailor. The ship, bound for England, passed close to the coast of Co. Donegal. Tom Conolly jumped overboard, swam ashore and reached Donegal in time to maintain his seat in the election which was then in progress. On August 10th, 1876 Thomas Conolly died. He was only 53 years of age and his death was greatly lamented. "His hospitality was unbounded and his house was always fu//. There were horses to ride, there were cars to be driven; there was an excellent cook and plenty of champagne... Dear old Tom Cono/Iy." Later Owners of Castletown Thomas Conolly's eldest son, Thomas, was killed in South Africa in 1900 and was succeeded by his brother Major Edward Conolly. On the death of Major Conolly in 1956, Lord Carew, his nephew, inherited Castletown. In 1965 he sold the house and the 500 acre estate to Major Willson for 5,166,000 In 1967 the Hon. Desmond Guinness purchased Castletown House and I20 acres of land for 93,000, in order to save the house for posterity and open " ' it to the public. In October 1979 the Castletown Foundation was established to assume the ownership and management of the house and to encourage its use for educational and general culture purposes. Owners of Castletown House 1722 House a-building by Speaker Conolly 1729 Katherine Conolly http://www.countyki1dare.net/History/page8.htm 29/03/O1 Ce1bridge.Net - A History of Celbridge / The Conollys of Castletown 1752 1754 1803 1821 1848 1876 1900 1956 1965 1967 1979 NOW William Conolly Thomas Conolly Lady Louisa Conolly Edward Packenham Conolly "Tom" Conolly Thomas Conolly Major Edward Conolly Lord Carew Major Willson Hon. Desmond Guinness Castletown Foundation DUCHAS - Office of Public Works (OPW) http://www.c0untyki1dare.net/History/page8 .htm Page 4 of 4 29/03/01 } THE IMPERIAL ” Ic;a _(/I//1/‘ TH, NEW DELHI IIO OOI, INDIA. Tum M, , 2m. H.393 /Ur we Page 1 A Access The English strand of 2 ‘J0 the UK archives network he A Archives Database I- I l lmfimMmlmmmm East Sussex Record Office: Archive of the Baker and Kirby families of Battle, Withyham and of Lower and Middle House, Mayfield Place and the Vicarage, Mayfield The contents of this catalogue are the copyright of East Sussex Record Office Rights in the Access to Archives database are the property of the Crown, © 2001~2006 To find out more about the archives described below, contact East Sussex Record Office AR HIVE F THE BAKER AND KIRBY FAMILIE OF BATTLE WITHYHAM AND OF LOWER AND p MIDDLE HO E MAYFIELD PLACE AND THE VICARAGE MAYFIELD E1;|_l Creator(s): Baker family of Withyham, East Sussex Baker family of Mayfield, East Sussex Kirby family of Mayfield, East Sussex Access Condition(s): Records are closed for 30 years from the last date of a document http2//www.a2a.org.uk/search/records.asp?cat=179-kir&cid=4 25/03/2007 13:46:21 Page 2 7‘ BAKER OF WITHYHAM AND MAYFIELD PLACE — lno ref. or datei > BAKER OF WITHYHAM AND MIDDLE HOUSE, MAYFIELD — ino ref. or datel 3’ KIRBY OF MAYFIELD VICARAGE — lno ref. or datel (3) Further records of the Baker and Kirby families of Mayfield and the Thompson family of Frant and Fareham, Hants - ref. ACC6420 - [n.d.] George Baker, 1679-1756 Notes concerning the burial of Bakers in Battle, West Peckham, Withyham and Groombridge, nd C1700 Vice—Admira| Charles Thompson, bt Copy orders given and received by Charles Thompson, 1788-1795 Letters from Corporations and other bodies congratulating CT on successful actions in 1794 and 1797, with a letter from F G Kirby, Perthshire, presenting them toJ H R Kirby, c1900 Power of attorney from Samuel Barrington to CT to recover debts in Barbados, 1793 Letter from John Scott congratulating CT on his baronetcy, and describing the recent mutiny; 1797 Norborne Thompson, bt Copy of a letter [?from CT to his son NT]; nd, [C1800] Exercise book of problems useful in fortification, and foreign currency calculations, C1800 Letter from the Duke of Beaufort, 1805 Writing, book~keeping and translation exercises, c1810, with a journal, Oct 1811 - Oct 1814 A selection of prophecies relative to the restoration of the Jews from the writings of Rev J Owen D D 1646; c1810 Jane Thompson, widow Correspondence and papers concerning the estate of her mother~in-law Margaret Thompson of Edinburgh, 1794 PCC probate of Charles Thompson, 27 Apr 1799 Letters from the Duke of Beaufort to JT's agent Robert Mylne, 1799-1805 Letter from Mr Hammond concerning a sextant, 1810 Correspondence and papers concerning the estate of her sister Elizabeth Selby of Edinburgh and niece Elizabeth Selby, 1788-1810 Correspondence concerning JT's visit to Lisbon with her sick daughter Jane, with a sketch of htlp://www.a2a.org.uk/search/records.asp?cat=179-kir&cid=4 25/03/2007 13:46:21 Page 3 Jane tomb in the protestant cemetery; 1814-1815 Certificates of the marriage of Charles Thompson and JT and of the baptisms of their children; 1783-1818 Letter from her son Norborne Thompson with his letter to an unnamed correspondent describing his court martial, 1819 PCC admon of Norborne Thompson, 30 Aug 1826 Letters from her son Henry Thompson, 1826 Letter from Jane Thompson to Lady Grey [?not sent], 1828 The Rev Henry Thompson, bt Letters from his mother Jane Thompson, 1812-1822 Seating plan of Frant church, C1820 Verse On Harrow School by F Sargent, copies by HT; nd (wmk 1824) French passport issued to HT, 1825 Marriage certificate of HT and Hannah Jean Grey, 1828 Drafts for a letter of thanks to his former parishioners in Cheltenham; nd, (wmk 1835) Lithograph dedicated to HT of the interior of Trinity Church Fareham, C1830 Piece of wool-stiching by Hannah Thompson, 1833 Draft letter to the Duke of Beaufort, 1836 with a copy of the will of Lord Botetourt granting an annuity to HT's father, 1771 Pedigree of the Thompson and Grey families; nd, post 1830 Orders on HT's institution to Frant, 1844 Papers concerning the estate of Elizabeth Mouat of Pitarthie, HT trustee, 1845 Orders on HT's collation to the prebend of Thorney in Chichester Cathedral, 1854 Blazon of the arms of HT, c1860 Draft letter to Abraham Lincoln, recommending a constitutional monarchy; 1861 Licence to remove the body of HT's son from Frant to Fareham, with covering letter from the bishop of Chichester, 1862 Letter from G Grey to HT, 1863 A present and reproof from the ladies addressed to HT; c1860 Note of a memorial [?tablet] to Sir Charles Thompson, dedicated by his wife and children; nd, c1880 The Rev John Kirby, (1786-1844) Verse on laying the first stone of St Mark's Chapel, Hadlow Down, with an epitaph on a http://www.a2a.org.uk/search/records.asp?cat=179-kir&cid=4 25/03/2007 13:46:21 Page 4 favourite rabbit, nd C1835 Handbill of Observations on the Lord's Prayer, nd, pre 1837 Lists of Bakers and Kirbys buried in [?Mayfield], Battle and Withyham churches, nd C1820 The Rev H T M Kirby, (1818-1897) Marriage certificate for HTMK and Hannah Jane Thompson, 1847 Letters concerning Diana Charlotte Stovin of Frant, a patient in Dr Newington's asylum; HT executor A history of the rectory of Mayfield by W[i||iam] Courthope, nd, (watermark 1845) Copy of an account of 1799 of the history of Mayfield Place, nd, C1850 Etchings of Mayfield Place, 1781-1809; Pedigree [by William Courthope] of families descended from Thomas Chichele, C1850 Album containing photographs of HTMK, HJK and their children, C1860—188O Book of newspaper cuttings, 1871-1876 Photograph of J Jones Coachman, nd [C1860] Photograph of Francis [Kirby], 1869 Photograph of the Lime Walk, C1870 The London Gazette Containing (p5863) notice of the transfer of part of the parish of Mayfield into the consolidated Chapelry of St Philip Burwash, 1877 Album containing photographs of Mayfield, the Vicarage and harvesters, C1880 Photograph of HTMK, nd [C1880] Photograph of Emily Kirby, eldest daughter of HTMK, nd [C1880] Photograph of Emily Kirby, nd, C1890 Photograph of HTMK with his family, nd [C1880] Photograph of one of HTM's daughters, C1880 Photograph of HTMK with hop—plckers, nd [C1880] Photographs of Mayfield Vicarage and the Kirby family Hannah Jane Kirby, (1829-1899) An account of HJK's life, written at Mayfield Vicarage 1861 [for a typed transcript see KIR/30/ 1] Photographs of HJK, nd [C1860 and 1880] Copy of the sermon preached by the Rev Henry Bligh at the memorial service for HJK, 1899 The Rev J H R 'Johnny' Kirby, (1849-1914) File ofJHR's papers including Lancing College Athletic Sports programme 1866, printed copy http://www.a2a.org.uk/search/records.asp?ca1=179-kir&cid=4 25/03/2007 13:46:21 Page 5 of] H R's sermon at Bridge in Kent 1866, birth certificates of Caroline Frances Kirby and Henry Richard Kirby 1887 and 1889, an inventory of the fixtures of Mayfield Vicarage 1897, accounts concerning the sale of Mayfield Vicarage, a plan of land proposed for purchase by JHR from his brother, a list of the incumbents of Mayfield 1270-1912, JHR's announcement of his resignation and letters expressing thanks for his work, tithe statement 1913, and an order for his memorial service; 1866-1914 Ordinations, institutions and licences ofJHR, 1873-1897 Photographs of Francis Kirby, c1900 Photograph album, nd c1880 Photograph of JHRK, c1880 Photograph of [?JHRK]; nd, c1890 Photograph of Patrixbourne Vicarage and JHRK, HRK and CFK, nd, c1895 Copy will of JHR, 1897 Photograph of Caroline Frances and Henry Richard Kirby, 1898 Papers relating to Mrs H J Kirby and the Kirby Trust including accounts for the drawing up of her will and its administration, and correspondence concerning the administration of the trust; JHR as trustee; 1899-1912 ’ Income and capital accounts for the trustees of the will of Rev Sir Henry Thompson, 1900- 1901 ‘ Papers relating to the executorship of Caroline Thompson including a copy will, accounts, a statement of the payment of the legacies and correspondence; 1900-1912 Papers concerning the provision of a new organ and bells including service sheets for the opening of the organ and dedication of the bells; 1900-1913 Letters concerning the ownership of paintings formerly owned by Hannah Jane Kirby, 1900- 1912 Papers relating to Mayfield National Schools, including the lease of the Boys School House by JHR, correspondence concerning the appeal for new school buildings and a playground, and builders‘ receipts; 1904-1913 Letters concerning rents received from property in Fareham and "The Elms"; 1904-1913 Photograph of Caroline Frances Kirby, 1905 Draft and copy trust deeds of the Dr John Hall Memorial Fund, 1908-1909 Rent book for a cottage in South Street Mayfield, 1908 Prospectuses and correspondence from theological colleges in Leeds, Chichester, Ely and http://www.a2a.o1'g.u1andFu-nzxsdncs Suaaandcnnclnt Andlam(3r.)inNevISh-$.frumCnIunan lwu-unu:R-u438l'T6 Manage. ham flfi land (1lh.) Citation dam: 1725-1843 £x:ndFu'n:1.fldns S%alIdCnu!llI2 Mauauz:r:mtmadd1B43 I &:n'uI$ R-U43BlT7 . HII'!h|a1d 6 plaz (4434 cmfian ax 1317-139 7 and Form: 8 (hrs flducna: R-U433/TE Ha:-snland (6a.) cra-doudans: 1765-1854, ‘.914 &umandFu1n:16da¢= Saapuand Cancun! &!.aI¢2n,r'1unHwan Earns: R-U438/T9 Ru: md wurrwms (47-'1.) Qfisan dlf: 1331-1&5, L514 Emxudi-‘orlugfidos Scfilldfintlnl 2Mess1a9esandbndIz13_JufmTTa'Ismapond:mIof1E5B.rru11 Nancy x ta-tun: R-U438fT1D Lana and mash <43.) Q-anon dam-. 1300-X319 &nIIaIII%1n:7dn5 Rd-Inn: R_—U43BI'T11 Virllxii H1115 Cruldon ducal: L778-1875 Exxn|tilIdFonI-I-.)3dns Smpaandthlfilt Mamlv piss of marsh imndnq Cnapas Sr. Mass-1 (39a.) Ru-uvau R-U438/T1‘.A " Lulu Wendmgtnn Farm _ 1 3 cmldon damn: 18434914 [ alnxandfou-In: 9 dun: } R scnouand canal: | ‘ § And Snarruw Caaa Farm I i J ‘I I Bnrham _[ ‘ 1 i Iufuumn: R-U438lT12 u Farm (43I.) ‘ 3 isaunandm-mm Mauaztadnedtoaeadd18B.hunDuva-Hammrficam mica-Qua-u43s/Tu _ UI:¢:erFarmnnwHa1sDei9htFa-mash.) ca-ntinn dun: 1665-X922 &SlaIdPcruI:-fidcc sapuandcanlnlt And Dnsdufs Farm (107a.). frum may and Smcadam 2 MP5. Rderuno: R-U43BlI’1-t Farm and land (4333 cnaucn an-= 1775-183 ’&mn:anlForn:.‘.7dn¢s Sept and Clint! M1139: and land (am), from Putnam- L_._.,___, A Rznrancs R-U438/T15 M$Ia9e,'n::ua1 Q'uunIda$:17'2S-1350 7!! and Form: 15 mars Sapuandcauunc 2<:a%§andfn:qean:HaIoandHursHaIMem1uI(4a.),frwnGa|:sl:y J L___-.. E-Isa R-U438lT16 Massage and land (visa) 1 Quinn 4&2 1801- ‘.850 _____._._____.._.__ Page 16 of 8 i 1 Hartsflalandaanaqs 2 Messages U70! #3: 1595-1739, 1799 &IntaaIIFunn:9dnI: ‘/Rduuna R-U438/123 . 51539:, nmv (hrn matings | ‘ anon-a dam: -_‘7u~1m2 mum: and Farm: 5 dz: ‘ Equine: R-UAZBITL1 Vanous pmpmis Cruunn d:& 1777-1907 Bthnlutaaldliarm: Lsdn 3 .%§Cfll&II ‘ uu:u‘mng mean at Hm Farm (1340) I 4 I. ‘: Rdu'aaa:R-U43B/l'22 V ‘ Managua and land (47a.) ‘ Q-undo: clams: 1688-1340 |ExtuIxan¢Form:25d:s x » _ Snspaandcomun Inflelcarnuanvaannutxle-1:a|mue,rI'amGatI1!1u' Page 17 af86 RduaaxR—U-$38/T22A &—liu|flI£:1799-1913 j1taIdl-‘on-In.-146a: ' Sawwflulnun Sana Farm (55a.) In" -'n:,G’nsla2.' ._J urnaetc hllrcrnaz R—U438l1'Z3 <2-al!iunda&17Sn-1865 Extnnandron-n:51r8:s Scuuandcanit In Blsiupsbaume, Uppa and Inwefiarwa; mash (17m.) In Lvdn, Did Romney. Ivyalwdl: mash (64a.)lnEas1andgamaponde2dcf1&37, fruneiegaya ms. wmnhm (6543.) L.__._.. &G'% R-U438/'Q4 Q'Q&n dl& 1766, 1347-1515 fitand Ftnm:9das Eonaandcomu-c AmIandatsamamDa1uninBishuushm.amo,Pam:cnoumeandKXng§mnapaId§of1847 Cnldhamunr Farm 0223.) Page 18 of 86 B&UuI: R-U435/17.5 caution dun: 1819-1854 Ennnt ad Faun: 8 ans S%cIn¢»Gol$t 1 M5uaqeand|an.fruncmga' 4_ Mandi Qlapl Eda-anu: R—U438/T25 Cr$dondIi1E79 %'|tlIIIFonn:3dn6 Sgnandthntn. Fm-nsalrsy Land (L1) Elana: R-U438/T27 Outlaw $1 1805-1902 in-said R-tn: 17 am: Sfilandfgj Including Olurm Mud:-m and a cam wmdmnl ‘ Vanous crunch’: N Rduax R-U43N127A ifiuntiuudtlnn 1904-1914 1¢n:I\dPonn:Sda:: 14aassdutu:3r|d9¢Pbm <:ne-mu-y gso. ) 1 ‘ i&a'uu:a:R-U438l'l’23 O-u6|ndIt317Z iflkild FVIIYI: 1 (1% f Smonuldanlmtlt :nau1IngmeKIng'sAnns Page 19 of St fiuz R-U4flT29 Heap-as alias Brnmmdd Farm (15a.) QC&ldl%1B41—lB71 Enunaldfiurm: 354195 Smanindallxlt In Raaxlvw and Hart in Hand (201) in Oulsienfmm (‘Adam Rdl§NaEI"d fFurmuy man af 1728, see P3], Rd.-nun: R-U438./T30 < May Sheet Fan-n (74a.) In Reunvcr £‘JjoIId:&17E-1.856 E&nandForu:19d£ Scnvnandcalrtmt >«I:ponoeedcf1865.frumCnl1ard idanna R-U438/111 Sslxnsnne Farm (1201) In Rennver_ <3-aI5nndam:1721«1796 B&tandFu1u: mam: !S%IaiI¢%Inmz (Says 2331:) Page 20 of 8: RI¢auna::R—U-$38/T32 lnlfllcl SI:ra3FanI\ Sand (4a.) Q-ski £1 L752-1787 Emuntaud Form: :1 does 3-npuamlcnnmn In Remrver, m$-Bet. M9 Oistand land (31a.) in Chsett (Save 532) &UIn$ R-U435/I33 Faun and land G63.) Ctufianaj 1656-1794 mutant: Form: 35 do: SGQIEIGCDIIEEIII mRu:.Iver(Sayeraat:) fiuunu: R-U433/T34 Masuage and land (62a.) ‘ Crjdj 1718-1&5 Ex1!an¢FunII:8do¢= janumuuvl in R$1NE'zlflHane(SayE'5I3m) &¢-13 R-«U438IT35 riellanmuqll Farm in Rannvaand !and (ESL) Q-anthnd§:1760-1898 kmnandfiot-m:22daa gsupunudculan ‘:arflsdnn1sabo rdetnn|amrafWllesha1u:¢I(Sayus:xa) 2:143. Page 21 ofsa » - ?39e23of8- I * I ruu-nu: R-U438lT36 ' scam andnnulult _ - K Manage and land (2403:) ' ' G-Iadnn um: 1323-133: 5 Indudingsilzafsiand atR¢:u.|va-(I874) J &u|tasdForm: Hdns Sac an ccnmnt 1 » Lrgnuuru ‘I . Including rmstpmperty In T31-35; wthfine mapondeeauf 1833frnm Egarand Paxs(Sava'e§=m)3 bulls. ‘ Eda-u-nu: :1—U43B/T45 1 } mucus R-U438I1TI “‘=5“39"“‘ 5"" ‘"4 Msaage and Ian: (127a.) _ _ 1676_u‘3 Cmid damn 1.793-1342 ’ — fin and Faun: 24 dos EnnIiaIIdFut1u:4Dm§ ‘ Smpsirldcnntnnt Stauaandconufl . FrumM|:1z In Giant. cottage and land (1a.) may on dud afzsozfmm Wax: 3 MB. Edema: R—U433/T46 rut-naneusz-uaaanss '~='|d<19I-$4113-1 Land(6a.)nnRaI:uver n .l77D_m‘3 D-nflandnu: 760- 1 1813 h$KaI1FoI'Is: Mflas Extatuand Form: 11 dot: , samnzuaancur: Sapuamlnnmnvt -1 Fwm Toisnn (VIo&I§fite) 1 . |Id‘b'Q§R~4lJ438/T47 Rflusuaak-(M38/139 — 5'“*"'“"¢"" "“g"°‘°s a-manna-ma mm ' e'enflud:& 1.713-13$ ' ‘ _ Exmvtalm Fm-masdocs Exzttfifavu: lldzts 5na—arnICuIIn&l Scqnaavdmnlal-1 Lnflardrsfiaruigzand fl Inducing Cllpcrufi In cms1e:(wouttons:ua) Iuruumam-«use/raa E F rcuaun l DaddsLaIxd(Sa.} in Chlstat I ' V 1 Pa E 24 of 8 Page 22 of 86 9 r crguanduu: 1757-1131:: ' ‘ :%I(andFnnn:;9dc¢: ' ‘ , Rd”.'.:R_u43an-48 ‘ Mamrunumam 5°’9“"“°"""" a-nlianmuu 17194355 . (WOGIIBII 682) J En-antacid Form: 3 dot: I l , suananucanunt I ‘ i R‘.__m: R_u438/T“ ; hm, lndge. Q:urtFarmana1ands(83a.).le:s:nn1¢ofDemand G1aau'm‘<.‘an:mry 2 bus. I 2 Hssuagsand land (134a.) . 2 ‘ O'a&n:I% 17$-lB46 Enucanufiou-vn:34an=s I t mm 7, Sulprandconxl Harshland induding Brnad Medan and write Mash (73a.), frum Dauisun 3 bdls. 5 &uuIxR-U433IT49 ; MuInrscf|1asuagnanuIano(1Ysa.) ”§a9°'fa‘“a"“a'd an-can ans: 1741-1:51 °'“‘*"' "‘="- ‘7‘7“3“' a1n“nd,-,,.m“3d°3 - &nus!aIuFurn1:38dcDarmg,Furn§and§.Jnhnfamil|earIdt1Iq'raI=m late:-ma R-U438/T137 Attestea aapies only of dads and sum:-mm: Qnafifl%1673-IE6 hhltalldflati-n:38nhm Salpeadcnntunt RzIanngcnHu9s=nanflHoneyuoadfamI£iaa:\dthars:n-.1, rnalmvdblataxadflaasns T4 . sure W mung am - :‘ 7 manna R—U435/E1 J : :-mzyuny taunts : cruuun d-as 1790-1815 { &nm and Farm: 35 dot: E Page 52 of Sun: and canal: V Fnrninslaroaurtfiaz mcudlng landatDur1v:d<.Pa:ndaatSanandHeawi:fIsunmariad 3 van: Hxtmaldul, High Wymmbe, 43 Lowerausvennrsin Lcndunand . am naveactaiasnu-agent,loaIbv.Tnacnneqaumenc2anainsaanrn:usu‘rwainmad:,vaan ten.-mes annmnamsm arrea1s;cmmnms_a1 the-carter; famflynawaurdiacurryrlgzamsunneru staying 1nRamsg&. TM"; ’ E E .1 E 3 5 § § 3 ‘ arpens51'a'maIrIt2nmman1r:pa|rs.Ac.::>mpanledby 1em=1stnEflu:Do\uaga'Caun&CnIryngtamar . . fl|os£|'ISflI ! Rdlranu: R-U638/E-15 , Mlnsu: and Blfmns D-atiovl dag 1951931 I aunt and Hum: 14 vats 1 Scspnanacnm-at I é’: - Khan: R-U438IEl6 I I I i Half-ya-niyren& l Vxtous rulnls an ran acmum: Crutinn dam: L73§:1780 — 1813 I Ella! and Form: 16 ans S%Oafi|‘Alj f Ash, sanavudx, Lvmmge: Elham. cmsaa-. Ruamoer and Formnau, 1739: I2! fzrsuvay of rnamm in {slannape St, Mayfair, 13114; s1gnmtman:ya9reu'IIuns feruseafcupnl Fiddsbvmnlerdflapd J Rn-. Ramsgzaa. 1792. L_ Form: Mlnsmwnd Ransgatn exams 1780-183; ‘Mrs Du:iey’s aamnts‘ fw lam: in Wlnqham. Pr=stun,{ Rduane R-U438IEl7 . Abssraas of rent acnnun jauaaunaatsxsoo-192a janrltamhrnumducs Rarfifinnsanufllnser _._ i I !'S=-9-Indus-nu: i 5 I 1 mean: R-U438IEl8 Mlnuus afmeeflngs : ; Craadnn m& 1525-1923 8 J i I ’0f5 1j.___.____, ,,.,.._.__-_.J l_. $123161-=vrlI:1vd sapaandcnatnm ofacaalmlsufnaquaafcavyvsynlndafien. Page 53 of 86' Reference R-U438/E19 _ Vanous zunums crude:-I dag 1919-198 §tIlltalI‘lFC'Ill: 146$ Scuplandcantult Including arecucursnip. L919-1923; lncnme. 1931-1573: aural 1929 lldu-one: R-M38130 Ramsgaa again’ Grader: #1: 17%-1911 Enaankand hr-In: 1 ml Saapnand Cantu 080-1808: In aftnmms in Hand. Ranals. bills for fmprovanan: and some pasanal lfls. Bfsashllenus blls fur oma Canvngllarrl aux ‘ndudnq aflnafims m slanmoe Street house 1807-1810: acnwnu ar repairs :2: Miss Can! F3311-1. ,,__.._.J Tuna: R-U438/E1 Summary anaaunts an-1tandFarlI:1bal n ’ Q-fiat %: l81D-1816 ‘ Sam: and Commit I uagemtmsmd‘ ForChapaPIa¢andHigh5uuet.Rams1at:avIda0sn&mkFam, Mirna-indudhqrenure:x'va:Ian-1 jwvvnentafratsandtans.Alsaraauzsupayntmunudewwlfllamdarkdfltuuasaqammr ' grands f ' Amuuncsrnrrepaismamunsmansem Page54of86 I E I Rdennau R-U433/E24/14 7 Blfrunsaizizvtnmus . l Q-inn n1 1930-1932 I Extu1aud.Fu'In: 4 was . 3 Rtfuunuu R-U438IE24l5 1 L13 afcass C113!) ans: Dec 193 Sawuannlhnmtt Tn.s&d‘Frax:sConyngna:nu:A.3iwdAb1in&pnnrraceren:|p1sfnrLHeuh Eda-cask-U438/E2511 Lz1Icyaa:n|uvson$tac\‘A|.|sulINaIIaufO1ann‘Iarn fiéfidj 1314 E:mnandForrn:1 hdl BL-Ia: R-U438laS/2 Lzgaq acnnnlsm eaacedemtge Henry, .3!!! Marques Canyngnrn craauundazlsm. EnstandForm:1.'adl I Hagan: Plum‘: 1 ) ldufia R-U438/E26 - Rwans and canu'Donaen1:: regardnq proposed munyaau Crabs: dim: 1901-L521 EInmandFum: 1541:: Esau: R-U433/E7 Ru.-usluons and unsuvathrts on ma C1-u1i:ndn$1fl99—1.912 EnaItaInFcnn:8dne i flAferusu:R~U438/E8 schema driest and dacumans auuondac-= 1.501-3915 s:m-ugausuuezmoa Page 55 of 8 ' Rub-nna: R4)438IE3 Hszzlhnaxus cream at: 1367. 1901-1915 &In£ and Pu:-In: 35 nix sap: and cans»: Znclufiag an! at mengag: !'w_ s1n.aun in 1915. I 9 I } §fE!%R-U438JE30 Ahsuaaoftlclerauingmmulmga Cm:&n 11 IE7-1921 E>::nmatdPaIn:26das [ Suvevlild léuenus R-U438IE1/1 1 Sunny afthe mixer uf Mxnscu Crualiandaexwou B:IllK1f"Ql“lE4l'Y 1BanlCZ%IIt 3yTrI:Isas<3-‘rma ikuIua:R-U438/ELR Mamrafmnsnr :Q:a&-drn:1743 .~ E:&landFa1I:Sfl‘ S%i!dClI& Surv=yubyDauiru¢::anelyin172n.-is:'lIgtMra'nsfur1743 33395560178- Rdu-uzfl-IHBBIEI/3 - D:uxpunnafthernuwufMIrna{anvltnerna'IurufPu:x:tsat5aI12 ‘, Qadul dIt$ 1744 THUG Kflllififf Fhfiéx R-U438lB1l4 Alszraa of B113 , Iranian da$ d75lI ! I El: and Form: 4 ti &-ulna R-U438IB1/5 Valumon of estata = 035% 1811 sens-anuaancanz lnTham-_:ofE1|uI, Dc-aqercnmtaufconvngaa-nbyldulfihdt. Iuierancn: R-0438/31/6 M R—U423I B1] 5 Qnitlou dams 1.815 iCEI% R-U438/E1/7 Smaey of Hlnsur 3:12: CL'&&n inns: 1816 Says am Cantu by John Mauanan cf Lumn. Indudlng Bmuk Faun, un$neazmanmermuMmenwnrmwmfimdmIdvacutI. apendlturean mzsana ru;airs,3&afrIapakuft:nhlngsarvd<::rNnuKsuIfaM1s£cfmnLSurvuyal Rnfnrcla: R-U435/‘E32 Surveys of War: and Column: in Chlslat (‘J-anion I-1&3 c1700,lB32 Exmmand Form: 2 dots Rah:-us¢a:R-U435/E33 Survey ethics Hacaand wmuous in Klnfin Q-¢nlnndac3182S,1BO Eachnzadfiu-I.-!.srnl.vcl Saaonandcununt '.vnn‘sxam map and aha gmnq sum of umvaaon. msnaasnoumc. Iangsmn and Lows many: Page '57 of 86 Alsoruvtalnfaamuaatznnandqe. nnfnnna: R-U433/B4 crumbs 4% 1309, 1815, 1839 ExmuandFonu:'4aoc Scunandpanét ! of various wooaus inducing land in Thane, Sale pafiuuarsand vfiaatiis HearnsDe§gntPa1minBnmama:IdMbI@'Court)'1rm. Elissa RAKE/ES Cruuon data: 179. 1750 amntaul Form: 2 doc ‘.1mb:r5.|rveysunHix$'n=$t: T J I Ja.,.......;....m7 ! Of Cmpstead Flat: and cans in Surveyandvduaflon Guvemg, Olfaru, ixtenam, Knodzhnit. I-knead and Kanshg; me DGUEHQ ' Umei afshareham; 53 Hi esmm an ofiord, Kemsing and Shnrenam LsrVBV$WHC}Wflm ~_...J tnGen1yeP¢-mllland Villi&‘lafatzI5inKfl'It I 5%zan¢l-‘urn: may $cfl8indCnu1lll£ Survevcfnwlas or Klddem!ns:a- and Oldingtun m %anuns::r. Ca waeau I EEEIZ RAMEIES Exunt1FarI:8dou: Sspoand CGICII OffammprupausanuIanainThan3.m2BIfrur|s$a:arI1|naudl1Igasta!unemofan=I§fursau dpattlurlsaffllfru-ufihlfiil I J I anaduldatu: 1540,1501 - my I I Misuallanasua Page 58 of 86 J I 1.... can. mnlnly under The Limifi Ounaus &dIt3 1870. 2371 Ida-Una: R-U438/E4-D 0-$‘$dI§1.E-‘.913 &:nnlan¢l'1arnu33dn= Tilflcbj Enckndirv-1r‘a9ah-s.addt:$nr-s.dra'maga.eIa:zrvc2tgrst. mmptnsfargamnarsanuagn 3frmsandPe:tFamI Rderuna: Rvu-$38/E41 autiondata-£1890-192'! fi!ltal'IEForl|I: 14:11:16 icnpnandcnncan Radon Haas: ?lzta’sImplv,eIa:1itLlg!Itvnthinvaa:nryoffixtm'a Page 59 of E I .' I I Edema: R-U433/E42 ' idngmn RHSHY Bfiflfld Farm: 18 docs I E i Sanazndcnnta-It wImpIaszfoasru5e.a2tnHeetFarm.Mms:a-Ahbw,PuAnu.mdomz;x-wmtes ‘ L 1 (H I a.....,.m.W J I Laitfslluxungrignsnnalffnvssln ‘ Gruattaadagz 1905-1927 Exumtandrornnsdns 4 _ sdmmaln:wemiu ‘ D1693 Union aadnn &: 1335 r ’, Ratnnnesk-u438IE44/I. I‘ %uutan¢Foa-nuécus Eialflffflj Pmmaofwondn.:se.n-:d|:ai1:1st2mapan E &9I'BlIa.'R—4J433/E44/2 Bidqeflurd Dlstrvctcoundlam Rmalsaniutyntmurty I Q-eauan:h&!.£,1B3:152S If Enunand l'1'.II1n:4doIS : fipnanllhllurt Misdianqaus agneemans Including mw order tonal Gavemmaut Beam amalganafliug ‘ D3r9§s Katerina R—d-138/E-64/3 Sean Rn1alD1dn'aCuma'| Page 60 of 81 ’ 5 Soon and (Blatant savaqedispumatfleznaweramtahingofsxnowaalndgravuiaxcflsu fihrunas R-U438/E44/4 O-ea&Ida& 1885,1397 §xaI1dFerI'l:-‘dos Tilflcflflii Pt.ldrs:dlanda¢ja1nII9HilIHaaHsu1al liefeiulas R-U438lE44IS ’.1’E!uSRilI'alD|£l'7ldCcunci CI'$3éd§.l398-1899 &IlntaflForu'I:3dnG saupaan-Jan-nun: V ' 5 Papasrqildirlgnesvraadatltlbldqeavustnur lfiuulxx R-U438/E45 Mlsalhleaus tenancy agrumaus for vanous clupauu Q-fim damn: 1756-L920 amntand Form: 33 docs %Qa)dCn£l Zruuding Bifmns manage. 1907; Got: Sbeetfiarm, 1919; Bamam Dams (‘x#Caus:. 191.5; Kingston Court Farm. 1905, 1.912; Penna. 1351; Reamer Tehqrdpfl Stzunn. 1341: MI-xsmrcnm. 1759. 1874'. 5m=nalH‘1rn\. 1340; Ilednn Farm. 1905; Snag: MIX, 1.907: Masnhnd Ln Mlnscer. Beaxsaourne and Am, 1756, 18924306: 21:412. 1808: Harsade Farm, 1311; aifmns. 1918-1920. 57ofE LJ’ L Page 61 of86 Ilnfanana: R-U438/E46 Draft less tn‘ maasnland In must-H Qufion data: 1317-1% aunt and Form: 15 doc; I I , Rduruuan R-U438IE-$7 Mlsmuaneous papers Crnuio-dams 1816, 1837- ‘.860 aaénzanuronnusaxxs Sarpaandlblrmn ReanngmsauanuKciestztsinIm1iaIdaan-.133 ‘iuntalIdFarmx7das . 7 1 i auaanaats papers regarding an! cnncaols O-anion d:& 2910-1921 Extant and Rmn: 8 dun: Hum-mun: R-U433/ES firtfiu 11% 1313-1971 sun: an¢_rcm:s an saavnaudcnm-1: From W. For§n' Gram, mining engines ..\I Ida-ax R4438/ESE Mlafllanalus us - Grfitiwl dai 1912-1929 amen: and Form: 1 bdl suspuandcanumt And aczcuurs mm 5. 8.). Bmley cf Blnnlnqnan; engines Riuuna: R-U438/E67 0&8! $3: 1905-1913 Exam and Fall: 9 dot: Say: and canal: KI Nijb-Wamnnfiu Km: (‘Al $l1dX$ . Page 65 af.86 I tau-H9221-U438/E68 ' Saba afBauma Burma and Heezaamq Gulfiall flat 1914 11 and Farm: 2 rots R:faunu:il-U435/E69 - Laseandagnznax ,auuanaaus::9:.z.1913 enunzanaronmzaoc Saaoanndcnnmn wlhCant:muryan:Iwuh<3IathamDrIllu:>L:n. 1% fliarencn: R«U438/E70 ' P1-usne:wsandmaaafEhsHee:GaiiSyndi& O'Ilfl'IIndi1:l510.L975 ExnmadFc-u:3au3 :‘ Sapuaudmuoznz -\ndnaau1Sann2Md'IpaR,2'haverIananvEStmr 11¢: R-U43BIE71 ; Muuozanaurn an! anide of anuauon Q'$linndl$:1904,19fl iutandrcl-n:2&:: Swain-Idcacux 0fKuICmI<‘nn§orILcd.,'uI1Imap Kama R-U438/E72 Agreements. an Qildcll di IE7-192 Stan-aaarhanux Rdaflngusmmananuaaflddantxfimlm. L I» l)H‘auIaR—U43&I93 I Papusraaungu:appusa't|:ncnKen!t‘AalEMl.l572 Cr&onn%n:1S22 yfixnntaudhmnadns fsapeandcunurz Infiiadingperflitxnfrumflaeu-u§aauft1xeViilof!m5t1'zMarqu$ L [ namuw mm: Elhdfihxial [52 am LX053] . fiflfllifl-U438/E74 J n-—- IansaIspaau'srIsacIIgtnfl'IaSom:1&tznflai§layandnIavIdza CI-aflnn dams: ‘.335-L903 Bualrtaud Form: 23 doc: I Kama: R-L|438Ifi5 ; Agtanmts, nraflcunveyana. am, Iasauth £1! Railway Cruuon was X346-13 T3 Fflfflli 15 dD§ x Ida-use R-043/55 Pmpoals In-nhnaaa:?c1soo §tandFu'm:2mnI’es I |SwpnandI"ana-K Taamvatswnmmnavennmnmewmcbalhnuurinfinghndmransnauamaflht Page 68 of 8 4 Ida-ma: R—U438IE77 Eas:K:mLi;ntRaiways I i i F Caution dates: 19104925 Basin and Form: 3 NB fin and haunt 5 Papas, m . pnomgrais lflu-vice.-R—u438/F18 lzldtanlrimaletaxandlrsnmnagnxs . G'aIiu1dat$1799-1920 ’ &Itandi'€m: 174% Edema R-U438/E19 Q'$dDIId3£::'.‘.7H)-(‘.1500 Btuizand Form: 9 Suapcandcnntun Inducfingfihufiazfarmandnagacaaquanwru Anuohtmuts dgamekeepa-, and ratcollectnn Oudon cans: 1781-190$ Enux and Foam 8 dos flafuuuaz R-U438/B0 Miscalaneousshsmvlats Maunsmardgafifidmvrls Q-auaIdaua::l927 &tnn::udFonn:3m Page 69 of 86 ideals: R~U438lEB!..I‘2 Papas raguclng Pa:-n'xm\.rn_e (‘amp Otfiantt-‘ L918-1919 Exzlnt and Penn: 3 the i java: R-U438/E31/3 ' Dxipdon of bauus of minor cl D'fiDlIdI&1757 E::mvtandfi:nn:1da: Iwel-1annuR—U438/E8114 Reounsun bu-nsatuknstuamwknralnhrusxx Quuan dim 1927 Emu: and Form: 4 on Rdh-as R-U438/E81/S Schamle affimngs at Iledal Hausa Klnflll Ouaflundax: 1928 &::.ntandFuu-rn:3ou I Ilia-nnu: 11-0433/E8115 I Cnnspatdencuvnuunni harm cmnhadnszlsls E&mzuFhrm:1fIe scnpnandcnnunt Regaining Gar: Wand. Ilman iIdaranzR~U438IE82 Pat2rsraali:gInmeAwanHnpzttit'nIIEnunseundvIda:% <:'aaunndan:1865 a21tandFarm:3do= Tilt: R-U43BI1 H opumnrs on title eh: O'—unnda$:1740-1.861 %uIandl'1:a-nu: 1260:: Page 70 of S6 Ifiu-at R—u43lIEB4 Bonds and rel$3 auction has 1720-1508 EnuItaIIdFonI:9dons I ' Hi-Inna: R~U438/35 Afflflavns and slnntuy dclarsadcns Qandul an-: 1735-1899 iK§%'flI322.i l&a'u‘I% R-U433/E86 arm. mama): and «:11: ceniflats <2-stionatz 1738-1893 Exzltanflfiarm: 1 lad " Suoaanflfinntnilt Aruduapymlslnaannacttmwmlwnofufflne Ida-nix R-U438lEH7 M52hl|$lS annnczs and SW 6&5 Qiuiun mm: 1759-1925 Emu: and Farm: 33 ans .&-uncmk-U438IEB8 ’ Cowsaanmazmofmflcremvas 1XaIdF0fll:J2i ‘tuuandcnnunt Maklytndawtti Clnquefixu Rdiena: R-U433/B9 Final miscdlalen in-nnnnauns: 1702-1923 Ermnand Fan: 1 bal 3-(arena: R-U438/E90 . M ale analogue and namnuars ;Cau&nda&19t2nt 1 Auancolflfiu Mm/2000l|$n; saonandrn-cunt sh-uedumt sahccauhga Fd:2flO1.uw|§ar2dfim:C3nedKmdsflShmB.2953lB‘ia§C5371D¢9%5!lZ|flB|¢=&$LP€M‘ ‘c1840 Page 71 of 3- 1 I PIflUuHa"I'$l$£ 1 Ada‘-list!-lelvaflnn-V .E'Jen ufsdunanMenev1uiLoMon,mumanLmrdedthe1stEan¢fCnnyngmmin1744am ‘su¢:::edadu>herfa1Ia*sa|am ! Edema: R-U433/B1/1 Quay WW CIMIS. Hard: Oafil £1: 1762 I n-r-Ema: :1-uaaaissuz 3:15:05 anmunts ofscomnn Harem’: e122 1 Grlifion :11 1740-1745 $1: and Fun: 3 ans F 1 Banana R-u¢38IE51/3 = Paynuausrnaadaforsadnrulesh pmuany Q I:-aunt sates: 1753-1761 { Mlszlanuus papus Page 72 of 8- { 5 sq: in Costa: I I RaamgmLadycnnyngnam‘sfu1mnamm:SacI:viihSt.pIB9H‘W LEGAL muaens 1 i-aux R-U438/U tlarzyvasawllbnnandcunrs Ojadj IE1 %1UHFC'Bl'.9&6 f1 Regamlngmamanarnfflitszrlndudlngverylalgefileoldupasflora Bic-Ia R—U438IL2 wiiam vain: (hwy Dauflaldilfifi Ifitnandfnu-nn4docs Sapeavdhnmlt _ Rgaruilg dlviil of Mtmerante 1 L &I'II\u:R-L|438lL3 Chancuyacu-an Paved abs Wllam versts Holiday ajicndaizéed sawaanllcoltult Rqruing a mortgage at Dlggu Court. Bimam KCCIZ R-U438/L4 may (1775) of prrvam An: Grands: dab: 1735 faint! Form: 1 file. 336 ff Formaaazaf Sir Héaty Fumes, aflecung manarufsoduall (mid! and pmnutvin Than: Page 73 of 86 Rdu-aux R-Uafills O-aIinndIus:177S Exmnzax-IdFnnn:47!f Sfiaandconfit mnynynm vests Banner and others, regiruhg the rnancrsiflissta Rdaauxa R-U438lLE ‘ Canyngllzli vusxs gnhb crudnndat$1778,1779 hnlItandFonn:3d::: Sannaldflwtult Rganilngmanarafflhsmr fish:-encn: R-U438/L7 conyngham versus Ont! ¢)'un':In di 1824 Esta: and Farm: 5 does S§landl‘All$I! iagaruhg rights of wrem in Hhsar R1-H13 R—U43B/L8 aua§ondIteI:1331 1|tzndFarm:1duc S¢mind®l&It Gmdsan vusu Elisun. laud in Mlnsu Page 74 of86 Iwuunca: R-U43wL9 fiyvghaln wuss Cdanan &—Ila|d::1B4S axutan-ul'¢rI'n:3wIs Sapnatldasnmst %IdllIIAsl1 Ea-ma: R-0435/11!) Canvngnam varsussoudl Eastern Raihny <2: O-u$nda$‘.846 Exmrtand Fan-u|:7dots S%&%l§I£ Rajavdhg mv$1\e1t uf nurmasn money £21 R-Ud38iLJ.1 Cruuahan: 1855 %tatIdFoI-I-I|:5¢ns %Will1&t Riifl SHEER Of ITIOHQBQE PHONE’. SUDQIHEII F-3fl'I'I Wb¢Ul)f'$|lX Rdiula R-U43BlL12 Laird vusus Brlggs Git fiti 1874-1&1 ant: and Form: 11 docs flflldjl %rerI§htslnma:I:rofMlnsH IIdIluI$R~U438JLL'i ‘ Cmvliqharnvasasunh Ea§2rnR:luaVCD Q'-dnndItas:1877-lea §It:ndFnrrn: Educ: SaplalIdCan£¢ Aaauntzfsaaadaam Page 75 of 31 &-Inca: R-U438/L14 Tmufl vets): NW G-udnndiwldatm hXIntan4FoI'In:5doG RqZdI\grlElcr0fMh§a KfCm$ R-U438/L15 Bmclxman versus Haley aiauflunuzldamd &t1anflFonn:'.1dos Sannandurnant Regarding fursnorein the rranw dbiruzr Raiarula: R-U43ElL16 Ramwlm cauxv Cam papers Q-¢&da&: undated trad Fun: 10 dos sauna and Cnnunt Claims to quit-rum Original bundle I R£&X&R-U4§IL17 Curwnqnamaga'\stMidKaItanuEas:KaIIDSuiavlazCnmany5lII 4‘ ' dfléuj I Exln'|tandFuI'm: Edna Page-76ot'8 Kane: R-U438/L13 $3!!! versus Canyngllam O&ond.§:I.lIdalai &mnandFumI:37dus Snap: and Quinn! Regarding wm of 5th Haruaus. deal. ’ Vanna: nuts and Ann of Pnnhm-I TICZHFQINST &-Inca: R—u438/L19l1 Aacollcarliuiwitfi th:sa|enfG|§lands Kln9xilI’u'I1.S\#fl:l'$I'ra ‘a-aauanaananmzs TZIHCDIITXI 7%.IV. ,1 ficfuultz .°.4U438IL19/2 V I Act: ficllltan.-Itne cnnvefintz of parishs and nmerpansh pmpaw « 5§'I:fi¢IIda1:1S35 Sarnnandanmn WHIIV. Rdaruna: R—U43B/L19/3 E Bill tn encnurage. , iaeadendun: £864 am regmarsaaysurflsnerianfingundandwalu l flung: R-U438IL19I4 .4 page77°f36 ' Page7§of8 Scupnandcnmnnt I Sawuandcamuat " Foxuianuuguuapswumcacounaas 'of'Kerne3ay.Haa1uunaI¢Ra:mu-oys:u'FsshayCnmua:1y.27&2n\;Ia. ' J 1' ‘ Rang-ulna!-U43&I05 oraftpaanon. Rlhnna:R-U4.'Nl|.19/5 Nmmafappgafim . &an.§mdam:c175D qadondljlgo E&I'I:ndForIII:J.dx saapnaadrhnmnt s“‘9""‘c°""“ Forcn:@'udinnuiapi:'aRaInsgatabywaqI1fPIecmnpany. ‘ Fmnrmrlnssinnargaumwucamiwaninmddmaflatnraqalnuufiawuflss Rniuuxmsfl-U43BIl.19/6 anfwulaui-U438/06 , Mu9ixnCorpn@onAI1 > P%'wI1tIGna'I.IePon:rxxfl a'oa!§nlIddnv.-1900 an-uouununaaws ' hx:n:andFou-rnxldnc Sa:9aanfl<‘aa$t eaasovla. Sou-andcnnnn: Rfiarflhgfllangfllfwifit I Ifi!uuIzR~u43B/|_1.9l7 5""°."S3‘=°‘°"'°°"""‘= I caA|u1'vAunEccL£s:Asr1uL <:un§nn¢au=:191n 1 S f Rnfunaa: R-U438/L19/E album: R—U43B/Q1 SutumryRuIsandoruer:nsaaubytheAgriuuuralBurd ' Paneysraanngmmesleoflhapnarnussa I2-antiuIdnas1917 > Cradnndatuslms anntandfiaa-nI:3dou: n-remnant-uaaa/us/9 ' &rnPrucud:1anAcr smfiumcuflt I2-ua&adn&}917 — Atwlcxhunu-eauxflca. dthamnraauxand a:(¢aganeIrTummann Farm l . Saaunasdthncnnt l 7&EG:vV. ‘ 1 fl-¢a:R-U43BlQ2 I Letters ruglmlng Sir Roger Hanwnods Chantv, Camnbuny G-uflIuI&: 28414842 Etltandrou-m:4da0(x\IUpxs6,10,14. 1914 75'.2.ndEdflmsna¢m1g wlcknamuxrnfinrs Hn|dlng.She§s)OO(VIl'.l.p:7.c1B98 3 R-tau-u: R-U438lP11 ‘ sea au 35-. Sheets xxxvn 16, XLVIILZ. nd I Qnadon data: (‘.1890 25'. Shea: Lt XXXVl.l4. 15; XLVIL2. 3. nd ""‘“‘ """“""‘°‘ ‘-""‘°‘1"“" 5'. 3m eaxucn. Sheet: Lvn.1. 2, 7. 1907 6'. 3111 edition. 91% H.VlI SVI. LV'lJ NW. l9(E $833 R-U4ZBlP12l1-7 Cnalcmasdonmaisanaulans 6'.Zndedl1nn.S!&XXxVHE.SE..L89B cradanaax r.151D—!.525 emu: and Form: 7 ea: 1 mug! J 1 Page 85 of 86 ThomuFarmmMiru:nran¢StLaw'raIc:. Cow ldUcIa:R-U438/P2012 ' RS_{nurandLEt2Stn.rrf1unvna!naInbr-aanntnuartnsumar .10-3dcII¢a&unda@ hl¢Ina=R-U438./P2flI3 _ HupusmmIhwmMaym&:KanuomRaMzys1uu\gCoptrhLSuwa‘hmFrmamI.I1!e%ur a-auondazu: umatad Raf-111$ R-U438lP2D/4 anundan=m'farmsinPu:rixbun-ne. Bridge, Luuerflamra. Blshorsboume Q-clflul ax: undated nu-nun: a-u43a/rrz:/5 _ ‘ ‘Nouaann-Giarttnn wood. La-erflarures. Gasnv. Langhanhrkwoods I ' Qmdun dams undam I Rduruuz R-4J43BIP2D/6 I In Stndmarsn, Wlddamuunux, and Plfitm ital ! G-nut.-ha dams urn-damn J nu-saga-udas/P20/7 Flats in Glide! Matslla I Crutlnn dubs: 156.2 I | nun:-us R-U438/P20/8 ' - Q Plan snowing . Ash and Snurmoum Z Landon din: undatnd -J )1 Farms an-und Klnfinn Pruver!ymm1.Prau:n.sn:Lnm:m‘1 Q-I-nun um: xmdacad jillflfllmfll F I iduuaou R-U438/F211/10 1' Easznedhalamsuafuramnnuqtasa Page 86 of86 fl Ii Irwin Melvin Cunningham, Ethel Askew Cunningham, Betty Joe Cunningham, Donald Cowen Cunningham Hazel Noreen Marie, Margie Ann, Imallean, Anita Virginia Gmningham History The motto "Over Fork Over" was introduced into the Cunningham coat of arms following the entry into Linlithgow castle of King Robert the Bruce and his followers, concealed in hay carts. The English, who were occupying it at the time, were driven out and it is said that the Cuninghames fell upon them with their forks, tossing the English into the air like hay and shouting their cry ‘Over, fork, over !' The first Cunningham is believed to have been a Flemish man named Wernibald, who took on the placename as his own when he received a grant of Kilmaurs in Cunningham, Ayrshire from Ll...-..~ An AAl\L£Il:||f\ ‘-Lia» f‘A..-.;-L-.L~IA AC (‘;—.~&-I-‘an;-I :u\ 4 ‘I /If\ |'|UgU UC |"|UlV||lt£, L|lt:.' \..U|lbLdU|C UI DLULICIIIU, Ill .L.L‘l'U. Haakon IV, King of Norway, arrived off the coast of this area to re-assert his rule over Scotland's Isles in 1263. This led to the sea battle of Largs from which Haakon would never return home. For his part in the battle, Harvey Cunningham of Kiimaurs had his family's property expanded by Alexander II. In 1321, Robert the Bruce granted the lands of Lamburgton to Hugh Cunningham. When Hugh's grandson Sir William married Margaret, heiress of the Dennistons of that Ilk, Glencairn became the property of the Cunninghams also. James III made Sir William's grandson, Alexander, Earl of Glencairn in 1488. He and his King died together at the Battle of Sauchieburn later in the same year. The 5th Earl of Glencairn was a member of the ‘Lords of the Congregation of Jesus Christ’, whose business was misappropriating church property and undermining Scotland's government on behalf of the well-paying English. The group's work was instrumental in the Tudors‘ destruction of Mary, Queen of Scots’ rights. ‘ The 9th Earl, however, was a patriot in the mould of the 1st Earl. While Scotland was under the control of Cromwell’s generals in 1653, Glencairn raised a rebellion on behalf of Charles II who was safe on the Continent. The rebellion was hopeless but in 1660 he was created Lord Chancellor of Scotland, following the Restoration. In the 18th century, a number of Cunninghams, including the 14th Earl, were friends in art with Robert Burns. For the chief, Burns wrote this tribute: The bridegroom may forget the bride Was made his wedded wife yestreen; The monarch may forget the crown That on his head an hour has been; The mother may forget the child That smiles sae sweetly on her knee; But I'll remember thee, Glencairn, And a’ that thou hast done for me! CZ/A ‘UV l/\"1(f‘_I/lrvvkzv‘/~D\/\4.L§"s)~r.,v,;{ « .;J,M~=nJ’ /1 * - (Lwmb (rmn, ' =9W~/9 cw "T? V . M‘/M 4 6 I A»- 4-’ Lgzkcm‘ \aV.~..u,kL.».I-~u~oV j‘~ M 30.3459: lm9~V>c gm; r‘1v'9*‘v’~*~, ,]L(’ 7_’\(,_(3';‘s {.718}? .\3 3A:gp_lK‘l‘ , 6% ye) ‘(CR , }4,“3Aw(?Q~M«:~1rKUEV(/7Lx(§w4L away (Kc . 22 V9 , W W” ! cmmm an . Wfotuv 644%,, , M1. .m{@2\% WW3 i % wyytw ’ » m/ém \Q.1oc«\}u‘>@it , 9* «N-Mwtgfr iieultj 8r%v'MM~C3. Z‘§~\'M__'? § ‘W1/S’ T S".H'.l-iA5l,.tLj¢,.é:3 ; So/mot. Fmm 1: clay/LL‘ .«,. CHAPTER 7 The Taylor Dynasty (a) John Taylor John Taylor was born on December 7th, 1655, the son of Nathaniel Taylour (as he spelt his surname), a Puritan who had supported Cromwell. He had served as Recorder of Colchester at the time of the Commonwealth and was appointed Member of Parliament for Bedford simply by Cromwell writing a letter without the formality of an election. Nathaniel was fanatical. He had 18 children, mostly born in Brook House, Holbom. Several died young. About 1679, John married Olive Tempest, the daughter of Sir Nicholas Tempest of Durham. They had 16 children of which the first three were girls — Mary, Olive and Margaret. Nathaniel died on January 15th, 1683, and so did not live to see their first son, Brook, who arrived on August 18th, 1685, when they were in Edmonton. John purchased Bifrons on September 29th, 1694. Their son, James, died a year later. About 1696 John Closterman was commissioned to paint the surviving family in oil on canvas. This picture currently hangs in Beningbrough Hall. More children followed and According to the Rev. Dr. John Harris‘, there were in 1719 “some very large and fine hollies and two brick walls covered on each side with striped holly which is planted on one side of the wall and made to bend down over the top and cover the other side to the bottom. The green walks are here also fine and covered with the cleanest turf I ever saw. About 500 yards below the house is a canal at the end of which are two islands and a little house built, which they call Trout Hall; in it are bathing places, some beds and rooms for company. The rivulet which makes the canal abounds with trout of two sorts, white and speckled, and in it are many loaches, some of which are often found in the trouts’ bellies”. + 1m~.»» /v.;.s~..9 /4v.+.3a_,, WM J1» w\,uat.a‘{Wj /~V\,,V(,o~s.d’l«..lu. (§'L<7t(1;A it I»!/.24. Wt” 4'16’ W /'7u”n»-”'5J Ci~>.~:_. .-'+d1: ‘/V’/<.=~T*«L0/; c~iu»tv Ww, °v”“’ it (»m»J. w:::~r:;+? M 1.. .,,,,tt_.ntg_ 1, 5 ’ I L: Trwvv-~1’<‘-7W‘ -A-1 /'"=L«*’ : 1 *~‘~*~”‘ we/t”*“"”’° . .. - 3 W a ~ 1 1 v .*< Nmfirb Mr , W :0‘ ;. !XJ( ‘xfai E5 led,/‘\./f/v<—./‘V .. \~‘f\,M1.M Q ' I " "' ’ ' ’ + 6.1./7«;;‘<,r§,.:,.;.Jr_.,) Nefduflh '1',-m,,,T(,l .,S i\.. ')rBH,fl,.;1/\’\’\. : .tsn—nma Wza~« (;>,,t. Sm: mlxw »L-~uw . . M» r:.¢..’L - ~ A Ckéu“-r (’i’”‘4‘w“' “L V7 ' i .2 1;: _x *\ mm! . ,, 1 , 1,\ ~,. _. r 71- . ,WWk r,,.,,,.,,, AW. ., .cx,mt mg» ’ _ r," /15. 7‘»"; <=_.«\ 4]“ \?f5‘K:<,1", Lo: fvu-x Qflx/\; Z"'UW V I i-wéji-AA/LC [f >. ‘L. LYKC). (T2; 5.1921,) @547; ,; (',t,w,_r1,c"/9 ,,7,m,,. L:-xaia-\_,. ¢“°4'?7 1.31%.,» 13. l\—{1.)\« LUSHINGTON LUSHINGTON, Stephen Rumbold (1776-1868), of Norton Court, nr. Faversham, Kent. RYE CANTERBURY b. 6 May 1776, 2nd s. of Rev. James Stephen Lushington of Rodmersham, vicar of Newcastle-upon-Tyne and preb. of Carlisle, by 2nd. w. Mary, da. of Rev. Humph- rey Christian of Docking, Norf. educ. Rugby 1785; Linton acad. m. (1) 9 Dec. 1797, Anne Elizabeth (d. 25 Mar. 1856), da. of Gen. George Harris, cr. 1st Baron Harris, 65. 2da.; (2) 8 May 1858, Marianne, da. ofjames Hearne of Gt. Portland Street, Mdx., s.p. Writer, E.I. Co. (Madras) 1790; asst. to sec., military, political and secret dept. 1792; asst. to translator, board of revenue 1793, Persian translator 1794; dep. sec. board of revenue 1796, sec. 1798; under searcher, Sea Gate 1796, collector, Ramnad 1799, Tinnevelly 1801; regis- trar, sadar and faujdari adalat 1803; at home 1803, res. 1807. , Chairman of ways and means 1810-13; sec. to Treas- ury Jan. 1814.-Apr. 1827; PC 30 June 1827; gov. Madras Oct. 1827—Oct. 1832. Capt. Lath of Scray vols. 1805; maj. militia 1810. 1807-1812 1812-1830, 1835-1837 2 E. Kent Lushington entered the East India Company ser- vice through his father’s connexions. In Madras he acted as private secretary to the victorious com- mander-in-chief General Harris from 1795 to 1799, marrying his daughter. He arrived home with an adequate fortune in 1803, three years after his father-in-law, whom he had assured that he wished to secure his own financial independence before leaving India and had no inclination to any of the professions that might realize this ambition at home. In the event it was his father’s death and his wife’s health that conspired to bring him home and he did not then rule out the possibility of returning to India. Lushington settled in Kent on an estate procured for him by General Harris. He later reminded Harris ‘that he then had no thought of entering Par- liatnent: I was occupied chiefly in overcoming my repugnance to an agricultural occupation which you and William had from the kindest motives prepared for me and thereafter in seconding your endeavours to secure your property and remove unjust calumny. In the early part of this struggle you felt the want of political connexion, and at the suggestion of Lord Wellesley, and with the con- curring judgment of Lord Moira, you proposed to me to get into Parliament. I declined it then not seeing any return of satisfaction or benefit, and we proceeded in repelling the attacks of the directors, and in preparing the government for a more just consideration of the great services you had rendered to your country. In the progress of this cause we thought it of the greatest importance to your success that Mr Perceval, then solicitor-general, should be engaged not merely professionally as your advocate, but that he should be warmly impressed with a sense of the deep injustice you had suffered. To this we both directed our par- 472 LUSHINGTON ticular attention, and of course both of us became per- sonally acquainted with him. General Harris wanted to recover a loan to the Madras government, but he also wished for a British peerage, having refused an Irish one on his return home at the instigation of Lord Wellesley} On the eve of the general election of 1806, Lush- ington agreed to come into Parliament to serve his father-in-law and approaches were made to Lord Moira for a seat, while Wellesley, believing that Harris was ‘made of money’, offered to procure him one for £4,000. In December 1806 an arrangement was made with the Treasury through Wellesley whereby Lushington was to be returned for Gram- pound on Sir Christopher Hawkins’s interest for ,5 5,000, with power to vacate in favour of the Gen- eral’s son Col. William Harris, or any other person acceptable to the minister Lord Grenville. This fell through, but Harris’s dispute with the East India Company continued. He had just invested in East India stock in Lushington’s name when the dissolution of 1807 provided a fresh opportunity. The general had some interest at Canterbury and Wellesley secured the new government’s backing for Lushington’s candidature there. He was averse to it, especially when the general eschewed a com- promise and spent as much on a contest, in which Lushington was defeated, as he had intended to in the purchase of a seat. But Wellesley saw to it that government compensated Lushington soon after- wards with a vacant seat for Rye, which he obtained for £2,500, of which Harris contributed £1,000? Although Lushington’s maiden speech was a de- fence of government’s conduct towards Denmark, 3 Feb. 1808, in which he rebuked opposition for a ‘sentimental system’ which ‘would embrace all nations but their own’, his chief parliamentary topic, predictably, was the defence of Wellesley’s conduct in India, which he was sure would be vindicated by any inquiry, 22 Feb., and defended in detail on 15 Mar. 1808; on 1 June he justified at length the East India Company’s policy towards the Carnatic. (In February .he had given notice of his intention to stand for the Company directory.) He found Perceval ‘very kindly disposed’ towards him, ‘for his request to me . . . to second the address to the throne was his own spontaneous act’. This was on 19 Jan. 1809. He spoke in exoneration of the Duke of York, 17 Mar. 1809. Harris having obtained his compensation, Lushington was now prepared to quit Parliament and had actually applied for the Chiltern Hundreds at the end of March 1809 and was arranging for his seat to be bestowed on a friend of Wellesley’s when Perceval and Huskisson persuaded him against it. He voted LUSHINGTON 473 for inquiry into charges of ministerial corruption, 25 Apr. 1809, and in the same month made another bid to secure election to the East India Company directory, with the encouragement of Perceval’s offer to place him on the India finance committee. He informed his father-in-law that not being ‘naturally a farmer’, he had better aspire to be a spokesman for the Company in the House, where he felt confident of recognition, ‘for I never lose my temper in debate’; besides, thanks to the imminent renewal of the Company charter, India must be ‘largely discussed’. In canvassing the Company directors in May 1809 he suggested that they should impress the proprietors ‘by recommending a person for their choice upon public grounds’, but nothing came of it. Of Curwen’s reform bill Lush- ington remarked in private that it ‘would in fact strengthen the influence of the crown and diminish that of the people. Such are the difficulties of meddling with the constitution. I shall always oppose every change until I can perceive the bene- fits of it.’3 In the event of a reshuffle in r809, Lushington was tipped for a place at the Treasury. His father- in-law, to whom he had mortgaged his estate, hinted that his finances needed boosting. If Wellesley formed an administration, both of them would benefit and Lushington intended to apply to him to be an under secretary of state. This application was postponed from September to 16 Nov. 1809, when Wellesley’s prospects seemed better, but Lush- ington was careful to assure Wellesley of Perceval’s continued ‘good opinion’ of him. In fact, he was content with Perceval’s appointment of him, previ- ously pledged, as chairman of ways and means in place of Wharton, 31 Jan. 1810, with £1,200 a ses- sion: it was ‘the most fortunate and flattering [event] of my life’/' When he took his seat for his first committee on 2 Feb. 1810, William Smith, encouraged by a very thin House, tried to substitute Davies Giddy, as a more experienced man; but Lushington parried the blow, ‘very adroitly’, so Perceval assured him, and was vindicated by the Speaker, whose confidence he henceforward enjoyed, and by others: Wharton pointed out that ‘not long experience, but a sort of technical knowledge’ was required. Lushington, who on the opposition push for an inquiry into the Scheldt expedition on 23 Jan. had stated that he had no objection to one but was confident ministers could justify themselves, was now more closely connected with government, and, relieved of the dread that he would have to chair the Scheldt in- quiry, voted with ministers throughout the debates on the subject.5 The Whigs listed him among the LUSHINGTON dozen personal adherents of Perceval in the House. For the rest of that Parliament, Lushington had little to say in debate outside his business duties. He did not find them onerous: ‘one day of my Poli- gar administration was more severe than a month of this. There is no pressure of the mind, the great requisites are impartiality and the faculty of sitting as long and as quiet as a shoemaker.’ He was careful to establish ‘a character for impartiality’, even to the extent of giving a decision against Perceval: but an invitation to a cabinet dinner on 19 June 1810 convinced him that it was taken in good part and Perceval, for whom he was prepared to undertake business chores during the recess, reassured him of his confidence. He had voted against criminal law reform, I May 1810, and against parliamentary reform, 21 May, as well as against the abolition of sinecures, 17 May 1810 (and subsequently). He viewed the Regency debates with distaste, disliking Perceval’s proposed limitations on the Regent’s power and embarrassed lest his casting vote should be required; he resolved, however, to uphold ‘the cause of the King and of my friend Perceval’ if necessary, recollecting ‘the miserable state of men’s minds in the Carnatic from the operation of a divided government’. He regarded Perceval’s death as a great personal blow and on I4. May 1812 appealed to the generosity of Parliament to agree to a provision for his family, having taken it upon himself to assure Perceval’s brother, Lord Arden, of it in advance. On 21 May he voted against Stuart Wortley’s motion for a stronger adm_-inistration, which he pri- vately believed the cabinet should have endorsed, though ‘much more easy to desire than to accom- plish’. Nevertheless, in the event of Wellesley forming a government, he was earmarked for the sec- retaryship of the Board of Control, though no longer considered a Wellesleyite and expecting to lose his place. He had in fact had the same appoint- ment proposed to him by government in July 181 I, when he was considering the possibility of returning to India, but could not then make up his mind to it. He now assured Wellesley of his support, freely confessing that he had adhered to Perceval, but was anxious to safeguard his father-in-law’s claims on Wellesley, only to learn that Wellesley stood little chance of forming a government. He regretted it, as he wished for a more efficient administration with Canning taking the lead in the Commons, regardless of what his own fate might be; and if Lord Moira, rather than Wellesley, headed a new ministry, he was confident that the former would be as ready to make his father-in-law a British peer. Even so, he agreed to parley with Wellesley at the eleventh hour, Page 1 of 4 East Kent Archives Centre: Conyngham Manuscripts I The contents of this catalogue are the copyright of East Kent Archives Centre. Rights in the Access to Archives database are the property of the Crown, © 2001-2003. To find out more about the archives described below, contact Ea_S_§_j§§fl§,,A_ijQfl[l(§_§___§QL?(IQ Conyngham Manuscripts Catalogue Ref. R-U438 Creator(s): Conyngham family, Marquesses of Conyngham [from Administrative History] This is essentially an accumulation of estate archives, no family papers having been deposited. Major General Henry Conyngham of Slane (co. Meath) married the daughter of Sir John Williams of Minster, Thanet thus creating a connection with Kent of great territorial significance. His son was successively created Baron Conyngham of Mount Charles, 1753, Viscount Conyngham in 1756, and Baron and Earl Conyngham of Mount Charles, 1781, with a special remainder to his nephew and heir Francis Pierpoint Burton. Lord Conyngham married Ellen, daughter of Soloman Merrett of London, merchant, who survived her husband and died in 1816. [from Administrative History] On the death of Lord Conyngham in 1781, his last title only of Baron of Mount Charles passed to his nephew and he also took the surname Conyngham. His son, who married Elizabeth Denison, served in the army and became successively Viscount, 1789, Earl, 1797, and Marquess, 1816. Lady Conyngham was a favourite of George IV and her husband was Lord Steward of the Household during his marquessate, Bifrons in Patrixbourne, came to the estate from the Taylor family and became the Kentish centre of Conyngham influence. [from Administrative History] In the 20th century the importance of this vast estate stretching between Canterbury and Broadstairs was enhanced by the development of the Kent Coalfield. As lords of the manor of Minster which covered most of Thanet the Conyngham family had considerable foreshore rights from Birchington to Ramsgate and also rights of wreck. Numerous disputes arose over the using of these powers. [from Scope and Content] Manorial documents, deeds and other documents relating to the Conyngham family estates at Bifrons in Patrixbourne and in Minster-in-Thanet MANORIAL DOCUMENTS Manor of Minster in Thanet FILE - ‘Survey of Col. Conyngham's Estate in the Isle of Thanet’ - ref. R-U438/M6 - date: 1700 TITLE DEEDS TESTAMENTARY Conyngham Wills FILE - Copy Will of William Conyngham of Ballydavet - ref. R-U438/T124/1 - date: 1700 FILE - Copy Will of Lt. General Conyngham of Mountcharles - ref. R-U438/T124/2 - date: 1704 FILE - Copy Will, with pedigree - ref. R-U438/T124/3 - date: 1762 \_ [from Scope and Content] Of Lucy Skipwith cousin of wife of General Conyngham FILE - Probate of Will of William Conyngham - ref. R-U438/T124/4 - date: 1738 FILE - Original Wills and codicils of Henry, Viscount Conyngham - ref. R-U438/T125/1-5 - date: 1758-1773 FILE - Will of Francis Plerepont Burton, 2nd Baron Conyngham - ref. R-U438/T126/1 - date: 1779 FILE - Will of William Conyngham formerly Burton, of Dublin - ref. R-U438/T126/2 - date: 1782 http://www.a2a.pro.gov.uk/search/documentxsl.asp?com=1&i=0&sty|esheet=x:... 30/10/03 Page 2 of 4 FILE - Draft Will of Henry 1st Marquess Conyngham - ref. R-U438/T126/3 - date: 1832 FILE - Copy Will of the Dowager Marchioness Conyngham - ref. R-U438/T126/4 - date: 1861 FILE - Drafts and copies of Wills and codicils - ref. R-U438/T127 - date: 1855-1876 \_ [from Scope and Content] Of Francis Nathaniel, 2nd Marquess Conyngham FILE - Drafts and copies of Wills and codicils - ref. R-U438/T128 - date: 1904-1916 \_ [from Scope and Content] Of Victor George Henry Francis, 5th Marquess Conyngham Miscellaneous probates of wills L [from Scope and Content] Not Conyngham family Miscellaneous copies and extracts of wills \_ [from Scope and Content] Not Conyngham family SETTLEMENTS AND PERSONAL ESTATE FILE - Appointment for securing £300 - ref. R-U438/T131/1 - date: 1744 \_ [from Scope and Content] Part ofjointure of Lady Ellen Conyngham, wife of 1st Baron FILE - Appointment of £4,000 - ref. R—U438/T131/2 - date: 1849 \_ [from Scope and Content] On marriage of Lady E/iz. Georgiana Conyngham and Geo. Bryan esq. ESTAT E FILE - List of costs - ref. R-U438/E24/5 - date: Dec 1929 \_ [from Scope and Content] Trustees of Francis Conyngham to A. B/oud Ab/in & poor rate receipts for c. Health FILE - Legacy accounts on estate of George Henry, 3rd Marquess Conyngham - ref. R-U438/E25/2 - date: 1882 Rentals and Accounts FILE - Half yearly rentals - ref. R-U438/E1 - date: 1790-1815 \_ [from Scope and Content] For Minster Court Estate including land at Durlock, Pococks at Sarre and Fleet with summaries of expenses for maintenance and repairs. Accompanied by letters to Ellen Dowager Countess Conyngham at various addresses including Hitchenden, High Wycombe, 43 Lower Grosvenor St in London and Knaresborough in Yorkshire from the Rev. R. Harvey, vicar of St Lawrence and Ramsgate who seems to have acted as her agent, locally. The correspondence contains estate news of repairs made, vacant tenancies and tenants in arrears; comments on the weather; family news of the Conynghams when staying in Ramsgate. FILE - Minutes of meetings - ref. R-U438/E18 - date: 1926-1928 \_ [from Scope and Content] Of executors of Marquess of Conyngham deceased. FILE - ‘Ramsgate estate‘ - ref. R—U438/E20 - date: 1780-1911 \_ [from Scope and Content] Rentals. bills for improvements and some personal bi/ls. Miscellaneous bills for other Conyngham estates including alterations to Stanhope Street house 1807-1810; accounts of repairs to Minster Court Estate. 1780-1808; list of tenants in Ireland. Surveys and Valuations FILE - Valuation of estates - ref. R-U438/E31/5 - date: 1811 \_ [from Scope and Content] In Thanet of Ellen, Dowager Countess of Conyngham by John Black. Estate Correspondence FILE - Letters to Francis Pierpont Burton, 2nd Baron Conyngham - ref. R-U438/E53 - date: 1782, 1785 FILE - Letters to Ellen, Dowager Lady Conyngham - ref. R-U438/E54 - date: 1786-1815 L [from Scope and Content] From the Rev. R. Harvey, her agent in Ramsgate with drafts of her replies. Mainly concerned with the tenancies and affairs connected with the Minster Court Estate and other farms in Minster, which formed her jointure but also containing news of the Conyngham family. http://www.a2a.pro.gov.uk/search/documentxsl.asp?com=1&i=0&stylesheet=x;.._ $0/10/03 Page 3 of 4 FILE - Letters to Henry, 1st Marquess Conyngham - ref. R-U438/E55 - date: 1788-1822 \_ [from Scope and Content] On various matters including correspondence from William Whaley explaining cause of debts and attempts to discharge them, 1795-1799; an enquiry regarding the Burton family pedigree, 1800, from William Clerk, Minster listing repairs needed to Conyngham house in Ramsgate, 1816; dispute with Lord Warden over right of wreck on Minster manor, 1821-1822 FILE - Letters to Francis Nathaniel 2nd Marquess Conyngham - ref. R-U438/E56 - date: 1833 FILE - Letters from Lord Conyngham and Robert Eason - ref. R-U438/E58 - date: 1792-1805 \_ [from Scope and Content] To L. Christinaz, Ramsgate agent to Lord Conyngham FILE - Correspondence between Lord Conyngham, his brother, Col. Burton and John Bembow - ref. R-U438/E59 - date: 1812-1819 FILE - Correspondence from William Clark of Minster, James Cull of Ramsgate and Richard Collard of Broadstairs - ref. R-U438/E60/1 -date: 1806-1824 \_ [from Scope and Content] All at one time serving as Lord Conyngham’s agent and also from John Holliday his gardner. Mainly concerning the lease of farms, /and and houses in Minster and Ramsgate and other estate matters FILE - Files of correspondence - ref. R—U438/E60/2 - date: 1816-1829 \_ [from Scope and Content] With John Bembow of Bembow, Albon and Bembow of Lincolns Inn regarding administration of the estate in Ramsgate and Minster including settlement of estate on death of Dowage Countess in 1816; enquires into whereabouts of deeds and leases, and choosing a new agent, 1816; /easing of Conyngham House in Ramsgate 1816-1819; proposed purchase of Stone House, Margate from John Boys, 1828-1829 Papers of the Merrett estate \_ [from Administrative History] Ellen daughter of Soloman Merrett of London, merchant, married the 1st Earl of Conyngham in 1744 and succeeded to her father's estate FILE - Miscellaneous papers - ref. R-U438/E91/4 - date: 1732-1770 \_ [from Scope and Content] Relating to Lady Conyngham’s fortune and the Sackville St. property LEGAL PAPERS FILE - Deposition - ref. R-U438/L5 - date: 1775 \_ [from Scope and Content] Conyngham versus Barker and others, regarding the manor of Minster FILE - Conyngham versus Cobb - ref. R-U438/L6 - date: 1778, 1779 FILE - Conyngham versus Cutler - ref. R-U438/L7 - date: 1824 FILE - Conyngham versus Coleman - ref. R-U438/L9 - date: 1845 FILE - Conyngham versus South Eastern Railway Co - ref. R-U438/L10 - date: 1846 FILE - Conyngham versus South Eastern Railway Co - ref. R-U438/L13 - date: 1877-1898 FILE - Conyngham against Mid Kent and East Kent District Water Company Bill - ref. R-U438/L17 - date: undated FILE - Conyngham versus Conyngham - ref. R-U438/L18 - date: undated OFFICIAL PAPERS FILE - Order of East Kent Commission of Sewers - ref. R-U438/O3 - date: 1748 \_ [from Scope and Content] To Henry Conyngham to pay rates levied for repair of a sluice FILE - Draft petition - ref. R-U438/O5 - date: C1750 \_ [from Scope and Content] From mariners in Margate to Lord Conyngham as Lord of the Manor against the Pier Wardens MAPS FILE - Conyngham Estate on 2nd edition 1" O.S - ref. R-U438/P13 - date: c.1840 http://www.a2a.pro.gov.uk/search/documentxsl.asp?com= 1&i=O&stylesheet=x;... 30/10/03 .u¢.\£snL- u» « w» ‘‘-> 0.97? WW5 Aughrim. by Cecil Kilpatrick, B.Sc. After the Boyne King James reached Dublin on the evening of his defeat at the Boyne, lst July (O.S.) 1690. The next morning he fled south, first to Waterford and then by sea to Kinsale where he picked up a French naval escort and returned to France for the rest of his life. His army under Lauzun abandoned Dublin and retreated westwards to the line of the Shannon, but also holding the walled city of Cork and the fortified port of Kinsale. Late in the year a great fleet of 70 ships put John Churchill (later Marlborough) and an expeditionary force ashore at Passage West and captured both towns. The French must now rely on the ports of Galway and Limerick on the West coast. King William reached Limerick on August 7th, but as his army had only their field guns he was held up till the siege train with heavy 24 pounder guns, drawn by oxen, arrived from Dublin. It had reached Ballyneety near the Silvermine Mountains just fourteen miles from its destination and had camped for the night, when Sarsfield struck. The previous day he had slipped out of Limerick on to the western shore with a strong cavalry raiding party. They headed upstream and recrossed at Killaloe, remaining concealed on Keeper Hill, watching and waiting till the camp was asleep. Not a man escaped and Limerick knew when the night sky was lit up with an enormous explosion of tons of gunpowder destroying guns and supplies. On 27th August an assault on the wall was attempted but was repulsed with heavy loss and after two more days the siege was abandoned for the year. King William, disappointed that the campaign would drag on for another year, took the road to Waterford and returned to London leaving Count Solms. the Dutch Commander, in charge. Lauiun, the French Commander, also decided to go home, taking all his French troops and leaving the 20 year old Duke of Berwick in command. The Winter of 1690 - 1691. Hostilities continued even though the main forces were dispersed into winter quarters all over Ireland. Jacobite Rapparees (irregulars) raided into Williamite territory for horses and cattle, while Williamite raids were made in Kerry and Sligo. ‘No man's land‘ ran from Bantry Bay through Macroom, Mallow, Tipperary, Thurles, Birr, Mullingar, Newtown Forbes to Lough Eme and Ballyshannon. Both armies behaved badly but as the soldiers had not been paid, they felt justified in taking what they could get. Peace feelers were put out and rumours abounded but came to nothing. With the turn of the year Solms was recalled for duty in Flanders and William wrote, before leaving for Holland, giving command to Baron Godart Van reede de Ginkel. He was a capable professional soldier, solid, cautious, and adept at uniting the many nationalities in his army in the fashion of Eisenhower of the last war. Mary acted as Sovereign in her own right and corresponded William informed. Generals Douglas and Yjrke were also in Flanders and were replaced by Mackay, the Killiecrankie an Englishman. In William's absence with Ginkel, keeping recalled for service General and Talmash, On the Jacobite side Tyrconnell, who had gone to France for fresh instructions from James and assistance from Louis XIV, returned with money but no French troops. James sent a peerage for Sarsfield, Earl of Lucan, as consolation for not getting command. Berwick was recalled and three high ranking French Lieutenant Generals arrived, all senior to Sarsfield. The new Commander was Le Marquis de St. Ruhe, usually referred to as St. Ruth, a competent energetic professional soldier with a brutal record as persecutor of the Huguenots in the Cevennes. As a soldier he was a great improvement on Lauzun with the added advantage of being without the impediment of King James. St. Ruth was accompanied by two other Generals, d'Usson and de Tesse. Of the three only de Tesse ever saw his homeland again and he was wounded three times. The Army Musters. In 1690 the army had mustered at Scarva or Aghaderg (Loughbricldand). At the end of the year the main depot would be Mullingar. The Dutch, Danes, Huguenot and English forces under Wurtenberg, which had been scattered across Munster would first rally at Cashel before moving northwards. The forces in Ulster would first assemble at Belturbet in Co. Cavan before moving to Mullingar. It is of particular interest to note the number of Ulster Regiments in William's Army. Cunyngham's Inniskilling Dragoons, already gazetted as 6th Inniskilling Dragoons which later became the 5th Inniskilling Dragoon Guards. They fought in defence of Enniskillen and at the Boyne and Aughrim. Wynn's Inniskilling Dragoons, already gazetted as 5th Royal Irish Dragoons, to become 5th Royal Irish Lancers and now 16th/5th Queens Royal Lancers. They fought in defence of Enniskillen, at the Boyne and Aughrim. Wolseley's Inniskilling Horse, fought in defence of Enniskillen, at the Boyne and Aughrim. Later they fought in Flanders but at the end of the war in 1697 were disbanded. Tiffin's Inniskilling Regiment of Foot, already gazetted as 27th Foot later to become the Royal Inniskilling Fusiliers and still later the Royal Irish Rangers. They fought in defence of Enniskillen, at the Boyne and Aughrim. Gustavus Hamilton's Regiment of Foot, fought in defence of Enniskillen, at the Boyne and at Aughrim. There were two Colonels Gustavus Hamilton. One was Governor of Enniskillen and raised the regiment. The other who fought in defence of Coleraine, withdrew to Londonderry. He later took over the Inniskilling Regiment and fought at the Boyne and Athlone. He remained as Governor of Athlone but the Regiment went on to the Battle of Aughrim. After the end of the war it was disbanded. St. John's Regiment of Foot, originally raised by Col. Henry Baker. Fought at Dromore, retreating to Londonderry, it fought at the Boyne and at Aughrim. At the end of hostilities it was disbanded. Loyd‘s Regiment of Foot, fought in defence of Enniskillen, at the Boyne and Athlone. It was left behind as a garrison and did not fight at Aughrim. It was later disbanded. Mitchelburn's Regiment of Foot, originally Skeffington's fought under Col. John Mitchelburn throughout the siege of Londonderry and at the Boyne. It mustered with the army under Ginkel but was detailed for garrison duty till the end of the war when it was disbanded. Cauldfield's Regiment of Foot, originally raised by Rev. George Walker for the defence of Dungannon, but withdrew to Londonderry and fought throughout the siege. Taken over by Col. Robert White after the siege but on his death in 1689 commanded by Col. John Cauldfield. The eight siege Regiments were so reduced in strength that they were merged in 1689 into four. Two fought at the Boyne but only one at Aughrim. Eventually all their traditions were merged into 27th Foot which recruited in Counties Londonderry, Tyrone, Fermanagh, and prior to 1922, in Co. Donegal. n___M_< One Irish Regiment, although not from Ulster, should be listed. Meath's Regiment originally Forbes. Had been part of King James's Army in Ireland but when reorganised by Tyrconnell managed to retain one third of its Protestants. It was sent to England and while all the others were disbanded on William's arrival, it was retained. The Roman Catholic members were dismissed and replaced by Irish Protestants. It returned to Ireland with Schomberg and was stationed in Belfast. It was gazetted as 18th Foot and fought at the Boyne and Aughrim. Later it became the senior Irish Regiment of the line as The Royal Irish Regiment and was disbanded with four other famous Irish Regiments in 1922. There was one further Ulster regiment, but it missed the Irish Campaign. The Royal Irish Light Dragoons raised in Londonderry in 1693 from survivors of the Siege. Originally known as Conyngham's Dragoons, not to be confused with Sir Albert Cunningham's Inniskilling Dragoons which by 1693 had become 6th Inniskilling Dragoons. They served King William on the Continent and later won fame under Marlborough becoming 8th Mngs Royal Irish Hussars. In recent times through amalgamation they reformed as The Queens Royal Irish Hussars and are at present serving in Arabia on the borders of Iraq with the Desert Rats. Ginkel's total force consisted of thirty battalions of infantry. Three were left behind on garrison duty, leaving twenty seven made up of twelve English, three Ulster, six Danish, three Dutch, and three Huguenot. He also had forty squadrons of horse and dragoons. making a total of 20,000 men. His artillery train consisted of twelve field pieces, thirty siege guns and six mortars. In command of the Cavalry was Major General Marquis de Ruvigny, a professional Huguenot soldier and brother of the brave Callemotte killed at the ford of Oldbridge leading his countrymen over the Boyne. Across the Shannon St. Ruth had moved up his forces from Galway and Limerick to Ballinasloe but his very late arrival in Ireland had placed him at a severe disadvantage in making preparations. He was not ready to take the field till the middle of June. His army which was about as large as Ginkel's, was made up of 16000 foot, 3,000 horse and 2,000 dragoons. Its soldiers were entirely Irish, apart from its French Generals. His artillery amounted to nine field pieces apart from those mounted for the defence of walled towns like Athlone and Limerick. The Advance Westward to Ballymore. On 6th June Ginkel marched out from Mullingar, having gained two weeks on the previous year. Next day he reached Ballymore about, half way to Athlone, and here the opening shots in the 1691 campaign were fired. A garrison of about I000 men under Col. Ulick Burke had fortified an old Norman motte defending a peninsula in a lake and surrounded by water or bog. Their intention was to hold up the advance as long as possible to gain time but they had an impossible task against the full weight of Ginkel's guns. It was all over in 24 hours, when the survivors were glad to surrender and go into captivity on Lambay Island. Time was lost however, waiting for the Duke of Wurtemberg and his forces and Athlone was not reached till 19th June. The Siege of Athlone — The Leinstertown. Athlone consisted of two walled towns separated by the River Shannon. The previous year, when approached by General Douglas, the defenders under Col. Richard Grace had abandoned the English Town on the Leinster side of the river and withdrawn over the bridge to the Irish town on the Connaught side. This year Col. Nicholas Fitzgerald resolved to defend both towns to allow time for St. Ruth to bring up his army from Ballinasloe. The attackers spent their first day in mounting a battery of heavy guns to make a breach in the bastion near the North Gate. The next day at daybreak firing commenced and by the afternoon had opened a breach 30 yards wide. A council of war decided to mount an assault that evening at 5 p.m. 300 grenadiers were to lead, followed by pioneers with axes to clear away any obstructions thrown up to repair the breach. Hugh Mackay would command four foot regiments who, once through, would fan out in both directions. The first man into the breach was a Huguenot Lieutenant who threw two grenades and fired his musket before being killed. By nightfall the Leinstertown was taken and the defenders had withdrawn over the bridge, throwing down the arch on the far side, which had been temporally repaired. The Connaught Town The next day St. Ruth came up with the main army and camped two miles from the town. Lt. General d'Usson was sent into the town to take over the defence with Major General Maxwell, a Scot, in support. On the Connaught bank just over the bridge, stood an exceptionally strong Castle and a little upstream, the stout Connaught Tower. Before any assault could be made these must be neutralised. The gunners set to work, bringing up the guns and mounting seven batteries to pound the opposite bank with the heaviest bombardment ever to take place in Ireland, till the German blitz. In all 12,000 cannon balls, 600 bombs and many tons of stones were thrown across propelled by 50 tons of gunpowder. It was thirsty work and the gunners consumed four barrels of beer and were paid £33.70 bonus money. In a week the castle lay in ruins. A great heap of rubble and all its guns had been silenced. The first plan of attack was to use a pontoon bridge made of tin boats brought from Dublin for the purpose, but it was found impossible to make progress under heavy fire without first capturing a bridge head on the other side. Next a flanking attack about a mile upstream, over a ford was tried. A raiding party, led by a Lieutenant, was sent to reconnoitre, with instructions to avoid getting involved with the enemy. The Lieutenant however, not only crossed the river, but yielded to the temptation to round up cattle and lost the vital element of surprise. On 26th June a frontal attack over the broken bridge was made with great daring. The troops advanced under covering fire and succeeded in repairing the gap with planks. The timbers were carried by 24 sappers, who were paid £13.l6.0 as a reward for their success. However before the main assault could be mounted, a Sergeant of Maxwell's Dragoons named Custume and ten volunteers rushed on to the bridge braving certain death but all perished in the hail of fire. A Lieutenant and twenty more men took their place and though only two survived they succeeded in throwing down the planks. On 29th June a Council of War was called and decided to attempt an assault over the ford just below the bridge. The main attack was to be made, while the defenders attention was diverted at the Bridge and at the pontoon bridge downstream. However the Jacobites noticed the preparations and moved in reinforcements from the main camp, causing the attempt to be abandoned. To test the depth of water at the ford three Danish soldiers under sentence of death were offered a pardon if they could cross. They wore helmets and breastplates and pretended to be deserters, while their comrades fired over their heads. They kept well apart to present a smaller target and to try different parts of the river. Their moment of danger came when they turned back and the Jacobites offered fire. Two were wounded but all returned safely saying that the water only reached their navels. The final assault was planned in great secrecy for the evening of 30th June. Men would be moved into place by stealth and the signal would be the tolling of bells for evening worship at the normal hour. 2,000 men led by Col. Gustavas Hamilton and grenadiers of the Inniskillings would take part under the command of Talmash. St. Ruth, to give his men a baptism of fire, had been rotating his regiments and had placed three very indifferent battalions of O'Hara's, O'Neill's and MacMahons Foot in the vital sector. The bells pealed at 6 p.m. when the assault party, with complete surprise bounced over the riverside parapet and into the river. General Mackay volunteering as a private soldier plunged in himself and almost before the Jacobites could open fire they were across, mounting the bank and fanning out. One party made for the bridge and another secured the walls. The Jacobites panicked and broke. General d'Usson was attending a party, but hearing the commotion, he rushed to the riverside only to be knocked down in the stampede of his own men and trampled underfoot. In less than an hour the whole town was in Williamite hands. Too late, St. Ruth came up with his main army only to find the gates closed and the walls manned by his enemies. It was a disastrous defeat brought on by over confidence and over- dependence on a physical feature. For St. Ruth it brought grief and shame. He could now only wipe out the humiliation and return to France and Louis XIV with honour, by staking all on one last battle. The Battlefield. Having lost the line of the Shannon, there were few strong defensive positions before Limerick. The River Suck at Ballinasloe was an insignificant obstacle, but five miles further west rose a long ridge running from the old castle and village of Aughrim for two miles to the old Church of Kilcommodon and known as Aughrim or Kilcommodon hill. On the eastern side of the ridge next Ballinasloe, lay a belt of bog and marsh for its whole length, with further lakes and bogs to the north and south to discourage flank attacks. St. Ruth had been in Ireland for only 7 weeks but he had observed the country as he passed through, with the eye of a soldier and he selected Aughrim for his last stand. He chose well for there was no better position to defend both the roads to Galway and Limerick. On July 8th his 37 battalions filed over the bridge of Ballinasloe and took up their positions with four days to dig in. General d'Usson was sent on to hold Galway and General de Tesse was appointed second in command with particular responsibility for the right or southern sector. Sarsfield was given command of the cavalry reserve and positioned on the left wing at the rear of the hill. He was given that nightmare instruction. "Don't move till further orders". Orders which never came. The Jacobite soldiers occupied their time well, digging trenches for musketeers at the old castle and to protect the battery of guns nearby where the Parish Church now stands. St. Ruth worked like a man inspired. He knew that his ill trained soldiers would fight best from behind a breastwork and adapted the hedges and ditches on the lower slopes of the hill to this end. The hedges were strengthened and thickened to serve the purpose of modem barbed wire, but gaps were left to facilitate the withdrawal and counter attack of infantry and the downhill charge of horse to dislodge any of Ginkel's men who gained a foothold on the hill. The most vulnerable point in the defence was at the southern end of the ridge where the little Tristaun stream entered the bog. This became known as The Pass of Urracaree for a line of eskers, or gravely hillocks, gave access over the bog. Here the defences were made doubly strong for they were sure to be tried and tested. St. Ruth paid particular attention to morale and encouraged the 80 Priests in the camp to instil a crusading spirit. A copy of his own eve of battle ovation has survived, in which he dwells on his own service in suppressing heresy in France and stresses the consequences which the coming battle will have for the faith. At dawn on the morning of the battle, which was a Sunday, the Priests ensured that every man attended mass. The Battle. Having taken Athlone, Ginkel was held up for ten days waiting for supplies of powder and shot to replenish his stock, exhausted by the heavy bombardment. The convoy of wagons from Dublin arrived on 11th July and immediately the army marched, reaching Ballinasloe by nightfall. Duke Wurtemberg, the Danish Commander, was appointed Second in Command, with special responsibility on the left wing. General Mackay took charge of the centre and General Ruvigny was placed on the right. At 6 a.m. on Sunday morning 12th July, leaving their tents and baggage, the army advanced to battle. Visibility was poor, as a heavy morning mist lay over the low ground and didn't lift till dispersed by the heat of the midday sun. Ginkel at last could see the enemy and was taken aback by the strength of their position. The Jacobite skirmishers, who had been holding up the advance, slowly fell back across the bog and the guns began to thunder across the valley. It was mid afternoon before the Danish Dragoons moving to the left to occupy the Pass of Urrachree, were driven back and the Inniskilling Dragoons came up to their assistance. Both sides poured in reinforcements and soon a general action had developed. The Jacobite tactics of withdrawing from hedge to hedge lured on their opponents and encouraged them to outreach themselves without flanking support. Then the cavalry swept down from the hill, through the gaps in the hedges and cut off the advance guard of the Williamites. It was then the turn of the musketeers, hidden behind their breastworks, to pick off the isolated forward troops and drive the remnant back into the bog. The Huguenots suffered particularly heavy losses and especially in a depression at the foot of the hill below the present road, which has ever since been known as The Bloody Hollow. At about 6.30 p.m. Mackay. seeing that no progress was being made at the Southern end of that ridge, ordered the centre to advance over the bog under the covering fire of their cannon. Four English battalions struggled through the morass up to their waists in water, Earle's Regiment (19th, later the Green Howards) leading. They appeared to be succeeding as the Jacobites were driven back, but they had only retired one field width from the edge of the bog. As soon as the English had formed up on the firm ground down came the cavalry and drove them back while once again musketeers to right and left picked them off. This time the Jacobite foot followed them back across the bog even taking some of the guns beyond the bog. However, there was no way they could manhandle them through the swamp and they were soon retaken. In this action Colonels Earle and Herbert were taken prisoner. It was now the turn of Kirke's and Gustavus Hamilton's Regiments to the left and Tiffin‘s and St. John's along with a Huguenot Regiment to their right. The Jacobites held their fire till the Williamites were within 20 yards and though a furious fight developed and things seemed to be in the balance for a while, they were driven back once more. St. Ruth was delighted at the steadiness of his troops and the success of his plans. The sun was sinking in the west and Ginkel was about to call off the action for the night. He sent for the baggage and tents to be brought up but the order was cancelled. Mackay had noticed a movement of both horse and foot from the north to the centre to relieve the hard-pressed defenders. Perhaps now was the time for an attack by the Williamite right, by the Castle. Here the way through the swamp was narrow, only two horsemen at a time could cross over. If the foot could cross first, perhaps the horse could succeed. Wynn's dismounted Dragoons and Leveson's led the attack, encouraged by the courageous Mackay who was thrown from his horse. Colonel Walter Burke defended the Castle stubbornly, but his guns had been silenced. The attackers reached a spot where they were sheltered from fire though they could advance no further. It was now up to the Cavalry and under Ruvigny, the Blues, Winn's Dragoons, and Wolseley's Horse galloped over the narrow causeway. St. Ruth had been watching anxiously. His reserve Cavalry under Sarsfield would soon sweep them back. He was mounting his horse when his head was carried away by a cannon ball. The Williamite cavalry crossed over and at the crucial moment the Jacobite cavalry under Brigadier Henry Lutteral and Lieutenant General Dominic Sheldon withdrew from the field and headed west. Their route from the battlefield is marked on the 6" Ordinance Map to this day as 'Lutterals Pass‘. Treachery was suspected though never proved. Yet when Lutteral was found to have been in correspondence with Ginkel and to have consequently received a Williamite pension, there can be little doubt. Lutteral and the Officer Corps of the Cavalry represented the old Roman Catholic gentry who hoped to redeem something of their estates. The Jacobite foot soldiers who had fought so well, were abandoned to their fate. They were rolled up by the charging Williamite Horse, wheeling south from the Castle along the ridge. They were cut down in their hundreds as they tried to escape. De Tesse tried to save the day, taking command of a force of Cavalry, but his men deserted him and he was lucky to get away, though wounded three times. Lord Galmoy and Sarsfield (Lord Lucan) who had been in the rear, were caught off guard by the suddenness of the rout. They did their best to hold back the tide, but were forced to withdraw westwards. Only nightfall saved what was left of the infantry but 7,000 of them lay dead on the field, including 400 officers. Another 450 high ranking officers were taken prisoner. Williamite losses were also heavy, amounting to 2,000 dead and wounded. Eleven Cavalry standards and the Colours of thirty-two infantry battalions were picked up the next day. Nine field guns, the reserve ammunition, tents, baggage and thousands of muskets were gathered by the victors. Near the spot where St. Ruth was struck down grew a blackthorn bush, which became known as St. Ruth's Bush. It, or it's successor, is marked by a plaque erected by Bord Failte which reads, 'The Jacobite General St. Ruth died here after a battle with the forces of King William on 12th July 1691. His defeat and death spelled an end to the hopes of James II and changed the course of Irish history‘. No one knows what happened to his body though Macauley's account states "The French General was hastening to the rescue when a cannon ball carried off his head. Those who were about him thought that it would be dangerous to make his fate known. The corpse was wrapped in a cloak, carried from the field and laid, with all secrecy, in the sacred ground among the ruins of the ancient monastery of Loughrea". O'Kelly's Latin account describes the grief and despair created by this disaster in which ‘the Irish lost the flower of their army and nation”. It was for the Irish Nationalist what Flodden Field had been for the Scots. ‘Forget not the field where they perished, The truest, the last of the brave: All gone and the bright hopes we cherished Gone with them and quenched in the grave“. John Moore. It was of course quite another matter for the Williamite victors as the following verse penned by William Archer 120 years ago shows. The Battle of Aughrim. The flight comes on, St. Ruth prevails, his troops he animates, And swears he‘ll drive the heretics, aye up to Dublin gates. But,, oft,, a ball by justice wing'd, to vindicate the truth. As he rode down Kilcomodan, laid low the brave Saint Ruth. Then came the rout‘ our troops rushed on, the foe fled, pale, aghast. Like autumn leaves in myriad's driven before November's blast. Seven thousand men they left behind, in death to close the eye. While Victory bless'd King William's men the Twelfth day of July". William Archer 1869. It had been a hard fought battle with both sides evenly matched in numbers of men. Both were all led and gave of their best. It was said, "Never did the Irish fight so well in their own country" and equally, never was an attack made with more bravery and determination. It was the bloodiest battle of the war, it was the last big battle ever fought in Ireland. Galway surrendered on 21st July and Limerick on 3rd October bringing to an end. The war on the continent continued till the signing of the Treaty of Ryswick in 1697, when Louis XIV recognised William and his successor, Anne. Sell ] lU‘lyeBay' Community ‘ Help I Listed in category: INNISKILLING DRAGOONS You are signed in # Back to list of items Starting bid: GBP 18.71 US $33 Place Bid> 1 Time left: 8 hours 54 mins 5-day listing, Ends »“~‘.%.s§—3{3- 95 £‘;‘::/-:9:9? PST Start time: Aug-25-05 01:49:07 PDT History: 0 bids 3 L§_,g_erp;Cme Item location: Uckfield tiizsgdsm f\'..Z.. ,. 1.-. \I\I.\..I»l....’,l-. 9 home pay register sign out services i site map .83} lstart new search Search I A.<:l_ya,n Qed Books, Comics & Magazines > Non-Fiction Books > Military/ War > Army > Campaigns/ Battles Item number: 8329352090 liltatch thi,s_item in My eBay I ..E...m.ai_l....t.q...a....ttiend Seller information » navalandmilitarypress (Q) 6 "'3 Feedback Score: 9 Positive Feedback: 100% Member since Aug—05— 05 in United Kingdom R.ea.d.._teed..t1aQK..99mmen Add to Favorite Sellers A,sl ““'‘W THE VIII KING(;S ROYAL IRISH HUSSARS 1693- Item number: 8329353134 1927 You are signed in Watch this item in My eBay I Email to a friend Starting bid? _GBP 36.-00 _ ‘ Seller information ivéppioximaiegy gs $6'3‘G4—} navalandmilitampress Place Bid> I ‘,5? n'r.=.' Feedback Score: 9 Positive Feedback: Time left: 8 hours 55 mins 100% “day, Ems A9g'33' Member since Aug—O5- 35 0i«53~*4 P97 05 in United Kingdom H istoryi Ame A.dr.q,.Lo_....Eay9rE<:§e.I.Ier§ Item location: Uckfield Ask seller a guestion Untied KiI’i§50m View seller's other iterr » _ Ships to: Worldwide Safe Bu in T; 37 L_a[ger Picture , _ _ {*y“g—‘Q ~51: Shipping}, payment details and return Qolicy Description :9: ’T U! The Naval & Military Press Specéalisaii Barrixfir rlxe Serixws .S'mdr.*rzt afC‘4;nfl:'£.t' oak Oetaét HISTORY OF THE VIII KlNGg,S ROYAL IRISH HUSSARS 1693-1927 The Rev. Robert H. Murray, 2005. N&M Press reprint (original pub 1928). 2 vols. SB. xii + 4 S s s is: mm :2 Very full history of an Irish cavalry regiment over two hundred and thirty years in peace and in war with lists of all officers who served in it, of Colonels, COs, RSMs. Very useful for research. Originally published in a limited edition ofjust 200, and virtually unobtainable since then.. The Regiment was raised in northern Ireland in January 1693, shortly after the Battles of the Boyne and Aughrim had seen the end of the French supported Irish rebellion and the Jacobite cause in Ireland. In the warrant authorising the formation of the regiment it was stated that the men should be known Protestants - Catholics were out! Known first as Colonel Cunningham's (Conyngham) Regiment of Dragoons, it became the 8th Dragoons in 1751 and then Light Dragoons until 1822 when it was designated King's Royal Irish Hussars. The first of the many campaigns in which it was to fight was the War of the Spanish Succession (1702-1713) during which it was in action in Spain over a period of some eight years. During its next two hundred years it woud see plenty of action - in the Crimea (Charge of the Light Brigade), in the Indian Mutiny, the 2nd Afghan War, the South African War and the Great War. All these campaigns are, of course, well covered, but there is plenty on the life of the Regiment, its officers and men, its changes in dress, its weapons and equipment, pay and conditions of service. There are tables showing nationalities of the men, their ages, their heights, lengths of service - even the ages and sizes of the horses - this in the period immediately following the ‘45' rebellion. There are some useful appendices for researchers at the end of Vol 2. There is the regimental calendar arranged on a monthly basis whereby any significant event in the history of the Regiment is shown in the relevant month with the date, day of the week and year in which it occurred. Thus, in January we read that the warrant for raising the Regiment was issued by William III on the 18th, a Sunday, in the year 1693; and in October we can see the Regiment sailed from Bombay for France on Friday 16th, 1914. There is the succession of Colonels from 1693 and commanding officers from 1750 when the appointment of CO was separated from that of Colonel of the Regiment, followed by an 86- page list of regimental officers, year by year, arranged by rank and seniority as in the Army Lists. There is an index to this list, arranged alphabetically with the dates each officer served with the regiment; and finally there is the list of RSMs from 1811 when that rank was established. The history concludes with a comprehensive 33-page Show Descriptions Page 1 of 1 MSS Home : MSS Index : MSS Descriptions Manuscripts: Descriptions Search for: Add 33919 1. Add 33878 - 33929 Extract: 33,878—33,929. COLLECTIONS by Rev. Thomas Streatfeild, of Chart’s Edge, Westerham, for a parochial history of Kent, consisting of voluminous biographical, genealogical and heraldic memoranda, extracts from parish registers, wills, and other records, etc. On the collector’s death in 1848, his materia Show the full text / Find Index references / Show Descriptions hierarchy 2. Add 33919 Extract: 33,919. STREATFEILD COLLECTIONS. Vol. XLII. Miscellaneous genealogical, biographical and other memoranda, consisting of short descents or pedigrees of Kentish and other families. Many of the notes in this and the following volume have apparently been incorporated in Add. 33,878—33,894. The names of Show the full text / Find Index references / Show Descriptions hierarchy Number of hits: 2. MSS Home : MSS Index : MSS Descriptions‘ htt. ../DESCO010.ASP?CollectionID=27&NStart=3 3919&CollectionName=Ad 6/ 26/00 Normanton Church Page 1 of 1 E) N L I NQ www rustnel (:9 In Normanton Church The church, with semi-circular portico and tower, was built in 1826-9 and was designed by Thomas Cundy, then architect to the Grosvenor estate in Westminster. The original site of Normanton Church (St Matthew's Church as it was once known) would have placed it below the proposed water line of Rutland Water. It was saved from this fate following a project, aided by voluntary subscription, which raised the level of the church and placed it above the water level on a pier of stones. The Church now stands proudly by the side of Rutland Water and houses an exhibition on the building of the reservoir which is open to the public from April to October. Opening Times: April-Sept (daily) & Oct (weekends only), 11am-4pm. Admission Charge Tel: 01572 653026 History ~ Photo Gallerv ~ Attractions ~ Facilities ~ Business ~ Noticeboard .!3_uL|ar1gL\,l_i1|aggs Back to Rutland On Line Home Copyright © 1996-2000 B.Utland O_n Qr1e_1.L1. . ‘ 1239. website All Rights awards 21300 Reserved - zvcaglgggfy winggr . Use of this site indicates you accept the Terms of Use. http://www.rutnet.co.uk/Villages/normanton/church.htm 8/3 1/00 1st Chapter — Osbert Sitwell - SignOnSanDiego < Page 1 of 9 .._E._gM. 1st Chapter - Osbert Sitwell ix“ Editorial Profile SEARCH FOR: Chapter One ‘ Osbert Sitwell By Philip Ziegler Copyright Philip Ziegler. All rights reserved. Excerpt lAn Area mm.u- 7r.u;I:u':n Francis Osbert Sacheverell Sitwell 1 was a man whose pride in his aristocratic ancestry coexisted uneasily with his conviction that the artist was the sole truly superior being. Only in his autobiography, where his background and upbringing were triumphantly transmuted into art, did these two ill-suited elements achieve complete reconciliation. His ancestry was, indeed, imposing; if not quite so splendiferous as he, and still more his sister Edith, were accustomed to assert. The Sitwells — or Cytewelles, as they were spelt in the fourteenth century — had been landowners in Derbyshire for over six hundred years. In the seventeenth century they ventured into industry, set up a large iron-works at Eckington, became one of the world's pre-eminent manufacturers of nails, and built themselves a fine new house at Renishaw, a few miles from their previous home. The direct line ended with the death of William Sitwell in 1776. William's nephew, Francis Hurt, inherited Renishaw. Francis evidently had great reverence for the family name: not only did he give it to his son as a Christian name but on succeeding to Renishaw he adopted it as his own surname. Young Sitwell Hurt, when he eventually inherited the estate, thus did so as Sitwell Sitwell: "Perhaps his hypersensitive http2//sandiegocitysearch.c0m/E/G/SANCA/0OOO/O7/67/ 6/9/00 1st Chapter — Osbert Sitwell — SignOnSanDiego Page 2 of 9 descendant should resume the patronymic and call himself Sir Hurt Hurt," remarked Evelyn Waugh in 1961. In his autobiography Osbert ignored his manufacturing forebears by leaping boldly from the early Cytewelles to the first baronet, Sir Sitwell Sitwell. "There are precious few Englishmen who could not assume a mediaeval name if they chose to pick about in their pedigree," Waugh wrote to Nancy Mitford. This was less well justified than his earlier jibe; though it may have strayed through the female line, Osbert’s direct descent from fourteenth -century Derbyshire landowners could not be questioned. But Osbert certainly preferred not to dwell on the fami|y’s brush with trade four hundred years later; he left the source of Sitwell Sitwell’s wealth discreetly obscure. He showed no similar reticence when it came to the zest with which Sitwell Sitwell and his heir dissipated the fruits of their ancestors’ industry; this, indeed, Osbert felt more a matter for congratulation than for shame. Sir Sitwell, as he was to become after the Prince Regent visited Renishaw and repaid the hospitality with a baronetcy, displayed the incontinent extravagance that was to mark his descendants. He built stables, gates, triumphal arches; imported marble chimney- pieces which had been discarded by the Duke of York, pictures and tapestries, fine furniture; flung out a ballroom: all so that the Regent could be entertained in the style to which he was accustomed. Fortunately for posterity, he had excellent taste and left a much embellished property behind him; unfortunately for his heir, he also left a much diminished fortune to match the lavish train of life which he had established. Undeterred, the second baronet, Sir George, behaved with equal prodigality. Horses and politics were his particular indulgence but he also made unwise investments, was the victim of a crooked solicitor and lost a fortune in the crash of the Sheffield Land Bank. In 1846 he was forced to shut up Renishaw and eke out a — relatively — penurious existence in the small towns of Germany. He died not long aftenNards and the family fortunes showed no signs of reviving under the third baronet, Sir Reresby. It was left to Sir Reresby's widow to pull things together during the minority of her son, George. Her astuteness, coupled with the discovery of rich seams of coal beneath the land at Renishaw, ensured that when the fourth baronet came of age in 1883 he found himself master of an estate which was not merely unencumbered but conspicuously profitable. Sometime in the early 1860s a small boy, escorted by a nurse, was travelling by train across England. A kindly old gentleman sitting opposite asked him http :// Sandie go.citysearch.com/E/ G/ SANCA/OOO0/07/ 67/ 6/9/00 1st Chapter - Osbert Sitwell - SignOnSanDiego Page 3 of 9 who he was. "I am Sir George Sitwell, baronet," the child is said to have replied. ''I am four years old and the youngest baronet in England." By this response he demonstrated both an alarming awareness of his own consequence and an inability to conceive what impression he might make on other people. Both characteristics were to mark him throughout his life. In the four volumes of his autobiography Osbert Sitwell portrayed his father as an eccentric on the grandest possible scale, grotesque yet awe-inspiring, a cross between Don Quixote and Lewis Carro||’s White Knight. Given Osbert’s freely admitted dislike of Sir George, it is tempting to assume that this was a caricature, largely the fruit of his imagination; an attempt to avenge himself on, or perhaps come to terms with, a man who he believed had done much to ruin his life. Elements of exaggeration there certainly were and many of Osbert’s best anecdotes were embellished so as to make a point more forcibly orjust to raise a laugh at his father’s expense. But few seem to have been wholly invented. Sir George was a very curious figure; in some ways remarkably appealing, in some ridiculous, in some curmudgeonly and mean. Anthony Powell, who often met him at Renishaw, insists that he was every bit as bizarre as his son described him; indeed, that the portrait was, if anything, too generous: "ln depicting the figure of Sir George Sitwell . . . the less pleasant sides are toned down, rather than exaggerated." This is not the impression of most observers, however. The weight of evidence suggests that, though little may have been made up in Osbert’s portrayal, a great deal was suppressed or distorted; the impression given of Sir George’s personality was unfair. "He wasn’t nearly as comic a figure as [Osbert] made him appear," Osbert’s younger brother, Sacheverell, told the historian of the family, John Pearson. "He was a much nicer person. I think he was much nicer than Osbert." Kenneth Clark felt the same: Sir George was "nicer and sadder than Osbert allowed in his ungenerous portrait." Again and again in reading of his dealings with other people one feels that, though he must often have been infuriating, his intentions were nearly always excellent and his courtesy immaculate. Osbert, with some reason, makes fun of his ridiculous inventions — a musical toothbrush, a small revolver for killing wasps; his self-proclaimed omniscience — continuously putting right lawyers, architects, doctors, gardeners, on the more arcane details of their professions; his megalomaniac building plans — remove that hill, divert that stream, here we must have a triumphal arch! But his son takes too little account of the fact that much of Sir George's http://sandiego.citySearch.com/E/G/SANCA/0OOO/07/67/ 6/9/O0 1st Chapter — Osbert Sitwell — SignOnSanDiego Page 4 of 9 ingenuity was usefully and practically employed; that his knowledge was unusually wide and his advice by no means always silly; that his plans quite often came to fulfilment and both his Derbyshire home at Renishaw and his Tuscan palace at Montegufoni were rendered immeasurably more beautiful by his activities. Osbert mocks his father's genius for financial obfuscation and his tendency to keep careful count of the pennies while allowing the pounds to flood away, but gives no hint that Sir George had a shrewd financial brain, was one of the first people to see the potential in South African mining shares, and made quite as much money on the Stock Exchange as he squandered on visionary projects. If Sir George had been idle or stupid he might have been less resented by his son, but he was clever and alarmingly energetic — the cleverest in the family, Alan Pryce-Jones believed: "On the rare occasions when I observed him in action, he struck me as a move or two ahead of his children." He wrote better than they did too, Kenneth Clark maintained: ''I believe that au fond they were all jealous of him." This opinion is harder to accept. His finest book, On the Making of Gardens, is clearly based on much travel, study and reflection, but the style is lush and over-romantic; the judgments dogmatic — "Flower beds in stars or moons or rounded figures cannot be right; they are simply unquiet." His advice to his readers was no doubt soundly based but not always entirely practical: "The great secret of success in garden-making [is] that we should abandon the struggle to make nature beautiful round the house and should rather move the house to where nature is beautiful." But he did know a great deal about Italian gardens in particular, his knowledge of the Middle Ages was extensive and peculiar and his views were taken seriously by genealogists and social historians of established reputation. His problem was that, almost since childhood, there had been no one to curb his whims, challenge his views, even to make fun of him. An only son, he had grown arrogant and aloof. His appearance fitted his character: "a suitable model for Van Dyck," Harold Acton described him; while Peter Quennell wrote of "his height, his patrician good looks, the air of dignified remoteness and self-sufficient impassivity with which he travelled through existence." Quennell saw something in him of Meredith's Sir Willoughby Patterne, and certainly few people can have been so complete an egoist. His view of contemporary life was almost entirely solipsistic and rendered the more eccentric by his firm assumption that, whatever subject might be in question, it had almost certainly been done better in the Middle Ages. lnevitably this led to a certain remoteness from contemporary life and an indifference to the http:// sandiego.citysearch.com/E/G/SANCA/0000/OW 67/ 6/9/00 1st Chapter - Osbert Sitwell - SignOnSanDiego Page 5 of 9 views, the activities, the very existence of other people. Indeed, he rarely even noticed other people, never knew his constituents in the days when he was in the House of Commons, and was capable of walking past his children in the street without a hint of recognition. At Renishaw, when confronted by his guests, he would be polite, even convivial, but he would usually lunch alone an hour before the others got to table. When Beverley Nichols was introduced to him, Sir George "merely sniffed and went away to sit by himself in a corner." Such rudeness was unusual and suggests an exceptional degree of preoccupation; it was entirely in character, however, that he should look up in the course of the meal that followed this aborted introduction and observe plaintively, ''I never know anybody in this house." "Sir George is the strangest old bugger you ever met," his butler, Henry Moat, once remarked to the composer Constant Lambert. He was prodigal when it came to acquiring works of art or constructing grandiose architectural follies, but would parsimoniously examine the smallest item on a bill or an estimate and was convinced that everyone except himself was guilty of the most wanton extravagance and must be curbed in their excesses. Osbert attributed this obsession to the depredations made on the family fortune in the nineteenth century by the army of poor relations who took up residence at Flenishaw and exploited their host with parasitic vigour: "To be financially safe, he felt, one should be friendless. ‘Such a mistake,’ he remarked to me once without explanation, ‘to have friends."' Sir George devoted much of his energies to worrying about money and was preoccupied by thoughts of his incipient pauperdom. His fears were fanned by the monumental extravagance of his wife.. Sir George’s father-in-law, Henry Denison, first Earl of Londesborough, spent on a scale which made the Sitwells seem like cheese-paring niggards. The family had amassed an immense fortune in the City of London in the mid- eighteenth century and their wealth was augmented by Elizabeth Denison, Marchioness of Conyngham, mistress of George lV. Osbert gallantly defended the reputation of his forebear in his autobiography but she remains one of the most rapacious harpies ever to have plundered the royal coffers. The Conynghams’ son, Lord Albert, inherited the Denison millions, took their name, and became first Baron Londesborough. His son, Henry, became an earl and pushed still further into the upper reaches of the aristocracy by marrying a daughter of the Duke of Beaufort. He thus ensured that their younger daughter Ida, the future Lady Ida Sitwell, could claim direct descent from the Plantagenets. History was not Lady |da’s strong point and she seems to http://sandiego.citysearch.com/E/G/SANCA/0O0O/O7/67/ 6/9/00 1st Chapter — Osbert Sitwell - SignOnSanDiego Page 6 of 9 have taken little pleasure in her royal ancestry; to her children, however, it was a subject for infinite satisfaction. With alarming zest, Lord Londesborough squandered the huge fortune that he had inherited on race-horses, grand houses, theatrical productions and other such diversions of the very rich. By the time Ida needed to look for a husband her fami|y’s wealth had been dramatically reduced; she, on the other hand, had been imbued with the conviction that there was nothing which she could not afford, no whim which it was not merely permissible but desirable to indulge. Sir George Sitwell was an ardent genealogist and regarded his wife’s lineage with all due deference. Lady Ida was also beautiful, and charming in a vapid, prattling way. By the standards of the time she was a most suitable match for a wealthy but not particularly grandiose baronet. In fact the combination proved disastrous. She was a stupid woman, "slightly mentally retarded" thought Harold Acton, and she was neither able nor willing to accompany her husband on his intellectual adventures. ''l have been much alone all my life,'' Sir George told Osbert sadly, "as your mother could not be and did not try to be a companion." Confronted by his indifference she retreated into a twilight life of bridge, bad novels and social fatuity. Until disaster struck she was never actively miserable — most strong emotions were beyond her — but she suffered from a nagging discontent. "Have you ever been happy?" she one night asked her daughter Edith. "Yes, Mother. Haven't you?" "Never bird-happy." Perhaps with encouragement she could have learned to tread new territories but she lacked both animation and application: "One always felt boredom was just round the corner," her cousin by marriage, Constance Sitwell, remembered. She loved flowers — preferably when out of season and expensive — rich scents and fabrics, beautiful jewels, but was inordinately generous and scattered her valuable possessions among her friends and relations with the same unthinking prodigality as she had acquired them. She recognised her extravagance but could do nothing to control it: ''I can't go to Paris," she once explained to Anthony Powell. "|‘ll spend money like a drunken sailor." It was as if only by spending could she keep ennui at bay; an attitude which filled her hyperactive husband with perplexed alarm. Her profligacy drove a fresh wedge between them; by the time their youngest child was born their relationship oscillated between cool neutrality and out-and-out dislike. When talking to the nine-year-old Osbert about his ancestors, Sir George once murmured pensively: "We've been working up towards something for a long time, for well over a century." Though he was in fact to take considerable pride in his children‘s http://sandiego.citysearch.com/E/G/SANCA/0OOO/07/67/ 6/9/O0 1st Chapter — Osbert Sitwell - SignOnSanDiego Page 7 of 9 achievements it is unlikely that he was contemplating a career in literature when he predicted this resplendent future — something more political or pro-consular must have been what he had in mind. It was therefore something of a disappointment to him when his first child was a daughter, a disappointment that grew ever more severe as it became obvious that Edith was not going to mature into the sort of amiable, attractive and intellectually unassuming girl who could be expected to marry well and thus redress the initial solecism of her sex. To you, sad child, upon the darkened stair, Poor flaxen foundling of the upper air, Osbert dedicated one of his earlier books of verse, and the image of Edith as a sad child — lonely, unfulfilled, at odds with the world in which she lived — emerges strikingly from all recollections of her family at the time. ''I had a very terrible childhood and youth, so terrible that I never think of it and never mention it," she told Stephen Spender many years later. In fact, she rarely ceased to brood on it and mentioned it repeatedly, but to the outside eye it does not seem that it was so very terrible. She was not treated cruelly, nor even seriously neglected. She might have been happier if she had been. Her trouble was that her parents tried to turn her into something that she could never be and failed to understand, or even to try to understand, her true potentiality. "What are you going to be when you are grown up?" a friend of her mother asked her. "A genius," Edith replied. Sir George, though with some doubts, might have accommodated a genius as a son but in a daughter such pretensions had to be resolutely curbed: the weapons used were gymnastics, the cello, and horrific contraptions of rubber and steel intended to adjust physical deficiencies which the doctors had detected or imagined in her legs, back and nose. ''I doubt whether any child was ever more mismanaged by her parents," wrote Osbert. Whether or not, objectively, she had good grounds for being so miserable is neither here nor there: as Victoria Glendinning has remarked in her brilliantly sympathetic biography, ''l have ended up with a great respect for her, and a very protective feeling, because of the loneliness and fear that were her almost constant companions." Any illusions Edith might have cherished about her importance in her parents‘ eyes were dispelled at the birth of Osbert on 6 December 1892 when she was five years old. The rejoicing in the household, the ringing of bells in the churches of his birthplace, Scarborough, must quickly have convinced her that something of great consequence had occurred. An heir had been born, and a mere daughter found herself relegated http :// s andie go.citysearch.c0m/E/ G/ SANCA/ O000/07/ 67/ 6/ 9/ O0 1st Chapter — Osbert Sitwell - SignOnSanDiego Page 8 of 9 even further into the background. It was not just a matter of status or comparative importance: Lady lda, whom Edith would have loved with passion if she had been given even the least encouragement, made a fuss of her son in a way her daughter had never experienced. Osbert was allowed to crawl over her bed, disorganise her papers, inspect her scents and jewellery; Edith had barely been tolerated in her bedroom. This was not just a tribute to the generally accepted myth of male superiority. Edith was gauche and superficially unattractive: a silly mother who relished pretty things was unlikely to find many charms in such a child, or to extend to it any great part of her limited capacity for affection. Another five years on, and the family was completed by the birth of Sacheverell. Sachie, as he was invariably called, found life less stressful than his elder siblings. He was an attractive and relatively uncomplicated child for whom it was as natural to love and be loved as it was difficult for his sister. Five years between brothers is a formidable gap but Edith’s disappearance into a world of governesses and music lessons left Osbert hungry for companionship. ''I suppose that when he was a very small child I understood him better than did anyone else," wrote Osbert. "l instinctively comprehended what he wanted to say, before others could: and on this foundation our friendship was soundly based." Friendship was an inadequate word for a relationship that was emotionally and intellectually intense; until Osbert went to boarding school the brothers shared a room, talked endlessly, and were as near inseparable as the demands of grown-ups would allow. They did not wilfully exclude their sister but inevitably at this stage of their lives she was a distant figure. Their father was still more remote but Lady lda showed Sachie the same warm affection as Osbert already enjoyed. Edith later accused her younger brother of inventing a relationship which had never existed; Sachie "created for himself a wonderful dream-mother who understood everything and shielded him in some extraordinary way." The facts "were sadly and terribly different." She conceded, though, that Sachie had been sheltered from the worst afflictions of an unhappy childhood; "the horror was all mine." "The facts" seem to have been that Lady lda was put off and slightly frightened by her intransigent daughter while regarding her sons as delightful playthings to be indulged and exhibited to her friends. Such an attitude did not provide a promising basis for a |ifetime’s relationship between a mother and her children but it served well enough while the boys were uncritical and undemanding. http://sandiegocitysearch.com/E/G/SANCA/00OO/O7/67/ 6/9/O0 Longdendale Facts, Figures and Places of Interest Page 3 Of 3 $3 Tollemache Family - When Sir Thomas Wilbraham of the Wilbraham family of Woodhey died in 1692 his Cheshire estates, including the manors of Mottram and Tintwistle and the lordship of Longdendale, were inherited by his son-in-law Lyonel Tollemache, the earl of Dysart in Scotland. The Tollemache family were absentee landlords throughout their period of ownership and employed a steward to run their extensive Longdendale estates. There were at least 25 tenants in Mottram in 1727, and 100 tenants in 1799. In 1873 the family held 25,830 acres in Cheshire, which returned an annual gross rental of £27,602 11s. Although the Tollemache family sold parts of their north-east Cheshire estates in 1841 and 1852, most lands were kept until the Mottram estate was sold in 1919. The title of the lord of Longdendale was retained by the family until it too was sold, in 1980, to Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council. If you know an interesting fact about Longdendale please send us an Email http://216.239.51.100/search?q=cache:dANN—rrnWAUC:www.tameside.gov.uk/corpgen/new/longinfo.htm+‘. .. O8/O5/02 Voyages In Time ~ Family, Friends & Places Page 1 of 1 Maternal Great Great Great Grandparents (Tollemache) Isabella Anne Forbes Fred.e_r.i.ck....Ja.,me.s T9,!lemach_e b-118817 brother of Lionel William John Tollemache (8th Earl of Dysart) m. 47 . 801 . d'185O b 1 cl 1888 m.1 Sarah Maria Bomford (d. 1835) dau. Louisa Maria Tollemache b. 1832 d. 1863 unmarried. Photo October 1999 Ham House, Richmond. Original home of Tollemache (Dysart) family. There are many books available on the history of the house and family. The house is open to the public. Click on the photograph for further details. http ://www.zip.com.au/~lnbdds/home/tollemachel . htm 08/05/02 English Farming: Chapter XVIII Page 1 OI 5 HOME AG LIBRARY CATALOG GO TO NEXT CHAPTER CHAPTER XVIII THE GREAT DEPRESSION AND RECOVERY, 1874-1914 Industrial crisis; special difficulties of farmers; the weather and foreign competition; Richmond Commission, 1879-82; further depression touching bottom in I896; Royal Commission of 1893; changeover from arable to grass farming; migration of dairy farmers from north and west; growth of milk production; cheapening of cultivation; returning prosperity in the new century. SINCE 1862 the tide of agricultural prosperity had ceased to flow; after 1874 it turned, and rapidly ebbed. A period of depression began which, with some fluctuations in severity, continued throughout the rest of the reign of Queen Victoria, and beyond. Depression is a word which is often loosely used. It is generally understood to mean a reduction, in some cases an absence, of profit, accompanied by a consequent diminution of employment. To some extent the condition has probably become chronic. A decline of interest on capital lent or invested, a rise in wages of labour, an increased competition for the earnings of management, caused by the spread of education and resulting in the reduction or stationary character of those earnings, are permanent not temporary tendencies of civilisation. So far as these symptoms indicate a more general distribution of wealth, they are not disquieting. But, from time to time, circumstances combine to produce acute conditions of industrial collapse which may be accurately called depression. Such a crisis occurred in agriculture from 1875 to 1884, and again from 1891 to 1899. Industrial undertakings are so inextricably interlaced that agricultural depression cannot be entirely dissevered from commercial depression. Exceptional periods of commercial difficulty had for the last seventy years recurred with such regularity as to give support to a theory of decennial cycles. In previous years, each recurring period had resulted in a genuine panic, clue as much to defective information as to any real scarcity of loanable capital. The historic failure of Overend and Gurney in 1866 and the famous "Black Friday" afford the last example of this acute form of crisis. Better means of obtaining accurate intelligence, more accessible supplies of capital, the greater stability of the Bank of England have combined with other causes to minimise the risk of financial stampedes. But, though periods of depression cease to produce the old—fashioned panic, they are not less exhausting, Their approach is more gradual; so also is the recovery. Disaster and revival are no longer concentrated in a few months. Years pass before improvement is apparent; the magnitude of the distress is concealed by its diffusion over a longer period. The agricultural depressions of 1875-84 and of 1891-99 had all the characteristics of the modern type of financial crisis. In 1870 had begun an inflation of prices. The outbreak of the Franco-German War and the withdrawal of France and Germany from commercial competition enabled England to increase her exports; the opening of the Suez Canal (1869) stimulated the shipbuilding trade; the railway development in Germany and America created an exceptional demand for coal and iron. Expanding trade increased the consuming power of the population, and maintained the prices of agricultural produce. The wisest or wealthiest landowners refused the temptation to advance rents on sitting tenants. But in many cases rents were raised, or farms were tendered for competition. Farmers became infected with the same spirit of gambling which in trade caused the scramble for the investment of money in hazardous enterprises. In their eagerness for land they were led into reckless biddings, which raised rentals beyond reasonable limits. In 1874 the reaction began. Demand had returned to normal limits; but the abnormal supply continued Over—production was the result. The decline of the coal and iron trade, the stoppage, partial or absolute, of cotton mills, disputes between masters and men, complications arising out of the Eastern question, the default on the Turkish debt, disturbances of prices owing to fluctuations in the purchasing power of gold and silver, combined to depress every industry. In 1878 the extent to which trade had been undermined was revealed by the failure of the Glasgow, Caledonian, and West of England Banks. One remarkable feature of the crisis was that it was not local but universal. New means of communication had so broken down the barriers of nations that the civilised world suffered together. Everywhere prices fell, trade shrank, insolvencies multiplied. In the United States the indirect consequences of the industrial collapse of 1873-4 proved to be of disastrous importance to English farming. A railway panic, a fall in the price of manufactured articles, a decline in wages drove thousands out of the towns to settle as agriculturists on the virgin soils of the West. English farming suffered from the same causes as every other home industry. In addition, it had its own special difficulties. The collapse of British trade checked the growth of the consuming power at home at the same time that a series of inclement seasons, followed by an overwhelming increase of foreign competition, paralysed the efforts of farmers. For three years in succession, bleak springs and rainy summers produced short cereal crops of inferior quality, mildew in wheat, mould in hops, blight in other crops, disease in cattle, rot in sheep, throwing heavy lands into foul condition, deteriorating the finer grasses of pastures. In 1875-6 the increasing volume of imports prevented prices from rising to compensate deficiencies in the yield of corn. The telegraph, steam carriage by sea and land, and low freights, consequent on declining trade, annihilated time and distance, destroyed the natural monopoly of proximity, and enabled the world to compete with English producers in the home markets on equal, if not more favourable, terms. Instead of there being one harvest every year, there was now a harvest in every month of each year. In 1877 prices advanced, owing to the progress of the Russo—Turkish War. But the potato crops failed, and a renewed outbreak of the cattle-plague, though speedily suppressed, hit stockowners hard. The tithe rent-charge was nearly £12 above its par value. Rates were rising rapidly. http://www.soilandhealth.org/0laglibrary/010136ernle/O10136ch18.htm O5/O7/O3 English Farming: Chapter XVIII Page 2 Of 5 Land-agents began to complain of the scarcity of eligible tenants for vacant corn-land. During the sunless ungenial summer of 1879, with its icy rains, the series of adverse seasons culminated in one of the worst harvests of the century, in an _ outbreak of pieuropneumonia and foot—and—mouth disease among cattle, and among sheep a disastrous attack of the liver rot, which inflicted an enormous loss on flockmasters. The English wheat crop scarcely averaged 15‘/2 bushels to the acre. In similar circumstances, farmers might have been compensated for the shortness of yield by an advance in price. This was no longer the case in 1879. America, which had enjoyed abundant harvests, poured such quantities of wheat into the country as to bring down prices below the level of the favourable season of the preceding year. At the same time, American cheese so glutted the market as to create a record for cheapness. Thus, at the moment when English farmers were already enfeebled by their loss of capital, they were met by a staggering blow from foreign competition. They were fighting against low prices as well as adverse seasons. English farmers were, in fact, confronted with a new problem. How were they to hold their own in a treacherous climate on highly rented land, whose fertility required constant renewal, against produce raised under more genial skies on cheaply rented soils, whose virgin richness needed no fertilisers? To a generation familiar with years of a prosperity which had enabled English farmers to extract more from the soil than any of their foreign rivals, the changed conditions were unintelligible. The new position was at first less readily understood, because the depression was mainly attributed to the accident of adverse seasons, and because the grazing and dairying districts had as yet escaped. Thousands of tenants ori corn—growing lands were unable to pay their rents. In many instances they were kept afloat by the help of wealthy landlords. But every landowner is not a Dives; the majority sit at the rich man's gate. In most cases there was no reduction of rents. Remissions, sometimes generous, sometimes inadequate, were made and renewed from time to time. Where the extreme urgency of the case was imperfectly realised, many old tenants were ruined. It was not till farms were relet that the necessary reductions were made, and then the men who profited were new occupiers. If any doubt still existed as to the reality of the depression, especially in corn-growing districts, it was removed by the evidence laid before the Duke of Richmond's Commission, which sat from 1879 to 1882. The Report of the Commission established, beyond possibility of question, the existence of severe and acute distress, and attributed its prevalence, primarily to inclement seasons, secondarily to foreign competition. It was generally realised that the shrinkage in the margin of profit on the staple produce of agriculture was a more or less permanent condition, and that rents must be readjusted. Large reductions were made between 1880 and 1884, and it was calculated that in England and Wales alone the annual letting value of agricultural land was thus decreased by 53/4 millions. Yet in many cases the rent nominally remained at the old figure. Only remissions were granted, which were uncertain in amount, and therefore disheartening in effect. According to Sir James Caird's evidence given in 1886, before the Royal Commission on Depression of Trade, the yearly income of landlords, tenants, and labourers had diminished since 1876 by £42,800,000. The worst was by no means over. On the contrary, the pressure of foreign competition gradually extended to other branches of agriculture. The momentum of a great industry in any given direction cannot be arrested in a day; still less can it be diverted towards another goal without a considerable expenditure of time and money. Unreasonable complaints were made against the obstinate conservatism of agriculturists, because they were unable to effect a costly change of front as easily as a man turns in his bed. The aims and methods of farming were gradually adapted to meet the changed conditions. As wheat, barley, and oats declined towards the lowest prices of the century, increased attention was paid to grazing, dairying, and such minor products as vegetables, fruit, and poultry. The corn area of England and Wales shrank from 8,244,392 acres in 1871 to 5,886,052 acres in 1901. Between the same years the area of permanent pasture increased from 11,367,298 acres to 15,399,025 acres. Yet before the change was complete farmers once more found themselves checkmated. The old adage "Down horn, up corn“ had once held true. Now both were down together. Till 1885 the prices of fat cattle had been well maintained, and those of sheep till 1890. Both were now beginning to decline before the pressure of foreign competition. Up till 1877 both cattle and sheep had been chiefly sent in alive from European countries. Now, America and Canada joined in the trade, and the importation of dead meat rapidly increased. Consignments were no longer confined to beef and pigs’ meat. New Zealand and the Republic of Argentina entered the lists. The imports of mutton, which in 1882 did not exceed 181,000 cwts., and chiefly consisted of meat boiled and tinned, rose in 1899 to 31/2 million cwts. of frozen carcases. The importation of cheese rose by more than a third; that of butter was doubled; that of wool increased more than two-fold. Meanwhile the outgoings of the farmer were steadily mounting upwards. Machinery cost more; labour rose in price and deteriorated in efficiency. The expenses of production rose as the profits fell. Some attempt was made by Parliament to relieve the industry. The recommendations of the Richmond Commission were gradually carried into effect. Grants were made in aid of local taxation. Measures were adopted to stamp out disease amongst live-stock, and to protect farmers against the adulteration of feeding-stuffs, and against the sale of spurious butter and cheese. The primary liability for tithe rent-charge was transferred from occupiers to owners (1891). The law affecting limited estates in land was modified by the Settled Lands Act (1882). A Railway and Canal Traffic Act was passed, which attempted to equallse rates on the carriage of home and foreign produce. The permissive Agricultural Holdings Act of 1875, which was not incorrectly described as a "homily to landlords" on the subject of unexhausted improvements, was superseded by a more stringent measure and a modification of the law of distress (1883). A Minister of Agriculture was appointed (1889), and an Agricultural Department established. But the legislature was powerless to provide any substantial help. Food was, so to speak, the currency in which foreign nations paid for English manufactured goods, and its cheapness was an undoubted blessing to the wage—earning community. Thrown on their own resources, agriculturists fought the unequal contest with courage and tenacity. But, as time went on, the stress told more and more heavily. Manufacturing populations seemed to seek food-markets everywhere except at home. Enterprise gradually weakened; landlords lost their ability to help, farmers their recuperative power. Prolonged depression checked costly improvements. Drainage was practically discontinued. Both owners and occupiers were engaged in the task of making both ends meet on http://www.soilandhealth.org/0laglibrary/010136ernle/010136ch18.htm 05/07/03 English Farming: Chapter XVIII P399 3 Of 5 vanishing incomes. Land deteriorated in condition; less labour was employed; less stock was kept; bills for cake and fertilisers were reduced. The counties which suffered most were the corn—growing districts, in which high farming had won its most signal triumphs. On the heavy clays of Essex, for example, thousands of acres, which had formerly yielded great crops and paid high rents, had passed out of cultivation into ranches for cattle or temporary sheep-runs. On_the light soils of Norfolk, where skill and capital had wrested large profits from the reluctant hand of Nature, there were widespread rum and bankruptcy. Throughout the Eastern, Midland, and Southern counties,wherever the land was so heavy or so light that its cultivation was naturally unremuneratlve, the same conditions prevailed. The West on the whole, suffered less severely. Though milk and butter had fallen in price, dairy-farmers were profiting by the cheapness of grain, which was ruining their corn—growing neighbours. Almost everywhere retrenchment, not development, was the enforced policy of agriculturists. The expense of laying land down to grass was shirked, and arable areas which were costly to work were allowed to tumble down to rough pasture. Economy ruled in farm management; labour bills were reduced, and the number of men employed on the land dwindled as the arable area contracted. During the years 1883-90, better seasons, remissions of rent, the fall in tithes, relief from some portion of the burden of rates, had arrested the process of impoverishment. To some extent the heavy land, whether arable or pasture, which wet seasons had deteriorated, recovered its tone and condition. But otherwise there was no recovery. Landlords and tenants still stood on the verge of ruin. Only a slight impulse was needed to thrust them over the border line. Two cold summers (1891—2), the drought in 1893, the unpropitious harvest of 1894, coupled with the great fall in prices of corn, cattle, sheep, wool, butter, and milk produced a second crisis, scarcely, if at all, less acute than that of 1879. In this later period of severe depression, unseasonable weather played a less important part than before. But in all other respects the position of agriculturists was more disadvantageous than at the earlier period. Foreign competition had relaxed none of its pressure; on the contrary, it had increased in range and in intensity. Nothing now escaped its influence. But the great difference lay in the comparative resources of agriculturists. In 1879 the high condition of the land had supplied farmers with reserves of fertility on which to draw; now, they had been drawn upon to exhaustion. In 1879, again, both landlords and tenants were still possessed of capital; now, neither had any money to spend in attempting to adapt their land to new conditions. In September, 1893, a Royal Commission was appointed to enquire into the depression of agriculture. The evidence made a startling revelation of the extent to which owners and occupiers of land, and the land itself, had been impoverished since the Report of the Duke of Richmond's Commission. It showed that the value of produce had diminished by nearly one half, while the cost of production had rather increased than diminished; that quantities of corn—land had passed out of cultivation; that its restoration, while the present prices prevailed, was economically impossible; that its adaptation to other uses required an immediate outlay which few owners could afford to make. Scarcely one bright feature relieved the gloom of the outlook. Foreign competition had falsified all predictions. No patent was possible for the improved processes of agriculture; they could be appropriated by all the world. The skill which British farmers had acquired by half a century of costly experiments was turned against them by foreign agriculturists working under more favourable conditions. Even distance ceased to afford its natural protection either of time or cost of conveyance, for not even the perishable products of foreign countries were excluded from English markets. Yet the evidence collected by the Commission established some important facts. It proved that many men, possessed of ample capital and energy, who occupied the best equipped farms, enjoyed the greatest liberty in cropping, kept the best stock, and were able to continue high farming, had weathered the storm even on heavy land; that small occupiers employing no labour but their own had managed to pull through; that, on suitable soils, market gardening and fruit—farming had proved profitable; that, even on the derelict clays of Essex, Scottish milk—farmers had made a living. At no previous period, it may be added, in the history of farming were the advantages and disadvantages of English land—ownership more strongly illustrated. Many tenants renting land on encumbered estates were ruined, because their hard—pressed landlords were unable to give them financial help. At least as many were nursed through the bad times by the assistance of landowners whose wealth was derived from other sources than agricultural land. When the extent of the agricultural loss and suffering is considered, the remedies adopted by the legislature seem trivial. Yet some useful changes were made. Farmers were still further protected against adulteration of cake, fertilisers, and dairy produce by the provisions of The Fertilisers and Feeding Stuffs Act (1893) and the Sale of Food and Drugs Act (1899). The Market Gardeners Compensation Act (1895) enabled a tenant, where land was specifically let for market garden purposes, to claim compensation for all improvements suitable to the business, even though they had been effected without the consent of the landlord. The Improvement of Land Act (1899) gave landowners increased facilities for carrying out improvements on borrowed money. The amendment of the Contagious Diseases of Animals Act (1896), requiring all foreign animals to be slaughtered at the port of landing, was a valuable step towards preventing the spread of infection. The Agricultural Rates Act (1896) and the subsequent Continuation Acts (1901, etc.), though they were only palliatives which did not settle the many questions involved in the increasing burden of rates, rendered the load of local taxation for the moment less oppressive. After all, agriculturists received little assistance from Parliament. They had to help themselves. Conditions slowly mended. More favourable seasons, rigid economy in expenses, attention to neglected branches of the industry have combined to lessen the financial strain. But the greatest relief has been afforded by the substantial reduction in the rents of agricultural land, which has resulted in a fairer adjustment of the economic pressure of low prices as between owners and occupiers. The nadir of the great depression came in 1894-95, when the price of wheat per imperial quarter fell to 22s. 10d. and 235. 1d., the lowest figures recorded for 150 years. From that time began a slow but steady rise in prices, sufficient to counterbalance the definite increase in wages which became manifest between 1895 and the end of the century and indeed continued, though more gradually, until the outbreak of war in 1914. After 1907 the price of wheat never fell below 305.; but wheat had become a commodity of less importance to farmers at large, for the acreage had declined to about one and http://www.soilandhealth.org/Olaglibrary/010136ernle/010136ch18.htm O5/07/O3 English Farming: Chapter XVIII Page 4 of 6 three-quarter millions. More than anything else milk had become the most money-making product, for the_demand was continuously increasing with the growth of population and the industrial prosperity of the period. Changes in -the farming population were marked as the old time arable farmers of the South and East of England, who had persisted in their traditional but now too expensive methods of cultivation, had to retire. About 1895, rents had really adjusted themselves to the times, indeed on the heavy lands of Essex, where the reductions of rent had not been rapid or large enough to save the old tenants, farms could be had on payment of the tithe, and many large estates took the greater part of their farms in hand rather than let to the sort of men who offered themselves. Tempted by these conditions, Scotchmen migrated. in numbers from a country where rents were still competitive and brought their knowledge of milk production and their more economical methods into Essex and Hertfordshire, and to a lesser degree into Kent and Surrey. Similarly, the dairy farmers of the West drifted into the South and Midlands, from Devonshire and Wales, men who had been bred to live harder and do their work more economically, if more roughly. For this was the great lesson that was being learned, how to get the work done on the arable land with less labour. What with the turning over of arable land to grass (21/2 million acres between 1872, and 1900) and economy in methods, something like a third of the labouring population left the land in the last quarter of the nineteenth century. There were other occupations to absorb the men, but none the less this forced exodus left a bitterness against farmers and landlords among the working classes that has not yet wholly disappeared. The cheapness of land during this last decade of the nineteenth century gave to many shrewd men who had broken with tradition and learnt how to farm cheaply an opportunity of putting together exceptionally large farming businesses. S. W. Farmer of Little Bedwyn was reputed to be farming 20,000 acres at the outbreak of war, at the same time George Baylis of Wyfield Manor near Newbury was farming over 12,000 acres in Berkshire and Hampshire, growing corn and hay without any stock, in Lincolnshire men like Dennis and the Wortbs built up great estates on potato growing out of little farms whose owners had been broken in the depression. These were examples of the success of better farming, but there were many instances where some sort of a paying return was got out of the land by turning it down to grass and reducing expenses to a minimum. Such was an estate put together near Ramsbury in Wiltshire, where about 4,000 acres of light arable land on the chalk were turned into a sheep ranch. In the early 'eighties, there was a hamlet called Snape on one part of the estate, containing a chapel, fourteen cottages, and a school attended by 44 children. In 1921 the street was grass—grown and almost obliterated, the buildings were in ruins. The working population had been reduced to a shepherd and his dog, like the owner, living elsewhere. Though the accomplishment was irregularly distributed considerable progress in the technique of farming was taking place. It was no longer possible for landowners and their agents to insist on particular methods of farming; covenants remained in the agreements, but were ignored as long as the tenant could pay his rent, so the diffusion of better methods came about by example, not by pressure from above. Indeed, in the main, landlords had accepted the position that there was little future for farming, that the development of their estates did not offer an outlet for their energies or capital comparable to those available elsewhere, and that their function was to be easy with their tenants in return for the sport and the social status that the ownership of land conferred. Their direct interest in agriculture was often confined to the breeding and showing of pedigree stock, the practical value of which began to be obscured almost in proportion as it became a rich man's plaything and a form of social competition. Of course, a generalisation of this kind about any of the classes engaged in agriculture, landlords, tenants, or labourers, is contradicted by a number of individuals, who worked hard at farming and managed their estates with knowledge and judgment, but none the less this period did witness the continued disappearance of the landowner as entrepreneur. In general the land was not sold, the possibilities of its monopoly values were too evident in a country of growing population and increasing industrial prosperity. It is true that towards the end of the first decade of the twentieth century there arose a number of land speculators who bought up embarrassed and under—rented estates and offered the farms to the selling tenants at greatly enhanced prices. The speculators had realised better than the landlords that farming was again a remunerative business and were not afraid of the odium of making the tenants pay its full value. Moreover, this was a time when considerable political attacks were being directed against the landlords, without much discrimination between the owners of agricultural land and those who were reaping "unearned increment" from ground rents in the growing urban areas. Some landowners took alarm and disembarrassed themselves of an investment which at the time was yielding an inferior rate of interest, yet carried with it heavy social obligations. Thus the Duke of Bedford sold both his Thorney and Tavistock Estates on terms favourable to the selling tenants. It was at the very depth of the depression that a beginning was made with State-aided agricultural education, in the train of which research soon followed. But this will be dealt with e|sewhere,—-results had hardly begun to accrue before the new century; the first improvements in technique came from the farmers themselves. Machinery was becoming more general upon the farm, the greatest single improvement having been the self-acting binder, the use of which began to be general about the end of the ‘eighties, after the introduction of the knotting mechanism and twine. But haymaking machinery and springtined cultivators were also doing their share in reducing the costs of cultivation and the amount of labour required upon the arable land. In the more specialised industries change was at work: in hop-growing, for example, the ‘eighties and early ‘nineties saw the general replacement of the old poles by string and wire erections on which the bines could be trained so as to get proper exposure to sun and air, and spraying methods were evolved to deal with blight and mould. Until these improvements began, the methods of hop-growing had not altered in any substantial respect from those described by Reynolde Scot in 1574. While the use of artificial fertilisers was not growing as rapidly as in countries like Holland and Germany, that was because the acreage under arable cultivation continued to decline and the farmers who were winning through were mostly those who relied on keeping their expenses down, yet the knowledge of how to apply them appropriately was spreading. In the latter years of the nineteenth century one might still meet the landlord who forbade his tenants to put any artificials on their land or the farmer who had substituted Kainit for nitrate of soda because it was cheaper, but such instances disappeared as the new century opened out. One new fertiliser, indeed, was beginning to prove itself of immense value to the grass land which was becoming the mainstay of English farming. Basic slag was invented in 1879, but it only reached agriculture after 1885, when Wrightson and Munro demonstrated that http://www.soilandhealth.org/Olaglibrary/010136ernle/O10136ch18.htm 05/07/03 English Farming: Chapter XVIII Page 5 01° 5 its phosphate required no treatment with acid if only the slag was finely ground. It soon showed itself as possessing a marvellous regenerative value on old pastures, especially on the clay soils on which its application induced a speedy growth of white clover whereby not only the stock gained but the pasture continued to acquire fertility. While farmers have always been immediately appreciative of improved strains of seed, it can be said that during the years 1890-1910 their interest in the value of pure seed and good strains was being continually stimulated, though the history of actual introductions may best be dealt with under research. In matters of live-stock the impulse towards the selection and standardisation of a pure breeding strain under the care of a Breed Society, which had been one of the chief achievements of English farming in the nineteenth century, was still active, as witness the formation of the following Societies--The Guernsey Cattle Society in 1885, the Dexter and Kerry Handbook in 1890, the Welsh Black Cattle Society in 1904, the British Holstein (now Friesian) Cattle Society in 1909. Flock Books began for Shropshires in 1883, Oxfords in 1889, Hampshires in 1890, Lincolnshires in 1892, Romney Marsh in 1895 and many others. Though from some points of view it might be questioned whether all these new breeds were wanted, the formation of a Society did tune up the general standard in the district occupied by the breed. The chief development during the period was concerned with milk, the demand for which was continuously increasing with the growing population and industrial prosperity. The milking capacity of the various breeds received more attention; for example, during this period the Dairy Shorthorns began to be differentiated and in 1905 an Association was formed in its interests, and herds like those of Hobbs and Evens obtained a repute to rival the northern beef herds. The necessity for care and cleanliness in the preparation and despatch of milk to the public was being continually forced upon the farmers by the Health Authorities of the large towns, who had from time to time experience of milk distributed epidemics. Regulations were enforced concerning such matters as water supply and air space in cowsheds, and if at times they were uninformed and dictatorial about the unessentials, they did arouse in the dairy world the sense that success in this growing business depended upon the purity of the product. It was indeed in the ‘eighties that the process of butter and cheese making, hitherto a matter of traditional and personal farm practice, were studied and standardised. At the same time the correct temperatures and acidities were determined so that the desired result could be obtained with certainty. "Creameries" and cheese factories began to be established in order to handle milk more efficiently and economically. The importations of butter from Denmark and the Baltic countries was growing rapidly and setting a standard of quality and uniformity that neither the English nor the Irish market butter could equal, however much a dairymaid here and there could turn out a "gilt—edged" product such as can never be obtained by factory methods. However, there is little or no market in England for fine butter at an adequate price; the English dairy farmers could get a better return by selling raw milk and abandoned the butter market to their foreign and colonial competitors. Only a few farmers in the West and South—West, Wales and its borders, continued to make butter because the rail communications precluded them from getting whole milk to market, while they could also turn the separated milk to account by calf- rearing. The Irish butter making was transformed on Danish lines, their farmers, like the Danish, being content with returns per gallon well below that expected by the English farmer. The machinery of the dairy was undergoing revolution; barrel churns replaced the old upright churns in which a dasher worked up and down in the whole milk, the only reminder of the old shape being the metal churns in which, for a few years longer perhaps, milk will travel by rail. Rail transport again brought the necessity of milk coolers, though the customers of the small farmers, each with their own milk round, still demanded "milk warm from the cow.“ But the most important of these machines for the dairyman was the centrifugal separator of which really efficient types began to be available about 1890, though, as indicated above, the perfecting of this exquisite machine coincided with the decline and practical extinction of commercial butter-making in England. Among other labour saving machines that began to appear on the farms towards the close of the nineteenth century were the small oil engines to run the grinding and food preparation plant, and sheep shearing machines, the use of which grew but slowly because there were still men enough about to clip the comparatively small flocks running on the usual farm. The commercial development of poultry rather belongs to the post-war period. Even down to the end of the century pou|try—keeping still halted between the methods of the fancier and of the farmer who had a mongrel flock picking about his stack-yard. W. B. Tegetmeier, in his day an authority, was said to have an offer open of £50 for anyone who could produce an accredited balance sheet showing a year's profit on a poultry farm, excluding those dealing in stock birds or eggs. About Heathfield in Sussex there was a successful cramming industry producing birds for the table, though the crammers did no breeding, but bought young birds for fattening from as far afield as Ireland. The period we are considering, 1890-1914, was also one of expansion and improved technique in market gardening and fruit growing, industries that were prospering in response not only to the growing population but to a change ‘in the general dietary. Potato growing, which had proved but a treacherous foundation for the Lincolnshire Yeomen in the ‘seventies and 'eighties, became one of the moneymaking crops for certain selected districts, like the Lothians and Ayrshire in Scotland, the silt and the warp soils of Lincoln and Yorkshire, the light soils of West Lancashire and Cheshire. Even on the gravels of Hertfordshire, where Arthur Young had found himself "living in the jaws of a wolf," potato growing brought wealth to some of the migrants from Scotland. Nothing revolutionary had happened to make the industry so profitable, it was a good instance of the accumulation of a number of small improvements, each of which could be pooh-poohed as not worth while by the oldtime farmer. New varieties were being introduced, "Up—to-date“ had a long run about the turn of the century; the virtue of Scotch seed was recognised, though the reason for its success was yet undiscovered. Boxing the seed and planting sprouted sets became standard practice; the fertilisers to procure large crops became understood, for the growers were substantial men willing to spend money and open to advice. Spraying with Bordeaux mixture was standardised, but did not become general in all districts because many growers preferred to gamble on intermittent appearance of blight. Market gardening was increasing and improving its methods, though it was still dependent upon the lavish supplies of http://www.soilandhealth.org/Olaglibrary/010136ernle/010136ch18.htm O5/O7/03 English Farming: Chapter XVIII Page 6 of 6 stable manure that could be obtained from the great towns. Naturally it was segregating into selected areas--the brick earths of the Thames Valley and North Kent, Bedfordshire, Huntingdon, Wisbech and the Fens, and the Vale of Evesham, where it was found that asparagus would flourish on stiffish clays, while selected areas in Cornwall could follow the earliest potato crops with a second crop of autumn and winter broccoli. Lastly, this period saw the great development of the glass-house cultivation in districts like Worthing, Swanley Junction and above all the Lea Valley. Fifty years ago the tomato was as great a rarity in England as an Avocado pear is to-day; a few were imported, a few were grown in private conservatories. In the late ‘eighties market cultivation under glass began and early in the ‘nineties Worthing tomatoes had established their position as superior to any importations. From that time until the outbreak of war there was no pause in the extension of the industry. Cucumbers went with the tomatoes, grapes and Chrysanthemums completed the old cycle; forced bulbs—tulips, narcissus, and iris, were later additions, as again has been the perpetual flowering carnation, for flowers have become as much a matter of general household expenditure as tomatoes or eggs. Looking at the state of agriculture generally the early years of the century may be recalled as a time of quiet but growing prosperity for farmers. One may read in Farmer's Glory, that singularly faithful presentation of farming life in Wiltshire, how Mr. A. G. Street, who settled down on his father's farm in 1907, looks back to those years before the war as "the spacious days," just as the man of an older generation recalled the ‘sixties and early ‘seventies as the good old times. "But that large tenant farmers were doing pretty well then, there is no question. I suppose the business side of farming had its worries in those days, but it is difficult to recall any. There were good seasons and bad seasons, doubtless. I can remember wet weather in harvest time and good weather. Good luck at lambing time and bad I can also call to mind, but nothing ever seemed to make any difference in our home life. It all seemed such a settled prosperous thing." Again I may quote my own contemporary opinion, written after a series of farming tours round the United Kingdom in 1910-12. "In the first place we must recognise that the industry is at present sound and prosperous." HOME AG LIBRARY CATALOG GO TO NEXT CHAPTER http://www.soilandhealth.org/0laglibrary/O10136ernle/010136ch18.htm O5/O7/03 _aristocracy. - affiliate. _on CD-ROM or download thePeerage.c0m A genealogical survey of the peerage of Britain as well as the royal families of Europe Person Page 10840 Burke's Peera e & Gentr Cracroft's Peerage Peerage Jacobs Peerage The definitive guide to the British The Complete Guide to the British Peerage Discount new & used items. affil Search for On Sale Today Print _ peerage now! _ Framing Last Edited=9 Mar 2003 Reverend Sir Richard Wrottesley, Bt. gained the title of Baronet Wrottesley, 1 Child of Reverend Sir Richard Wrottesley, Bt.: Elizabeth Wrotteslev+ b. 1 Nov 1745, cl. 25 May 1822 Citations 1. [S6] G.E. Cokayne; with Vicary Gibbs, H.A. Doubleday, Geoffrey H. White, Duncan Warrand and Lord Howard de Walden, editors, The Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United Kingdom, Extant, Extinct or Dormant, new ed., 13 volumes in 14 (1910-1959; reprint in 6 volumes, Gloucester, U.K.: Alan Sutton Publishing, 2000), volume III, page 208. Hereinafter cited as The Complete Peerage. Lady Jane Conynghaml (F) b. 1 June 1826, cl. 24 December 1900, #108394 Pedigree Last Edited=25 Feb 2004 Lady Jane Conyngham was the daughter of _,__E,rga_,ncis Nathaniel Conyngham, 2nd Marquess of Conyngham and ‘ Lady Jane Paget.1 She was born on 1 June 1826 at Great Stanhope Street, London, Enqland.1 She married Francis George Spencer, 2nd Baron Churchill of Whichwood, son of Francis Almeric Spencer, 1st Baron Churchill of Whichwood and Lady Frances Fitzroy, on 19 May 1849 at Bifrons, Kent, England} She died on 24 December 1900 at age 74 at Osborne House, Osborne, Isle of Wight, England} She was buried on 29 December 1900 at Finstock, Oxfordshire, Enqland.1 Her will (dated 2) was probated, at over £12,000 gross or over £6,000 net. She was invested as a Lady, Royal Order of Victoria and Albert, 3rd class (V.A.).1 Through her marriage, Lady Jane Conyngham gained the title of Baroness Churchill of Whichwood. She held the office of Lady of the Bedchamber to HM Queen Victoria between 1854 and 1900.1 Child of Lady Jane Conyngham and Francis George Spencer, 2nd Baron Churchill of Whichwood: Maior Victor Albert Francis Charles Spencer, 1st Viscount Churchill+ b. 23 Oct 1864, d. 3 Jan 1934 Citations 1. [S_6__] G.E. Cokayne; with Vicary Gibbs, H.A. Doubleday, Geoffrey H. White, Duncan Warrand and Lord Howard de Walden, editors, The Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United Kingdom, Extant, Extinct or Dormant, new ed., 13 volumes in 14 (1910-1959; reprint in 6 volumes, Gloucester, U.K.: Alan Sutton Publishing, 2000), volume III, page 208. Hereinafter cited as The Complete Peerage. Francis Nathaniel Conyngham, 2nd Marquess of Conynghaml (M) b. 11 June 1797, d. 17 July 1876, #108395 Pedigree Last Edited=10 May 2003 Francis Nathaniel Conyngham, 2nd Marquess of Conyngham is the son of Henry Conyngham, 1st Marquess of Conynqham and Elizabeth Denison. He was born on 11 June 1797. He married Lady Jane Paget, daughter of Field Marshal Sir Henry William Paget, 1st . Marquess of Anqlesey and Lady Caroline Elizabeth Villiers, on 23 April 1824.2 He died on 17 July 1876 at age 79. He gained the title of 2nd Marquess of Conyngham. 1 Children of Francis Nathaniel Conyngham, 2nd Marquess of Conyngham and Lady Jane Paget: Georqe Henry Conyngham, 3rd Marquess Conyngham+ b. 3 Feb 1825, d. 2 Jun 1882 Ladv Jane Convngham+ b. 1 Jun 1826, d. 24 Dec 1900 Children of Francis Nathaniel Conyngham, 2nd Marquess of Conyngham: Lady Elizabeth Georqiana Conyngham d. 2 Feb 1904 Ladv Cecilia Auqusta Convngham+ cl. 16 Aug 1877 Lady Frances Caroline Martha Conyngham+ b. 1827, d. 17 Jun 1898 Citations 1. [$1 G.E. Cokayne; with Vicary Gibbs, H.A. Doubleday, Geoffrey H. White, Duncan Warrand and Lord Howard de Walden, editors, The Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United Kingdom, Extant, Extinct or Dormant, new ed., 13 volumes in 14 (1910-1959; reprint in 6 volumes, Gloucester, U.K.: Alan Sutton Publishing, 2000), volume III, page 208. Hereinafter cited as The Complete Peerage. 2. [_S_8] Charles Mosley, editor, Burke's Peerage and Baronetage, 106th edition, 2 volumes (Crans, Switzerland: Burke's Peerage (Genealogical Books) Ltd, 1999), volume 1, page 76. Hereinafter cited as Burke's Peerage and Baronetage, 106th edition. Lady Jane Pagetl (F) b. circa 1804, cl. 28 January 1876, #108396 Pedigree Last Edited=16 Aug 2003 Consanguinity Index=0.0°/o Lady Jane Paget was the daughter of Field Marshal Sir Henry William Paget, lst Marquess of Anqlesey and Lady . Caroline Elizabeth Vi||iers.1 She was born circa 1804. She married Francis Nathaniel Convngham, 2nd Marquess of Conyngham, son of Henry Convngham, 1st Marquess of Conynghar_n__ and Elizabeth Denison, on 23 April 1824.2 She died on 28 January 1876.2 Children of Lady Jane Paget and Francis Nathaniel Convngham, 2nd Marquess of Conynqham: George Henry Convngham, 3rd Marquess Conyngham+ b. 3 Feb 1825, d. 2 Jun 1882 Lady Jane Convngham+ b. 1 Jun 1826, d. 24 Dec 1900 Citations 1. [S6] G.E. Cokayne; with Vicary Gibbs, H.A. Doubleday, Geoffrey H. White, Duncan Warrand and Lord Howard de Walden, editors, The Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ire/and, Great Britain and the United Kingdom, Extant, Extinct or Dormant, new ed., 13 volumes in 14 (1910-1959; reprint In 6 volumes, Gloucester, U.K.: Alan Sutton Publishing, 2000), volume III, page 208. Hereinafter cited as The Complete Peerage. 2. [S8] Charles Mosley, editor, Burke's Peerage and Baronetage, 106th edition, 2 volumes (Crans, Switzerland: Burke's Peerage (Genealogical Books) Ltd, 1999), volume 1, page 76. Hereinafter cited as Burke's Peerage and Baronetage, 106th edition. Field Marshal Sir Henry William Paget, 1st Marquess of Anglesey1 (M) b. 17 May 1768, d. 29 April 1854, #108397 .l3:d1gLe.e Last Edited=5 Dec 2004 Appears on charts: Pedigree for Ladv Diana Frances Spencer Field Marshal Sir Henry William Paget, 1st Marquess of Anglesey was the son of Sir Henry Paget, 1st Earl of Uxbridge and Jane Champagne? He was born on 17 May 1768 at London, England? He was baptised on 12 June 1768 at St. George's Church, St. George Street, Hanover Square, Mayfair, London, England .2 He married, firstly, ‘ Ladv Caroline Elizabeth Villiers, daughter of George Bussy Villiers, 4th Earl of Jersey and Frances Twysden, on 25 July 1795 at Grosvenor Scluare, Mayfair, London, E__r_lg,La_n_d.3 He and Lady Caroline Elizabeth Villiers were divorced in 1810 in the Scots Courts, at her suit. 3 He married, secondly, Lady Charlotte Cadogan, daughter of Charles Sloane Cadogan, 1st Earl Cadogan and Mary Churchill, in 1810.3 He died on 29 April 1854 at age 85 at Uxbridge House, Old Burlington Street, London, England.3 He was buried on 6 May 1854. 3 His will was probated in July 1854.3 He was educated at Westminster School, Westminster, London, England? He graduated from Christs Church, Oxford University, Oxford, Oxfordshire, England , on 28 June 1786 with a Master of Arts (M.A.). 2 In 1790 he raised a regiment (the 80th Foot, or Staffordshire Volunteers) from his father's tenancy.3 He held the office of M.P. (Tory) for the Carnarvon boroughs between 1790 and 1796.2 He gained the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel in 1795 in the service of the 16th Light Dragoons.3 He held the office of M.P. (Tory) for Milborne Port between 1796 and 1804.3 He gained the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel in 1797 in the service of the 7th Light Dragoons.3 He was Colonel of the 7th Light Dragoons between 1801 and 1842.3 He gained the rank of Major-General in 1802.3 He held the office of M.P. (Tory) for Milborne Port between 1806 and 1810.3 He gained the rank of Lieutenant- General in 1808.3 He had seduced Charlotte, then the mother of four children, and a verdict against him of £24,000, a duel between him and her brother, Captain Cadogan, and two divorces, were the results of this misconduct.3 He held the office of Lord-Lieutenant of Anglesey between 1812 and 1854.3 He succeeded to the title of 4th Baronet Bay/y, of P/acenewyd, co. Anglesey and Mount Bagena//, co. Louth [I., 1730] on 13 March 1812.4 He succeeded to the title of 10th Lord Paget de Beaudesert [E., 1549] on 13 March 1812.5 He succeeded to the title of 2nd Earl of Uxbridge, co. Midd/esex [G.B., 1784] on 13 March 1812.5 He fought in the Battle of Corunna, where he commanded the cavalry under Sir John Moore.3 He was invested as a Knight Grand Cross, — Order of the Bath (G.C.B.) on 2 January 1815.3 He fought in the Battle of Waterloo on 18 June 1815, where he commanded the Anglo-Belgian cavalry, contributing greatly to the Allied success, although he was wounded and lost a leg.3 He was created 1st Marquess ofAng/esey [U.K.] on 4 July 1815.2 He was invested as a Knight of St. George (K.S.G.) [Russia] on 21 August 1815.3 He was invested as a Knight of Maria Theresa (K.M.T.) [Austria] on 21 August 1815.3 He was invested as a Knight Grand Cross, Hanoverian Order (G.C.H.) in 1816.3 He was invested as a Knight, Order of the Garter (K.G.) on 19 February 1818.3 He gained the rank of General in 1819.3 He held the office of Lord High Steward [England] in 1821, at the coronation of King George IV.3 He was invested as a Privy Counsellor (P.C.) in 1827.3 He held the office of Master General of the Ordnance between 1827 and 1828.3 He held the office of Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland between 1828 and 1829, although the Tory Government did not approve of his conduct, and recalled him.3 He held the office of Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland between 1830 and 1833, after going over to the Whigs.3 He was awarded the decoration of the Gold Stick in 1842.3 He was Colonel of the Royal Horse Guards between 1842 and 1854.3 He gained the rank of Field Marshal in 1846.3 He held the office of Master General of the Ordnance between 1846 and 1852.3 He held the office of Lord-Lieutenant of Staffordshire between 1849 and 1854.3 According to Gibbs, he was a brilliant and gallant cavalry officer, but neither a wise nor a virtuous man. He was very popular in Ireland during his first, and very unpopular in his second vice-royalty.3 Children of Field Marshal Sir Henry William Paget, 1st Marquess of Anglesey and Lady Caroline Elizabeth Villiers: Ladv Caroline Paget+ b. 6 Jun 1796, d. 12 Mar 1874 Sir Henry Paget, 2nd Marquess of Anglesey+ b. 6 Jul 1797, d. 7 Feb 1869 Captain Lord William Paget+ b. 1 Mar 1803, d. 17 May 1873 Lady Jane Paget+ b. c 1804, d. 28 Jan 1876 Lady AUCiUSta Paget+ b. b 1805, d. 6 Jun 1872 Lady Georgina Paget+ b. b 1809, d. 9 Nov 1875 Lord Arthur Paget b. b 1809, d. 1825 Lady Agnes Paget+ b. c 1809, d. 9 Oct 1845 Children of Field Marshal Sir Henry William Paget, 1st Marquess of Anglesey and Lady Charlotte Cadogan: Ladv Emily Paget b. c 1810, d. 6 Mar 1893 Lady Adelaide Paget b. bt 1811 - 1836, d. 21 Aug 1890 Admiral Lord Sir Clarence Edward Paget+ b. 17 Jun 1811, d. 22 Mar 1895 General Lord Alfred Henry Paget+ b. 26 Jun 1816, d. 24 Aug 1888 General Lord George Augustus Frederick Paget+ b. 1927.3 He died on 3 January 1934 at age 69.3 He held the office of Page of Honour to HM Queen Victoria between 1876 and 1881.1 He succeeded to the title of 3rd Baron Churchill of Whichwood [ U. K., 1815] on 24 November 1886.1 He held the office of Lord in Waiting (Conservative) between 1889 and 1992.1 He held the office of Lord in Waiting (Conservative) between 1895 and 1905.1 He held the office of Master of the Buckhounds between 1900 and 1901.3 He held the office of Lord Chamberlain in 1902.3 He was created 1st Viscount Churchill [U.K.] on 14 July 1902.1 He was invested as a Knight Commander, Royal Victorian Order (K.C.V.O.) on 19 November 1902.1 He gained the rank of Lieutenant in the service of the Coldstream Guards.3 He gained the rank of Major in the service of the Oxfordshire Yeomanry.3 He was Chairman of the Great Western Railway in 1908.1 He held the office of J.P. for Oxfordshire.3 He held the office of J.P. for Leicestershire.3 He was Chairman of the British Overseas Bank.3 He was a director of the British India Steamship Company.3 He was a director of P&O.3 He was a director of Grand Union CanaL3 Children of Major Victor Albert Francis Charles Spencer, 1st Viscount Churchill and Lady Verena Maud : Hon. Victor Almeric Lancelot Spencer b. 18 Jan 1888, d. 18 Jan 1888 Major Victor Alexander Spencer, 2nd Viscount Churchill b. 2 Aug 1890, d. 21 Dec 1973 Hon. Victoria Ivv Louise Spencer b. 15 Oct 1897 Hon. Ursula Spencer b. 21 Jun 1901, d. 1 Jun 1934 Children of Major Victor Albert Francis Charles Spencer, 1st Viscount Churchill and Christine McRae Sinclair: Lady Sarah Faith Georgina Spencer+ b. 5 Jun 1931 Victor George Spencer Spencer, 3rd Viscount Churchill b. 31 Jul 1934 Citations 1. [g] G.E. Cokayne; with Vicary Gibbs, H.A. Doubleday, Geoffrey H. White, Duncan Warrand and Lord Howard de Walden, editors, The Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United Kingdom, Extant, Extinct or Dormant, new ed., 13 volumes in 14 (1910-1959; reprint in 6 volumes, Gloucester, U.K.: Alan Sutton Publishing, 2000), volume III, page 208. Hereinafter cited as The Complete Peerage. 2. [S6] Cokayne, and others, The Complete Peerage, volume III, page 209. 3. [Q] Charles Mosley, editor, Burke's Peerage and Baronetage, 106th edition, 2 volumes (Crans, Switzerland: Burke's Peerage (Genealogical Books) Ltd, 1999), volume 1, page 573. Hereinafter cited as Burke's Peerage and Baronetage, 106th edition. Lady Verena Maud Lowtherl (F) b. 6 April 1865, d. 25 December 1938, #108399 E_ed£J£e_e Last Edited=10 May 2003 Lady Verena Maud Lowther was the daughter of Henry Lowther, 3rd Earl of Lonsdale and Emily Susan Caulfield.1 She was born on 6 April 1865.1 She married Major Victor Albert Francis Charles Spencer, 1st Viscount Churchill, son of Francis George Spencer, 2nd Baron Churchill of Whichwood and Lady Jane Convngham, on 1 January 1887 at Cottesmore, Rutland, Enc1land.1 She and Major Victor Albert Francis Charles Spencer, 1st Viscount Churchill were divorced in 1927.2 She died on 25 December 1938 at age 73. She was invested as a Lady, Royal Order of Victoria and Albert (V.A.).-’- Through her marriage, Lady Verena Maud Lowther gained the title of Baroness Churchill of Whichwood on 1 January 1887. Through her marriage, Lady Verena Maud Lowther gained the title of Viscountess Churchill on 14 July 1902. Children of Lady Verena Maud Lowther and Major Victor Albert Francis Charles Spencer, 1st Viscount Churchill: Hon. Victor Almeric Lancelot Spencer b. 18 Jan 1888, cl. 18 Jan 1888 Major Victor Alexander Spencer, 2nd Viscount Churchill b. 2 Aug 1890, d. 21 Dec 1973 Hon. Victoria Ivy Louise Spencer b. 15 Oct 1897 Hon. Ursula Spencer b. 21 Jun 1901, d. 1 Jun 1934 Citations 1. [S_6] G.E. Cokayne; with Vicary Gibbs, H.A. Doubleday, Geoffrey H. White, Duncan Warrand and Lord Howard de Walden, editors, The Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United Kingdom, Extant, Extinct or Dormant, new ed., 13 volumes in 14 (1910-1959; reprint in 6 volumes, Gloucester, U.K.: Alan Sutton Publishing, 2000), volume III, page 209. Hereinafter cited as The Complete Peerage. 2. [S_8] Charles Mosley, editor, Burke's Peerage and Baronetage, 106th edition, 2 volumes (Crans, Switzerland: Burke's Peerage (Genealogical Books) Ltd, 1999), volume 1, page 573. Hereinafter cited as Burke's Peerage and Baronetage, 106th edition. Henry Lowther, 3rd Earl of Lonsdalel (M) b. 27 March 1818, d. 15 August 1876, #108400 Pedigree Last Edited=10 May 2003 Henry Lowther, 3rd Earl of Lonsdale is the son of Henry Cecil Lowther and Lucy Eleanor Sherard. He was born on 27 March 1818. He married Emily Susan - , daughter of St. George Francis Caulfield, on 31 July 1852. He died on 15 August 1876 at age 58. He gained the title of 3rd Earl of Lonsdale. 1 Children of Henry Lowther, 3rd Earl of Lonsdale and Emily Susan Caulfieldz Sibyl Emily Lowther cl. 11 Jun 1932 St. George Henry Lowther, 4th Earl of Lonsdale+ b. 4 Oct 1855, cl. 8 Feb 1882 Hugh Cecil Lowther, 5th Earl of Lonsdale b. 25 Jan 1857, d. 13 Apr 1944 Charles Edwin Lowther b. 11 Jul 1859, cl. 2 Apr 1888 Lady Verena Maud Lowther+ b. 6 Apr 1865, d. 25 Dec 1938 Lancelot Edward Lowther, 6th Earl of Lonsdale+ b. 25 Jun 1867, d. 11 Mar 1953 Citations 1. [_S_6] G.E. Cokayne; with Vicary Gibbs, H.A. Doubleday, Geoffrey H. White, Duncan Warrand and Lord Howard de Walden, editors, The Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain and the United Kingdom, Extant, Extinct or Dormant, new ed., 13 volumes in 14 (1910-1959; reprint in 6 volumes, Gloucester, U.K.: Alan Sutton Publishing, 2000), volume III, page 209. Hereinafter cited as The Complete Peerage. Latest Entries - FAQ - Abbreviations - thePeeraqe.com Discussion Group Compiler: Darryl Lundz 128 Heke Street, Wellington, NEW ZEALAND Googier I r Web r=www.thePeerage.com This page was created by John Cardinal ’s Second Site v1.8.0. Site updated on 25 January 2005 from monarchs of europe; 139,824 people j waif‘) /(07.5/‘>’&‘i 5.‘ 4/C,"{/7“ "7 ’ ya/L’/ab/’ fl rfW”'°’j)fl”h Cw . ,Lm7b*Wf”,tn.fl P” we‘ cf" M/m:L.7:.§7»'r(i‘r7 W/flu ww;~«* <./véi//f M , ’ 0 (:41/‘L’ ‘ 906% 7 4); /7/(6 Mai A{ (M7 & /(ffl~=*“V W _ Ln‘/7 W f'I\.?l/W0 W % ~ . /3 1/ , CCLW Q66/J4 ’[.'Lo.bfl/C¢~*/““p 3%’)? Baronet Ainsworth, of Ardanaiseig, co. Argyll [United Kingdom, 1917] 1st: John Stirling Ainsworth (12 Jan 1917-24 May 1923) 2nd: Thomas Ainsworth (24 May 1923-1 Mar 1971) 3rd: John Francis Ainsworth (1 Mar 1971-1981) 4th: Thomas David Ainsworth (l981—24 Nov 1999) 5th: Anthony Thomas Hugh Ainsworth (24 Nov 1999- ) Sir John Francis Ainsworth, 3rd Bt.1 (M) b. 4 January 1912, d. 1981, #72042 d. 198llp7205.htm#i72042|Sir Thomas Ainsworth, 2nd Bt.|b. 8 Feb 1886 d. 1 Mar 1971|p7204.htm#i72039|Lady Edina Dorothy Hope Conynghamlb. 18 Oct 1888 d. 13 Apr 1964lp7204.htm#i72035lSir John S. Ainsworth. lst Bt.|b. 30 Jan 1844 d. 24 May 19231pl2240.htm#i122400|Margaret C. Macredield. 8 Oct 1918lp12242.htm#i1224l3|Henry F. Conyngham, 4th Marquess Conynghamlb. 1 Oct 1857 d. 28 Aug 1897|p7199.htm#i71982lFrances E. S. E. de Moleynsld. 8 Jul l939|p7199.htm#i71981l');"Pedigree Last Edited=l5 Feb 2005 Sir John Francis Ainsworth, 3rd Bt. was the son of Sir Thomas Ainsworth, 2nd Bt. and Lady Edina Dorothy Hope Conyn,gham.1 He was born on 4 January 1912.1 He married, firstly, Josephine Bernard, daughter of Commander Walter Randolph Bernard and Millicent Olive Graves, on 26 August 1938.1 He and Josephine Bernard were divorced in 1946.1 He married, secondly, Anita Mar,garet Ann Lett, daughter of Harold Arthur Lett, on 19 February 1946.1 He died in 1981.1 He was educated at Eton College, Eton, Berkshire. England.1 He was educated at Trinity College. Cambridge University. Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, England.1 He graduated from Trinity College, Cambridge University, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, in 1933 with a Bachelor of Arts (B.A.).1 He graduated from Trinity College. Cambridge University. Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, in 1937 with a Master of Arts (M.A.).1 He was invested as a Fellow, Royal Historical Society (F.R.Hist.S.).1 He was an external lecturer in Medieval History between 1966 and 1981 at University College of Cork. Cork. County Cork, Ireland.1 He succeeded to the title of 3rd Bar0ne2‘Ainsworth, ofArdanaiseig, co. Argyll [U.K., 1917] on 1 March 1971.1 Citations 1. . [S_3Z] Charles Mosley, editor, Burke's Peerage, Baronetage & Knightage, 107th edition, 3 volumes (Wilmington, Delaware, U.S.A.: Burke's Peerage (Genealogical Books) Ltd, 2003), volume 1, page 57. Hereinafter cited as Burke ’s Peerage and Baronetage, 107th edition. thePeerage.com A genealogical survey of the peerage of Britain as well as the royal families of Europe Person Page 7206 Burke's Feera e & Gentr The Com lete Peera e § C_M$ The definitive guide to the British G. E. Cokayne. 2nd Edition. 13 Volumes in Crazy Love - Bukowski‘s favourite movie Fantastic low prices aristocracy. — affiliate. 14. Buy it now on CD. _adaptation - out now! _want now on eBaY! N_e_vy,gl:1_tri~e:_s — EAQ - Abbreviations - Site Map - thePeeraqe.com Discussion Group, Major Sir John St. Vigor Foxl (M) #72051 Last Edited=13 Jun 2004 Major Sir John St. Vigor Fox held the office of Deputy Lieutenant} He held the office of J.P.1 He lived at Westholme House, Alltgrlkghefibgan Mallet Somerset, :rE|and.1 Child of Major Sir John St. Vigor Fox: .l§l.Lcb9.las-2S_t1 ...... eyjgor Fox+ Citations 1. [_S__3_7_] Charles Mosley, editor, Burke's Peerage, Baronetage & Knightage, 107th edition, 3 volumes (Wilmington, Delaware, U.S.A.: Burke's Peerage (Genealogical Books) Ltd, 2003), volume 1, page 57. Hereinafter cited asBurke’s Peerage and Baronetage, 107th edition. Sir Thomas David Ainsworth, 4th Bt.1 (M) b. 22 August 1926, cl. 24 November 1999, #72052 Pedigree Last Edited=30 Oct 2004 Sir Thomas David Ainsworth, 4th Bt. was the son of Sir Thomas Ainsworth, 2nd Bt. and ,lYL_I:i___e aaaaaa Domvi|e.1 He was born on 22 August 1926.1 He married Sarah Mary Walford, daughter of Lt.-Col. Hugh Carr Walford, on 6 May 1957.1 He died on 24 November 1999 at age 73.1 He was educated at Eton College, Eton, Berkshire, ,ELql_and.1 He gained the rank of Lieutenant in the service of the 11th Hussars.1 He was a merchant banker.1 He succeeded to the title of 4th Baronet Ainsworth, of Ardanaiseig, co. Argyil [U.K., 1917] in 1981.1 Children of Sir Thomas David Ainsworth, 4th Bt. and Sarah Mary Walford: Serena Mary Ainsworth+ b. 13 Mar 1958 Tessa Jane Ainsworth b. 6 Aug 1959 Sir Anthony Thomas Hugh Ainsworth, 5th Bt. b. 30 Mar 1962 Charles David Ainsworth b. 24 Aug 1966 Citations 1. [S32] Charles Mosley, editor, Burke's Peerage, Baronetage & Knightage, 107th edition, 3 volumes (Wilmington, Delaware, U.S.A.: Burke's Peerage (Genealogical Books) Ltd, 2003), volume 1, page 57. Hereinafter cited asBurl (Glendale, California, U.S.A.) to Darryl Lundy, 25 January 2004 and 6 April 2004. Hereinafter cited as "re: McLaughlin Family". E. T. A. Wennerwald (M) #94276 Last Edited=18 Sep 2002 RIN: 12931 POSTFIX: of Copenhagen 412931. Child of E. T. A. Wennerwald: Anne Marqarethe Wennerwald Ethel Jean Southam (F) #94277 Pedigree Last Edited=22 Sep 2003 Ethel Jean Southam is the daughter of Wilscoccnc Mills Southam. She married Sir Theodore Ernest Warren Brinckman, 4th Bt., son of Sir Theodore Francis Brinckman, 3rd Bt. and Marv Frances Linton, on 5 June 1939. She and Sir Theodore Ernest Warren Brinckman, 4th Bt. were divorced in 1952. Her married name was Brinckman. Wilson Mills Southam (M) #94278 Last Edited=18 Sep 2002 RIN: 12933 POSTFIX: of Rockcliffe, Ottowa, Canada 412933. Children of Wilson Mills Southam: Ethel Jean Southam Margaret Wilson South.am+ Major Adrian Leigh McLaughlin1 (M) b. 1910, d. 1970, #94279 E.ed1xe_e Last Edited=7 Feb 2004 Major Adrian Leigh McLaughlin was the son of gt;-_ Col. Hubert James McLaughlin and Winifred Hawthorne l:Ijc_lgs.1 He was born in 1910.1 He died in 1970.1 He fought in the Second World War.1 He was liaison officer of the Soviet Army.1 He gained the rank of Major in the service of the King's Royal Rifle Corps.1 He held the office of Vice—Consul to Prague, where he was expelled by the Soviets, accussed if spying.1 Citations 1. [S1007] Dr. G. Harry McLaughlin, "re: McLaughlin Family," e- mail message from (Glendale, California, U.S.A.) to Darryl Lundy, 25 January 2004 and 6 April 2004. Hereinafter cited as "re: McLaughlin Family". Margaret Wilson Southam (F) #94280 Pttedtitgttee Last Edited=18 Sep 2002 Margaret Wilson Southam is the daughter of Wilson Mills Southam. She married Sir Roderick Napoleon Brinckman, 5th Bt., son of Sir Theodore Francis Brinckman, 3rd Bt. and Mary Frances Linton, on 10 January 1931. She and Sir Roderick Napoleon Brinckman, 5th Bt. were divorced in 1943. Her married name was Brinckman. RIN: 12935 DIVORCE: 1943 412935. Children of Margaret Wilson Southam and Sir Roderick Napoleon Brinckman, 5th Bt.: Theodore George RODERICK Brinckman+ b. 20 Mar 1932 John Francis Brinckman+ b. 14 Sep 1933 New Entries - FAQ - Abbreviations - Site Map - thePeeraqe.com Discussion Group Compiler: Darryl Lunqz 128 Heke Street, Wellington, NEW ZEALAND Gocégle“ ' r www 6 thePeerage.com This page was created by John Cardinal's Second Site v1.8.0. Site updated on 11 April 2005 from monarchs of europe; 144,999 people Historical Manuscripts Commission | ARCHON I ARCHON Directory Page 1 of 1 C H§5‘t'BRlCAL MANUSCREPTS CDMWSSEDN I ‘ l-i'iJ!+€El§Ec‘.R¥':l-E[E'§i‘TlE res;-." itttirefrict‘ ABOUT HMC NATIONAL REGlSTER OF ARCHWES ARCHQN MANORML DOCUMENTS REGESTEH ADWCE PUBLICATWNS ARCHIVES IN FOCUS ARCHON DIRECTORY mu-us section A'_°h°_“ C°d° 1 0153 _ ARCHON Directory Birmingham City Archives 3 A-z of professional organisations 3 Add or amend an entry ARCHON Portal Contact Details Central Library Chamberlain Square Birmingham B3 3HQ England Print this page Tel 0121 303 4217 Fax 0121 212 9397 Email archives@birmingham.gov.uk URL http://www.birminciham.qov.uk/ Central Library Manager: Paul Hemmings Senior Archivist : Sian Roberts Access Information Open : Mon, Tues, Thurs-Sat 9-5 Member of CARN scheme Readers ticket required Research service NRA information for this repository The NRA indexes contain the following entries for this repository 2 - NRA catalogues (322) - Businesses (304) I Organisations (707) n Families (57) I Persons (260) u Other (130) Lists of major accessions available electronically for this repository 2 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Last amended : 20/11/2001 back About HMC 1 National Register of Archives l ARCHON l Manorial Documents Register | Advice I Publications 1 Archives in Focus Design by Readin Room Ltd Technology by Sherwood Government © 2002 Crown CODvriQht http ://www. hmc.gov. uk/archon/searches/locresult.asp?LR= 143 29/04/03 Map of B33HQ Page 1 of 2 mUltimap.com _ 0 save Map Aemetr. mores QUlCKSEAP.CH Great Britain GB postcode or place b33hq .ff:g§SERRCH TIPS fianvnncsn sermon §”i'fiEb' HERIRL PHOTO BOOK IN THIS HREH HOTEL TFIBLE COTTHGESVENTS GfiRHlRE BUY... Eunnnnnnnuulu“ SPECIAL FEATURES AEREAS. 33!-£0‘T0S LGNDIMI THEE MAP BUSJHESS SERVICES TEXT WEATHER SERVECE . WERELESS Is BT Broadband avaéiabie in What ha ened to m house numbers? T?..»5.FFlv'.Z iNFC3RP«‘E£tTEON Display the latest traffic information on the map. Trafiic Reports cover Great Britain and show details of roadworks, congestion. bad weather and pianned events affecting ératfrc. IWAP tfv£¥‘£39'3£MATlDfl Address: B33HQ wee X:4066OO m Y:2869OO m 52:28:49N, t:54:18W (Postcode) Grid Ref:SP065869{accurate to 100 metres) Drsz Web Address: http://www.multimap.com/map/browsecgi?X=406500&Y=287000&scale:1000O&coordsys=gb Train Station Birminqham New Street Train Station 0.3 miles (0.5 km) Motorway Junction A38lM) ‘not L 2.3 miles (3.7 km) Airport Birmingham 8.5 miles l13.7 km) LEW.‘ AL Et“i§’=l3RMx€&TIOf¢ C Propertiestorsale P Rental Properties F Hotels (R Restaurants r Pubs F Services P Entertainment F Leisure C Education Whatever you need, just Ask jeeves http://uk2.multimap.com/map/browse.cgi?client=public&db=pc&addr1=&client=. .. 29/O4/03 HAMMONS HISTORY PAGE Page 1 of 19 HAMMONS HISTORY PAGE This page contains stories from newspapers, biographys, and notes of interest. [ALABAMA || ARIZONA ] || || I [CONNECTICUT ||nELAWARE||Lo_13_D_IA || IQTAHO I QLINOIS I| IIIQJLVA j 7| I ILOUISIANA || MAINE || l |l I IMINNESOTA H MISSISSIPPI“ MISSOURI ILMONTANA | 7 NEW NEW EMA EAMPSHIRE IERSEY NEW MEXICO NEW YORK NA A OELO _oELAE_OMA OREEON RHODA SOUTH ISLAND CAROLINA SOUTH DAKOTA TENNESSEE |TEXAS H UTAH 1] VERMONT || VIRGINIA |L | NIA WISCONSIN WYOMING ENGLAND WALES BLACK HISTORY Dig HAMMONS OF NAMES HAMMOND FAMILY The origin of this family in England is said to have been traced to two kinsmen of William the Conqueror, who went into England with him in 1066. These young warriors were descended from a younger son of Rollo, the first Duke of Normandy, while William the Conqueror was descended from the eldest son. The eldest of the two early Hammonds in England, Sir Robert Fitzhamer, seventh Count or Earl of Coneile in Normany, was a mighty man of valor, one of the most illustrious, of all the valiant knights that accompanied the Conqueror into England. Later he became Lord Cardiff in Wales, Lord 0 fTrwkesbury, and Earl of Gloucester in England, and by King Rufus he was made a free Prince of Wales, styled by the King, Robert the Great, by the grace of God, Prince of Glamorgan, Earle of Coneile, etc. He was also commissioned general of the army against the French. The second, Haimon, called Dapifer, from his haveing received the office of Lord Steward for the King. He died without children. Robert left four daughters. Later members of this family became prominently identified with the Church, as Bishops, Abbots, etc. The oldest direct line in England, are the Hammonds of St. Albans Court, in Kent County, where this branch has been seated since the riegn of Henry VIII, King of England, when John Hammond was tenant to the Abbot and Convent of St. Albans; his son Thomas purchased the manor in 1551; and married (first) Anne, daughter of Robert Haddle and (second) Alice, daughter of Edward Monnis of Waldershire, by whom he had ten children. Two of his grandsons, Francis and Robert became distinguished in the Army, each winning the title of Colonel; they accompanied Sir Walter Raleigh on his expedition to Guinea, and won the praise of that gallant soldier. Sir William Hammond, of St. Albans, who received the honor of Knighthood, 1608, married http://www.tcnet.net/hammons/histOry.html O6/O9/O1 HAMMONS HISTORY PAGE Page 2 of 19 Elizabeth, daughter of Anthony Archer, Esq., of Bishopsborne and had issue: Sir Anthoney, his eldest son and heir, who married Ann daughter of Sir Dudley Digges, Knight of Chillam Castle, Master of Rolls to King Charles I, and member of the Council of the Virginia Co., 1609. Through this kinship, Ralph Hamor or Hammond, proved by foreign research to be one and the same, was one of the twelve gentlemen, to whom King James I, in 1624, granted a charter to proceed to Virginia to establish a colony, of which he appointed Sir Francis Wyatt, Governor; Sir George Yeardly, Knight, and the other ten gentlemen, Esq., to be his council. This Ralph Hamor the first of the name in America, was of the Hammonds of Aerin of Kent Co., England; he was a younger son of that house, whose lineage is the same as the Hammonds of St. Albans, but being the heir of a younger son, their arms are different. During the reign of Charles I and II, the Hammonds, were high in office in England, Dr John Hammond, was Court Physician to King James I., and his son, was Chaplain to Charles I, and another son came to Virginia, and was a member of the House of Burguess, from Isle of Wight Co., 1635-1652; he then went to Maryland, where he remained a few years, before returning to England, where he wrote "Leak and Rachel" describing the Colonies of Maryland and Virginia. Yet another son of Dr. John Hammond, was a Lieut. Gen. in Cromwells Army, and his grandson, a son of Thomas Hammond, was Col. Robert Hammond, Governor of the Isle of Wight, England, and it was to this Col. Robert Hammond, that King Charles I, fled for protection when driven from his throne, Col. Robert being loyal to his King, gave him shelter beneath his roof, which act of loyalty cost him his office. ALABAMA Richmond F. Hammond(17 March 1832-18 July 1882) One of the most influential pioneer families of Attalla, AL., was Richmond F. Hammond, his wife Mary Elizabeth. Having moved to Attalla about 1872. They had been living on his father's farm of 3,000 acres in St. Clair Co. Al. his father settled there in 1820. They had 67 slaves which the Civil War freed and this farm was to big and non profitable so Richmond decided that for his children to have better advantages he moved to Attalla. He bought a block of land there and shortly there after died. Mary Elizabeth being a forceful woman, who had a head for business made a fortune with the aid of her sons and daughters. Two children had died in infancy and this left seven whom grew to maturity. Sons, Albert, Joseph W.,B. Pope, John B.and Newton. Daughters, Nena and Bevans All were successful business men. Albert died at age 27. The others all accumulated large fortunes and property. B. Pope became a lawyer and went to McAlister OK. Bevens married John Staton. Neva never married. To show the close relations of the slaves to the owners: the following took place. After the Battle of Gettysburg Mary Elizabeth collected about $3,000 in Union silver. She turned it over to one of the two slave overseers, uncle Joe and told him to hide it and not tell her where it was hidden so she could resist pressure of disclosing its location. When Richmond returned from the war he ask his wife if she had any money. She told him to ask uncle Joe, the slave who had been made overseer. Which he did. The money was found hidden under the marble slab of a grave in the family graveyard. With freedom given his slaves, Richmond gave uncle Joe and uncle John sections of land and a year's supply of food and clothing. Not only did he show his appreciation of their loyalty this way. He named his sons after them, Joe and John. (see Philip Hammond in West Virginia) http://www.tcnet.net/hammons/history.html 06/09/O1 Bodleian Library UNI\'i:I~35IT\’ (H1 ()Xl34§)lll’) The Electronic Calendar of the Carte Papers, 1660-87 The Carte Papers The Carte papers in the Bodleian Library comprise vast collections of original papers from various sources which Thomas Carte amassed in preparation for the publication of his biography of James Butler, 1st Duke of Ormond, in 1735-6. There are 276 large volumes, comprising Ormond, Fitzwilliam, Chichester, Sandwich, Wharton, Huntingdon and Nairn papers largely relating to the history of Britain and Ireland in the period 1560- 1715. The largest group, forming the core of the Carte MSS., is the 111 volumes of the papers of James Butler, 12th Earl and 1st Duke of Ormond (1610-88). Ormond was created Lord Lieutenant of Ireland in 1644, having commanded the army there since 1640. Ormond led the war effort against the Confederate Catholics who had set up in opposition to the Dublin government in 1642 and effectively ruled much of Ireland. Subsequently Ormond conducted a series of peace negotiations with the Confederates, as Charles I sought Irish support against his English Parliament. Ormond went into exile in 1650 following military defeat by Cromwell's invading forces. After the Restoration in 1660, Ormond was a leading minister to Charles II, and was Lord Lieutenant of Ireland twice more before his death in 1688. The Ormond papers among the Carte MSS. are the major source for the Civil War and Restoration era in Irish history. In effect, they form the archive of the royal administration there, but their significance goes far beyond this. Many of the original records of the Irish administration were destroyed as a result of war and fires from the 18th to the 20th centuries. The archives of the Confederate government are no longer extant, and so Ormond's correspondence with the leaders of the Confederation is a major source for this crucial period in Irish history Ormond's papers include correspondence with leading Irish political figures of the period, as well as correspondence with King Charles I and II and leading English ministers relating to Irish affairs. The papers also richly document the complexities of the Restoration settlement in Ireland and the difficulties of dealing with the land claims of former Cromwellian soldiers, royalists and loyal Catholics. The numerous petitions from Irish citizens are a rich source for local and family history as well as for the social and economic condition of Ireland. The Ormond papers have long been recognised as a major source for 17th century Irish history, and are cited in numerous works. Carte himself published a number of letters in his Life of Ormonde; J.T. Gilbert published many documents in his History of the Irish confederation and the war in Ireland, 1641 (1882-91), and A contemporary history of affairs in Ireland, 1641-52 (1879-80). However, the vast bulk of the papers remain unpublished. The Carte Calendar Between 1877 and 1883 Edward Edwards produced a calendar of the entire Carte collection, itself comprising 75 volumes. It had been intended to publish the calendar, but deterred by the difficulties of its sheer bulk and complexity, the Library decided not to go ahead with publication. The calendar is therefore only available in the Bodleian Library, though some Irish libraries have microfilm copies. The calendar gives an abstract of every paper in the Carte collection in chronological order. It is written in a not always easy Victorian hand, and it has no index. For users interested in particular persons, places or subjects, there is no means of access. The ‘Religion and Rebellion‘ project The History of Parliament Trust and the Bodleian Library have formed a partnership to carry out the ‘Religion and Rebellion‘ project, and funding has been secured from the Heritage Lottery Fund to keyboard all the calendar entries for the period 1660-87. This will unlock the untapped riches of the Carte collection by producing an electronic version of the calendar available to all over the internet. This period includes a great deal of important material for the study of Restoration Ireland, but also includes two further collections of papers acquired by Carte: the papers of Edward Montagu (1625-72), 1st Earl of Sandwich, admiral and envoy to Spain; and some of the papers of Philip Wharton (1613-96) 4th Baron Wharton, and his son Thomas Wharton (1648-1716), 1st Marquess of Wharton. These entries will be combined with an electronic version of the summary catalogue description of the Carte papers and be made available by Summer 2005 through the % (Access to Archives) gateway to archival descriptions. The calendar will also be presented on this page in its original chronological form, and here volumes will be mounted as they are completed. The intention is to reproduce the calendar as it stands, with changes in layout to clarify the information in its new electronic context. The omissions and mistakes of the original calandar will therefore be duplicated at this stage unless they are very obvious without recourse to checking the original papers. However, in creating an online version we have the opportunity to amend the text at any time in the future, and we would be grateful if users could bring any errors they have noticed to our attention. The Bodleian Library aims to build on this project, and will be seeking funding to extend the conversion of the Carte Calendar to include the very important papers relating to the government of Ireland c.1560- 1660, and papers relating to the exiled Stuarts from 1689-1720. The Project team Project Manager: Mike Webb (Special Collections and Western Manuscripts, Bodleian Library) Text encoders: Sarah Brolly Simon Charles Tom Charlton Emily Tarrant Encoding Advisers (Oxford Digital Library): Jonathan Blaney Emma Leeson Judith Siefring Technical support: Lawrence Mielniczuk (Systems and Electronic Resources Service) Carte Calendar: 1660-1687 (Volumes 30- 61) Search Carte Calendar Volume 30: 1660 Vo|ussm_..e_...3...1.: 1661 January - May 1661 June - December Volugm”e_g_3fi3: 1662 January — August Volume 34: 1662 September - December 3.5: 1663 January - April Volume 36: 1663 May - July @,r_1_1__e___3_Z: 1663 August - October Volume 38: 1663 November - December Volume 39: 1664 January - May Volume 40: 1664 June - December Volume 41: Volume 42: Volume 43: Volume 44: Volume 45: Volume 46: Volume 47: Volume 48: Volume 49: Volume 50: Volurne...S.1.: Volume 52: Volume 53: Volume 54: Volume 55: Volume 56: Volume 57: Volume 58: Volume 59: Volume 60: Volume 61: 1665 January - June 1665 July - December 1666 January - June 1666 July - December 1667 January - April 1667 May - August 1667 September — December 1668 January — May 1668 June - December 1669 1670 - 1672 1673 - 1674 1675 - 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 - 1687 Suppm‘?.:‘:(1 1)}-' tin"-. Heritage Lottery Fund Last modified: 15 March 2005 by Mike Webb